www.lawtimesnews.com Open in urlscan Pro
104.26.13.24  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

/newsletter

<form class="newsletter__item" action="/newsletter">
  <div class="newsletter__item__input">
    <input name="email" type="email" class="form-control" placeholder="Enter your email address here">
  </div>
  <div class="newsletter__item__btn">
    <button type="submit" class="btn btn-inline btn-inline--orange">SIGN UP</button>
  </div>
</form>

<form class="sj-search-form">
  <div id="sj-search-bar"> <span id="sj-icon-search"></span> <input data-sj-search-query="" type="search" placeholder="search this site"> <button data-sj-search-query-go="" type="submit" class="sj-search-go blue">Search</button> </div>
</form>

Text Content

CONTINUE TO SITE

CONTINUE TO SITE

CANADIAN LAWYER| LEXPERT
 * NEWS
    * News
    * Features

 * PRACTICE AREAS
    * ADR
    * Corporate commercial
    * Criminal
    * Environmental
    * Family
    * Human rights
    * Insurance
    * Labour and employment
    * Litigation
    * Medical malpractice
    * Personal injury
    * Privacy and data
    * Real estate
    * Trusts and estates

 * EVENTS
 * JOBS
 * RESOURCES
    * Practice management
    * Professional regulation
    * Legal education
    * Multimedia

 * SUBSCRIBE

 1. 
 2. Professional regulation


LSO DISCLOSES INTERNAL DOCUMENTS SOUGHT IN BENCHER MURRAY KLIPPENSTEIN’S LAWSUIT



Bencher sued for documents associated with legal regulator's equity, diversity,
and inclusion initiatives

Murray Klippenstein
BY Aidan Macnab 12 Feb 2024
Share


The Law Society of Ontario has reversed course and disclosed to bencher Murray
Klippenstein the internal documents related to its equity, diversity, and
inclusion (EDI) programs that he sued the regulator in 2022 to obtain. 

Klippenstein sought the documents when he was elected bencher in 2019 because he
says he was concerned about the integrity and validity of studies and surveys
which formed the backdrop of a package of EDI policies the law society adopted
in 2016. The law society’s position was that it was up to Convocation to decide
whether to disclose them. He brought a claim to the Superior Court arguing that,
based on statutory and common law and the principles of good governance, he was
entitled to the information as a director of the corporation because it was
necessary to allow him to carry out his due diligence and oversight role.

Klippenstein filed his statement of claim in June 2022 and followed up with a
motion for summary judgment last April. Through their legal counsel, the law
society delivered hundreds of pages of the requested documentation to
Klippenstein’s Edmonton-based lawyer, William Kenny. The law society also agreed
to pay Klippenstein’s legal costs.



“The several hundred pages of documents, which I'm still going through,
unfortunately, confirm the indications I've had for years, which is that some of
the major studies behind the Law Society's EDI programs and policies are, sadly,
deeply misleading,” says Klippenstein. “The actual database for the major survey
of the profession, which is the foundation of all our EDI programs, was not
disclosed before this. I now see the numbers. It's a bit shocking.”

“The actual numbers in the survey were hidden from us in the reports, and they
undermine what the reports said,” he says. “I'm kind of not surprised that they
were hidden.”

Law Society of Ontario spokesperson Jennifer Wing declined Law Times’ request
for an interview. She says the law society would not comment as the litigation
remains before the court.

Many of the documents Klippenstein requested were related to a 2013 survey that
helped inform a working group exploring challenges faced by racialized lawyers
and paralegals. The working group’s report, “Working Together for Change:
Strategies to Address Issues of Systemic Racism in the Legal Professions,”
included 13 recommendations for law society policy.

In his claim, Klippenstein alleged statistical deficiencies in the 2013 survey,
including a six-percent response rate; a failure to note the number of people
surveyed; a self-selected, rather than random, sample; a failure to
differentiate between lawyers and paralegals; and a failure to mention or assess
the significance of non-response.


MOST READ

ONT. COURT OF APPEAL RULING CLARIFIES LAW AROUND MAREVA ORDERS, SAYS LAWYER

LSO DISCLOSES INTERNAL DOCUMENTS SOUGHT IN BENCHER MURRAY KLIPPENSTEIN’S LAWSUIT

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT CLARIFIES PUBLIC POLICY MATTERS IN AWARDING COSTS IN
ESTATE LITIGATION



Among the 13 policy recommendations resulting from the working group report was
the “statement of principles” – that the law society require every licensee to
“adopt and abide by a statement of principles acknowledging their obligation to
promote equality, diversity, and inclusion generally, and in their behaviour
towards colleagues, employees, clients and the public.” Convocation repealed the
requirement in 2019. Also among the recommendations was a requirement that
workplaces have a diversity policy, complete an EDI self-assessment every two
years, and the LSO publish a public inclusion index based on workplace surveys
every four years.

When he was elected as bencher on the StopSOP slate of candidates promising to
repeal the statement of principles, Klippenstein requested the documentation but
was rebuffed. The law society’s treasurer said she lacked the authority to hand
over the material and referred the request to the strategic planning and
advisory committee (SPAC), which would consider it and make a recommendation to
Convocation. In response to Klippenstein’s claim, the law society argued that it
was up to Convocation to decide whether he required the requested documents to
fulfill his obligations as a bencher.

Klippenstein argued that as a bencher, he is an officer of the law society
corporation and has the right to access and obtain any documents or records
necessary to fulfill that role.

“The Law Society did not give a reason for its sudden change in position in now
giving me the documents after years of resistance,” says Klippenstein. “I don't
know what the Law Society's exact thinking was, but I've maintained for years
that I, as a bencher, have important information rights.

“I am seeking full indemnity costs because I think it was reprehensible that I
didn't get this information.”
 





RELATED STORIES

 * Good Governance Coalition sweeps Law Society of Ontario bencher election
 * Law Society of Ontario denied injunction to spare trees at Osgoode Hall


FREE NEWSLETTER

Our newsletter is FREE and keeps you up to date on all the developments in the
Ontario legal community. Please enter your email address below to subscribe.
SIGN UP
Fetching comments...
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


RECENT ARTICLES & VIDEO

INSURANCE COVERAGE CLARITY HELPING TO ADDRESS RIDESHARE-RELATED INJURY CASES,
SAYS JASMINE DAYA

LSO DISCLOSES INTERNAL DOCUMENTS SOUGHT IN BENCHER MURRAY KLIPPENSTEIN’S LAWSUIT

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT REJECTS CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY’S BID TO OVERTURN
ARBITRATION DECISION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT REFUSES TO APPOINT A REPRESENTATIVE IN A PERSONAL INJURY
CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT DISMISSES PRIVACY BREACH CASE AGAINST FINANCIAL DUE
DILIGENCE DATABASE

ONTARIO EXPANDS INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES WITH NEW HAGUE CONVENTION
RATIFICATION


MOST READ ARTICLES

ONT. COURT OF APPEAL RULING CLARIFIES LAW AROUND MAREVA ORDERS, SAYS LAWYER

07 Feb 2024

LSO DISCLOSES INTERNAL DOCUMENTS SOUGHT IN BENCHER MURRAY KLIPPENSTEIN’S LAWSUIT

12 Feb 2024

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT CLARIFIES PUBLIC POLICY MATTERS IN AWARDING COSTS IN
ESTATE LITIGATION

07 Feb 2024

SUPERIOR COURT DECLINES REQUEST FOR FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES RECORDS IN
PERSONAL INJURY CASE

07 Feb 2024

 * Canadian Lawyer Magazine
 * Canadian Law List
 * Lexpert® Rising Stars
 * Canadian Law Awards

 * Newsletter
 * Authors
 * Sitemap
 * RSS

 * Advertise
 * About us
 * Contact us
 * Privacy
 * Terms of Use
 * Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2024 KM Business Information Canada Ltd.


×
Search