www.wired.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.130.194  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Skip to main content

Open Navigation Menu
Menu
Story Saved

To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.

Close Alert


A Vigilante Hacker Took Down North Korea’s Internet. Now He’s Taking Off His
Mask
 * Security
 * Politics
 * Gear
 * Backchannel
 * Business
 * Science
 * Culture
 * Ideas
 * Merch

Story Saved

To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.

Close Alert

Sign In

SUBSCRIBE


GET WIRED


FOR JUST $29.99 $5

SUBSCRIBE


Search
Search
 * Security
 * Politics
 * Gear
 * Backchannel
 * Business
 * Science
 * Culture
 * Ideas
 * Merch

 * Podcasts
 * Video
 * Newsletters
 * Magazine
 * Events
 * WIRED Insider
 * WIRED Consulting
 * Jobs
 * Coupons

Chevron
ON SALE NOWGet WIRED - now only $29.99 $5This is your last free article. See the
future here first with 1 year of unlimited access.SUBSCRIBE NOW
Already a subscriber? Sign in

Get WIRED - now only $29.99 $5. SUBSCRIBE NOW




Andy Greenberg

Security
Apr 4, 2024 5:00 AM


A VIGILANTE HACKER TOOK DOWN NORTH KOREA’S INTERNET. NOW HE’S TAKING OFF HIS
MASK

As “P4x,” Alejandro Caceres single-handedly disrupted the internet of an entire
country. Then he tried to show the US military how it can—and should—adopt his
methods.
Alejandro Caceres, the 38-year-old Colombian American cybersecurity entrepreneur
and hacker behind the P4x pseudonym.Photograph: Devin Christopher
Save this storySave
Save this storySave

A little over two years have passed since the online vigilante who would call
himself P4x fired the first shot in his own one-man cyberwar. Working alone in
his coastal Florida home in late January of 2022, wearing slippers and pajama
pants and periodically munching on Takis corn snacks, he spun up a set of
custom-built programs on his laptop and a collection of cloud-based servers that
intermittently tore offline every publicly visible website in North Korea and
would ultimately keep them down for more than a week.

P4x’s real identity, revealed here for the first time, is Alejandro Caceres, a
38-year-old Colombian-American cybersecurity entrepreneur with hacker tattoos on
both arms, unruly dark brown hair, a very high tolerance for risk, and a very
personal grudge. Like many other US hackers and security researchers, Caceres
had been personally targeted by North Korean spies who aimed to steal his
intrusion tools. He had detailed that targeting to the FBI but received no real
government support. So he decided to take matters into his own hands and to send
a message to the regime of Kim Jong Un: Messing with American hackers would have
consequences. “It felt like the right thing to do here,” Caceres told WIRED at
the time. “If they don’t see we have teeth, it’s just going to keep coming.”

North Korea Hacked Him. So He Took Down Its Internet

By Andy Greenberg

As he sought an outlet to broadcast that message to the Kim regime, Caceres told
his story to WIRED while he carried out his attack, providing screen-capture
videos and other evidence that he was, in fact, single-handedly disrupting the
internet of an entire country in real time. But it was only just before going
public that he decided to invent the P4x pseudonym for himself. The handle,
pronounced “pax,” was a cheeky allusion to his intention of forcing a kind of
peace with North Korea through the threat of his own punitive measures. He hoped
that by hiding behind that name, he might evade not just North Korean
retaliation but also criminal hacking charges from his own government.



Instead of prosecuting him, however, Caceres was surprised to find, in the wake
of his North Korean cyberattacks, the US government was more interested in
recruiting him. Caceres would spend much of the next year on a strange journey
into the secretive world of America’s state-sponsored hacking agencies. Adopted
informally by a Pentagon contractor, he was invited to present his techniques to
high-level US defense and intelligence officials. He carried out a long-term
hacking project designed to impress his new audience, hitting real foreign
targets. And he pitched Department of Defense officials on a mode of US
government-sanctioned cyberattacks that, like his solo North Korean takedown,
would be far leaner, faster, and arguably more effective than Washington’s slow
and risk-averse model of cyberwar.



Caceres worried after his attack on North Korea that the US government might
prosecute him. Instead, he was surprised to find that it was more interested in
recruiting him.

Photograph: Devin Christopher

Featured Video



Historian Breaks Down Napoleon's Battle Tactics



Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





Caceres’ pitch never got the green light. Now, partly due to his frustration
with that experience, he’s finally dropping his pseudonym to send a new message,
this one aimed at his fellow Americans: that the US government needs to wield
its hacking powers far more aggressively. “Both the NSA and the DOD have a ton
of talented hackers, yet when it comes to actually performing disruptive cyber
operations, for some reason we as a country are just frozen and scared,” Caceres
says. “And that needs to change.”



He points to ransomware actors, mostly based in Russia, who extracted more than
a billion dollars of extortion fees from victim companies in 2023 while
crippling hospitals and government agencies. North Korea–affiliated hackers,
meanwhile, stole another $1 billion in cryptocurrency last year, funneling
profits into the coffers of the Kim regime. All of that hacking against the
West, he argues, has been carried out with relative impunity. “We sit there
while they hack us,” Caceres says.



So Caceres is now arguing that it’s time for the US to try the P4x approach:
that a part of the solution to foreign cybersecurity threats is for the American
government’s own hackers to show their teeth—and to use them far more often.



Caceres and the Pentagon contractor that partnered with him—whose founder agreed
to talk to WIRED on the condition we not name him or his company—spent much of
the past two years advocating within the US government for that far-more-brazen
approach to state-sponsored cyberattacks. They describe it as a special forces
model: single hackers or small teams carrying out nimble, targeted digital
disruptions, in contrast to the US’s traditionally slower and more bureaucratic
approach to cyberwarfare.

“You can have an impact here, and it can be asymmetrical, and it can occur on a
much faster timescale,” summarizes the founder of the hacker startup that worked
with Caceres to pitch the Pentagon.

He cites a military principle that each member of a special forces unit should
have the effect of 16 conventional soldiers. “With what we and P4x were doing,
we wanted to increase that ratio a hundredfold,” he says. “And P4x would teach
other operators how to do it.”


P4X AMERICANA

In his public life as a security researcher, Caceres is known as a talented and
sometimes brash figure in the hacker community: The second-generation
Colombian-American, who used the hacker handle _hyp3ri0n long before he adopted
the P4x pseudonym, is the founder of the cybersecurity company Hyperion Gray and
a frequent speaker at events like the Defcon hacker conference, where he has
shared methods for lone hackers to amplify their reach and effects through cloud
services and high-performance computing clusters. He’s also the creator of a
somewhat controversial vulnerability scanning tool called PunkSpider, which he
announced at Defcon in 2021 that he intended to use to scan every website in the
world and publicly reveal all of their hackable vulnerabilities.

From the beginning of his hacker career, Caceres has never been one to shy away
from the most aggressive applications of the digital dark arts. His first job
out of college, while he pursued a graduate degree in international science and
technology policy, was working for a subsidiary of the notorious military
contractor formerly known as Blackwater, doing open-source intelligence
investigations for corporate security and executive protection—what he describes
as a “Google sweatshop.” Within a few years, however, Caceres and his firm
Hyperion Gray were getting grants from the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency, using his growing prowess in cloud and high-performance
computing to scan the dark web as part of Darpa’s Memex program devoted to
advancing search technologies for national security applications.

Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





In that dark-web scouring, Caceres says, he regularly came upon child sexual
abuse materials forums and even violent extremist content. He admits that he
didn’t hesitate to hack some of those sites, pulling data off their backend
servers and anonymously handing it to contacts at the Department of Homeland
Security. “That probably wasn’t 100 percent legal,” he says, “but I didn’t
necessarily give a fuck.”

Even his company's name, Hyperion Gray, reflected Caceres’ sense of the murky
territory in which he traveled: It combined his _hyp3ri0n hacker handle, the
name of a Titan from Greek mythology, with a shade in the middle of the spectrum
between ideas of whitehat and blackhat hacking.

So when North Korean hackers chose Caceres as one of their targets in 2021, it
was inevitable that he wouldn’t let that slight go unanswered. In January of
that year, a fellow hacker whom Caceres didn’t know approached him online
through a friend and asked if he’d take a look at what appeared to be an
interesting software exploitation program, offering it to Caceres to download. A
day or so later, Caceres read a blog post from Google’s Threat Analysis Group
warning that North Korean hackers were going after US security researchers in
what appeared to be an effort to steal their hacking tools and intel. Sure
enough, when Caceres checked the file he’d downloaded and run on his own
computer, he saw that it included a backdoor—only the fact that he’d quarantined
the program on his machine had protected him from being fully compromised.



A portrait taken of Caceres before he decided to publicly reveal his identity as
P4x.

Photograph: Devin Christopher

Caceres, appalled, reported the hacking attempt to the FBI. He says the bureau
ultimately did little more than a fact-finding interview with him, with no real
follow-up. So after nursing his grudge for a full year, he decided to take
matters into his own hands. In late January of 2022, he began running custom
hacking scripts designed to target a few key North Korean routers responsible
for internet traffic into and out of the country, repeatedly checking whether
they were online and, if they were, amplifying his waves of malicious data
requests to cause them to crash. He described the project to WIRED at the time
as about equivalent in workload to a “small-to-medium” size penetration test of
the kind Hyperion Gray would carry out for clients.

Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





North Korean watchers soon began to notice that the Hermit Kingdom’s entire web,
from its government portal to its state-run airline booking site, had been
knocked offline for days on end by an apparent cyberattack. News outlets
published stories that pointed to the country’s recent missile tests, implying
that the attack was perhaps the work of another country’s cyber forces—one news
site suggested the US or possibly China—to signal to North Korea that it should
stop threatening its neighbors. In reality, it was all the work of one aggrieved
Florida man in his pajamas.


A CYBER ARMY OF ONE

The US government may have had nothing to do with North Korea’s man-made
internet outage, but it quietly took an interest in it. In the weeks after WIRED
published its story about P4x’s solo hacking feat, Caceres began to receive
messages from hacker friends with connections to the Pentagon and intelligence
agencies—sent not to P4x but to Caceres’ own true-name accounts. Several
agencies, he was told, were intrigued by his work and interested in talking to
him.



For those in the know, identifying Caceres had been worryingly easy: He had
given away hints in posts to his Twitter account about his North Korean
targeting prior to his decision to hide it behind the P4x pseudonym. After P4x’s
public statements on the cyberattack, one fellow hacker had even posted
screenshots of Caceres’ now-deleted tweets, though without spelling out what
exactly they revealed.

One friend had discussed Caceres’ work with a high-ranking military official and
told Caceres there was someone the official now wanted Caceres to talk to: a
longtime military intelligence contractor who had done contract work for the
Joint Special Operations Command, which oversees groups like the Army’s Delta
Force and the Navy’s Seal Team Six. WIRED agreed to call him Angus, though that
isn’t his real name.

A few weeks after his North Korea attack, Caceres met Angus in the offices of
Angus’ Pentagon-funded hacker startup. Angus began by warning Caceres that he
was potentially in danger of reprisal from the North Korean state and that he
should be wary of the possibility of a physical attack that might be made to
look like a mugging, or of someone tampering with his prescription medications.
“Before that, I was nervous,” Caceres says. “After that, I was shit-scared.”
Angus suggested the hacker ought to arm himself. (Caceres, not one for half
measures, later bought three guns and multiple bulletproof vests.)

Angus quizzed Caceres about his past hacking activities, his allegiance to other
governments—he said he didn’t have any—and his politics. He specifically asked
Caceres if he was a Marxist. Caceres confirmed he was not. With that brief
vetting out of the way, they went out for drinks and talked late into that night
about what a P4x-style US special forces hacker team might look like and what
sort of work they might do together to demonstrate that model to the Department
of Defense.

Soon after, Angus convened a meeting of military and intelligence staff at his
startup’s office, where they listened to a presentation from Caceres. Standing
before an audience of officials from Cyber Command, Special Operations Command,
the NSA, and the Marines' Cyberspace Command known as Marforcyber, he detailed
his North Korean hacking project as a case study and laid out principles for how
it could be replicated: Aim for “easy and impactful.” Minimize the number of
“cooks in the kitchen.” Iterate rapidly. He laid out a timeline for operations
that suggested assembling teams of two to four hackers, with support from
researchers and analysts, and taking just a few days to plan an operation.

Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





“For the US government, any execution on target is typically a six-month
process. P4x did it in two weeks,” says Angus. “The whole point was that he can
show them how to do it, and if they wanted to they could fund it and see it
happen.”

The response to the presentation was positive, if somewhat cynical, according to
Angus. “Most of them put their faces in their palms when they realized what he’d
done and how he did it, and the only thing that stopped them from doing it was
bureaucracy,” he says. Caceres remembers that one audience member responded with
a joke: that Caceres forgot the step where he presents a 100-slide PowerPoint
deck to someone who doesn’t understand what he’s talking about and then denies
him authorization.


TOO HOT FOR THE DOD

After that initial presentation, Caceres gave a similar talk at MIT Lincoln
Laboratory, a Pentagon-funded R&D lab, and then was invited to speak again near
DC, this time to a larger audience of military and intelligence officials. That
last speaking engagement was delayed due to paperwork and would ultimately never
happen—in part because Caceres was by then busy with a more hands-on
demonstration.



In fact, while Angus sought funding for their project, Caceres was targeting
another foreign adversary to show the full extent of the cyber mayhem a small
team could inflict. Over the next year, he and another hacker who goes by the
handle tu3sday undertook a broad intrusion campaign whose details they both
declined to describe.

Caceres and tu3sday did much of that hacking in the offices of Angus’ startup,
visiting the site dozens of times over the next year. But Caceres says that the
work was never officially carried out with the company’s approval or
involvement, much less the Pentagon’s. “The message I got was that it was a
‘don’t get caught, we’ll disavow all knowledge’ sort of thing," Caceres says.

Meanwhile, Angus found that he was running into roadblocks in his attempts to
get more official support for their experiment. “The initial response was, ‘We
should be doing that,’” he says. But as he “talked it up a very long chain, all
the way to very senior people to see if they were amenable to it, most of them
were not.”

Angus says he’s still not sure why their project didn’t gain traction. He
believes it was only partly a considered decision by the Pentagon not to engage
in the more aggressive and freewheeling hacking operations that they’d proposed.
He thinks the resistance can be explained at least as much by the Department of
Defense’s sclerotic management and the difficulty of convincing it to try
anything new that involves risk. “There were forces that were nebulous even to
me, and people wanted different things, and there was a lot of risk-aversion,”
says Angus. “Bureaucracy was 100 percent a factor. They were trying to dilute
liability.”

After nearly a year of Angus’ efforts to find funding for the project and
failing, Caceres says he gave up and ended his visits to the startup. “We had
something really powerful to share here, and something they really need,” he
says of the US military. “And nothing really came of it.”

Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





WIRED reached out to the Department of Defense, Cyber Command, and the NSA, but
none responded to our requests for comment.


A TRICKY TRILEMMA

Even after hitting that brick wall, Caceres hasn’t given up on his pitch. He has
come forward, now speaking to WIRED under his own name, in an attempt to
rekindle the idea of American “special forces” hackers: He still imagines small
teams who make the lives of ransomware gangs hell by repeatedly targeting and
destroying their servers and personal computers, or breaking into the wallets of
North Korea–linked hackers to steal back the hundreds of millions of dollars in
cryptocurrency that they routinely take from US victims. He also suggests that
US cyber forces could easily, like P4x, take down North Korea’s internet for
extended periods in response to every major theft until Kim’s state-sponsored
thieves are forced to stop. “Like, every time they steal a hundred million
dollars we shut down their internet for a year,” says Caceres. “Let’s figure out
what kind of disruption makes them think twice about doing this.”

Caceres even argues that this sort of deterrent response could be used in answer
to Russian or North Korean misbehavior in the physical world, such as war crimes
or human rights abuses. Most radically, he argues that US cyber targeting
shouldn’t be confined to military, government, or even criminal targets: that
civilian infrastructure should be fair game, too. He says the effects of those
attacks should be thought of not as “cyberwar” but as simply another kind of
trade embargo or sanctions. “Exactly as we’re withholding certain goods and
businesses from Russia right now,” Caceres says, “we could be withholding the
internet.”



On his right arm, Caceres has tattoos of his pre-P4x hacker handles. On his
left, he has a cryptographic hash—a long string of numbers and letters—that
encodes a word. He invites WIRED readers to try to crack it.

Photograph: Devin Christopher

Those with a less run-and-gun approach to cyber policy, of course, cite some
valid reasons why the Pentagon might hesitate to adopt the P4x model of
state-sponsored hacking. If US Cyber Command took up Caceres’ notion of
attacking civilian targets, for instance, it could be accused of war crimes,
just as some have said about Russia’s cyberattacks against Ukraine, argues
Jacquelyn Schneider, a cyber conflict researcher at Stanford’s Hoover
Institution. Not only would indiscriminate attacks on civilians be arguably
immoral, she points out, they’d potentially invite other countries to do the
same, or worse.

Most Popular
 * Security
   Roku Breach Hits 567,000 Users
   
   Andy Greenberg

 * Science
   The Quest to Map the Inside of the Proton
   
   Charlie Wood

 * Security
   How Israel Defended Against Iran's Drone and Missile Attack
   
   Brian Barrett

 * Culture
   The 16 Best Movies on Amazon Prime Right Now
   
   Matt Kamen

 * 





“That's not nice, and it’s not a good norm,” says Schneider. She says that much
of the US government’s slow approach to cyberattacks stems from its care to
ensure it avoids unintentionally hitting civilians as well as breaking
international law or triggering dangerous blowback.



Still, Schneider concedes that Caceres and Angus have a point: The US could be
using its cyber forces more, and some of the explanations for why it doesn’t
amount to bureaucracy. “There are good reasons, and then there are bad reasons,”
says Schneider. "Like, we have complicated organizational politics, we don’t
know how to do things differently, we’re bad at using this type of talent, we’ve
been doing it this way for 50 years, and it worked well for dropping bombs.”

America’s offensive hacking has, by all appearances, gotten less aggressive and
less nimble over the past half decade, Schneider points out. Starting in 2018,
for instance, General Paul Nakasone, then the head of Cyber Command, advocated a
“defend forward” strategy aimed at taking cyber conflict to the enemy’s network
rather than waiting for it to occur on America’s turf. In those years, Cyber
Command launched disruptive hacking operations designed to cripple Russia’s
disinformation-spouting Internet Research Agency troll farm and take down the
infrastructure of the Trickbot ransomware group, which some feared at the time
might be used to interfere in the 2020 election. Since then, however, Cyber
Command and other US military hackers appear to have gone relatively quiet,
often leaving the response to foreign hackers to law enforcement agencies like
the FBI, which face far more legal constraints.

Caceres isn’t entirely wrong to criticize that more conservative stance, says
Jason Healey, who until February served as a senior cybersecurity strategist at
the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. He responds to Caceres’
cyberhawk arguments by citing the Subversive Trilemma, an idea laid out in a
2021 paper by the researcher Lennart Maschmeyer: Hacking operations have to
choose among intensity, speed, and control. Even in earlier, more aggressive
years, US Cyber Command has tended to turn up the dial for control, Healey says,
prioritizing it over those other variables. But he notes there may in fact be
certain targets—such as ransomware gangs or hackers working for Russia’s
no-holds-barred GRU military intelligence agency—who might warrant resetting
those dials. “For those targets,” says Healey, “you really can release the
hounds.”


P4X IS DEAD, VIVA P4X

As for Caceres himself, he says he’s not opposed to American hacking agencies
taking a conservative approach to limiting their damage or protecting
civilians—as long as they take action. “There's being conservative,” he says,
“and then there's doing fuck all.”

On the argument that more aggressive cyberattacks would lead to escalation and
counterattacks from foreign hackers, Caceres points to the attacks those foreign
hackers are already carrying out. The ransomware group AlphV's catastrophic
attack on Change Healthcare in February, for instance, crippled medical claim
platforms for hundreds of providers and hospitals, effects about as disruptive
for civilians as any cyberattack can be. “That escalation is already happening,”
Caceres says. “We’re not doing anything, and they’re still escalating.”

Caceres says he hasn’t entirely given up on convincing someone in the US
government to adopt his more gloves-off approach. Ditching the P4x handle and
revealing his real name is, in some sense, his last-ditch attempt to get the US
government’s attention and restart the conversation.

But he also says he won’t be waiting for the Pentagon’s approval before he
continues that approach on his own. “If I keep going with this alone, or with
just a few people that I trust, I can move a lot faster,” he says. “I can fuck
shit up for the people who deserve it, and I don't have to report to anyone.”

The P4x handle may be dead, in other words. But the P4x doctrine of cyberwarfare
lives on.






YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE …

 * Navigate election season with our Politics Lab newsletter and podcast

 * Think Google’s “Incognito mode” protects your privacy? Think again

 * Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment and assault in Antarctica

 * The earth will feast on dead cicadas

 * Upgrading your Mac? Here’s what you should spend your money on

Andy Greenberg is a senior writer for WIRED covering hacking, cybersecurity, and
surveillance. He’s the author of the new book Tracers in the Dark: The Global
Hunt for the Crime Lords of Cryptocurrency. His last book was *Sandworm: A New
Era of Cyberwar and the Hunt for the Kremlin's Most... Read more
Senior Writer
 * X

Topicshackerscybersecuritynational securityNSAdepartment of defensecyberwarnorth
korea
More from WIRED
The US Government Has a Microsoft Problem
Microsoft has stumbled through a series of major cybersecurity failures over the
past few years. Experts say the US government’s reliance on its systems means
the company continues to get a free pass.

Eric Geller

Trump Loyalists Kill Vote on US Wiretap Program
An attempt to reauthorize Section 702, the so-called crown jewel of US spy
powers, failed for a third time in the House of Representatives after former
president Donald Trump criticized the law.

Dell Cameron

Judges Block US Extradition of WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange—for Now
A high court in London says the WikiLeaks founder won’t be extradited
“immediately” and the US must provide more “assurances” about any extradition.

Dell Cameron


House Votes to Extend—and Expand—a Major US Spy Program
The US House of Representatives voted on Friday to extend the Section 702 spy
program. It passed without an amendment that would have required the FBI to
obtain a warrant to access Americans’ information.

Dell Cameron

Apple Chip Flaw Leaks Secret Encryption Keys
Plus: The Biden administration warns of nationwide attacks on US water systems,
a new Russian wiper malware emerges, and China-linked hackers wage a global
attack spree.

Andrew Couts

Some of the Most Popular Websites Share Your Data With Over 1,500 Companies
Cookie pop-ups now show the number of “partners” that websites may share data
with. Here's how many of these third-party companies may get your data from some
of the most popular sites online.

Matt Burgess

The XZ Backdoor: Everything You Need to Know
Details are starting to emerge about a stunning supply chain attack that sent
the open source software community reeling.

Dan Goodin, Ars Technica

‘Malicious Activity’ Hits the University of Cambridge’s Medical School
Multiple university departments linked to the Clinical School Computing Service
have been inaccessible for a month. The university has not revealed the nature
of the “malicious activity.”

Matt Burgess







ONE YEAR FOR $29.99 $5

SUBSCRIBE
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. It is the essential source of information
and ideas that make sense of a world in constant transformation. The WIRED
conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our
lives—from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and
innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and
new industries.

More From WIRED

 * Subscribe
 * Newsletters
 * FAQ
 * WIRED Staff
 * Editorial Standards
 * Archive
 * RSS
 * Accessibility Help

Reviews and Guides

 * Reviews
 * Buying Guides
 * Coupons
 * Mattresses
 * Electric Bikes
 * Fitness Trackers
 * Streaming Guides

 * Advertise
 * Contact Us
 * Customer Care
 * Jobs
 * Press Center
 * Condé Nast Store
 * User Agreement
 * Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement
 * Your California Privacy Rights

© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from
products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate
Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior
written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices

SELECT INTERNATIONAL SITE

United StatesLargeChevron
 * Italia
 * Japón
 * Czech Republic & Slovakia

 * Facebook
 * X
 * Pinterest
 * YouTube
 * Instagram
 * Tiktok


Manage Preferences





WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our 167 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as
unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your
choices by clicking below or at any time in the privacy policy page. These
choices will be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data.More
Information


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO PROVIDE:

Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for
identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised
advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research
and services development. List of Partners (vendors)

I Accept
Show Purposes
Continue without Accepting