www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
104.111.250.82  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content
Search Navigation
Democracy Dies in Darkness

Subscribe

Sign in



Advertisement


Close
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
Elections
Midterms 2022
Results by stateChevronDown
Senate
House
Governors
Abortion access
Election deniers
Where votes remain
Democracy in America


GEORGIA’S RUNOFF SYSTEM WAS CREATED TO DILUTE BLACK VOTING POWER


TWO BLACK MEN ARE COMPETING FOR A U.S. SENATE SEAT IN A PROCESS CRAFTED BY
SEGREGATIONISTS TO STIFLE BLACK POLITICAL POWER

By Matthew Brown
December 5, 2022 at 3:06 p.m. EST

People wait in line to vote on the first day of early voting for the runoff on
Nov. 26 in Marietta, Ga. (Elijah Nouvelage for The Washington Post)
Listen
10 min
Comment on this story
Comment
64
Gift Article
Share

ATLANTA — Tuesday’s showdown between Sen. Raphael G. Warnock (D) and Republican
challenger Herschel Walker is the product of an unusual general election runoff
system that was pushed by a powerful Georgia segregationist who sought to blunt
the power of Black voters in the 1960s.


WpGet the full experience.Choose your planArrowRight


While 10 states use runoffs in primary elections, Georgia and Louisiana are the
only two that do so in general elections. Georgia’s system was created in 1964
after the urging of Denmark Groover, who blamed Black voters for a reelection
loss and proposed runoffs. Groover later acknowledged the runoff system was
intended to suppress Black political representation.



While runoff elections had existed for decades in Southern primaries, Georgia’s
enthusiastic adoption of two-round voting came as a way of “ensuring a
conservative White candidate won an election,” said Ashton Ellett, a political
historian and archivist at the University of Georgia.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“A runoff makes it harder for folks who have less resources to vote. This was
before advanced in-person voting or [voting was offered] by mail and when we had
many other unfair, iniquitous, undemocratic policies. It wasn’t for a partisan
advantage so much as an ideological and cultural one,” Ellett said.

Now, 58 years later, that system is part of the first race in history where two
Black men are competing for a U.S. Senate seat, after neither Warnock nor Walker
garnered 50 percent of the vote in last month’s election. Walker was born just
before the system was created, and Warnock was born soon after. Neither has
discussed the system on the trail, and neither campaign has responded to
requests for comment on Georgia’s use of runoffs.

Runoffs are common in Georgia’s local and down-ballot races, like contests for
the General Assembly, but the race between Warnock and Walker is only the 12th
statewide runoff since the system was enacted.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Voting rights groups have been pushing to get rid of the system. State officials
estimate that administering another election will cost taxpayers at least $10
million, and campaigns and political groups are expected to spend even more than
that.

Georgia’s Senate race is heading to a runoff. Here’s how it will work.

“Off-cycle elections, that is, elections not held in November of midterm or
presidential years, historically see lower turnout overall and especially low
turnout for racial and ethnic minority groups,” said Bernard Fraga, a professor
of political science at Emory University who studies voter turnout and
demographics.

The system added intentional friction to the democratic process and provides “a
second chance for the majority group to consolidate support and stymies efforts
by numerical minorities to build a winning coalition,” Fraga said.




The flurry of election changes that delivered Georgia a runoff system came amid
a fierce national fight over voting rights and discrimination in the 1960s. The
years-long work of activists as part of the Civil Rights movement had brought
national attention to the struggle of Black Americans in the South and greater
scrutiny of the region’s discriminatory policies and entrenched White
segregationist elite. Past techniques used to politically disenfranchise Black
Americans, including primaries only open to White voters, selectively applied
poll taxes, literacy tests and acts of terrorism, were now outlawed or less
effective. The proportion of Black Georgians registered to vote in 1960 was 29
percent, according to the New Georgia Encyclopedia, an educational website
written and reviewed by scholars; by 1964, that number had risen to 44 percent.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“The creativity of White, Southern politicians, for over 100 years, in figuring
out ways to, first, keep Black people from voting and then trying to make it as
difficult and burdensome as they can without it appearing racist, and a
violation of the Constitution, is breathtaking,” said Steven Lawson, a professor
emeritus of history at Rutgers University, who served as an expert witness in a
Justice Department suit challenging Georgia’s runoff system in 1990.



Most pressing, major civil rights legislation was being hotly debated in
Congress while the Supreme Court had just scrapped Georgia’s county unit
electoral system, akin to a county-based electoral college that gave
disproportionate weight to voters in the state’s many rural, predominantly White
counties. The court ruled in 1963 that the system disproportionately empowered
rural White voters over Black voters and those in urban areas like Fulton
County, home to Atlanta. It was the first of the high court’s “one person, one
vote” rulings that mandated state voting systems and congressional districts
weigh each vote roughly equally.

Georgia needed a new electoral system. In stepped Groover, one of the state’s
most influential legislators and a hard-line segregationist.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“He had been a leading segregationist. He was the single leading proponent of
the county unit system. He sponsored school segregation bills, and he was a
sponsor of the bill that changed the [Georgia state] flag” to add the
Confederate battle emblem in 1958, said J. Morgan Kousser, a historian and
social scientist at the California Institute of Technology who served as an
expert witness in cases challenging the runoff system and many other civil
rights cases across the South.

Groover “may have been the smartest, or the hardest-working legislator in the
chamber,” according to Charles Bullock, a professor of political science at the
University of Georgia, who has researched and written multiple books on Georgia
politics, including a book on the runoff system.

“He read all the legislation and would ask pointed, often challenging questions
of legislators, so much so his name became a verb: 'To Grooverize,’” said
Bullock.

Yet his influence in the legislature was interrupted in 1958, when Groover lost
his reelection bid to another White candidate, which Groover blamed on “bloc
voting,” a euphemism he later admitted in court meant Black voters supporting
his more moderate rival by enough votes to defeat him in a tight plurality
election.




Even with little access to the ballot, a marginal number of Black voters could
help elect a less hard-line segregationist in parts of the South, Kousser said.
Headlines in the Macon Telegraph chronicled the “bloc voting controversy” in
which Groover and his supporters effectively argued that Black votes were
tantamount to fraud.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



After a later reelection, Groover proposed a bill enacting runoff elections to
stop “bloc voting” in any new system. A 1964 election law study committee
adopted a version of Groover’s proposal weeks before the Civil Rights Act of
1964 was passed.

“When the county system went, people like Groover were looking for ways to make
sure that Black voting power was diluted,” said Lawson.

The system was codified in the state constitution through a 1968 referendum
after Georgia’s political machine was shocked by the chaotic 1966 election of
Lester Maddox, a populist arch-segregationist, as governor. Much of the state’s
political establishment believed Maddox would have lost in a runoff to a less
outspoken segregationist, Bullock said, but the governorship was the only office
the 1964 changes hadn’t applied to because of a 19th-century legal quirk.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Groover was so committed to the state’s defunct electoral laws that as the 1964
legislative session ended, signaling the end of the county unit system and amid
a tense congressional redistricting fight, Groover crawled across the chamber’s
balcony to remove its official clock in a symbolic show of stopping time in its
place.

From its start through the 1980s, civil rights groups argued the process was
intentionally burdensome on counties, campaigns and Black political activists.
Coupled with policies like harsh gerrymandering and countywide elections, many
Black candidates outside Atlanta found it difficult to succeed alongside the
state’s still byzantine election rules.

The system came under federal scrutiny in 1990, when the Justice Department and
American Civil Liberties Union jointly sued Georgia over its runoff policy,
describing the practice writ large as a means of exhausting and diluting Black
votes. A key part of that litigation: admissions from Groover who late in life
openly acknowledged the racial motivations behind his policies.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



According to a court deposition, Groover told federal investigators that “I was
a segregationist. I was a county unit man. But if you want to establish if I was
racially prejudiced, I was. If you want to establish that some of my political
activity was racially motivated, it was.”

The department lost in federal trial and appeals court. Judges accepted the
state’s defense that the system was created to combat corruption in the county
unit system.

“The judge was willing to believe that while Groover was a racist, he wasn’t
responsible for this system,” Lawson said.

In 1992, the state legislature changed the threshold for a runoff, requiring a
candidate to earn at least 45 percent of votes instead of 50 percent. But
Republicans changed it back in 1996 after narrowly losing a Senate race. The
effort was led by then-governor Sonny Perdue (R), whose cousin, David Perdue,
narrowly lost a 2021 runoff election for U.S. Senate to Democrat Jon Ossoff.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



In 2021, Georgia Republicans passed a sweeping and controversial voter law that
shortened the time between an election and a runoff from nine weeks to four,
leading to confusion and stress for election administrators.

Georgia’s governing Republicans have largely avoided the issue during
legislative sessions and skirted answering whether they support the runoff
system, though they keep the door open about whether the process can be
reformed. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) and his staff “will
be looking at the entire process for possible improvements once this one is
successfully complete,” said Mike Hassinger, a spokesman.

Voting rights groups in Georgia overwhelmingly support abolishing runoffs. While
many activists would like Georgia to name winners based on whoever gets the most
votes, as happens in most states, others see this as an opportunity to implement
ranked-choice voting or another system.

“It needs to go. It needs to change,” said Hillary Holley, executive director of
Care In Action, a voting rights and labor group. “It is a relic of Jim Crow, it
is suppressive, inefficient and is also fiscally irresponsible. It needs to just
go away.”


THE 2022 MIDTERM ELECTIONS

Georgia runoff election: A runoff between Sen. Raphael G. Warnock (D) and
Republican challenger Herschel Walker on Dec. 6 will cap a turbulent election
year. Here’s how the runoff will work and a look at Warnock and Walker’s paths
to victory.

Divided government: Republicans narrowly won back control of the House, while
Democrats will keep control of the Senate, creating a split Congress.

What the results mean for 2024: A Republican Party red wave seems to be a ripple
after Republicans fell short in the Senate and narrowly won control in the
House. Donald Trump announced his 2024 presidential campaign on Tuesday, experts
helped us game out what would happen if he wins again.




64 Comments
GiftOutline
Gift Article
Georgia Senate runoff
HAND CURATED
 * Post Politics Now: Warnock, Walker make final pitches in Georgia Senate
   runoff
   December 5, 2022
   
   
   Post Politics Now: Warnock, Walker make final pitches in Georgia Senate
   runoff
   December 5, 2022
 * When to expect results from Georgia’s Senate runoff
   December 5, 2022
   
   
   When to expect results from Georgia’s Senate runoff
   December 5, 2022
 * What Georgia’s past two Senate contests tell us about the runoff
   December 5, 2022
   
   
   What Georgia’s past two Senate contests tell us about the runoff
   December 5, 2022

View 3 more stories




Subscribe to comment and get the full experience. Choose your plan →


View more

Loading...
Advertisement


Advertisement

live updatespoliticsChevronRight

11:07 PM

THE LATEST: TRUMP’S COMMITTEE PAYING FOR LAWYERS OF KEY MAR-A-LAGO WITNESSES

10:52 PMThe latest: Biden calls into Ga. radio station, touting Democrats’
record
10:39 PMAnalysis: What does ‘woke’ mean? Whatever Ron DeSantis wants.
10:38 PMTake a look: What to know about Congress’s push to protect ‘Dreamers’
10:22 PMThe latest: Walker steps up campaign appearances on eve of runoff
TOP STORIES
The Briefing
Don’t miss reporting and analysis from the Hill and the White House.
Social Security offices critical to disability benefits hit breaking point


Ukraine live briefing: Missile attack causes power, water outages in Ukraine;
blasts reported at Russian air bases


Analysis|Biden shakes up the primary calendar and insulates himself from
challengers


Refresh
Try a different topic

Sign in or create a free account to save your preferences
Advertisement


Advertisement

Company
 * About The Post
 * Newsroom Policies & Standards
 * Diversity and Inclusion
 * Careers
 * Media & Community Relations
 * WP Creative Group
 * Accessibility Statement

Get The Post
 * 
 * Become a Subscriber
 * Gift Subscriptions
 * Mobile & Apps
 * Newsletters & Alerts
 * Washington Post Live
 * Reprints & Permissions
 * Post Store
 * Books & E-Books
 * Newspaper in Education
 * Print Archives (Subscribers Only)
 * e-Replica
 * Today’s Paper
 * Public Notices

Contact Us
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Contact the Opinions team
 * Advertise
 * Licensing & Syndication
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability

Terms of Use
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices

washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices








THE WASHINGTON POST CARES ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY

We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique
IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices
by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate interest is
used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled
to our partners and will not affect browsing data.


WE AND OUR PARTNERS PROCESS DATA TO PROVIDE:

Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Select basic ads. Store
and/or access information on a device. Create a personalised ads profile. Select
personalised ads. Create a personalised content profile. Select personalised
content. Measure ad performance. Measure content performance. Apply market
research to generate audience insights. Develop and improve products. View list
of partners

I accept Disable all Manage cookies