www.nytimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.129.164  Public Scan

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/business/economy/franchise-regulation.html
Submission: On April 20 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

POST https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/business/economy/franchise-regulation.html&apn=com.nytimes.android&amv=9837&ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&isi=284862083

<form method="post" action="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/business/economy/franchise-regulation.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"
  data-testid="MagicLinkForm" style="visibility: hidden;"><input name="client_id" type="hidden" value="web.fwk.vi"><input name="redirect_uri" type="hidden"
    value="https://nytimes.app.goo.gl/?link=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/business/economy/franchise-regulation.html&amp;apn=com.nytimes.android&amp;amv=9837&amp;ibi=com.nytimes.NYTimes&amp;isi=284862083"><input name="response_type"
    type="hidden" value="code"><input name="state" type="hidden" value="no-state"><input name="scope" type="hidden" value="default"></form>

Text Content

Skip to content

Sections
SEARCH
Economy

SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEKLog in
Thursday, April 20, 2023
Today’s Paper
SUBSCRIBE FOR $1/WEEK
Economy|Franchisers, Facing Challenges to Business Model, Punch Back

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/business/economy/franchise-regulation.html
 * Give this article
 * 
 * 
 * 7


THE U.S. ECONOMY TODAY

 * Where Is the Economy Headed?
 * Latest Bank Earnings, Explained
 * Tips for Investors
 * Inflation Report
 * Job Trends

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Supported by

Continue reading the main story





FRANCHISERS, FACING CHALLENGES TO BUSINESS MODEL, PUNCH BACK

Discontented franchisees have found allies among state legislators and federal
regulators in pushing for new laws and rules, but change has been slow.

 * Send any friend a story
   
   As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can
   read what you share.
   
   
   Give this article
 * 
 * 
 * 7
 * Read in app
   


Members of the Asian American Hotel Owners Association at a conference this
week. The group’s leader says hotel owners are frustrated with franchisers over
their relationship.Credit...Mark Abramson for The New York Times


By Lydia DePillis

April 20, 2023Updated 6:38 p.m. ET

When you visit a McDonald's, a Jiffy Lube or a Hilton Garden Inn, you may assume
you’re visiting one business. More likely, you’re actually visiting two: the
operator of that particular location, known as the franchisee, and the larger
company that owns the intellectual property behind it, or the franchiser.

Conflict is inherent in that relationship, but it has hit a boil in recent
months, as franchisees say they’re being squeezed out of the profits their
business generates through new fees, required vendors and constraints on their
ability to sell.

On Monday, the Government Accountability Office released a report finding that
franchisees “do not enjoy the full benefit of the risks they bear,” citing
interviews with dozens of small-business owners who said they lacked control
over basic operations that determined their ability to earn a profit.

They’ve found a sympathetic ear in the Biden administration and in several state
legislatures, giving rise to a growing wave of proposals to limit the power of
franchisers.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Franchisers have been largely successful in heading off new laws and rules,
which the chief executive of McDonald's, Chris Kempczinski, has described as an
existential threat.

“The reality is that our business model is under attack,” he said in February at
the convention of the International Franchise Association, a trade group for
franchisers, franchisees and franchise suppliers. “If you’re not paying
attention to these pieces of legislation because you think they don’t impact
you, think again.”


Image

The chief executive of McDonald’s says the franchising industry’s business model
is “under attack” because of a push for new laws and rules.Credit...Haiyun
Jiang/The New York Times


Franchising has been a feature of American capitalism for decades, allowing
brands to grow quickly using investment from entrepreneurs who commit their own
capital in exchange for a business plan and a logo that consumers might
recognize. The Federal Trade Commission requires franchisers to disclose factors
including start-up costs and the company’s financial performance to those
considering buying a franchise, and some state laws govern considerations like
transfer rights.

But much of the relationship is largely unregulated — changes a franchiser can
make to contracts, for example, and which vendors can be required.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Keith Miller, a Subway franchisee in California who has become an advocate for
franchisee rights, said the lack of oversight had given rise to an increasing
number of disputes. “There’s more of a squeeze on the franchisees than ever,” he
said. Franchisees’ royalty payments used to cover things like marketing, new
menus and sales tools, he added, but “now you seem to have to pay for your
services.”


INFLATION F.A.Q.

Card 1 of 5

What is inflation? Inflation is a loss of purchasing power over time, meaning
your dollar will not go as far tomorrow as it did today. It is typically
expressed as the annual change in prices for everyday goods and services such as
food, furniture, apparel, transportation and toys.

What causes inflation? It can be the result of rising consumer demand. But
inflation can also rise and fall based on developments that have little to do
with economic conditions, such as limited oil production and supply chain
problems.

Is inflation bad? It depends on the circumstances. Fast price increases spell
trouble, but moderate price gains can lead to higher wages and job growth.

How does inflation affect the poor? Inflation can be especially hard to shoulder
for poor households because they spend a bigger chunk of their budgets on
necessities like food, housing and gas.

Can inflation affect the stock market? Rapid inflation typically spells trouble
for stocks. Financial assets in general have historically fared badly during
inflation booms, while tangible assets like houses have held their value better.

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 



The franchise industry says that its business model remains beneficial to
individual owners, and that additional regulation would protect substandard
franchisees at everyone else’s expense. Matthew Haller, chief executive of the
International Franchise Association, cited a 2021 survey by the market research
firm Franchise Business Review in which 82 percent of franchisees said they
supported their corporate leadership.



But legislative battles at the state level reflect rising tension.

Hotel franchisees, squeezed by lost revenue during pandemic lockdowns, say they
have also been hurt by the hotel brands’ loyalty programs, which require the
hotelier to rent rooms at a reduced rate. A bill in New Jersey that would limit
those loyalty programs, as well as rebates that brands can collect from vendors
that franchisees are required to use, faces fierce opposition from the American
Hotel and Lodging Association. In a statement, the association’s chief
executive, Chip Rogers, said the bill would “completely undermine the foundation
of hotel franchising by limiting a brand’s ability to enforce brand standards.”

Laura Lee Blake, the chief executive of the 20,000-member Asian American Hotel
Owners Association, said hoteliers had reached desperation. “There comes a point
when you’ve tried and tried to meet with the franchisers to ask for changes, and
they refuse to listen,” she said.

In Arizona, legislation introduced to enhance franchisees’ ability to sell their
businesses and prevent retaliation from franchisers if they band together in
associations has also faced resistance. The bill was approved by two committees
in February and March, but the International Franchise Association hired two
lobbying firms to fight it.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



In a Republican caucus meeting, opponents attacked the legislation as a
“sledgehammer” that would bring the government into private business
relationships. The bill’s sponsor, Representative Anastasia Travers, a freshman
Democrat, said she was taken aback by how quickly opposition snowballed, and
ultimately gave up on it for the 2023 session.

“Time has not been my friend,” Ms. Travers said.

A similar bill in Arkansas, which the International Franchise Association
initially said would be “the most extreme franchise regulation of any state,”
was amended to strip entire sections, including one that would have prevented
franchisers from imposing any requirement that “unreasonably changes” the
financial terms of the relationship as a condition of renewal or sale.

After the bill was slimmed down — leaving provisions such as one restoring the
existing statute, which had been rendered ineffective by a subsequent law, and
another requiring the franchiser to establish material cause before terminating
the franchise — the industry group withdrew its opposition, allowing swift
passage.


Image

A Subway location in New York. “There’s more of a squeeze on the franchisees
than ever,” said Keith Miller, a Subway franchise owner in
California.Credit...Carlo Allegri/Reuters


In an email to supporters before the votes, the franchise association’s vice
president for state and local government relations, Jeff Hanscom, credited the
Arkansas agribusiness giant Tyson Foods for being “instrumental in negotiating
this outcome.” Tyson Foods did not respond to a request for comment.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



At the federal level, franchisers may face greater challenges.

The Biden administration is moving on two fronts. One is the Federal Trade
Commission, which issued a request in March for information about the ways in
which franchisers control franchisees. The initiative could result in additional
guidance or rules — putting the industry on high alert.

The second front is the National Labor Relations Board, which has proposed
making it easier for franchisers to be designated as “joint employers” that
would be liable for the labor law violations of franchisees if they exerted
significant control over working conditions. Franchisers maintain that this
would “destroy” the business model, because it would subject them to
unacceptable risks.


UNDERSTAND INFLATION AND HOW IT AFFECTS YOU

 * Taming Inflation: The Federal Reserve’s success or failure at reining in
   surging prices will affect your wallet and, maybe, the next election, our
   columnist says.         
 * The Fed’s Strategy: The Fed is aiming to get inflation down to 2%. But does
   that target still make sense?
 * Investing on Chickens: As a spike in egg prices spooks consumers, some are
   taking steps to secure their own future supply by snapping up chicks that
   will grow into egg-laying chickens.
 * Food Prices: Rising prices at grocery stores and restaurants have changed the
   way many seniors shop and eat out. For some, it could affect their health or
   leave them feeling isolated.

Franchisers attribute the flurry of activity to union influence. The Service
Employees International Union, in particular, has long fought to get McDonald's
designated as a joint employer so it would be easier to mount an organizing
effort across the chain, rather than store by store.

Robert Zarco, a Miami lawyer retained by an association of 1,000 McDonald’s
owners, said that to avoid the joint-employer designation, and the extra
liability it would bring, franchisers could choose to weaken their grip on
franchisee operations.

“If the company wants to not be considered a joint employer, it’s very simple to
fix,” he said. “Unwind all those excessive controls that they have implemented
that are outside of protecting the brand and the product and service quality.”



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



The franchise association’s federal lobbying spending hit a high of $1.24
million in 2022, alongside millions more spent in recent years on federal
elections, and doesn’t include money spent by the individual franchise brands.

The high stakes are evident in other ways, as well.

The Franchise Times, a 30-year-old independent trade publication with six
editorial employees, writes about day-to-day events in the industry:
acquisitions, executive leadership changes, technology trends. When strife
arises, such as lawsuits and bankruptcies, it writes about those, too.

The publication’s legal columnist, Beth Ewen, wrote several stories this year
about Unleashed Brands, a portfolio of franchises that has drawn lawsuits from
franchisees. In response, the company published a markup of one of Ms. Ewen’s
stories in red pen font with “DEBUNKED” stamped across the top. (The
organization had given similar treatment to an article about the company by The
New York Times. Both publications stand by their reporting, and Unleashed did
not ask for corrections.)

In March, a new website popped up at the address “NoFranchiseTimes.com.” Its
front page was devoted to an attack on what it called “editorial bias,”
“denigrating the businesses that support their publication.”

It called for the publication’s advertisers — which include law firms, vendors
and brands — to cancel their purchases.



Advertisement

Continue reading the main story



Michael Browning Jr., the chief executive of Unleashed Brands and a member of
the International Franchise Association’s board, emailed the trade group’s
membership saying that while he had not created the website, he supported its
message and thought the group should revoke The Franchise Times’s membership.
Mr. Browning did not respond to a request for further comment.

The association declined to revoke the membership, and the publication says its
advertising revenue is up from last year. But to Ms. Ewen, a 35-year veteran of
business reporting, the episode shows that the industry is trying to divert
attention from real problems — and that some members are playing hardball.

“They’re trying to hit at our business model and our ability to keep going,” she
said. “There’s a lot of people spending a lot of time trying to get us and
others to stop doing these stories.”







Advertisement

Continue reading the main story




COMMENTS 7

Franchisers, Facing Challenges to Business Model, Punch BackSkip to Comments
Share your thoughts.
The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and
expertise. Comments are moderated for civility.




SITE INDEX




SITE INFORMATION NAVIGATION

 * © 2023 The New York Times Company

 * NYTCo
 * Contact Us
 * Accessibility
 * Work with us
 * Advertise
 * T Brand Studio
 * Your Ad Choices
 * Privacy Policy
 * Terms of Service
 * Terms of Sale
 * Site Map
 * Canada
 * International
 * Help
 * Subscriptions



Support independent journalism.

See subscription options