what-if.xkcd.com Open in urlscan Pro
2a04:4e42:400::67  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

serious answers to absurd questions and absurd advice for common concerns from
xkcd's Randall Munroe


WHAT IF?


&


HOW TO:

THE NEWS

The seventh What If? video, "Would a submarine work as a spaceship?" is up on
YouTube now!

◀︎ ▶︎


COMET ICE

Could I cool down the Earth by capturing a comet and dropping it in the ocean,
like an ice cube in a glass of water?

Daniel Becker

No. In fact, it's honestly sort of impressive to find a solution that would
actively make the problem worse in so many different ways.

Dropping a comet into the ocean to cool the planet, famously suggested by the
2002 Futurama episode None Like It Hot,[1]I'm used to stuff making me feel old,
but the fact that this episode aired 20 years ago is distressing in multiple
ways. wouldn't work for a few reasons.

One is that dropping things from space creates heat. When water—or anything
else—falls, it gains kinetic energy. When it stops falling, that energy has to
go somewhere. Generally, it turns into heat. Water that goes over Niagara Falls,
for example, gains enough kinetic energy during the 50-meter plunge to warm it
up by about 0.1°C by the time it reaches the bottom. (This added heat is minor
compared to the cooling effects of evaporation on the way down, so the actual
temperature at the bottom is likely colder.)

Outer space is a lot higher up than Niagara Falls,[citation needed] so the
plunge down into the atmosphere at the bottom of Earth's gravity well adds a lot
more than 0.1 degrees worth of heat. A chunk of ice from space that falls to
Earth gains enough energy to warm the ice up, melt it, boil it into vapor, and
then heat the vapor to thousands of degrees. If you built an icy waterfall from
space, the water would arrive at the bottom as a river of superheated steam.

Small chunks of ice falling from space disintegrate and boil away before they
reach the ground, warming the upper atmosphere. Large comets can reach the
ground intact and be vaporized on impact as their kinetic energy is converted to
heat all at once. This heat energy would be about 100 times greater than the
energy needed to bring even a very cold comet up to room temperature, so a comet
falling from space would heat the Earth 100 times more than it cooled it.

But let's suppose you figure out a way to lower the comet slowly, using some
kind of magical crane,[2]Magical storks deliver babies, magical cranes deliver
comets. and gently set the comet in the ocean.

Comets are more dust than ice, but they're not particularly dense. A tiny piece
of a comet would float for a short time until it became waterlogged, melted, and
broke apart. A full-size comet wouldn't be strong enough to support its own
weight, and would collapse like a drying sand sculpture.

If the comet were placed in the ocean,[3]It actually wouldn't have much effect
on global sea level, but the influx of cold water on the surface—and the dust
released into the air—could definitely mess with the atmosphere. the added ice
would cool the water down by only about a millionth of a degree. If you set the
comet on land, it would soak up heat from the atmosphere—which contains much
less stored heat than the oceans—briefly cooling the air by an average of one or
two thousandths of a degree.

Okay, so we just need thousands of comets, right? Each one will cool the air a
little bit. With a large enough supply of comets, we can keep the Earth nice and
cool, as long as we make sure they're lowered slowly.

Unfortunately, comets would affect the Earth's temperature in another way. In
addition to dust and water, they contain a small amount of CO2, which would be
released into the atmosphere as the comet melted. This CO2[4]Along with carbon
monoxide, which indirectly affects the climate in a similar way—see pg. 718-719
of the IPCC WG1 AR5 report for more. would change Earth's radiation balance,
trapping heat near the surface and raising the planet's temperature. After a few
years, the comet's greenhouse effect would have trapped more heat than the ice
absorbed, and over the decades to follow, the extra heat would keep piling up.

The CO2 released from the comet would raise the temperature of the Earth for
centuries. It wouldn't just cancel out the cooling effect of the ice—over time,
the comet's greenhouse effect would deliver as much heat as if you'd just let it
slam into the planet and vaporize.[5]Although letting a comet slowly decay on
the surface would definitely be preferable to a high-speed impact, as any
dinosaur from the end of the Cretaceous can tell you.

It's okay. Despite all this, your scenario could fix global warming.

Remember that hypothetical crane that lets you lower comets to the surface?
Well, if you hooked it up to a generator, you could use the slowly-descending
comet to produce electricity.

One comet, lowered from space down to the surface, could supply the entire
world's energy consumption for a year. Sure, it would release a little CO2, but
it would be nothing compared to the pollution from our current sources of
energy. A comet crane generator could cut our energy-related greenhouse gas
emissions to almost zero. The comet isn't the important part, the crane is.

Sadly, we don't have the technology to build comet-lowering cranes—certainly not
in time to help mitigate climate change. But harvesting orbital energy like this
is a neat idea! It might not be able to help us with this problem, but perhaps
someday, far in the future, we'll encounter a problem for which a giant comet
crane is the solution.

◀︎ ▶︎
the archives submit a question

THE BOOKS

WHAT IF?

Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions

more info >

THING EXPLAINER

Complicated Stuff in Simple Words

more info >

HOW TO

Absurd Scientific Advice for Common Real-World Problems

more info >

WHAT IF? 2

More Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions

more info >

COMICS FROM XKCD

xkcd.com

 * xkcd.com
 * what if? feed

©2022 xkcd, inc.