www.thieme-connect.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
141.66.193.71
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://news5.thieme.de/r/r.aspx?AyADxKathsT0rKnazCb0FkxZSA2
Effective URL: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-2328-2644
Submission: On June 21 via api from HK — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-2328-2644
Submission: On June 21 via api from HK — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMName: headerSearch — GET /products/all/search
<form action="/products/all/search" method="get" name="headerSearch" id="headerSearch">
<input type="text" name="query" placeholder="Suche" class="searchField" value="">
<div id="searchFilter" class="pseudoSelect searchFilter">
<div id="searchFilter_currentSelection" class="currentSelection">
<div class="label"> Volltextsuche </div>
</div>
<ul class="selectList dropMenu">
<li><a id="fulltext" href="#">Volltextsuche</a></li>
<li><a id="author" href="#">Autorensuche</a></li>
<li><a id="title" href="#">Titelsuche</a></li>
<li><a id="doi" href="#">DOI-Suche</a></li>
<li><a id="metadata" href="#">Metadatensuche</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<input type="hidden" name="radius" id="navSearchRadius" value="fulltext">
<input type="hidden" name="option" value="AND">
<input type="hidden" name="clearSavedProfileSearch" value="true">
<input type="submit" class="searchButton">
</form>
Name: headerLogin — POST https://profile.thieme.de/HTML/sso/THIEME/login.htm
<form action="https://profile.thieme.de/HTML/sso/THIEME/login.htm" method="post" name="headerLogin">
<input type="hidden" name="action" value="login">
<input type="hidden" name="rdeLocaleAttr" value="de">
<input type="hidden" name="hook_url" value="https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-2328-2644">
<div class="formLine">
<label for="username">Benutzername oder E-Mail-Adresse:</label>
<input class="textfield" type="text" name="username">
</div>
<div class="formLine">
<label>Passwort:</label>
<input class="textfield" type="password" name="password">
</div>
<div class="submitLine">
<input class="button submitButton" type="submit" name="submitButton" value="Login">
</div>
<a href="https://profile.thieme.de/HTML/sso/THIEME/thieme_forgotten_access_data.htm?hook_url=https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-2328-2644&rdeLocaleAttr=de" class="optionLink" rel="nofollow">Zugangsdaten vergessen?</a>
<a href="/products/all/registration" class="optionLink" rel="nofollow">
Neu registrieren
</a>
<a href="https://profile.thieme.de/HTML/sso/ejournals/shibboleth.htm?hook_url=https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/a-2328-2644&rdeLocaleAttr=de" class="optionLink" rel="nofollow">OpenAthens/Shibboleth Login</a>
</form>
Name: toc — POST /products/issue/jsonLoadIssues
<form action="/products/issue/jsonLoadIssues" method="post" name="toc" id="toc">
<input type="hidden" name="shortname" value="plantamedica">
<input type="hidden" name="year">
<input type="hidden" name="isDisplayVolume" value="false">
<fieldset id="yearSelect">
<label>Jahre (Archiv)</label>
<div id="yearSelectContainer">
<div id="currentYearSelection">
<div class="label" id="currentYear">2024</div>
</div>
<ul class="selectList year">
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2024" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2024; getIssues(2024); return false">
2024
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2023" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2023; getIssues(2023); return false">
2023
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2022" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2022; getIssues(2022); return false">
2022
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2021" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2021; getIssues(2021); return false">
2021
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2020" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2020; getIssues(2020); return false">
2020
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2019" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2019; getIssues(2019); return false">
2019
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2018" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2018; getIssues(2018); return false">
2018
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2017" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2017; getIssues(2017); return false">
2017
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2016" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2016; getIssues(2016); return false">
2016
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2015" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2015; getIssues(2015); return false">
2015
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2014" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2014; getIssues(2014); return false">
2014
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2013" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2013; getIssues(2013); return false">
2013
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2012" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2012; getIssues(2012); return false">
2012
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2011" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2011; getIssues(2011); return false">
2011
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2010" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2010; getIssues(2010); return false">
2010
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2009" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2009; getIssues(2009); return false">
2009
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2008" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2008; getIssues(2008); return false">
2008
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2007" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2007; getIssues(2007); return false">
2007
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2006" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2006; getIssues(2006); return false">
2006
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2005" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2005; getIssues(2005); return false">
2005
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2004" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2004; getIssues(2004); return false">
2004
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2003" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2003; getIssues(2003); return false">
2003
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2002" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2002; getIssues(2002); return false">
2002
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2001" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2001; getIssues(2001); return false">
2001
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/2000" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=2000; getIssues(2000); return false">
2000
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1999" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1999; getIssues(1999); return false">
1999
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1998" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1998; getIssues(1998); return false">
1998
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1997" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1997; getIssues(1997); return false">
1997
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1996" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1996; getIssues(1996); return false">
1996
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1995" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1995; getIssues(1995); return false">
1995
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1994" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1994; getIssues(1994); return false">
1994
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1993" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1993; getIssues(1993); return false">
1993
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1992" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1992; getIssues(1992); return false">
1992
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1991" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1991; getIssues(1991); return false">
1991
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1990" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1990; getIssues(1990); return false">
1990
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1989" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1989; getIssues(1989); return false">
1989
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1988" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1988; getIssues(1988); return false">
1988
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1987" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1987; getIssues(1987); return false">
1987
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1986" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1986; getIssues(1986); return false">
1986
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1985" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1985; getIssues(1985); return false">
1985
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1984" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1984; getIssues(1984); return false">
1984
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1983" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1983; getIssues(1983); return false">
1983
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1982" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1982; getIssues(1982); return false">
1982
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1981" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1981; getIssues(1981); return false">
1981
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1980" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1980; getIssues(1980); return false">
1980
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1979" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1979; getIssues(1979); return false">
1979
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1978" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1978; getIssues(1978); return false">
1978
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1977" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1977; getIssues(1977); return false">
1977
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1976" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1976; getIssues(1976); return false">
1976
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1975" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1975; getIssues(1975); return false">
1975
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1974" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1974; getIssues(1974); return false">
1974
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1973" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1973; getIssues(1973); return false">
1973
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1972" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1972; getIssues(1972); return false">
1972
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1971" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1971; getIssues(1971); return false">
1971
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1970" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1970; getIssues(1970); return false">
1970
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1969" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1969; getIssues(1969); return false">
1969
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1968" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1968; getIssues(1968); return false">
1968
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1967" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1967; getIssues(1967); return false">
1967
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1966" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1966; getIssues(1966); return false">
1966
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1965" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1965; getIssues(1965); return false">
1965
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1964" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1964; getIssues(1964); return false">
1964
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1963" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1963; getIssues(1963); return false">
1963
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1962" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1962; getIssues(1962); return false">
1962
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1961" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1961; getIssues(1961); return false">
1961
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1960" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1960; getIssues(1960); return false">
1960
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1959" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1959; getIssues(1959); return false">
1959
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1958" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1958; getIssues(1958); return false">
1958
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1957" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1957; getIssues(1957); return false">
1957
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1956" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1956; getIssues(1956); return false">
1956
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1955" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1955; getIssues(1955); return false">
1955
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1954" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1954; getIssues(1954); return false">
1954
</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="/products/ejournals/issues/10.1055/s-00000058/1953" onclick="document.getElementById('issueSelect').style.display='inline';document.toc.action='#'; document.toc.year.value=1953; getIssues(1953); return false">
1953
</a>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</fieldset>
<fieldset id="issueSelect" style="display: inline">
<label>Ausgaben</label>
<ul class="selectList" id="issue">
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-59723">07/08: Special Issue Judith M. Rollinger, Elke H. Heiß</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-59659">06: 416-490</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-59464">05: 336-410</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-59326">04: 256-332</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-59094">03: 172-251</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-58923">02: 84-165</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-013-58810">01: 4-80</a></li>
<li><a href="/products/ejournals/issue/10.1055/s-014-58867">Planta Medica Women: </a></li>
</ul>
</fieldset>
</form>
Text Content
planta medica * EN * DE * Home * Produkte * Zeitschriften * Bücher * Buchreihen * Service * Service für Bibliotheken * Hilfe * Kontakt * Portal Planta Medica Volltextsuche * Volltextsuche * Autorensuche * Titelsuche * DOI-Suche * Metadatensuche * * * * * * Zeitschrift * Aims and Scope * Herausgeber * Jahresverzeichnisse * Informationen zur DFG-Nationallizenz * Impressum * Mediadaten * Linkedin * X * Autor*innen * Autorenhinweise * Manuskript einreichen * Publikationsregeln * Abonnement * Ihr Abonnement: Kontakt & Information * Lizenzen: Kontaktpartner Institutionen * Fachgesellschaft * Gesellschaft für Arzneipflanzen- und Naturstoff-Forschung e.V. * Collections * Planta Medica Women * About Women in Medicine * Open Access * nicht eingeloggt Login * Benutzername oder E-Mail-Adresse: Passwort: Zugangsdaten vergessen? Neu registrieren OpenAthens/Shibboleth Login * Warenkorb Jahre (Archiv) 2024 * 2024 * 2023 * 2022 * 2021 * 2020 * 2019 * 2018 * 2017 * 2016 * 2015 * 2014 * 2013 * 2012 * 2011 * 2010 * 2009 * 2008 * 2007 * 2006 * 2005 * 2004 * 2003 * 2002 * 2001 * 2000 * 1999 * 1998 * 1997 * 1996 * 1995 * 1994 * 1993 * 1992 * 1991 * 1990 * 1989 * 1988 * 1987 * 1986 * 1985 * 1984 * 1983 * 1982 * 1981 * 1980 * 1979 * 1978 * 1977 * 1976 * 1975 * 1974 * 1973 * 1972 * 1971 * 1970 * 1969 * 1968 * 1967 * 1966 * 1965 * 1964 * 1963 * 1962 * 1961 * 1960 * 1959 * 1958 * 1957 * 1956 * 1955 * 1954 * 1953 Ausgaben * 07/08: Special Issue Judith M. Rollinger, Elke H. Heiß * 06: 416-490 * 05: 336-410 * 04: 256-332 * 03: 172-251 * 02: 84-165 * 01: 4-80 * Planta Medica Women: * Inhaltsverzeichnis * Aktuelle Ausgabe * Kostenlose Probeausgabe (01/2024) Ähnliche Zeitschriften * Drug Research * Pharmacopsychiatry * Synfacts * Synlett * Synthesis * Pharmaceutical Fronts * Chinese Medicine and Natural Products Bücher zum Thema * Chemie RSS-FEED ABONNIEREN Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein. https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000058.xml TEILEN / BOOKMARKEN Facebook X Linkedin Weibo PDF herunterladen Planta Med DOI: 10.1055/a-2328-2644 Original Papers POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC OF THE DITERPENES ENT-POLYALTHIC ACID AND DIHYDRO-ENT-AGATHIC ACID FROM COPAIFERA DUCKEI OIL RESIN IN RATS Fábio Alves Aguila 1 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade de Franca, Franca, Brazil , Jairo Kenupp Bastos 2 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto – University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil , Rodrigo C. S. Veneziani 1 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade de Franca, Franca, Brazil , Glauco Henrique Balthazar Nardotto 2 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto – University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil , Larissa Costa Oliveira 1 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade de Franca, Franca, Brazil , Adriana Rocha 2 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto – University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil , Vera Lucia Lanchote 2 School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto – University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil , Sérgio Ricardo Ambrósio 1 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade de Franca, Franca, Brazil › Institutsangaben Gefördert durch: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Gefördert durch: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Gefördert durch: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2011/13630-7 › Weitere Informationen * Abstract * Volltext * Referenzen * Abbildungen als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints * Abstract * Introduction * Results and Discussion * Material and Methods * Plant materials and chemicals * Development and validation of an analytical method for ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid in rat plasma * LC-MS/MS analysis * Preparation of standard solutions * Sample preparation * Method validation * Population pharmacokinetics of ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid in rats * Animal experiments * Population pharmacokinetic models * Contributorsʼ Statement * References ABSTRACT Copaifera duckei oleoresin is a plant product extensively used by the Brazilian population for multiple purposes, such as medicinal and cosmetic. Despite its ethnopharmacological relevance, there is no pharmacokinetic data on this important medicinal plant. Due to this, we determined the pharmacokinetic profile of the major nonvolatile compounds of C. duckei oleoresin. The diterpenes ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid correspond to approximately 40% of the total oleoresin. Quantification was performed using LC-MS/MS, and the validated analytical method showed to be precise, accurate, robust, reliable, and linear between 0.57 and 114.74 µg/mL plasma and 0.09 to 18.85 µg/mL plasma, respectively, for ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid, making it suitable for application in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. Wistar rats received a single 200 mg/kg oral dose (gavage) of C. duckei oleoresin, and blood was collected from their caudal vein through 48 h. Population pharmacokinetics analysis of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rats was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling conducted in NONMEN software. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ent-polyalthic acid were absorption constant rate = 0.47 h−1, central and peripheral apparent volume of distribution = 0.04 L and 2.48 L, respectively, apparent clearance = 0.15 L/h, and elimination half-life = 11.60 h. For dihydro-ent-agathic acid, absorption constant rate = 0.28 h−1, central and peripheral apparent volume of distribution = 0.01 L and 0.18 L, respectively, apparent clearance = 0.04 L/h, and elimination half-life = 3.49 h. The apparent clearance, central apparent volume of distribution, and peripheral apparent volume of distribution of ent-polyalthic acid were approximately 3.75, 4.00-, and 13.78-folds higher than those of dihydro-ent-agathic. # KEYWORDS Copaifera duckei - dihydro-ent-agathic acid - ent-polyalthic acid - Leguminosae - pharmacokinetic INTRODUCTION The Copaifera genus (Leguminosae), commonly known as “Copaíbas”, “Copaibeiras”, or “Copaívas”, encompasses approximately 70 species of large trees that are widely distributed in Brazil, primarily in the northern region, with a particular emphasis on the states of Amazonas, Pará, and Roraima [1], [2], [3]. The oleoresins extracted from the trunk of these plants have long been utilized in traditional Brazilian medicine, demonstrating various beneficial properties such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, analgesic, wound healing, antitumor, purgative, and antiparasitic activities [1], [2], [3]. Moreover, these oleoresins hold significant pharmacological value and are commercially sold as crude oil to serve as raw material for producing cosmetics [1], [3], [4]. These oleoresins exhibit variable viscosity and color and comprise volatile sesquiterpenes and nonvolatile acid diterpenes [1], [5]. Despite notable variations in the chemical composition among Brazilian Copaifera species, sesquiterpene compounds such as δ-cadinene, α-cadinol, α-cubebene, β-elemene, α-copaene, α-humulene, β-caryophyllene, and caryophyllene oxide, as well as kaurane, clerodane, and labdane diterpenes, have been identified in all examined species [1], [6], [7]. Among the various Copaifera oleoresins found in Brazil, the oleoresin from Copaifera duckei Dwyer is the most prominent representative of Amazonian “Copaíbas”. This oleoresin comprises approximately 72% nonvolatile components, including the diterpenes ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid [6], [7] ([Fig. 1]). Fig. 1 Chemical structures of the major nonvolatile constituents of Copaifera duckei oil resin: ent-polyalthic acid (1) and dihydro-ent-agathic acid (2). In Brazilian folk medicine, the recommended oral dosage is 3 – 5 drops dispersed in warm water or honey, taken up to three times daily to treat internal ailments [8], [9]. Despite the oral administration of these oleoresins, there is a lack of information regarding their pharmacokinetic studies. Consequently, we have developed and validated an analytical method to determine the pharmacokinetic profiles of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rat plasma samples following a single oral dose of C. duckei oleoresin administration. # RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The mass spectra in the mobile phase and the chromatograms of plasma samples of the ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids and the internal standard (IS) warfarin are depicted in [Figs. 2] and [3]. The matrix effect, linearity, precision, accuracy, and stability are shown in [Table 1]. The carryover tests of the ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids and the IS warfarin are shown in [Fig. 3]. Chromatographic peak areas of the blank plasma samples were lower than 20% of the lower limit quality control (LLQC) areas, as shown in [Fig. 3]. Fig. 2 Full scan mass spectrum of Copaifera duckei oil resin, dihydro-ent-agathic, ent-polyalthic acids, and warfarin sodium (internal standard) diluted in the mobile phase. Fig. 3 Chromatograms of the lower limit quality control (LLQC), low-quality control (LQC), and high-quality control (HQC) samples and of blank plasma samples immediately following HQC sample analysis of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids. Table 1 Validation parameters of the method of analysis of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rat plasma samples. Table 1 Validation parameters of the method of analysis of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rat plasma samples. NMF = normalised matrix factor, CV = coefficient of variation, RSE = relative standard error, LLQC = lower limit of quantification, LQC = low-quality control, MQC = medium quality control, HQC = high-quality control Parameter ent-Polyalthic acid Dihydro-ent-agathic acid Matrix effect Mean NMF (CV%) LQC HQC 0.40 (8.61%) 0.39 (4.74%) 0.94 (5.83%) 0.51 (6.06%) Linearity range (µg/mL) Regression equation Correlation coefficient (r) 0.57 – 114.74 y = 0.422 126 × x − 0.226 519 0.993 176 0.09 – 18.85 y = 3.16 888 × x − 0.146 839 0.996 044 Stability CV% RSE% CV% RSE% Shor-term (25 °C, 6 h) LQC (n = 3) 4.03 − 6.26 (n = 4) 3.51 − 3.71 HQC (n = 4) 3.78 − 10.14 (n = 4) 2.60 − 7.58 Post-processing (12 °C, 10 h) LQC (n = 3) 3.00 − 12.65 (n = 3) 5.73 − 5.77 HQC (n = 4) 6.81 5.84 (n = 5) 2.03 2.36 Freeze/thaw cycles (25 °C, 6 h) LQC (n = 5) 1.52 4.59 (n = 5) 4.09 − 5.30 HQC (n = 5) 3.03 10.82 (n = 5) 4.37 − 6.26 Precision and accuracy CV% RSE% CV% RSE% Intra-assay LLQC (n = 7) 2.61 − 0.20 (n = 7) 5.02 3.34 LQC (n = 7) 3.53 8.57 (n = 7) 5.17 − 5.60 MQC (n = 7) 6.30 4.81 (n = 7) 3.29 − 4.89 HCQ (n = 7) 4.05 − 4.24 (n = 7) 2.27 − 2.53 Inter-assays (3 assays) LLQC (n = 22) 8.57 0.10 (n = 22) 5.98 8.80 LQC (n = 17) 9.61 − 1.46 (n = 20) 6.45 − 1.06 MQC (n = 22) 6.48 0.47 (n = 22) 7.07 − 2.24 HCQ (n = 19) 7.30 3.69 (n = 21) 3.20 − 5.01 Both ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acid pharmacokinetics were characterized as a bicompartmental structural model with first-order absorption and elimination. Plasma concentrations versus time curves of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids are presented in [Fig. 4]. The typical values of the parameters and interindividual variability (IIV) are presented in [Table 2] (θ i = θ TV × eη , where θ i is the parameter value of an individual animal, θ TV is the population parameter typical value, and η is a random variable with mean zero and variance ω 2). Fig. 4 Observed plasma concentrations over time of ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in 44 Wistar rats following a 200-mg/kg Copaifera duckei oil resin dose administrated by gavage (91.79 mg/kg of ent-polyalthic acid and 18.08 mg/kg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid). Table 2 Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic model of ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid in rats following oral administration (gavage) of a 200-mg/kg dose of Copaifera duckei oleoresin (91.79 mg/kg of ent-polyalthic acid and 18.08 mg/kg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid). Table 2 Estimates of the population pharmacokinetic model of ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid in rats following oral administration (gavage) of a 200-mg/kg dose of Copaifera duckei oleoresin (91.79 mg/kg of ent-polyalthic acid and 18.08 mg/kg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid). Parameter ent-Polyalthic acid Dihydro-ent-agathic acid Estimates Bootstrap (n = 1000) Estimates Bootstrap (n = 1000) Typical value (θ) RSE IIV (ω 2) RSE Typical value median PI (2.5 – 97.5%) IIV median PI (2.5 – 97.5%) Typical value (θ) RSE IIV (ω 2) RSE Typical value median PI (2.5 – 97.5%) IIV median PI (2.5 – 97.5%) CL/F: apparent clearance. Vc/F: apparent central volume of distribution; Q: intercompartmental clearance; Vp/F: apparent peripheral volume of distribution; IIV: interindividual variability. RSE%: residual standard error; PI: percentile interval range; SD: standard deviation. Cmax: maximum concentration. Tmax: time to achieve Cmax. t 1/2: half-life. Relative F: relative bioavailability between ent-polyalthic/dihydro-ent-agathic acids Ka (h−1) 0.47 12.16% – 0.47 (0.37 – 0.90) – 0.28 12.9% – 0.28 (0.22 – 0.67) – CL/F (L/h) 0.15 13.91% 0.25 44.68% 0.15 (0.099 – 0.19) 0.26 (0.05 – 0.75) 0.04 9.3% 0.329 26.1% 0.04 (0.03 – 0.05) 0.31 (0.16 – 0.54) Vc/F (L) 0.04 20.17% – 0.04 (0.03 – 0.09) – 0.01 27.6% 0.01 (0.01 – 0.04) Q/F (L/h) 0.13 11.91% – 0.14 (0.10 – 0.21) – 0.02 30.1% 0.02 (0.01 – 0.05) Vp/F (L) 2.48 30.36% 0.98 37.09% 2.50 (1.33 – 4.66) 0.98 (0.26 – 2.05) 0.18 14.0% – 0.19 (0.14 – 0.31) – σ 2 0.15 21.26% – 0.14 (0.09 – 0.20) – 0.17 15.6% – 0.16 (0.11 – 0.22) – Median PI (25 – 75%) Mean (SD) Median PI (25 – 75%) Mean (SD) Tmax (h) 0.50 (0.45 – 0.75) 0.64 (0.36) 0.75 (0.50 – 1.50) 1.26 (0.87) Cmax (µg/mL) 41.63 (33.25 – 50.91) 42.75 (13.22) 22.65 (16.97 – 29.36) 22.03 (9.80) t 1/2 (h) 11.60 (7.85 – 15.15) 11.60 (7.14) 3.49 (2.52 – 4.78) 3.49 (2.17) AUC0–48 (μg · h/mL) 130.74 (96.43 – 176.64) 144.89 (131.16) 103.00 (69.84 – 150.67) 118.76 (68.62) Relative F 0.245 The residual variability of both acids was described by a proportional residual error model. Therefore, the concentration estimates of each time (j) and animal (i) was Yij = F ij + F ij × εij where Yij is the observed concentration, Fij is the concentration estimate, and ε ij is a random variable with mean zero and variance σ 2 ([Table 2]). The goodness of fit plot (GOF) and visual predictive check (VPC) of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids ([Figs. 5] and [6]) indicated a good fit of the predicted plasma concentrations to the observed data, and the bootstraps ([Table 2]) indicate acceptable bias and good accuracy of the fixed and random effects estimates. In addition, the bootstrap had only 11.1% minimization failures. Fig. 5 Goodness of fit plot of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids. Observed concentrations over population and individual predictions (left). Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) over population predictions and time (right). Red line: trend line; dashed lines: identity line and two and half times the identity (left plots); 2, 0, and − 2 CWRES (right plots). Fig. 6 Visual predictive check (VPC) of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids in rat plasma over time. Dots: observed plasma concentrations. Lines: 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of observed concentrations. Shaded areas: 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of the simulated concentrations (n = 1000). The influence of animal weight and age on the pharmacokinetic parameters of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids were explored however due to the uniformity of weight and age values among the animals no effect was identified. To our knowledge, this is the first method for analyzing ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids in the plasma of rats by LC-MS/MS. The method presented a wide linearity range and low lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.57 – 114.74 and 0.09 – 18.85 µg/mL plasma, respectively), which makes it suitable to be applied to preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. We could not analyze the ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids by multiple reactions monitoring (MRM). Despite several fragmentation tests with different ionization energies and argon flux, their ionized molecules did not generate fragment ions appreciably. A similar difficulty was also described by Gasparetto et al. [10] in the analysis of kaurenoic acid, a diterpene contained in Guaco. The sample preparation method did not present a significant matrix effect for standard or lipemic plasma samples ([Table 1]). However, the matrix effect for hemolyzed plasma was higher than 15%, and the hemolyzed plasma samples should be disregarded. The method is selective for ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids at concentrations ≥ the LLQC. The chromatogramsʼ peak areas of interferents were lower than 20% compared to the chromatogramsʼ peak analytes at LLQC concentrations ([Fig. 3]). The analytical method showed good intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy, with the coefficient of variation (CV) and relative standard error (RSE) of quality controls lower than 15%. Similarly, the stability of the freeze/thaw cycles, post-processing in an auto-injector, and short-term on a bench had a CV and RSE lower than 15%. The C. duckei oleoresin sample was prepared at 20 mg/mL in saline with Cremophor 10% to furnish a homogeneous suspension able to provide the dose of 200 mg of oleoresin per kilogram of rat in a volume not exceeding 10 mL/kg of rat, as described by the Good Practices for the Administration of Substances and Blood Collection [11]. Blood samples in volumes lower than 400 µL were collected from the caudal vein, not exceeding three samples per animal. The volume collected was less than 10% of the animalʼs total blood volume, making volume replacement unnecessary, according to the Good Practice Guide for the Administration of Blood Substances and Collections, which would cause changes in pharmacokinetic parameters [11]. This is the first report on the population pharmacokinetics of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids. With few reports on the bioavailability of natural products and limited population pharmacokinetic studies on natural products, finding similar data for comparison is difficult. ent-Polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids have similar lipophilicity (logP = 4.9 and 4.7, respectively) and polar surface area (50.4 and 74.6 Å2, respectively) [12]. However, the apparent clearance (CL/F), central apparent volume of distribution (Vc/F), and peripheral apparent volume of distribution (Vp/F) of ent-polyalthic acid are approximately 3.75-, 4.00-, and 13.78-folds higher than the dihydro-ent-agathic ones, and the relative bioavailability between ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids is 0.245 ([Table 2]). Due to the Brazilian populationʼs extensive use of copaibaʼs oleoresin, further studies are needed to establish safe and effective doses for humans. Furtado et al. [13] reported no genotoxic activity at doses up to 2000 mg of oleoresin/kg of animal for six different Copaifera species (C. duckei, Copaifera multijuga, Copaifera paupera, Copaifera pubiflora, Copaifera reticulata, and Copaifera trapezifolia). However, they observed cytotoxic activity of C. duckei oleoresin on Chinese hamster fibroblast cells at a concentration of 9.8 µg/mL. Castro-e-Silva et al. [14] reported the oral treatment of rats with 600 mg oleoresin/kg/day for 7 days and after partial hepatectomy. They also observed a decrease in hepatocellular proliferation and mitochondrial breathing in the liver. Noteworthy is that in the present study, the C. duckei oleoresin sample was prepared at 20 mg/mL in saline with Cremophor 10% to furnish a homogeneous suspension able to provide the dose of 200 mg of oleoresin per kilogram of rat in a volume not exceeding 10 mL/kg of rat, as described by the Good Practices for the Administration of Substances and Blood Collection. Finally, it is possible to conclude that the developed LC-MS/MS analytical method is reliable for the pharmacokinetic studies of Copaifera oleoresin ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acid diterpenes. The CL/F, Vc/F, and Vp/F of ent-polyalthic acid are higher than that of dihydro-ent-agathic. It is also essential to observe that the literature reports that diterpenes with an oxidized furan ring, such as teucrin A, are known liver toxic compounds [15]. All these facts indicate the need for further toxicological and clinical studies to better understand the safety aspects of using Copaifera oleoresin. # MATERIAL AND METHODS PLANT MATERIALS AND CHEMICALS C. duckei Dwyer oleoresin was collected in Belém (Pará State, Brazil) at coordinates S01°06.933′, O48°19.781′. A voucher specimen (NID:96/2012) was obtained and deposited in the Herbarium of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Eastern Amazon). The Botanist Silvane Tavares Rodrigues identified the specimen (voucher number 175 206). ent-Polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid ([Fig. 1]) were isolated and identified through nuclear magnetic resonance analysis by our research group from the same oleoresin used in this study [6], [16]. Their purity was also evaluated by integrating the area under the signals corresponding to the compounds of interest in the 1H NMR spectrum. The IS was warfarin sodium, purchased from FURP. The following HPLC grade reagents were used: Milli Q Plus purified water (Millipore), methanol (Merck), acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldrich), methyl tert-butyl ether (Fischer Scientific), and isopropanol (J. T. Baker). Formic acid and glacial acetic acid (J. T. Baker), both of analytical grade, were employed as mobile phase modifiers. # DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ENT-POLYALTHIC ACID AND DIHYDRO-ENT-AGATHIC ACID IN RAT PLASMA LC-MS/MS ANALYSIS Chromatographic analysis was conducted using an Alliance e2695 Waters system (Waters Corp.). A LiChrospher 100 CN (5 µm) column with a LiChroCART 125 – 4 mm (Merck) pre-column was utilized and maintained at a temperature of 27 °C. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of water, acetonitrile, isopropanol, and formic acid (64.8 : 20 : 15 : 0.2 v/v/v/v) with a 0.7 mL/min flow rate. Mass spectrometry detection was performed using a Quattro Micro Liquid Chromatograph triple quadrupole (Micromass) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid were detected in the single ion recording (SIR) mode, while warfarin (IS) was detected in the MRM mode. The ESI source was set to the negative mode. The parameters were configured as follows: capillary voltage − 3.00 kV, source and desolvation temperatures of 125 and 400 °C, respectively, cone and desolvation gas flow (N2) were set at 50 and 800 L/h, respectively, and argon was employed as the collision gas at a rate of 0.15 mL/min. The cone voltage, collision energies, and ion transitions for each analyte were optimized according to [Table 3]. Data acquisition and sample quantifications were performed using MassLynx 4.1 version (Waters). Table 3 Precusor/product ion pairs and parameters for multiple reactions monitoring of ent-polyalthic acid, dihydro-ent-agathic acid, and the internal standard (IS) warfarin. Table 3 Precusor/product ion pairs and parameters for multiple reactions monitoring of ent-polyalthic acid, dihydro-ent-agathic acid, and the internal standard (IS) warfarin. Compound Retention time (min) MS mode Transitions (precursor > product) Cone voltage (V) Collision energy (eV) ent-Polyalthic acid 11.18 SIR 315 50 2 Dihydro-ent-agathic acid 5.72 SIR 335 50 2 IS 5.06 MRM 307.1 > 161.5 30 20 # # PREPARATION OF STANDARD SOLUTIONS Stock solutions of ent-polyalthic (5 mg/mL) acid, dihydro-ent-agathic acid (1 mg/mL), and warfarin sodium (IS, 5 mg/mL) were prepared separately in methanol and kept at − 20 °C. The calibration standards were prepared by successive dilutions in methanol to obtain concentrations of 1.15, 2.29, 3.44, 4.59, 6.88, 9.18, 22.95, 45.90, 91.79, 114.74, 137.69, 183.58, and 229.48 µg of ent-polyalthic acid/mL methanol and 0.19, 0.38, 0.57, 0.75, 1.13, 1.51, 3.77, 7.54, 15.08, 18.85, 22.62, 30.16 e 37.70 µg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid/mL methanol. Warfarin sodium (IS) solution was further diluted in methanol to obtain a 5 µg/mL concentration. # SAMPLE PREPARATION Fifty microliters of plasma sample (or blank plasma for calibration curves) were added to 2000 µL microtubes (Axygen Scientific) to begin the sample preparation. Subsequently, 25 µL of IS solution (5 µg/mL), 50 µL of 0.75 M acetic acid, and 25 µL of methanol (or 25 µL of each standard solution for calibration curves) were added. The microtubes were then vortexed for 30 s using a vortex mixer (Phoenix Luferco, model AP56). After mixing, 500 µL of the extraction solution (methyl tert-butyl ether : isopropanol, 4 : 1 v/v) were added to the microtubes. Another 30-s vortex mixing was performed, followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 21 500 g, 4 °C (Himac CF8DL). The resulting supernatants were carefully transferred to other clean microtubes and subjected to evaporation until dryness using a vacuum concentrator. The dried residues were then reconstituted in 100 µL of the mobile phase and mixed for 30 s. The processed samples were stored in the automatic injector at 12 °C, and 60 µL of each sample were injected into the LC-MS/MS system. For the construction of calibration curves, peak area ratios (analyte/IS) were plotted against plasma concentrations. The concentration ranges were 0.57 to 114.74 µg/mL and 0.09 to 18.85 µg/mL for ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acid, respectively. # METHOD VALIDATION The analytical method was validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines [17]. The quality control samples were prepared at the plasma concentrations shown in [Table 4]. Table 4 Quality control concentrations of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rat plasma. Table 4 Quality control concentrations of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rat plasma. Quality control sample ent-Polyalthic acid (µg/mL) Dihydro-ent-agathic acid (µg/mL) LLQC: lower limit concentrations quality control, LQC: lower concentration quality control, MQC: medium concentration quality control, HQC: higher quality control concentrations, DQC: dilution quality control LLQC 0.57 0.09 LQC 1.72 0.28 MQC 57.37 9.42 HQC 91.79 15.08 DQC 114.74 18.85 The matrix effect was assessed using eight 50 µL aliquots of blank plasma obtained from different rats, including two lipemic samples, two hemolyzed samples, and four standard samples. The blank plasma extracts were then spiked with standard solutions at concentrations corresponding to the high-quality control (HQC) and low-quality control (LQC), along with the addition of the IS solution. Additionally, exact standard solutions in methanol spiked with the IS solution were analyzed. The matrix factor normalized with the IS (NMF) was calculated by dividing the peak area ratios of analyte/IS from the post-extracted plasma samples by the peak area ratios of analyte/IS from the neat solutions. The matrix effect was determined by calculating the CV of all obtained MFs. Selectivity was evaluated using blank plasma from eight different sources, including four standard samples, two lipemic samples, and two hemolyzed samples. The resulting chromatograms were compared to LLQC concentration samples. Linearity was assessed through triplicate calibration curves, including a blank and zero samples. The carryover effect was evaluated by consecutively injecting three blank samples, followed by injecting the sample at the HQC concentration. Precision and accuracy (intraday and inter-day) were evaluated by performing seven replicates of LLQC, LQC, medium quality control (MQC), and HQC of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in a single analytical run (intra-assay) and in three different analytical runs (inter-assay). The precision and accuracy results are expressed as the CV and RSE. Stability tests in rat plasma were conducted using four replicates of LQC and HQC samples. For the freeze/thaw stability evaluation, the LQC and HQC replicates were subjected to three cycles of freezing at − 70 °C for 24 h, followed by thawing at room temperature and freezing again at − 70 °C for 24 h. The samples were then analyzed at the end of the three cycles. Short-term stability was assessed by keeping the LQC and HQC samples at room temperature for 1 h before preparation and analysis. Post-processing stability was evaluated by storing the processed LQC and HQC samples in the automatic injector at 12 °C for 24 h before analysis. The stability results are expressed as the CV and RSE. # POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS OF ENT-POLYALTHIC ACID AND DIHYDRO-ENT-AGATHIC ACID IN RATS ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS Male Wistar rats (260 ± 30 g, n = 44) were housed in metabolic cages under controlled temperature (25 ± 1 °C), relative humidity (40 – 70%), a 12-h light-dark cycle, and with free access to food and water. On December 9, 2015, the Ethics Committee of Universidade de Franca (CEUA) approved the experimental protocol on the Use of Animals under protocol number 057/15. After 12 h fasting, 20 mg/mL C. duckei oleoresin, dissolved in physiological saline solution with 1.0% Cremophor, were orally administered by gavage at a dose of 200 mg/kg (91.79 mg/kg of ent-polyalthic acid and 18.08 mg/kg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid) to a total of 44 rats. Serial blood samples of 200 µL (3 to 4 samples per animal) were collected from tail vein at 5, 15, 30, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48 h (n = 8 for each sampling time) after oleoresin administration and transferred to tubes containing heparin as an anticoagulant (Liquemine 5000 IU; Roche). After centrifugation (10 min, 9560 g, 4 °C), the plasma samples were stored at − 70 °C until analysis. # # POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS Population pharmacokinetics models of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in rats were evaluated by nonlinear mixed-effects modelling conducted in NONMEN software, version 7.4.3 (ICON Development Solutions), with compiler GNU Fortran 4.6 (Free Software Foundation, Inc.) and interface PsN, version 4.9.0 (Perlspeaks-NONMEM) [18]. R version 3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) was used to reorganize the dataset, statistical summaries, and graphics. The estimations were conducted based on the first-order conditional estimation with the interaction method (FOCE-I). The model-building criteria included (1) successful minimization, (2) reduced relative standard error and shrinkage values of estimates, (3) number of significant digits, (4) successful covariance step, (5) correlation between model parameters, and (6) acceptable gradients at the last iteration [19], [20]. All fixed and random effects were introduced into the model according to a stepwise procedure exploring mono- or bicompartmental pharmacokinetics with first order and elimination and different absorption models (first-order, lag-time, or transit compartment models). The residual variability was explored by additive, proportional, or proportional combined with additive error models. The IIV was explored in all parameters assuming a log-normal distribution. Comparison between hierarchical models was based on graphic and statistical methods that included (1) reduction of the objective function value (OFV) and AIC (Akaike information criteria), (2) values of relative standard error and shrinkage, (3) GOF that included plots of the predicted population (PRED) and individual (IPRED) concentrations versus the observed concentrations and the conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) versus population predicted concentrations and time [20], [21]. A stepwise forward inclusion/backward elimination procedure was used for covariate selection, according to the concept that the difference in − 2 log likelihood between two models is approximately χ2 distributed, with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters between the hierarchical models [22]. The covariates were introduced one by one and retained if a decrease in OFV of at least 3.84 units (p < 0.05) was observed. During the backward elimination procedure, an increase in OFV of at least 7.8 units (p < 0.005) was used as a criterion for a significant effect. The predictive performance of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acid pharmacokinetic models was assessed via graphical and statistical methods, including VPCs [20], [21], [23] and bootstrapping [24], in addition to graphical evaluation of the GOF. VPCs were obtained from 1000 simulations per animal of the ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acid plasma concentrations from 0 to 48 h. Bootstrap analysis identified bias, stability, and precision of the estimates obtained with the model and was performed with 1000 new datasets generated by resampling individuals (with replacement) from the original dataset. The area under the plasma concentration from 0 to 48 h (AUC0 – 48) of ent- polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids was calculated by the trapezoidal rule in R version 3.6.1 from the modelʼs individual predicted concentrations over time. Then, the relative bioavailability between ent-polyalthic/dihydro-ent-agathic acids of each animal was accessed through the equation: F = AUC0 – 48 of ent-polyalthic acid × dose of dihydro-ent-agathic acid AUC0 – 48 of dihydro-ent-agathic acid × dose of ent-polyalthic acid # # CONTRIBUTORSʼ STATEMENT Data collection: F. A. Aguila, Nardotto G. H. B., Oliveira, L. C.; design of the study: F. A. Aguila, Bastos, J. K., Veneziani R. C. S., Nardotto G. H. B., Oliveira, L. C., Rocha, A., Lanchote, V. L., Ambrosio S.R; statistical analysis: F. A. Aguila, Nardotto G. H. B., Oliveira, L. C., Rocha, A., Lanchote, V. L., Ambrosio S.R; analysis and interpretation of the data: F. A. Aguila, Bastos, J. K., Veneziani R. C. S., Nardotto G. H. B., Oliveira, L. C., Rocha, A., Lanchote, V. L., Ambrosio S.R; drafting the manuscript: Bastos, J. K., Veneziani R. C. S., Rocha, A., Lanchote, V. L., Ambrosio S.R; critical revision of the manuscript: Bastos, J. K., Veneziani R. C. S., Lanchote, V. L., Ambrosio S.R, Ambrosio S. R. # # CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support (grant number 2011/13 630 – 7) and CAPES and CNPq for fellowships. * REFERENCES * 1 Arruda C, Mejia JAA, Ribeiro VP, Borges CHG, Martins CHG, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR, Bastos JK. Occurrence, chemical composition, biological activities and analytical methods on Copaifera genus-A review. Biomed Pharmacother 2019; 109: 1-20 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 2 Cardinelli CC, Silva JEAE, Ribeiro R, Veiga VF, dos Santos EP, de Freitas ZMF. Toxicological effects of copaiba oil (Copaifera spp.) and its active components. Plants (Basel) 2023; 12: e1054 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 3 Veiga VF, Pinto AC. The Copaifera L. genus. Quim Nova 2002; 25: 273-286 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 4 Veiga VF, Zunino L, Calixto JB, Patitucci ML, Pinto AC. Phytochemical and antioedematogenic studies of commercial copaiba oils available in Brazil. Phytother Res 2001; 15: 476-480 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 5 Carneiro LJ, Tasso TO, Santos MFC, Goulart MO, dos Santos R, Bastos JK, da Silva JJM, Crotti AEM, Parreira RLT, Orenha RP, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR. Copaifera multijuga, Copaifera pubiflora and Copaifera trapezifolia oleoresins: Chemical characterization and in vitro cytotoxic potential against tumoral cell lines. J Brazil Chem Soc 2020; 31: 1679-1689 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 6 Carneiro LJ, Bianchi TC, da Silva JJM, Oliveira LC, Borges CHG, Lemes DC, Bastos JK, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR. Development and validation of a rapid and reliable RP-HPLC-PDA method for the quantification of six diterpenes in Copaifera duckei, Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera multijuga oleoresins. J Brazil Chem Soc 2018; 29: 729-737 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 7 da Silva JJM, Crevelin EJ, Carneiro LJ, Rogez H, Veneziani RCS, Ambrósio SR, Beraldo Moraes LA, Bastos JK. Development of a validated ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of acid diterpenes in Copaifera oleoresins. J Chromatogr A 2017; 1515: 81-90 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 8 da Trindade R, da Silva JK, Setzer WN. Copaifera of the neotropics: A review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 1511 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 9 Sachetti CG, de Carvalho RR, Paumgartten FJR, Lameira OA, Caldas ED. Developmental toxicity of copaiba tree (Copaifera reticulata Ducke, Fabaceae) oleoresin in rat. Food Chem Toxicol 2011; 49: 1080-1085 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 10 Gasparetto J, Peccinini R, de Francisco T, Cerqueira L, Campos F, Pontarolo R. A kinetic study of the main guaco metabolites using syrup formulation and the identification of an alternative route of coumarin metabolism in humans. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0118922 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 11 Diehl KH, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, Vidal JM, van de Vorstenbosch C. A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J Appl Toxicol 2001; 21: 15-23 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 12 Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1-13 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 13 Furtado RA, de Oliveira PF, Senedese JM, Ozelin SD, de Souza LDR, Leandro LF, de Oliveira WL, da Silva JJM, Oliveira LC, Rogez H, Ambrósio SR, Veneziani RCS, Bastos JK, Tavares DC. Assessment of toxicogenetic activity of oleoresins and leaves extracts of six Copaifera species for prediction of potential human risks. J Ethnopharmacol 2018; 221: 119-125 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 14 Castro-E-Silva jr. O, Zucoloto S, Ramalho FS, Ramalho LNZ, Reis JMC, Bastos AAC, Brito MVH. Antiproliferative activity of Copaifera duckei oleoresin on liver regeneration in rats. Phytother Res 2004; 18: 92-94 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 15 Kouzi SA, Mcmurtry RJ, Nelson SD. Hepatotoxicity of germander (Teucrium chamaedrys L.) and one of its constituent neoclerodane diterpenes teucrin A in the mouse. Chem Res Toxicol 1994; 7: 850-856 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 16 Borges CHG, Cruz MG, Carneiro LJ, da Silva JJM, Bastos JK, Tavares DC, de Oliveira PF, Rodrigues V, Veneziani RCS, Parreira RLT, Caramori GF, Nagurniak GR, Magalhães LG, Ambrósio SR. Copaifera duckei oleoresin and its main nonvolatile terpenes: In vitro schistosomicidal properties. Chem Biodivers 2016; 13: 1348-1356 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 17 EMEA/CHMP/EWP. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation, Guideline Rev. 1 Corr. 2, (07/21 2011). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/bioanalytical-method-validation Accessed: 02/13 2020 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 18 Bauer RJ. NONMEM tutorial part I: Description of commands and options, with simple examples of population analysis. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2019; 8: 525-537 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 19 Bauer RJ. NONMEM tutorial part II: Estimation methods and advanced examples. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2019; 8: 538-556 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 20 Mould DR, Upton RN. Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development-part 2: Introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2013; 2: e38 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 21 Nguyen THT, Mouksassi MS, Holford N, Al-Huniti N, Freedman I, Hooker AC, John J, Karlsson MO, Mould DR, Ruixo JJP, Plan EL, Savic R, van Hasselt JGC, Weber B, Zhou C, Comets E, Mentre F. Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: Metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017; 6: 87-109 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 22 Maitre PO, Buhrer M, Thomson D, Stanski DR. A three-step approach combining Bayesian regression and NONMEM population analysis: Application to midazolam. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1991; 19: 377-384 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 23 Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. Aaps J 2011; 13: 143-151 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 24 Dowd PA, Pardo-Iguzquiza E, Egozcue JJ. The total bootstrap median: A robust and efficient estimator of location and scale for small samples. J Appl Stat 2015; 42: 1306-1321 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar CORRESPONDENCE Profa. Dra. Vera Lucia Lanchote Departamento de Análises Clínicas, Toxicológicas e Bromatológicas School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo Av. do Café, s/n – Vila Monte Alegre 14040-900 Ribeirão Preto – SP Brazil Telefon: + 55 16 33 15 46 99 eMail: lanchote@fcfrp.usp.br Prof. Dr. Sérgio Ricardo Ambrósio Núcleo de Pesquisa em Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas University of Franca Av. Dr. Armando Sales Oliveira, 201 – Parque Universitário 14404-600 Franca – SP Brazil Telefon: + 55 16 37 11 88 88 eMail: sergio.ambrosio@unifran.edu.br PUBLIKATIONSVERLAUF Eingereicht: 22. November 2023 Angenommen nach Revision: 15. Mai 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 15. Mai 2024 Artikel online veröffentlicht: 18. Juni 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany WE RECOMMEND 1. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of the Copaifera reticulata oleoresin and its major diterpene acids AL Pfeifer Barbosa et al., Planta Medica, 2019 2. Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution Study of Paclitaxel Liposome in Sprague-Dawley Rats and Beagle Dogs by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry X. Wang et al., Drug Research, 2013 3. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of the Copaifera reticulata oleoresin and its major diterpene acids AL Pfeifer Barbosa et al., Planta Medica, 2019 4. Antimicrobial Terpenoids from the Oleoresin of the Peruvian Medicinal Plant Copaifera paupera Benigna M. Tincusi et al., Planta Medica, 2002 5. Antimicrobial Terpenoids from the Oleoresin of the Peruvian Medicinal Plant Copaifera paupera Benigna M. Tincusi et al., Planta Medica, 2002 1. Pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of eprosartan in Chinese healthy volunteers of different gender H. R. Xu et al., Pacific Affairs, 2007 2. Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel in healthy Chinese volunteers Zou Jian-Jun et al., Pacific Affairs, 2012 3. Pharmacokinetics of robenidine hydrochloride in plasma of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) at different water temperatures YU Linxue et al., Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018 4. Pharmacokinetics and dosage regimen of cefepime in healthy goats following intramuscular administration Rajput Supriya et al., INROADS, 2020 5. Effect of piperine on pharmacokinetic profile of marbofloxacin following repeated administration in goats Bhardwaj Pallavi et al., The Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 2022 Powered by * Privacy policy * Do not sell my personal information * Google Analytics settings I consent to the use of Google Analytics and related cookies across the TrendMD network (widget, website, blog). For more information, see our Privacy Settings and Terms of Use. Yes No * REFERENCES * 1 Arruda C, Mejia JAA, Ribeiro VP, Borges CHG, Martins CHG, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR, Bastos JK. Occurrence, chemical composition, biological activities and analytical methods on Copaifera genus-A review. Biomed Pharmacother 2019; 109: 1-20 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 2 Cardinelli CC, Silva JEAE, Ribeiro R, Veiga VF, dos Santos EP, de Freitas ZMF. Toxicological effects of copaiba oil (Copaifera spp.) and its active components. Plants (Basel) 2023; 12: e1054 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 3 Veiga VF, Pinto AC. The Copaifera L. genus. Quim Nova 2002; 25: 273-286 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 4 Veiga VF, Zunino L, Calixto JB, Patitucci ML, Pinto AC. Phytochemical and antioedematogenic studies of commercial copaiba oils available in Brazil. Phytother Res 2001; 15: 476-480 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 5 Carneiro LJ, Tasso TO, Santos MFC, Goulart MO, dos Santos R, Bastos JK, da Silva JJM, Crotti AEM, Parreira RLT, Orenha RP, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR. Copaifera multijuga, Copaifera pubiflora and Copaifera trapezifolia oleoresins: Chemical characterization and in vitro cytotoxic potential against tumoral cell lines. J Brazil Chem Soc 2020; 31: 1679-1689 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 6 Carneiro LJ, Bianchi TC, da Silva JJM, Oliveira LC, Borges CHG, Lemes DC, Bastos JK, Veneziani RCS, Ambrosio SR. Development and validation of a rapid and reliable RP-HPLC-PDA method for the quantification of six diterpenes in Copaifera duckei, Copaifera reticulata and Copaifera multijuga oleoresins. J Brazil Chem Soc 2018; 29: 729-737 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 7 da Silva JJM, Crevelin EJ, Carneiro LJ, Rogez H, Veneziani RCS, Ambrósio SR, Beraldo Moraes LA, Bastos JK. Development of a validated ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of acid diterpenes in Copaifera oleoresins. J Chromatogr A 2017; 1515: 81-90 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 8 da Trindade R, da Silva JK, Setzer WN. Copaifera of the neotropics: A review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 1511 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 9 Sachetti CG, de Carvalho RR, Paumgartten FJR, Lameira OA, Caldas ED. Developmental toxicity of copaiba tree (Copaifera reticulata Ducke, Fabaceae) oleoresin in rat. Food Chem Toxicol 2011; 49: 1080-1085 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 10 Gasparetto J, Peccinini R, de Francisco T, Cerqueira L, Campos F, Pontarolo R. A kinetic study of the main guaco metabolites using syrup formulation and the identification of an alternative route of coumarin metabolism in humans. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0118922 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 11 Diehl KH, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, Vidal JM, van de Vorstenbosch C. A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J Appl Toxicol 2001; 21: 15-23 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 12 Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1-13 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 13 Furtado RA, de Oliveira PF, Senedese JM, Ozelin SD, de Souza LDR, Leandro LF, de Oliveira WL, da Silva JJM, Oliveira LC, Rogez H, Ambrósio SR, Veneziani RCS, Bastos JK, Tavares DC. Assessment of toxicogenetic activity of oleoresins and leaves extracts of six Copaifera species for prediction of potential human risks. J Ethnopharmacol 2018; 221: 119-125 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 14 Castro-E-Silva jr. O, Zucoloto S, Ramalho FS, Ramalho LNZ, Reis JMC, Bastos AAC, Brito MVH. Antiproliferative activity of Copaifera duckei oleoresin on liver regeneration in rats. Phytother Res 2004; 18: 92-94 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 15 Kouzi SA, Mcmurtry RJ, Nelson SD. Hepatotoxicity of germander (Teucrium chamaedrys L.) and one of its constituent neoclerodane diterpenes teucrin A in the mouse. Chem Res Toxicol 1994; 7: 850-856 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 16 Borges CHG, Cruz MG, Carneiro LJ, da Silva JJM, Bastos JK, Tavares DC, de Oliveira PF, Rodrigues V, Veneziani RCS, Parreira RLT, Caramori GF, Nagurniak GR, Magalhães LG, Ambrósio SR. Copaifera duckei oleoresin and its main nonvolatile terpenes: In vitro schistosomicidal properties. Chem Biodivers 2016; 13: 1348-1356 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 17 EMEA/CHMP/EWP. Guideline on bioanalytical method validation, Guideline Rev. 1 Corr. 2, (07/21 2011). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/bioanalytical-method-validation Accessed: 02/13 2020 PubMedGoogle Scholar * 18 Bauer RJ. NONMEM tutorial part I: Description of commands and options, with simple examples of population analysis. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2019; 8: 525-537 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 19 Bauer RJ. NONMEM tutorial part II: Estimation methods and advanced examples. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2019; 8: 538-556 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 20 Mould DR, Upton RN. Basic concepts in population modeling, simulation, and model-based drug development-part 2: Introduction to pharmacokinetic modeling methods. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2013; 2: e38 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 21 Nguyen THT, Mouksassi MS, Holford N, Al-Huniti N, Freedman I, Hooker AC, John J, Karlsson MO, Mould DR, Ruixo JJP, Plan EL, Savic R, van Hasselt JGC, Weber B, Zhou C, Comets E, Mentre F. Model evaluation of continuous data pharmacometric models: Metrics and graphics. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2017; 6: 87-109 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 22 Maitre PO, Buhrer M, Thomson D, Stanski DR. A three-step approach combining Bayesian regression and NONMEM population analysis: Application to midazolam. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1991; 19: 377-384 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 23 Bergstrand M, Hooker AC, Wallin JE, Karlsson MO. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks for diagnosing nonlinear mixed-effects models. Aaps J 2011; 13: 143-151 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar * 24 Dowd PA, Pardo-Iguzquiza E, Egozcue JJ. The total bootstrap median: A robust and efficient estimator of location and scale for small samples. J Appl Stat 2015; 42: 1306-1321 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar Lizenzen und Reprints Fig. 1 Chemical structures of the major nonvolatile constituents of Copaifera duckei oil resin: ent-polyalthic acid (1) and dihydro-ent-agathic acid (2). Fig. 2 Full scan mass spectrum of Copaifera duckei oil resin, dihydro-ent-agathic, ent-polyalthic acids, and warfarin sodium (internal standard) diluted in the mobile phase. Fig. 3 Chromatograms of the lower limit quality control (LLQC), low-quality control (LQC), and high-quality control (HQC) samples and of blank plasma samples immediately following HQC sample analysis of ent-polyalthic and dihydro-ent-agathic acids. Fig. 4 Observed plasma concentrations over time of ent-polyalthic acid and dihydro-ent-agathic acids in 44 Wistar rats following a 200-mg/kg Copaifera duckei oil resin dose administrated by gavage (91.79 mg/kg of ent-polyalthic acid and 18.08 mg/kg of dihydro-ent-agathic acid). Fig. 5 Goodness of fit plot of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids. Observed concentrations over population and individual predictions (left). Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) over population predictions and time (right). Red line: trend line; dashed lines: identity line and two and half times the identity (left plots); 2, 0, and − 2 CWRES (right plots). Fig. 6 Visual predictive check (VPC) of ent-polyaltic and dihydro-ent-agatic acids in rat plasma over time. Dots: observed plasma concentrations. Lines: 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of observed concentrations. Shaded areas: 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of the simulated concentrations (n = 1000). zum Seitenanfang © 2024 Georg Thieme Verlag KG | Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung | Smartphone Version Ihre aktuelle IP-Adresse: 81.95.5.44 Voreinstellungen verwalten Cookies Button IHRE PRIVATSPHÄRE IST UNS WICHTIG Wir und unsere 842 Partner speichern und/ oder greifen auf Informationen auf einem Gerät zu, z.B. auf eindeutige Kennungen in Cookies, um personenbezogene Daten zu verarbeiten. Sie können Ihre Präferenzen akzeptieren oder verwalten, einschließlich Ihres Widerspruchsrechts bei berechtigtem Interesse. Klicken Sie dazu bitte unten oder besuchen Sie jederzeit die Seite der Datenschutzrichtlinie. Diese Präferenzen werden unseren Partnern signalisiert und haben keinen Einfluss auf Surfdaten. Datenschutzinformation Impressum WIR UND UNSERE PARTNER VERARBEITEN DATEN, UM FOLGENDES BEREITZUSTELLEN: Genaue Geolocation-Daten verwenden. Geräteeigenschaften zur Identifikation aktiv abfragen. Speichern von und/oder Zugriff auf Informationen auf einem Gerät. Personalisierte Werbung und Inhalte, Messung von Werbung und Inhalten, Zielgruppenforschung und Entwicklung von Dienstleistungen. Liste der Partner (Lieferanten) Akzeptieren Alle ablehnen Zwecke anzeigen IHRE PRIVATSPHÄRE Wir verarbeiten Ihre Daten, um Inhalte oder Anzeigen bereitzustellen, und analysieren die Bereitstellung solcher Inhalte oder Anzeigen, um Erkenntnisse über unsere Website zu gewinnen. Wir geben diese Informationen auf der Grundlage einer Einwilligung und eines berechtigten Interesses an unsere Partner weiter. Sie können Ihr Recht auf Einwilligung oder Widerspruch gegen ein berechtigtes Interesse ausüben, und zwar auf der Grundlage eines der folgenden bestimmten Zwecke oder auf Partnerebene über den Link unter jedem Zweck. Diese Entscheidungen werden an unsere Anbieter, die am Transparency and Consent Framework teilnehmen, signalisiert. Weitere Informationen Alle zulassen EINWILLIGUNGSPRÄFERENZEN VERWALTEN COOKIES FÜR MARKETINGZWECKE Cookies für Marketingzwecke Diese Cookies können über unsere Website von unseren Werbepartnern gesetzt werden. Sie können von diesen Unternehmen verwendet werden, um ein Profil Ihrer Interessen zu erstellen und Ihnen relevante Anzeigen auf anderen Websites zu zeigen. Sie speichern nicht direkt personenbezogene Daten, basieren jedoch auf einer einzigartigen Identifizierung Ihres Browsers und Internet-Geräts. Wenn Sie diese Cookies nicht zulassen, werden Sie weniger gezielte Werbung erleben. LEISTUNGS-COOKIES Leistungs-Cookies Diese Cookies ermöglichen es uns, Besuche und Verkehrsquellen zu zählen, damit wir die Leistung unserer Website messen und verbessern können. Sie unterstützen uns bei der Beantwortung der Fragen, welche Seiten am beliebtesten sind, welche am wenigsten genutzt werden und wie sich Besucher auf der Website bewegen. Alle von diesen Cookies erfassten Informationen werden aggregiert und sind deshalb anonym. Wenn Sie diese Cookies nicht zulassen, können wir nicht wissen, wann Sie unsere Website besucht haben. UNBEDINGT ERFORDERLICHE COOKIES Immer aktiv Diese Cookies sind zur Funktion der Website erforderlich und können in Ihren Systemen nicht deaktiviert werden. In der Regel werden diese Cookies nur als Reaktion auf von Ihnen getätigte Aktionen gesetzt, die einer Dienstanforderung entsprechen, wie etwa dem Festlegen Ihrer Datenschutzeinstellungen, dem Anmelden oder dem Ausfüllen von Formularen. Sie können Ihren Browser so einstellen, dass diese Cookies blockiert oder Sie über diese Cookies benachrichtigt werden. Einige Bereiche der Website funktionieren dann aber nicht. Diese Cookies speichern keine personenbezogenen Daten. SPEICHERN VON ODER ZUGRIFF AUF INFORMATIONEN AUF EINEM ENDGERÄT 676 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Speichern von oder Zugriff auf Informationen auf einem Endgerät Cookies, Endgeräte- oder ähnliche Online-Kennungen (z. B. login-basierte Kennungen, zufällig generierte Kennungen, netzwerkbasierte Kennungen) können zusammen mit anderen Informationen (z. B. Browsertyp und Browserinformationen, Sprache, Bildschirmgröße, unterstützte Technologien usw.) auf Ihrem Endgerät gespeichert oder von dort ausgelesen werden, um es jedes Mal wiederzuerkennen, wenn es eine App oder einer Webseite aufruft. Dies geschieht für einen oder mehrere der hier aufgeführten Verarbeitungszwecke. Liste von IAB-Lieferanten | Illustrationen anzeigen PERSONALISIERTE WERBUNG UND INHALTE, MESSUNG VON WERBELEISTUNG UND DER PERFORMANCE VON INHALTEN, ZIELGRUPPENFORSCHUNG SOWIE ENTWICKLUNG UND VERBESSERUNG VON ANGEBOTEN 802 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Personalisierte Werbung und Inhalte, Messung von Werbeleistung und der Performance von Inhalten, Zielgruppenforschung sowie Entwicklung und Verbesserung von Angeboten * VERWENDUNG REDUZIERTER DATEN ZUR AUSWAHL VON WERBEANZEIGEN 613 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Werbeanzeigen, die Ihnen auf diesem Dienst präsentiert werden, können auf reduzierten Daten basieren, wie z. B. der Webseite oder App, die Sie gerade verwenden, Ihrem ungefähren Standort, Ihrem Gerätetyp oder den Inhalten, mit denen Sie interagieren (oder interagiert haben) (z. B., um die Anzeigefrequenz der Werbung zu begrenzen, die Ihnen ausgespielt werden). Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen * ERSTELLUNG VON PROFILEN FÜR PERSONALISIERTE WERBUNG 496 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Informationen über Ihre Aktivitäten auf diesem Dienst (wie ausgefüllte Formulare, angesehene Inhalte) können gespeichert und mit anderen Informationen über Sie (z. B. Informationen aus Ihrer vorherigen Aktivität auf diesem Dienst oder anderen Webseiten oder Apps) oder ähnlichen Benutzern kombiniert werden. Diese werden dann verwendet, um ein Profil über Sie zu erstellen oder zu verbessern (dies kann z. B. mögliche Interessen und persönliche Merkmale beinhalten). Ihr Profil kann (auch zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt) verwendet werden, um es zu ermöglichen, Ihnen Werbung zu präsentieren, die aufgrund Ihrer möglichen Interessen für Sie wahrscheinlich relevanter ist. Illustrationen anzeigen * VERWENDUNG VON PROFILEN ZUR AUSWAHL PERSONALISIERTER WERBUNG 492 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Werbung, die Ihnen auf diesem Dienst angezeigt wird, kann auf Ihrem Werbeprofil basieren. Dieses Werbeprofil kann Ihre Aktivitäten (wie ausgefüllte Formulare, angesehene Inhalte) auf diesem Dienst oder anderen Webseiten oder Apps, mögliche Interessen und persönliche Merkmale beinhalten. Illustrationen anzeigen * ERSTELLUNG VON PROFILEN ZUR PERSONALISIERUNG VON INHALTEN 220 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Informationen über Ihre Aktivitäten auf diesem Dienst (wie zum Beispiel: ausgefüllte Formulare, angesehene nicht werbliche Inhalte) können gespeichert und mit anderen Informationen über Sie (wie Ihrer vorherigen Aktivität auf diesem Dienst oder anderen Webseiten oder Apps) oder ähnlichen Benutzern kombiniert werden. Diese werden dann verwendet, um ein Profil über Sie zu erstellen oder zu ergänzen (dies kann z.B. mögliche Interessen und persönliche Merkmale beinhalten). Ihr Profil kann (auch zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt) verwendet werden, um Ihnen Inhalte anzuzeigen, die aufgrund Ihrer möglichen Interessen für Sie wahrscheinlich relevanter sind, indem z. B. die Reihenfolge, in der Ihnen Inhalte angezeigt werden, geändert wird, um es Ihnen noch leichter zu machen, Inhalte zu finden, die Ihren Interessen entsprechen. Illustrationen anzeigen * VERWENDUNG VON PROFILEN ZUR AUSWAHL PERSONALISIERTER INHALTE 193 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Inhalte, die Ihnen auf diesem Dienst präsentiert werden, können auf Ihren Inhaltsprofilen basieren, die Ihre Aktivitäten auf diesem oder anderen Diensten (wie Formulare, die Sie einreichen, Inhalte, die Sie sich ansehen), mögliche Interessen und persönliche Aspekte widerspiegeln können. Dies kann beispielsweise dazu genutzt werden, um die Reihenfolge anzupassen, in der Ihnen Inhalte angezeigt werden, um es Ihnen noch leichter zu machen, (Nicht-Werbe-)Inhalte zu finden, die Ihren Interessen entsprechen. Illustrationen anzeigen * MESSUNG DER WERBELEISTUNG 715 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Informationen darüber, welche Werbung Ihnen präsentiert wird und wie Sie damit interagieren, können verwendet werden, um festzustellen, wie sehr eine Werbung Sie oder andere Benutzer angesprochen hat und ob die Ziele der Werbekampagne erreicht wurden. Die Informationen umfassen zum Beispiel, ob Sie sich eine Anzeige angesehen haben, ob Sie daraufgeklickt haben, ob sie Sie dazu animiert hat, ein Produkt zu kaufen oder eine Webseite zu besuchen usw. Diese Informationen sind hilfreich, um die Relevanz von Werbekampagnen zu ermitteln. Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen * MESSUNG DER PERFORMANCE VON INHALTEN 361 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Informationen darüber, welche Werbung Ihnen präsentiert wird und wie Sie damit interagieren, können dazu verwendet werden festzustellen, ob (nicht werbliche) Inhalte z. B. die beabsichtigte Zielgruppe erreicht und Ihren Interessen entsprochen haben. Dazu gehören beispielsweise Informationen darüber, ob Sie einen bestimmten Artikel gelesen, sich ein bestimmtes Video angesehen, einen bestimmten Podcast angehört oder sich eine bestimmte Produktbeschreibung angesehen haben, wie viel Zeit Sie auf diesem Dienst und den von Ihnen besuchten Webseiten verbracht haben usw. Diese Informationen helfen dabei, die Relevanz von (nicht werblichen) Inhalten, die Ihnen angezeigt werden, zu ermitteln. Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen * ANALYSE VON ZIELGRUPPEN DURCH STATISTIKEN ODER KOMBINATIONEN VON DATEN AUS VERSCHIEDENEN QUELLEN 454 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Basierend auf der Kombination von Datensätzen (wie Benutzerprofilen, Statistiken, Marktforschung, Analysedaten) können Berichte über Ihre Interaktionen und die anderer Benutzer mit Werbe- oder (nicht werblichen) Inhalten erstellt werden, um gemeinsame Merkmale zu ermitteln (z. B., um festzustellen, welche Zielgruppen für eine Werbekampagne oder für bestimmte Inhalte empfänglich sind). Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen * ENTWICKLUNG UND VERBESSERUNG DER ANGEBOTE 538 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Informationen über Ihre Aktivitäten auf diesem Angebot, wie z. B. Ihre Interaktion mit Anzeigen oder Inhalten, können dabei helfen, Produkte und Angebote zu verbessern und neue Produkte und Angebote zu entwickeln basierend auf Benutzerinteraktionen, der Art der Zielgruppe usw. Dieser Verarbeitungszweck umfasst nicht die Entwicklung, Ergänzung oder Verbesserung von Benutzerprofilen und Kennungen. Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen * VERWENDUNG REDUZIERTER DATEN ZUR AUSWAHL VON INHALTEN 127 LIEFERANTEN KÖNNEN DIESEN ZWECK NUTZEN Switch Label Inhalte, die Ihnen auf diesem Dienst präsentiert werden, können auf reduzierten Daten basieren, wie z. B. der Webseite oder App, die Sie verwenden, Ihrem ungefähren Standort, Ihrem Endgerätetyp oder der Information, mit welchen Inhalten Sie interagieren (oder interagiert haben) (z. B. zur Begrenzung wie häufig Ihnen ein Video oder ein Artikel angezeigt wird). Illustrationen anzeigen Den Berechtigten Interessen Widersprechen Widerspruch entfernen Liste von IAB-Lieferanten VERWENDUNG GENAUER STANDORTDATEN 258 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESE SONDERFUNKTION NUTZEN Verwendung genauer Standortdaten Mit Ihrer Zustimmung kann Ihr genauer Standort (mit einem Radius von weniger als 500 Metern) zur Unterstützung der in diesem Rahmenwerk erläuterten Zwecke verwendet werden. Liste von IAB-Lieferanten ENDGERÄTEEIGENSCHAFTEN ZUR IDENTIFIKATION AKTIV ABFRAGEN 125 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESE SONDERFUNKTION NUTZEN Endgeräteeigenschaften zur Identifikation aktiv abfragen Mit Ihrer Zustimmung können bestimmte für Ihr Endgerät spezifische Merkmale angefordert und verwendet werden, um es von anderen Endgeräten zu unterscheiden (wie z. B. die installierten Zeichensätze oder Plugins, die Auflösung Ihres Bildschirms), um die in diesem Rahmenwerk erläuterten Zwecke zu unterstützen. Liste von IAB-Lieferanten GEWÄHRLEISTUNG DER SICHERHEIT, VERHINDERUNG UND AUFDECKUNG VON BETRUG UND FEHLERBEHEBUNG 507 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESEN SONDERZWECK NUTZEN Immer aktiv Ihre Daten können verwendet werden, um ungewöhnliche und potenziell betrügerische Aktivitäten (zum Beispiel bezüglich Werbung, Werbe-Klicks durch Bots) zu überwachen und zu verhindern, und um sicherzustellen, dass Systeme und Prozesse ordnungsgemäß und sicher funktionieren. Die Daten können auch verwendet werden, um Probleme zu beheben, die Sie, der Webseite- oder Appbetreiber oder der Werbetreibende bei der Bereitstellung von Inhalten und Anzeigen und bei Ihrer Interaktion mit diesen haben können. Liste von IAB-Lieferanten | Illustrationen anzeigen BEREITSTELLUNG UND ANZEIGE VON WERBUNG UND INHALTEN 501 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESEN SONDERZWECK NUTZEN Immer aktiv Bestimmte Informationen (wie IP-Adresse oder Endgerätefunktionen) werden verwendet, um die technische Kompatibilität des Inhalts oder der Werbung zu gewährleisten und die Übertragung des Inhalts oder der Werbung auf Ihr Endgerät zu ermöglichen. Liste von IAB-Lieferanten | Illustrationen anzeigen ABGLEICHUNG UND KOMBINATION VON DATEN AUS UNTERSCHIEDLICHEN QUELLEN 359 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESE FUNKTION NUTZEN Immer aktiv Informationen über Ihre Aktivitäten auf diesem Dienst können zur Unterstützung der in diesem Rahmenwerk erläuterten Zwecke mit anderen Informationen über Sie aus unterschiedlichen Quellen abgeglichen und kombiniert werden (z. B. Ihre Aktivitäten auf einem anderen Online-Dienst, Ihrer Nutzung einer Kundenkarte im Geschäft oder Ihren Antworten auf eine Umfrage). Liste von IAB-Lieferanten VERKNÜPFUNG VERSCHIEDENER ENDGERÄTE 326 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESE FUNKTION NUTZEN Immer aktiv Zur Unterstützung der in diesem Rahmenwerk erläuterten Zwecke kann ermittelt werden, ob es wahrscheinlich ist, dass Ihr Endgerät mit anderen Endgeräten verbunden ist, die Ihnen oder Ihrem Haushalt angehören (z. B., weil Sie sowohl auf Ihrem Handy als auch auf Ihrem Computer beim gleichen Dienst angemeldet sind oder weil Sie auf beiden Endgeräten die gleiche Internetverbindung verwenden). Liste von IAB-Lieferanten IDENTIFIKATION VON ENDGERÄTEN ANHAND AUTOMATISCH ÜBERMITTELTER INFORMATIONEN 487 PARTNER KÖNNEN DIESE FUNKTION NUTZEN Immer aktiv Ihr Endgerät kann zur Unterstützung der in diesem Rahmenwerk erläuterten Zwecke mithilfe von Informationen unterschieden werden, die es beim Zugriff auf das Internet automatisch übermittelt (z. B. die IP-Adresse Ihrer Internetverbindung oder die Art des Browsers, den Sie verwenden). Liste von IAB-Lieferanten Back Button COOKIE-LISTE Search Icon Filter Icon Clear checkbox label label Apply Cancel Consent Leg.Interest checkbox label label checkbox label label checkbox label label Meine Auswahl bestätigen