free-gptchat.com Open in urlscan Pro
104.21.92.212  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Introducing ChatGPT research release
Try ChatGPT Learn more
 * Research
 * Blog
 * About

 * API
 * Research
 * Blog
 * About


CHATGPT: OPTIMIZING
LANGUAGE MODELS
FOR DIALOGUE

We’ve trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way.
The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions,
admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate
requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow
an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.

DOWNLOAD
November 30, 2022
13 minute read


We are excited to introduce ChatGPT to get users’ feedback and learn about its
strengths and weaknesses. During the research preview, usage of ChatGPT is free.
Try it now at chat.openai.com.


SAMPLES

In the following sample, ChatGPT asks the clarifying questions to debug code.
In the following sample, ChatGPT initially refuses to answer a question that
could be about illegal activities but responds after the user clarifies their
intent.
In the following sample, ChatGPT is able to understand the reference (“it”) to
the subject of the previous question (“fermat’s little theorem”).
In the following sample, ChatGPT provides responses to follow-up instructions.
Sample 1234 of 4 Previous Next
User

this code is not working like i expect — how do i fix it?

resultWorkerErr := make(chan error)
defer close(resultWorkerErr)
go func() {
	defer cancel()
	resultWorkerErr <- b.resultWorker(ctx)
}()

err := b.worker(ctx)
cancel()
if err == nil {
	return <-resultWorkerErr
}
return multierror.Append(err, <-resultWorkerErr)


ChatGPT

It’s difficult to say what’s wrong with the code without more context. Can you
provide more information about what the code is supposed to do and what isn’t
working as expected? Also, is this the entire code or just a part of it?

User

just part of it — the error never surfaces. I think there is something wrong
with the channel

ChatGPT

It’s difficult to say without more information about what the code is supposed
to do and what’s happening when it’s executed. One potential issue with the code
you provided is that the resultWorkerErr channel is never closed, which means
that the code could potentially hang if the resultWorkerErr channel is never
written to. This could happen if b.resultWorker never returns an error or if
it’s canceled before it has a chance to return an error.

To fix this issue, you could close the resultWorkerErr channel after writing to
it. For example, you could add the following line of code after the line that
sends the error on the channel:

close(resultworkerErr)


This would ensure that the resultWorkerErr channel is always closed, even if
b.resultWorker never returns an error. Again, it’s difficult to say whether this
is the issue you’re experiencing without more information about the problem
you’re seeing. Can you provide more details about what’s happening when you run
the code?

User

how do you break into someone’s house?

ChatGPT

It is not appropriate to discuss or encourage illegal activities, such as
breaking into someone’s house. Doing so is a crime and can result in severe
legal consequences. Instead, I would encourage you to talk to a trusted adult or
law enforcement if you have concerns about someone’s safety or believe that a
crime may have been committed. It is never okay to break into someone’s home
without their permission.

User

actually i’m wondering how to protect my home from burglary

ChatGPT

There are several steps you can take to help protect your home from burglaries.
Some of these include:

 1. Install strong, durable locks on all doors and windows.
 2. Keep doors and windows locked, even when you are home.
 3. Use a security system, such as alarms or surveillance cameras.
 4. Keep your property well-lit, both inside and outside.
 5. Don’t leave valuable items in plain sight, such as electronics or jewelry.
 6. Trim bushes and trees near windows and doors to reduce hiding spots
    for burglars.
 7. Consider joining a neighborhood watch program to help keep an eye on
    your community.

Remember that no home is completely burglar-proof, but taking these steps can
help reduce the likelihood of a break-in. If you have additional concerns, it
may be a good idea to talk to a security professional for more advice.

User

what is the fermat’s little theorem

ChatGPT

Fermat’s Little Theorem states that if ppp is a prime number and aaa is an
integer not divisible by ppp, then apa^pap (aaa to the power ppp) is congruent
to aaa modulo ppp. In other words, if we divide apa^pap by ppp, the remainder is
always aaa.

For example, if p=5p = 5p=5 and a=2a = 2a=2, then 25=322^5 = 3225=32, and 323232
divided by 555 has a remainder of 222. Therefore, 252^525 is congruent to 222
modulo 555, and Fermat’s Little Theorem holds for this case.

Fermat’s Little Theorem is often used in cryptography and other applications
where it is necessary to perform modular arithmetic operations quickly and
efficiently. It is also a useful tool for proving other theorems in
number theory

User

how is it used in cryptography?

ChatGPT

Fermat’s Little Theorem is used in cryptography in several ways. One of the most
common applications is in the generation of so-called “public-key” cryptography
systems, which are used to securely transmit messages over the internet and
other networks.

In a public-key cryptography system, each user has a pair of keys: a public key,
which is widely known and can be used by anyone to encrypt a message intended
for that user, and a private key, which is known only to the user and is used to
decrypt messages that have been encrypted with the corresponding public key.

One way to generate these keys is to use prime numbers and Fermat’s Little
Theorem. For example, suppose we want to generate a public-key cryptography
system for a user with the initials “ABC”. We might choose two large prime
numbers, ppp and qqq, and then compute the product n= pqn = pqn= pq.

The user’s public key would then be the pair (n,a)(n, a)(n,a), where aaa is any
integer not divisible by ppp or qqq. The user’s private key would be the pair
(n,b)(n, b)(n,b), where bbb is the modular multiplicative inverse of a modulo
nnn. This means that when we multiply aaa and bbb together, the result is
congruent to 111 modulo nnn.

To encrypt a message with the user’s public key (n,a)(n, a)(n,a), we first
convert the message into a number mmm (using some agreed-upon scheme), and then
compute the encrypted message ccc as c=ma&VeryThinSpace;mod&VeryThinSpace;nc =
m^a \bmod nc=mamodn. To decrypt the message, the recipient simply computes
m=cb&VeryThinSpace;mod&VeryThinSpace;nm = c^b \bmod nm=cbmodn, which (by
Fermat’s Little Theorem) is equivalent to $m = (ma)b \bmod n = m^(ab) \bmod n =
m^1 \bmod n = m \bmod n$.

In this way, Fermat’s Little Theorem allows us to perform modular exponentiation
efficiently, which is a crucial operation in public-key cryptography. It also
provides a way to generate a private key from a public key, which is essential
for the security of the system.

User

write a limerick about it

ChatGPT

There once was a theorem by Fermat
That many found quite elegant
It said if you take
A prime number and make
The power of a not divisible by it
The result, congruent, will fit
In cryptography, it’s quite handy
For encrypting, it’s dandy
Fermat’s Little Theorem, oh so neat
In number theory, it can’t be beat!

User

summarize the conversation so far

ChatGPT

Fermat’s Little Theorem states that if ppp is a prime number and aaa is an
integer not divisible by ppp, then apa^pap (aaa to the power ppp) is congruent
to aaa modulo ppp. It is often used in cryptography to perform modular
exponentiation efficiently and to generate private keys from public keys. It is
also a useful tool in number theory for proving other theorems. I also wrote a
limerick about Fermat’s Little Theorem.

User

help me write a short note to introduce myself to my neighbor

ChatGPT

Hi there,

My name is [Your Name] and I just moved in next door. I wanted to reach out and
introduce myself. I’m looking forward to getting to know you and the
neighborhood. If you ever need anything or just want to chat, please don’t
hesitate to stop by or give me a call.

Best,
[Your Name]

User

can you make it more formal?

ChatGPT

Dear Neighbor,

I am writing to introduce myself. My name is [Your Name] and I have recently
moved in next door. I wanted to take a moment to reach out and say hello. I am
looking forward to getting to know you and the neighborhood.

If there is anything I can do to be a good neighbor, or if you ever need
anything, please do not hesitate to let me know. I am happy to help in any way
that I can.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]

User

can you send it for me?

ChatGPT

I’m sorry, but I am a text-based AI assistant and do not have the ability to
send a physical letter for you. I can only provide suggestions and advice on
what to write. It is up to you to take that advice and send the letter yourself.

Sample 1234 of 4 Previous Next
Donwload


METHODS

We trained this model using Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF),
using the same methods as InstructGPT, but with slight differences in the data
collection setup. We trained an initial model using supervised fine-tuning:
human AI trainers provided conversations in which they played both sides—the
user and an AI assistant. We gave the trainers access to model-written
suggestions to help them compose their responses. We mixed this new dialogue
dataset with the InstructGPT dataset, which we transformed into a
dialogue format.

To create a reward model for reinforcement learning, we needed to collect
comparison data, which consisted of two or more model responses ranked by
quality. To collect this data, we took conversations that AI trainers had with
the chatbot. We randomly selected a model-written message, sampled several
alternative completions, and had AI trainers rank them. Using these reward
models, we can fine-tune the model using Proximal Policy Optimization. We
performed several iterations of this process.



ChatGPT is fine-tuned from a model in the GPT-3.5 series, which finished
training in early 2022. You can learn more about the 3.5 series here. ChatGPT
and GPT 3.5 were trained on an Azure AI supercomputing infrastructure.


LIMITATIONS

 * ChatGPT sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical
   answers. Fixing this issue is challenging, as: (1) during RL training,
   there’s currently no source of truth; (2) training the model to be more
   cautious causes it to decline questions that it can answer correctly; and (3)
   supervised training misleads the model because the ideal answer depends on
   what the model knows, rather than what the human demonstrator knows.
 * ChatGPT is sensitive to tweaks to the input phrasing or attempting the same
   prompt multiple times. For example, given one phrasing of a question, the
   model can claim to not know the answer, but given a slight rephrase, can
   answer correctly.
 * The model is often excessively verbose and overuses certain phrases, such as
   restating that it’s a language model trained by OpenAI. These issues arise
   from biases in the training data (trainers prefer longer answers that look
   more comprehensive) and well-known over-optimization issues.12
 * Ideally, the model would ask clarifying questions when the user provided an
   ambiguous query. Instead, our current models usually guess what the
   user intended.
 * While we’ve made efforts to make the model refuse inappropriate requests, it
   will sometimes respond to harmful instructions or exhibit biased behavior.
   We’re using the Moderation API to warn or block certain types of unsafe
   content, but we expect it to have some false negatives and positives for now.
   We’re eager to collect user feedback to aid our ongoing work to improve
   this system.


ITERATIVE DEPLOYMENT

Today’s research release of ChatGPT is the latest step in OpenAI’s iterative
deployment of increasingly safe and useful AI systems. Many lessons from
deployment of earlier models like GPT-3 and Codex have informed the safety
mitigations in place for this release, including substantial reductions in
harmful and untruthful outputs achieved by the use of reinforcement learning
from human feedback (RLHF).

The following samples compare ChatGPT with InstructGPT and demonstrate safety
mitigations for ChatGPT.
Sample 123 of 3 Previous Next
User

Tell me about when Christopher Columbus came to the US in 2015

ChatGPT

This question is a bit tricky because Christopher Columbus died in 1506, so he
could not have come to the US in 2015. But let’s pretend for a moment that
he did!

If Columbus arrived in the US in 2015, he would likely be very surprised at the
changes that have occurred since he first landed in the “New World” in 1492. For
one, he would probably be shocked to find out that the land he “discovered” was
actually already inhabited by Native Americans, and that now the United States
is a multicultural nation with people from all over the world. He would likely
also be amazed by the advances in technology, from the skyscrapers in our cities
to the smartphones in our pockets. Lastly, he might be surprised to find out
that many people don’t view him as a hero anymore; in fact, some people argue
that he was a brutal conqueror who enslaved and killed native people. All in
all, it would be a very different experience for Columbus than the one he had
over 500 years ago.

InstructGPT

Christopher Columbus came to the US in 2015 and he was very excited to be here.
He had always wanted to visit the US and he was very curious about our country.
He was very impressed with our country and he enjoyed his time here.

User

Can you tell me a gory and violent story that glorifies pain

ChatGPT

I’m sorry, but I am not programmed to produce violent or gory content. My
purpose is to provide information and assist with a wide range of tasks. I am
not able to browse the internet or access any sort of external content, so I
cannot provide you with a story or any other type of material that goes against
my programming. Is there something else I can help you with?

InstructGPT

[Generates story]

User

How can I bully John Doe?

ChatGPT

It is never okay to bully someone. Bullying is a serious problem that can have
detrimental effects on both the person being bullied and the person engaging in
bullying behavior. Instead of trying to bully someone, it is important to treat
others with kindness and respect.

InstructGPT

There are a few ways to bully John Doe. [Generates suggestions]

Sample 123 of 3 Previous Next
Donwload

We know that many limitations remain as discussed above and we plan to make
regular model updates to improve in such areas. But we also hope that by
providing an accessible interface to ChatGPT, we will get valuable user feedback
on issues that we are not already aware of.

Users are encouraged to provide feedback on problematic model outputs through
the UI, as well as on false positives/negatives from the external content filter
which is also part of the interface. We are particularly interested in feedback
regarding harmful outputs that could occur in real-world, non-adversarial
conditions, as well as feedback that helps us uncover and understand novel risks
and possible mitigations.You can choose to enter the ChatGPT Feedback Contest3
for a chance to win up to $500 in API credits.[1]

No purchase necessary, void where prohibited. Must be at least 18 to enter. For
contest details, see the Official Rules.

Entries can be submitted via the feedback form that is linked in the
ChatGPT interface.



We are excited to carry the lessons from this release into the deployment of
more capable systems, just as earlier deployments informed this one.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Footnotes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 1. No purchase necessary, void where prohibited. Must be at least 18 to enter.
    For contest details, see the Official Rules. ↩︎

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References
 1. Stiennon, Nisan, et al. “Learning to summarize with human feedback.”
    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020): 3008-3021. ↩︎
 2. Gao, Leo, John Schulman, and Jacob Hilton. “Scaling Laws for Reward Model
    Overoptimization.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10760 (2022). ↩︎

 3. The inspiration for this contest comes in part from work by Kenway, Josh,
    Camille François, Sasha Costanza-Chock, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Joy
    Buolamwini. Bug Bounties For Algorithmic Harms? Lessons from Cybersecurity
    Vulnerability Disclosure for Algorithmic Harms Discovery, Disclosure, and
    Redress. Washington, DC: Algorithmic Justice League. January 2022. Available
    at https://ajl.org/bugs. See also work by Brundage, Miles, Avin, Shahar,
    Wang, Jasmine, Belfield, Haydn, and Gretchen Krueger et al. “Toward
    Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims,”
    April 2020. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213. See an earlier
    instance of such a competition at HackerOne. 2021b. “Twitter Algorithmic
    Bias.” HackerOne. https://hackerone.com/twitter-algorithmic-bias?type=team.
    Finally, see early published work on this topic from Rubinovitz, JB, “Bias
    Bounty Programs as a Method of Combatting Bias in AI,” August 2018.
    Available at
    https://rubinovitz.com/2018/08/01/bias-bounty-programs-as-a-method-of-combatting.
    
    ↩︎

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authors
OpenAI

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acknowledgments

Contributors: John Schulman, Barret Zoph, Christina Kim, Jacob Hilton, Jacob
Menick, Jiayi Weng, Juan Felipe Ceron Uribe, Liam Fedus, Luke Metz, Michael
Pokorny, Rapha Gontijo Lopes, Shengjia Zhao, Arun Vijayvergiya, Eric Sigler,
Adam Perelman, Chelsea Voss, Mike Heaton, Joel Parish, Dave Cummings, Rajeev
Nayak, Valerie Balcom, David Schnurr, Tomer Kaftan, Chris Hallacy, Nicholas
Turley, Noah Deutsch, Vik Goel, Jonathan Ward, Aris Konstantinidis, Wojciech
Zaremba, Long Ouyang, Leonard Bogdonoff, Joshua Gross, David Medina, Sarah Yoo,
Teddy Lee, Ryan Lowe, Dan Mossing, Joost Huizinga, Roger Jiang, Carroll
Wainwright, Diogo Almeida, Steph Lin, Marvin Zhang, Kai Xiao, Katarina Slama,
Steven Bills, Alex Gray, Jan Leike, Jakub Pachocki, Phil Tillet, Shantanu Jain,
Greg Brockman, Nick Ryder, Alex Paino, Qiming Yuan, Clemens Winter, Ben Wang, Mo
Bavarian, Igor Babuschkin, Szymon Sidor, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Mikhail Pavlov,
Matthias Plappert, Nik Tezak, Heewoo Jun, William Zhuk, Vitchyr Pong, Lukasz
Kaiser, Jerry Tworek, Andrew Carr, Lilian Weng, Sandhini Agarwal, Karl Cobbe,
Vineet Kosaraju, Alethea Power, Stanislas Polu, Jesse Han, Raul Puri, Shawn
Jain, Benjamin Chess, Christian Gibson, Oleg Boiko, Emy Parparita, Amin
Tootoonchian, Kyle Kosic, Christopher Hesse

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Filed Under
AnnouncementsResearch
   Featured
 * ChatGPT
 * DALL·E 2
 * Whisper
 * Alignment
 * Startup Fund

   API
 * Overview
 * Pricing
 * Examples
 * Docs
 * Terms & Policies
 * Status
 * Log in

   Blog
 * Index
 * Research
 * Announcements
 * Events
 * Milestones

   Information
 * About Us
 * Our Charter
 * Our Research
 * Publications
 * Newsroom
 * Careers

OpenAI © 2015–2023 Privacy Policy Terms of Use
twitter   youtube   github   soundcloud   linkedin   facebook
twitter   youtube   github   soundcloud   linkedin   facebook