dl.acm.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
172.64.145.167
Public Scan
URL:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1322432.1322433
Submission: On May 22 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Submission: On May 22 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis 3 forms found in the DOM
Name: defaultQuickSearch — GET /action/doSearch
<form action="/action/doSearch" name="defaultQuickSearch" method="get" title="Quick Search" class="quick-search--form">
<div class="quick-search--input">
<div class="input-group option-0"><label for="AllFieldf73847c0-d936-48ec-9bf9-139b3828507f" class="sr-only">Search ACM Digital Library</label><input type="search" autocomplete="off" id="AllFieldf73847c0-d936-48ec-9bf9-139b3828507f-cloned"
name="AllField" placeholder="Search ACM Digital Library" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3" data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3"
data-group-titles-conf="3" value="" class="auto-complete quick-search__input cloned-with-ids"></div>
</div>
<div class="quick-search--button"><button type="submit" title="Search" aria-label="Search" class="btn quick-search__button icon-Icon_Search"><span class="sr-only">Search</span><span>Search</span></button></div>
</form>Name: defaultQuickSearch — GET /action/doSearch
<form action="/action/doSearch" name="defaultQuickSearch" method="get" title="Quick Search" class="quick-search--form cloned hidden-xs hidden-sm">
<div class="quick-search--input">
<div class="input-group option-0"><label for="AllFieldf73847c0-d936-48ec-9bf9-139b3828507f" class="sr-only">Search ACM Digital Library</label>
<div class="autoComplete_wrapper" role="combobox" aria-owns="autoComplete_list_1" aria-haspopup="true" aria-expanded="false" aria-label="Enter a text or select an option"><input type="search" autocomplete="off"
id="AllFieldf73847c0-d936-48ec-9bf9-139b3828507f" name="AllField" placeholder="Search ACM Digital Library" data-auto-complete-max-words="7" data-auto-complete-max-chars="32" data-contributors-conf="3" data-topics-conf="3"
data-publication-titles-conf="3" data-history-items-conf="3" data-group-titles-conf="3" value="" class="auto-complete quick-search__input" aria-controls="autoComplete_list_1" aria-autocomplete="both"></div>
</div>
<ul id="autoComplete_list_1" role="listbox" hidden="" class="autoComplete rlist"></ul>
</div>
<div class="quick-search--button"><button type="submit" title="Search" aria-label="Search" class="btn quick-search__button icon-Icon_Search"><span class="sr-only">Search</span><span>Search</span></button></div>
</form>POST /action/exportCiteProcCitation
<form action="/action/exportCiteProcCitation" method="post" target="_blank"><input type="hidden" name="content" value=""><input type="hidden" name="dois" value=""><input type="hidden" name="format" value="">
<fieldset class="input-group"><label for="citation-format" class="visibility-hidden">Select Citation format</label><select id="citation-format" data-csl-doi="10.1145/1322432.1322433" aria-label="Select Citation format">
<option value="bibtex" data-format="bibTex">BibTeX</option>
<option value="endNote" data-format="endNote">EndNote</option>
<option value="acm" data-format="text">ACM Ref</option>
</select><span class="select-arrow"><i class="icon-bottom-arrow"></i></span></fieldset>
<ul class="rlist tab__content">
<li id="allResultstab" aria-labelledby="allResults" role="tabpanel" class="tab__pane">
<div class="all-results-tab-container">
<div class="hidden warning-message mb-2">Please download or close your previous search result export first before starting a new bulk export.</div>
<div class="desc-text">
<div class="bold">Preview is not available.</div>By clicking download,<b class="ml-1">a status dialog</b> will open to start the export process. The process may take<b class="ml-1">a few minutes</b> but once it finishes a file will be
downloadable from your browser. You may continue to browse the DL while the export process is in progress.
</div>
<a href="#" title="Download" data-href="/action/searchCitationExport?query=DOI%3D10.1145%252F1322432.1322433%26target%3Dindex-terms" class="btn transparent downloadBtn"><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-Icon_Download"></i>Download<i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-export"></i></a>
</div>
</li>
<li id="selectedTab" aria-labelledby="selected" role="tabpanel" class="tab__pane active">
<div class="csl-wrapper copy__text-wrapper">
<pre class="copy__text csl-response"></pre>
<div id="export-warning"></div>
<div class="pull-right">
<ul role="menu" class="rlist--inline separator">
<li><a href="javascript:void(0)" role="menuitem" title="Download citation" class="download__btn disabled"><label class="visibility-hidden">Download citation</label><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-Icon_Download"></i></a></li>
<li><input type="hidden" id="doisLimitNumber"
value="1000"><a href="javascript:void(0)" role="menuitem" title="Copy citation" class="copy__btn disabled"><label class="visibility-hidden">Copy citation</label><i aria-hidden="true" class="icon-pages"></i></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</form>Text Content
THIS WEBSITE USES COOKIES
We occasionally run membership recruitment campaigns on social media channels
and use cookies to track post-clicks. We also share information about your use
of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may
combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve
collected from your use of their services. Use the check boxes below to choose
the types of cookies you consent to have stored on your device.
Do not sell or share my personal information
Use necessary cookies only Allow all cookies Show details
OK
Use necessary cookies only Allow selected cookies Allow all cookies
Necessary
Preferences
Statistics
Marketing
Show details
Cookie declaration [#IABV2SETTINGS#] About
Necessary (10) Preferences (5) Statistics (16) Marketing (25) Unclassified
(0)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like
page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot
function properly without these cookies. These cookies do not gather information
about you that could be used for marketing purposes and do not remember where
you have been on the internet.
NameProviderPurposeExpiryType__cf_bm [x2]ACMThis cookie is used to distinguish
between humans and bots. This is beneficial for the website, in order to make
valid reports on the use of their website.1 dayHTTP__jidc.disquscdn.comUsed to
add comments to the website and remember the user's Disqus login credentials
across websites that use said
service.SessionHTTPdisqusauthc.disquscdn.comRegisters whether the user is logged
in. This allows the website owner to make parts of the website inaccessible,
based on the user's log-in status. SessionHTTP_cfuvidACMThis cookie is a part of
the services provided by Cloudflare - Including load-balancing, deliverance of
website content and serving DNS connection for website operators.
SessionHTTPcf_chl_1ACMThis cookie is a part of the services provided by
Cloudflare - Including load-balancing, deliverance of website content and
serving DNS connection for website operators. 1 dayHTTPcf_chl_rc_mACMThis cookie
is a part of the services provided by Cloudflare - Including load-balancing,
deliverance of website content and serving DNS connection for website operators.
1 dayHTTPCookieConsentCookiebotStores the user's cookie consent state for the
current domain1 yearHTTP1.gifCookiebotUsed to count the number of sessions to
the website, necessary for optimizing CMP product delivery.
SessionPixelVISITOR_PRIVACY_METADATAYouTubeStores the user's cookie consent
state for the current domain180 daysHTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way
the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that
you are in.
NameProviderPurposeExpiryTypeaet-dismissc.disquscdn.comNecessary for the
functionality of the website's
comment-system.PersistentHTMLdrafts.queuec.disquscdn.comNecessary for the
functionality of the website's
comment-system.PersistentHTMLsubmitted_posts_cachec.disquscdn.comNecessary for
the functionality of the website's
comment-system.PersistentHTMLmopDeployMopinionPendingSessionHTMLMACHINE_LAST_SEENACMPending300
daysHTTP
Statistic cookies help website owners understand how visitors interact with
websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
NameProviderPurposeExpiryType_gaGoogleRegisters a unique ID that is used to
generate statistical data on how the visitor uses the website.2
yearsHTTP_ga_#GoogleUsed by Google Analytics to collect data on the number of
times a user has visited the website as well as dates for the first and most
recent visit. 2 yearsHTTP_gatGoogleUsed by Google Analytics to throttle request
rate1 dayHTTP_gidGoogleRegisters a unique ID that is used to generate
statistical data on how the visitor uses the website.1
dayHTTP_hjSession_#HotjarCollects statistics on the visitor's visits to the
website, such as the number of visits, average time spent on the website and
what pages have been read.1 dayHTTP_hjSessionUser_#HotjarCollects statistics on
the visitor's visits to the website, such as the number of visits, average time
spent on the website and what pages have been read.1
yearHTTP_hjTLDTestHotjarRegisters statistical data on users' behaviour on the
website. Used for internal analytics by the website operator.
SessionHTTP_hp2_#Heap AnalyticsCollects data on the user’s navigation and
behavior on the website. This is used to compile statistical reports and
heatmaps for the website owner.1 dayHTTP_hp2_hld#.#Heap AnalyticsCollects data
on the user’s navigation and behavior on the website. This is used to compile
statistical reports and heatmaps for the website owner.1 dayHTTP_hp2_id.#Heap
AnalyticsCollects data on the user’s navigation and behavior on the website.
This is used to compile statistical reports and heatmaps for the website owner.1
yearHTTP_hp2_ses_props.#Heap AnalyticsCollects data on the user’s navigation and
behavior on the website. This is used to compile statistical reports and
heatmaps for the website owner.1 dayHTTPdisqus_uniquec.disquscdn.comCollects
statistics related to the user's visits to the website, such as number of
visits, average time spent on the website and loaded
pages.SessionHTTPcollectGoogleUsed to send data to Google Analytics about the
visitor's device and behavior. Tracks the visitor across devices and marketing
channels.SessionPixelhjActiveViewportIdsHotjarThis cookie contains an ID string
on the current session. This contains non-personal information on what subpages
the visitor enters – this information is used to optimize the visitor's
experience.PersistentHTMLhjViewportIdHotjarSaves the user's screen size in order
to adjust the size of images on the website.SessionHTMLtdGoogleRegisters
statistical data on users' behaviour on the website. Used for internal analytics
by the website operator. SessionPixel
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is
to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and
thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
NameProviderPurposeExpiryTypebadges-messagec.disquscdn.comCollects data on the
visitor’s use of the comment system on the website, and what blogs/articles the
visitor has read. This can be used for marketing purposes.
PersistentHTMLapi/telemetryHeap AnalyticsCollects data on user behaviour and
interaction in order to optimize the website and make advertisement on the
website more relevant. SessionPixelhHeap AnalyticsCollects data on user
behaviour and interaction in order to optimize the website and make
advertisement on the website more relevant.
SessionPixel#-#YouTubePendingSessionHTMLiU5q-!O9@$YouTubeRegisters a unique ID
to keep statistics of what videos from YouTube the user has
seen.SessionHTMLLAST_RESULT_ENTRY_KEYYouTubeUsed to track user’s interaction
with embedded
content.SessionHTTPLogsDatabaseV2:V#||LogsRequestsStoreYouTubePendingPersistentIDBnextIdYouTubeUsed
to track user’s interaction with embedded
content.SessionHTTPPREFYouTubeRegisters a unique ID that is used by Google to
keep statistics of how the visitor uses YouTube videos across different
websites.8 monthsHTTPremote_sidYouTubeNecessary for the implementation and
functionality of YouTube video-content on the website.
SessionHTTPrequestsYouTubeUsed to track user’s interaction with embedded
content.SessionHTTPServiceWorkerLogsDatabase#SWHealthLogYouTubeNecessary for the
implementation and functionality of YouTube video-content on the website.
PersistentIDBTESTCOOKIESENABLEDYouTubeUsed to track user’s interaction with
embedded content.1 dayHTTPVISITOR_INFO1_LIVEYouTubePending180
daysHTTPYSCYouTubePendingSessionHTTPyt.innertube::nextIdYouTubeRegisters a
unique ID to keep statistics of what videos from YouTube the user has
seen.PersistentHTMLytidb::LAST_RESULT_ENTRY_KEYYouTubeUsed to track user’s
interaction with embedded content.PersistentHTMLYtIdbMeta#databasesYouTubeUsed
to track user’s interaction with embedded
content.PersistentIDByt-remote-cast-availableYouTubeStores the user's video
player preferences using embedded YouTube
videoSessionHTMLyt-remote-cast-installedYouTubeStores the user's video player
preferences using embedded YouTube
videoSessionHTMLyt-remote-connected-devicesYouTubeStores the user's video player
preferences using embedded YouTube
videoPersistentHTMLyt-remote-device-idYouTubeStores the user's video player
preferences using embedded YouTube
videoPersistentHTMLyt-remote-fast-check-periodYouTubeStores the user's video
player preferences using embedded YouTube
videoSessionHTMLyt-remote-session-appYouTubeStores the user's video player
preferences using embedded YouTube
videoSessionHTMLyt-remote-session-nameYouTubeStores the user's video player
preferences using embedded YouTube videoSessionHTML
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying,
together with the providers of individual cookies.
We do not use cookies of this type.
[#IABV2_LABEL_PURPOSES#] [#IABV2_LABEL_FEATURES#] [#IABV2_LABEL_PARTNERS#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's
experience more efficient. Other than those strictly necessary for the operation
of the site, we need your permission to store any type of cookies on your
device. Learn more about ACM, how you can contact us, and how we process
personal data in our Privacy Policy. Also please consult our Cookie Notice.
You can change or withdraw your consent from the Cookie Declaration on our
website at any time by visiting the Cookie Declaration page. If contacting us
regarding your consent, please state your consent ID and date from that page.
Your consent applies to the following domains: dl.acm.org
Cookie declaration last updated on 30.04.24 by Cookiebot
skip to main content
* Advanced Search
* Browse
* About
* * Sign in
* Register
* Search ACM Digital Library
SearchSearch
* Advanced Search
* Journals
* Magazines
* Proceedings
* Books
* SIGs
* Conferences
* People
* * Browse
* About
* More
*
Search ACM Digital Library
SearchSearch
Advanced Search
ACM Computing Surveys
* Journal Home
* Just Accepted
* Latest Issue
*
* Archive
* Authors
* Author Guidelines
* Calls for Papers
* Submission Site
* ACM Author Policies
* Editors
* Editorial Board
* Associate Editor Guidelines
* Associate Editors Welcome Video
* Reviewers
* Reviewer Guidelines
* About
* Charter
* Announcements
* Abstracting/Indexing
* CSUR Author List
* CSUR Affiliations
* ACM Award Winners
* Contact Us
* More
* Home
* ACM Journals
* ACM Computing Surveys
* Vol. 40, No. 1
* Survey of graph database models
research-article
Share on
*
*
*
*
*
SURVEY OF GRAPH DATABASE MODELS
* Authors:
* Renzo Angles
Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
View Profile
,
* Claudio Gutierrez
Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
View Profile
Authors Info & Claims
ACM Computing SurveysVolume 40Issue 1Article No.: 1pp
1–39https://doi.org/10.1145/1322432.1322433
Published:22 February 2008Publication History
* 633citation
* 17,463
* Downloads
Metrics
Total Citations633
Total Downloads17,463
Last 12 Months882
Last 6 weeks107
* Get Citation Alerts
*
*
* Publisher Site
*
* Get Access
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
Volume 40, Issue 1
PreviousArticleNextArticle
* *
* * Abstract
* References
* Cited By
* Index Terms
* Recommendations
* Comments
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
Volume 40, Issue 1
PreviousArticleNextArticle
* *
* * Abstract
* References
* Cited By
* Index Terms
* Recommendations
* Comments
*
*
*
* 136References
*
*
*
Skip Abstract Section
ABSTRACT
Graph database models can be defined as those in which data structures for the
schema and instances are modeled as graphs or generalizations of them, and data
manipulation is expressed by graph-oriented operations and type constructors.
These models took off in the eighties and early nineties alongside
object-oriented models. Their influence gradually died out with the emergence of
other database models, in particular geographical, spatial, semistructured, and
XML. Recently, the need to manage information with graph-like nature has
reestablished the relevance of this area. The main objective of this survey is
to present the work that has been conducted in the area of graph database
modeling, concentrating on data structures, query languages, and integrity
constraints.
REFERENCES
1. Abiteboul, S. 1997. Querying semi-structured data. In Proceedings of the
6th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). LNCS, vol. 1186.
Springer, 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
2. Abiteboul, S. and Hull, R. 1984. IFO: A formal semantic database model. In
Proceedings of the 3th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 119--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. Abiteboul, S., Quass, D., McHugh, J., Widom, J., and Wiener, J. L. 1997.
The Lorel query language for semistructured data. Int. J. Dig. Libr. 1, 1,
68--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
4. Abiteboul, S. and Vianu, V. 1997. Queries and computation on the Web. In
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT).
LNCS, vol. 1186. Springer, 262--275. Google ScholarDigital Library
5. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1988. Efficient search in very large
databases. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Very
Large Data Bases (VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 407--418. Google ScholarDigital
Library
6. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1989. Materialization and incremental
update of path information. In Proceedings of the 5th International
Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer Society, 374--383.
Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1994. Algorithms for searching massive
graphs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 6, 2, 225--238. Google ScholarDigital
Library
8. Albert, R. and Barabási, A.-L. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex
networks. Rev. Mod. Phy. 74, 47.Google ScholarCross Ref
9. Alechina, N., Demri, S., and de Rijke, M. 2003. A modal perspective on
path constraints. J. Logic Computation 13, 6, 939--956.Google ScholarCross
Ref
10. Amann, B. and Scholl, M. 1992. Gram: A Graph Data Model and Query
Language. In European Conference on Hypertext Technology (ECHT). ACM,
201--211. Google ScholarDigital Library
11. Andries, M. and Engels, G. 1993. A hybrid query language for an extended
entity-relationship model. Tech. Rep. TR 93-15, Institute of Advanced
Computer Science, Universiteit Leiden. May.Google Scholar
12. Andries, M., Gemis, M., Paredaens, J., Thyssens, I., and den Bussche, J.
V. 1992. Concepts for graph-oriented object manipulation. In Proceedings
of the 3rd International Conference on Extending Database Technology
(EDBT). LNCS, vol. 580. Springer, 21--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
13. Angles, R. and Gutierrez, C. 2005. Querying RDF data from a graph database
perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference
(ESWC). Number 3532 in LNCS. 346--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
14. Aufaure-Portier, M.-A. and Trépied, C. 1976. A survey of query languages
for geographic information systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd
International Workshop on Interfaces to Databases. 431--438.Google Scholar
15. Azmoodeh, M. and Du, H. 1988. GQL, A graphical query language for semantic
databases. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM). LNCS, vol. 339.
Springer, 259--277. Google ScholarDigital Library
16. Beeri, C. 1988. Data models and languages for databases. In Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). LNCS, vol.
326. Springer, 19--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
17. Benkö, G., Flamm, C., and Stadler, P. F. 2003. A graph-based toy model of
chemistry. J. Chem. Inform. Computer Science (JCISD) 43, 1 (Jan),
1085--1093.Google Scholar
18. Berge, C. 1973. Graphs and Hypergraphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Google
ScholarDigital Library
19. Brandes, U. 2005. Network Analysis. Number 3418 in LNCS.
Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
20. Bray, T., Paoli, J., and Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. 1998. Extensible Markup
Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation 10, (February).
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210. Google ScholarDigital Library
21. Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata,
R., Tomkins, A., and Wiener, J. 2000. Graph structure in the Web. In
Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web conference on Computer
Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications
Networking. North-Holland Publishing Co., 309--320. Google ScholarDigital
Library
22. Buneman, P. 1997. Semistructured data. In Proceedings of the 16th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 117--121.
Google ScholarDigital Library
23. Buneman, P., Davidson, S., Hillebrand, G., and Suciu, D. 1996. A query
language and optimization techniques for unstructured data. SIGMOD Record.
25, 2, 505--516. Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Buneman, P., Fan, W., and Weinstein, S. 1998. Path constraints in
semistructured and structured databases. In Proceedings of the 17th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 129-- 138.
Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Cardelli, L., Gardner, P., and Ghelli, G. 2002. A spatial logic for
querying graphs. In Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP). LNCS. Springer, 597--610.
Google ScholarDigital Library
26. Chandra, A. K. 1988. Theory of database queries. In Proceedings of the 7th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 1--9.
Google ScholarDigital Library
27. Chen, P. P.-S. 1976. The entity-relationship model---toward a unified view
of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1, 1, 9--36. Google ScholarDigital
Library
28. Chomicki, J. 1994. Temporal query languages: a survey. In Proceedings of
the First International Conference on Temporal Logic (ICTL).
Springer-Verlag, 506--534. Google ScholarDigital Library
29. Codd, E. F. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks.
Commun. ACM 13, 6, 377-- 387. Google ScholarDigital Library
30. Codd, E. F. 1980. Data models in database management. In Proceedings of
the 1980 Workshop on Data abstraction, Databases, and Conceptual Modeling.
ACM Press, 112--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
31. Codd, E. F. 1983. A relational model of data for large shared data banks.
Commun. ACM 26, 1, 64--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
32. Conklin, J. 1987. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Comput. 20,
9, 17--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
33. Consens, M. and Mendelzon, A. 1993. Hy+: A hygraph-based query and
visualization system. SIGMOD Record 22, 2, 511--516. Google ScholarDigital
Library
34. Consens, M. P. and Mendelzon, A. O. 1989. Expressing structural hypertext
queries in graphlog. In Proceedings of the 2th Conference on Hypertext.
ACM Press, 269--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
35. Cruz, I. F., Mendelzon, A. O., and Wood, P. T. 1987. A graphical query
language supporting recursion. In Proceedings of the Association for
Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Management of Data. ACM
Press, 323--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
36. Cruz, I. F., Mendelzon, A. O., and Wood, P. T. 1989. G+: recursive
queries without recursion. In Proceedings of the 2th International
Conference on Expert Database Systems (EDS). Addison-Wesley, 645--
666.Google Scholar
37. Date, C. J. 1981. Referential integrity. In Proceedings of the 7th
International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). IEEE Computer
Society, 2--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
38. de S. Price, D. J. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science 149,
510--515.Google ScholarCross Ref
39. Deng, Y. and Chang, S.-K. 1990. A G-Net model for knowledge representation
and reasoning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3 (Dec), 295--310. Google
ScholarDigital Library
40. Deville, Y., Gilbert, D., van Helden, J., and Wodak, S. J. 2003. An
overview of data models for the analysis of biochemical pathways. In
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Methods
in Systems Biology. Springer-Verlag, 174. Google ScholarDigital Library
41. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F. 2003. Evolution of Networks---From
Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press. Google
ScholarDigital Library
42. Fernández, M., Florescu, D., Kang, J., Levy, A., and Suciu, D. 1998.
Catching the boat with strudel: experiences with a Web-site management
system. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of Data. ACM Press, 414--425. Google ScholarDigital Library
43. Flesca, S. and Greco, S. 1999. Partially ordered regular languages for
graph queries. In Proceedings of the 26th International Colloquium on
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP). LNCS, vol. 1644. Springer,
321--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
44. Flesca, S. and Greco, S. 2000. Querying graph databases. In Proceedings of
the 7th International Conference on Extending Database
Technology---Advances in Database Technology (EDBT). LNCS, vol. 1777.
Springer, 510--524. Google ScholarDigital Library
45. Florescu, D., Levy, A., and Mendelzon, A. O. 1998. Database techniques for
the World-Wide Web: A survey. SIGMOD Record 27, 3, 59--74. Google
ScholarDigital Library
46. Fry, J. P. and Sibley, E. H. 1976. Evolution of data-base management
systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
47. Furche, T., Linse, B., Bry, F., Plexousakis, D., and Gottlob, G. 2006. RDF
querying: language constructs and evaluation methods compared. In
Reasoning Web. Number 4126 in LNCS. 1--52.Google Scholar
48. Gemis, M. and Paredaens, J. 1993. An object-oriented pattern matching
language. In Proceedings of the First JSSST International Symposium on
Object Technologies for Advanced Software. Springer-Verlag, 339--355.
Google ScholarDigital Library
49. Gemis, M., Paredaens, J., Thyssens, I., and den Bussche, J. V. 1993. GOOD:
A graph-oriented object database system. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM
SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM Press,
505--510. Google ScholarDigital Library
50. Giugno, R. and Shasha, D. 2002. GraphGrep: A fast and universal method for
querying graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference in
Pattern recognition (ICPR).Google Scholar
51. Graves, M. Graph data models for genomics. http://www.xweave.com/people/in
graaves/pubs.Google Scholar
52. Graves, M. 1993. Theories and tools for designing application-specific
knowledge base data models. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Google ScholarDigital Library
53. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1994. Querying a genome
database using graphs. In Proceedings of the 3th International Conference
on Bioinformatics and Genome Research.Google Scholar
54. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1995a. A graph-theoretic
data model for genome mapping databases. In Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer
Society, 32. Google ScholarDigital Library
55. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1995b. Graph database
systems for genomics. IEEE Eng. Medicine Biol. Special issue on Managing
Data for the Human Genome Project 11, 6.Google Scholar
56. Griffith, R. L. 1982. Three principles of representation for semantic
networks. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 7, 3, 417--442. Google ScholarDigital
Library
57. Guha, R.V., Lassila, O., Miller, E., and Brickley, D. 1998. Enabling
inferencing. The Query Languages Workshop (QL).Google Scholar
58. Gutiérrez, A., Pucheral, P., Steffen, H., and Thévenin, J.-M. 1994.
Database graph views: A practical model to manage persistent graphs. In
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
(VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 391--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
59. Güting, R. H. 1994. GraphDB: modeling and querying graphs in databases. In
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
(VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 297--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
60. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., den Bussche, J. V., and Gucht, D. V. 1990a. A
graph-oriented object database model. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 417--424. Google
ScholarDigital Library
61. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., den Bussche, J. V., and Gucht, D. V. 1991. A
graph-oriented object database model. Tech. Rep. 91-27, University of
Antwerp (UIA), Belgium. (March).Google Scholar
62. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., and Gucht, D. V. 1990b. A graph-oriented
object model for database end-user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1990
ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM Press,
24--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
63. Hammer, J. and Schneider, M. 2004. The GenAlg project: developing a new
integrating data model, language, and tool for managing and querying
genomic information. SIGMOD Record 33, 2, 45--50. Google ScholarDigital
Library
64. Hammer, M. and McLeod, D. 1978. The semantic data model: a modelling
mechanism for data base applications. In Proceedings of the 1978 ACM
SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 26--36. Google
ScholarDigital Library
65. Hanneman, R. A. 2001. Introduction to social network methods. Tech. Rep.,
Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside.Google
Scholar
66. Hayes, J. and Gutierrez, C. 2004. Bipartite graphs as intermediate model
for RDF. In Proceedings of the 3th International Semantic Web Conference
(ISWC). Number 3298 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 47--61.Google Scholar
67. Heuer, A. and Scholl, M. H. 1991. Principles of object-oriented query
languages. In Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft (BTW).
Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 270. Springer, 178--197.Google Scholar
68. Hidders, J. 2001. A graph-based update language for object-oriented data
models. Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google
Scholar
69. Hidders, J. 2002. Typing graph-manipulation operations. In Proceedings of
the 9th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT).
Springer-Verlag, 394--409. Google ScholarDigital Library
70. Hidders, J. and Paredaens, J. 1993. GOAL, A graph-based object and
association language. Advances in Database Systems: Implementations and
Applications, CISM, 247--265.Google Scholar
71. Hull, R. and King, R. 1987. Semantic database modeling: Survey,
applications, and research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 19, 3, 201--260.
Google ScholarDigital Library
72. ISO. 1999. International Standard ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps.Google Scholar
73. Jagadish, H. V. and Olken, F. 2003. Data management for the biosciences:
report of the NLM Workshop on Data Management for Molecular and Cell
Biology. Tech. Rep. LBNL-52767, National Library of Medicine.Google
Scholar
74. Kerschberg, L., Klug, A. C., and Tsichritzis, D. 1976. A taxonomy of data
models. In Proceedings of Systems for Large Data Bases (VLDB). North
Holland and IFIP, 43--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
75. Kiesel, N., Schurr, A., and Westfechtel, B. 1996. GRAS: A graph-oriented
software engineering database system. In IPSEN Book. 397--425. Google
ScholarDigital Library
76. Kifer, M., Kim, W., and Sagiv, Y. 1992. Querying object-oriented
databases. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD International Conference
on Management of Data. ACM Press, 393--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
77. Kim, W. 1990. Object-oriented databases: definition and research
directions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3, 327--341. Google
ScholarDigital Library
78. Klyne, G. and Carroll, J. 2004. Resource description framework (RDF)
concepts and abstract syntax.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/.Google Scholar
79. Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Sivakumar, D., Tomkins, A., and
Upfal, E. 2000. The Web as a graph. In Proceedings of the 19th Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 1--10. Google
ScholarDigital Library
80. Kunii, H. S. 1987. DBMS with graph data model for knowledge handling. In
Proceedings of the 1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference on Exploring
technology: Today and Tomorrow. IEEE Computer Society Press, 138--142.
Google ScholarDigital Library
81. Kuper, G. M. and Vardi, M. Y. 1984. A new approach to database logic. In
Proceedings of the 3th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 86--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
82. Kuper, G. M. and Vardi, M. Y. 1993. The Logical Data Model. ACM Trans.
Database Syst. 18, 3, 379-- 413. Google ScholarDigital Library
83. Langou, B. and Mainguenaud, M. 1994. Graph data model operations for
network facilities in a geographical information system. In Proceedings of
the 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Vol. 2.
1002--1019.Google Scholar
84. Lécluse, C., Richard, P., and Vélez, F. 1988. O2, an object-oriented data
model. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of Data. ACM Press, 424--433. Google ScholarDigital Library
85. Levene, M. and Loizou, G. 1995. A graph-based data model and its
ramifications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 7, 5, 809--823. Google
ScholarDigital Library
86. Levene, M. and Poulovassilis, A. 1990. The Hypernode model and its
associated query language. In Proceedings of the 5th Jerusalem Conference
on Information technology. IEEE Computer Society Press, 520--530. Google
ScholarDigital Library
87. Levene, M. and Poulovassilis, A. 1991. An object-oriented data model
formalised through hypergraphs. Data Knowl. Eng. 6, 3, 205--224. Google
ScholarDigital Library
88. Mainguenaud, M. 1992. Simatic XT: A data model to deal with multi-scaled
networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 16, 281--288.Google ScholarCross
Ref
89. Mainguenaud, M. 1995. Modelling the network component of geographical
information systems. Int. J. Geog. Inform. Syst. 9, 6, 575--593.Google
ScholarCross Ref
90. Mannino, M. V. and Shapiro, L. D. 1990. Extensions to query languages for
graph traversal problems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3, 353--363.
Google ScholarDigital Library
91. McGee, W. C. 1976. On user criteria for data model evaluation. ACM Trans.
Database Syst. 1, 4, 370--387. Google ScholarDigital Library
92. McGuinness, D. L. and van Harmelen, F. 2004. OWL Web ontology language
overview, W3C recommendation 10 (February).
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/.Google Scholar
93. Medeiros, C. B. and Pires, F. 1994. Databases for GIS. SIGMOD Record 23, 1
(March), 107--115. Google ScholarDigital Library
94. Mendelzon, A. O. and Wood, P. T. 1989. Finding regular simple paths in
graph databases. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on
Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 185--193.
Google ScholarDigital Library
95. Navathe, S. B. 1992. Evolution of data modeling for databases.
Communications of the ACM 35, 9, 112--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
96. Nejdl, W., Siberski, W., and Sintek, M. 2003. Design issues and challenges
for RDF- and schema-based peer-to-peer systems. SIGMOD Record 32, 3,
41--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
97. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks.
SIAM Rev. 45, 2, 167--256.Google ScholarDigital Library
98. Olken, F. 2003. Tutorial on graph data management for biology. IEEE
Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference (CSB).Google Scholar
99. Papakonstantinou, Y., Garcia-Molina, H., and Widom, J. 1995. Object
exchange across heterogeneous information sources. In Proceedings of the
11th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer
Society, 251--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
100. Paredaens, J. and Kuijpers, B. 1998. Data models and query languages for
spatial databases. Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) 25, 1--2, 29--53.
Google ScholarDigital Library
101. Paredaens, J., Peelman, P., and Tanca, L. 1995. G-Log: A graph-based query
language. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 7, 3, 436--453. Google
ScholarDigital Library
102. Peckham, J. and Maryanski, F. J. 1988. Semantic data models. ACM Comput.
Surv. 20, 3, 153--189. Google ScholarDigital Library
103. Pepper, S. and Moore, G. 2001. XML topic maps (XTM) 1.0---TopicMaps.Org
Specification. http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/xtm1-20010806.html.Google
Scholar
104. Poulovassilis, A. and Hild, S. G. 2001. Hyperlog: A graph-based system for
database browsing, querying, and update. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13,
2, 316--333. Google ScholarDigital Library
105. Poulovassilis, A. and Levene, M. 1994. A nested-graph model for the
representation and manipulation of complex objects. ACM Trans. Inform.
Syst. 12, 1, 35--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
106. Prud'hommeaux, E. and Seaborne, A. 2005. SPARQL Query Language for RDF,
W3C Working Draft 21 July.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/.Google Scholar
107. Ramakrishnan, R. and Ullman, J. D. 1993. A survey of research on deductive
database systems. J. Logic Prog. 23, 2, 125--149.Google ScholarCross Ref
108. Roussopoulos, N. and Mylopoulos, J. 1975. Using semantic networks for
database management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). ACM, 144--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
109. Samet, H. and Aref, W. G. 1995. Spatial data models and query processing.
In Modern Database Systems. 338--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
110. Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B., Schmidt, J. W., and Wetzel, I. 1993.
Integrity enforcement in object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the
4th International Workshop on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data
and Objects. Google ScholarDigital Library
111. Shasha, D., Wang, J. T. L., and Giugno, R. 2002. Algorithmics and
applications of tree and graph searching. In Proceedings of the 21th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 39-- 52.
Google ScholarDigital Library
112. Shekhar, S., Coyle, M., Goyal, B., Liu, D.-R., and Sarkar, S. 1997. Data
models in geographic information systems. Commun. ACM 40, 4, 103--111.
Google ScholarDigital Library
113. Sheng, L., Ozsoyoglu, Z. M., and Ozsoyoglu, G. 1999. A graph query
language and its query processing. In Proceedings of the 15th
International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer
Society, 572--581. Google ScholarDigital Library
114. Sheth, A., Aleman-Meza, B., Arpinar, I. B., Halaschek-Wiener, C.,
Ramakrishnan, C., Bertram, C., Warke, Y., Avant, D., Arpinar, F. S.,
Anyanwu, K., and Kochut, K. 2005. Semantic association identification and
knowledge discovery for national security applications. J. Database Manag.
16, 1 (Jan-March), 33--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
115. Shipman, D. W. 1981. The functional data model and the data language
DAPLEX. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 6, 1, 140--173. Google ScholarDigital
Library
116. Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., and Sudarshan, S. 1996. Data models. ACM
Comput. Surv. 28, 1, 105--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
117. Sowa, J. F. 1976. Conceptual graphs for a database interface. IBM J. Res.
Devel. 20, 4, 336--357.Google ScholarDigital Library
118. Sowa, J. F. 1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind
and Machine. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
119. Sowa, J. F. 1991. Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the
Representation of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
120. Stein, L. D. and Tierry-Mieg, J. 1999. AceDB: A genome database management
system. Comput. Sci. Eng. 1, 3, 44--52.Google ScholarDigital Library
121. Tansel, A., Clifford, J., Gadia, S., Jajodia, S., Segev, A., and
Snodgrass, R. T., Eds. 1993. Temporal Databases: Theory, Design, and
Implementation. Benjamin-Cummings. Google ScholarDigital Library
122. Taylor, R. W. and Frank, R. L. 1976. CODASYL data-base management systems.
ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1, 67--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
123. Thalheim, B. 1991. Dependencies in Relational Databases. Leipzig, Teubner
Verlag.Google Scholar
124. Thalheim, B. 1996. An overview on semantical constraints for database
models. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Intellectual
Systems and Computer Science.Google Scholar
125. Tompa, F. W. 1989. A data model for flexible hypertext database systems.
ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 7, 1, 85--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
126. Tsichritzis, D. C. and Lochovsky, F. H. 1976. Hierarchical data-base
management: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1, 105--123. Google
ScholarDigital Library
127. Tsvetovat, M., Diesner, J., and Carley, K. 2004. NetIntel: A database for
manipulation of rich social network data. Tech. Rep. CMU-ISRI-04-135,
Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for
Software Research International.Google Scholar
128. Tuv, E., Poulovassilis, A., and Levene, M. 1992. A storage manager for the
hypernode model. In Proceedings of the 10th British National Conference on
Databases. Number 618 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 59--77. Google
ScholarDigital Library
129. Vardi, M. Y. 1982. The complexity of relational query languages (extended
abstract). In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
(STOC). ACM Press, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
130. Vassiliadis, P. and Sellis, T. 1999. A survey of logical models for OLAP
Databases. SIGMOD Record 28, 4, 64--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
131. Vianu, V. 2003. A Web odyssey: From Codd to XML. SIGMOD Record 32, 2,
68--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
132. Watters, C. and Shepherd, M. A. 1990. A transient hypergraph-based model
for data access. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 8, 2, 77--102. Google
ScholarDigital Library
133. Weddell, G. E. 1992. Reasoning about functional dependencies generalized
for semantic data models. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 17, 1, 32--64. Google
ScholarDigital Library
134. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and
Haythornthwaite, C. 1996. Computer networks as social networks:
collaborative work,telework, and virtual community. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22,
213--238.Google ScholarCross Ref
135. Yannakakis, M. 1990. Graph-theoretic methods in database theory. In
Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 230--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
136. Zicari, R. 1991. A framework for schema updates in an object-oriented
database system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on
Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer Society, 2--13. Google
ScholarDigital Library
Show All References
CITED BY
View all
1. Wang B, Li M, Peng Z and Lu W. (2024). Hierarchical attributed graph-based
generative façade parsing for high-rise residential buildings. Automation
in Construction. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105471. 164. (105471). Online
publication date: 1-Aug-2024.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0926580524002073
2. Remadi A, El Hage K, Hobeika Y and Bugiotti F. (2024). To prompt or not to
prompt: Navigating the use of Large Language Models for integrating and
modeling heterogeneous data. Data & Knowledge Engineering.
10.1016/j.datak.2024.102313. 152. (102313). Online publication date:
1-Jul-2024.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169023X24000375
3. Buosi S, Timilsina M, Torrente M, Provencio M, Fey D and Nováček V.
(2024). Boosting predictive models and augmenting patient data with
relevant genomic and pathway information. Computers in Biology and
Medicine. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108398. 174. (108398). Online
publication date: 1-May-2024.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010482524004827
4. Sacilotto R, Mathur S and Gonsalves R. Connecting Asset Stores with Graph
Databases. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal. 10.5594/JMI.2024/XBZC2345. 133:2.
(28-36).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10500341/
5. Currim S, Snodgrass R and Suh Y. (2024). Identifying the Root Causes of
DBMS Suboptimality. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 49:1. (1-40).
Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3636425
6. Castro-Ospina A, Solarte-Sanchez M, Vega-Escobar L, Isaza C and
Martínez-Vargas J. (2024). Graph-Based Audio Classification Using
Pre-Trained Models and Graph Neural Networks. Sensors. 10.3390/s24072106.
24:7. (2106).
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/7/2106
7. Arroyuelo D, Bustos B, Gómez-Brandón A, Hogan A, Navarro G and Reutter J.
(2024). Worst-Case-Optimal Similarity Joins on Graph Databases.
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data. 2:1. (1-26). Online
publication date: 12-Mar-2024.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3639294
8. Guo Q, Zhang C, Zhang S and Lu J. (2024). Multi-model query languages:
taming the variety of big data. Distributed and Parallel Databases. 42:1.
(31-71). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-023-07433-1
9. Besta M, Gerstenberger R, Peter E, Fischer M, Podstawski M, Barthels C,
Alonso G and Hoefler T. (2023). Demystifying Graph Databases: Analysis and
Taxonomy of Data Organization, System Designs, and Graph Queries. ACM
Computing Surveys. 56:2. (1-40). Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3604932
10. Deforche M, De Vos I, Bronselaer A and De Tré G. (2024). A Hierarchical
Orthographic Similarity Measure for Interconnected Texts Represented by
Graphs. Applied Sciences. 10.3390/app14041529. 14:4. (1529).
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/4/1529
11. Jiang Y, Liu J, Ba J, Yap R, Liang Z and Rigger M. Detecting Logic Bugs in
Graph Database Management Systems via Injective and Surjective Graph Query
Transformation. Proceedings of the 46th IEEE/ACM International Conference
on Software Engineering. (1-12).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3597503.3623307
12. Mondal R, Ignatova E, Walke D, Broneske D, Saake G and Heyer R. (2024).
Clustering graph data: the roadmap to spectral techniques. Discover
Artificial Intelligence. 10.1007/s44163-024-00102-x. 4:1.
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44163-024-00102-x
13. García R and Angles R. Path Querying in Graph Databases: A Systematic
Mapping Study. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3371976. 12.
(33154-33172).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10456906/
14. Ayats H, Cellier P and Ferré S. (2024). Concepts of neighbors and their
application to instance-based learning on relational data. International
Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 10.1016/j.ijar.2023.109059. 164.
(109059). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0888613X23001901
15. Buosi S, Timilsina M, Janik A, Costabello L, Torrente M, Provencio M, Fey
D and Nováček V. (2024). Machine learning estimated probability of relapse
in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients with aneuploidy
imputation scores and knowledge graph embeddings. Expert Systems with
Applications: An International Journal. 235:C. Online publication date:
1-Jan-2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121127
16. Bhattacharyya A and Chakravarty D. (2024). Graph Database: Re-engineering
Methodologies Relational to NOSQL Databases. Intelligent Strategies for
ICT. 10.1007/978-981-97-1260-1_12. (131-146).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-1260-1_12
17. Swevels A, Fahland D and Montali M. (2024). Implementing Object-Centric
Event Data Models in Event Knowledge Graphs. Process Mining Workshops.
10.1007/978-3-031-56107-8_33. (431-443).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-56107-8_33
18. Feng W, Chen S, Liu H and Ji Y. PeeK: A Prune-Centric Approach for K
Shortest Path Computation. Proceedings of the International Conference for
High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. (1-14).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3581784.3607110
19. Besta M, Gerstenberger R, Fischer M, Podstawski M, Blach N, Egeli B,
Mitenkov G, Chlapek W, Michalewicz M, Niewiadomski H, Mueller J and
Hoefler T. The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and
Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of Cores. Proceedings
of the International Conference for High Performance Computing,
Networking, Storage and Analysis. (1-18).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3581784.3607068
20. Berkholz C and Nordström J. (2023). Near-optimal Lower Bounds on
Quantifier Depth and Weisfeiler–Leman Refinement Steps. Journal of the
ACM. 70:5. (1-32). Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3195257
21. Das U, Hood C and Nagpure V. (2023). A Reasoning System Architecture for
Spectrum Decision Making 2023 International Symposium on Networks,
Computers and Communications (ISNCC). 10.1109/ISNCC58260.2023.10323992.
979-8-3503-3559-0. (1-10).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10323992/
22. Equi M, Mäkinen V and Tomescu A. (2023). Graphs cannot be indexed in
polynomial time for sub-quadratic time string matching, unless SETH fails.
Theoretical Computer Science. 975:C. Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2023.114128
23. Yuan Y, Soh D, Guo K, Xiong Z and Quek T. (2023). Joint Network Topology
Inference via Structural Fusion Regularization. IEEE Transactions on
Knowledge and Data Engineering. 35:10. (10351-10364). Online publication
date: 1-Oct-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2023.3264971
24. Chen X and Atlee J. (2023). Variability-aware Neo4j for Analyzing a
Graphical Model of a Software Product Line 2023 ACM/IEEE 26th
International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems
(MODELS). 10.1109/MODELS58315.2023.00034. 979-8-3503-2480-8. (307-318).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10343738/
25. Fernau H and Gajjar K. (2023). The Space Complexity of Sum Labelling.
Theory of Computing Systems. 67:5. (1026-1049). Online publication date:
1-Oct-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-023-10130-2
26. Areces C, Cassano V, Dutto D and Fervari R. Data Graphs with Incomplete
Information (and a Way to Complete Them). Logics in Artificial
Intelligence. (729-744).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_49
27. Syafiq M, Azri S and Ujang U. (2023). Modelling Reoccurrence of Events in
an Event-Based Graph Database for Asset Management 2023 4th International
Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Sciences (AiDAS).
10.1109/AiDAS60501.2023.10284664. 979-8-3503-1843-2. (102-108).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10284664/
28. Deforche M, De Vos I, Bronselaer A and De Tré G. An Orthographic
Similarity Measure for Graph-Based Text Representations. Flexible Query
Answering Systems. (206-218).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42935-4_17
29. Thys G. Developing and implementing a superconnector of producers in the
printing industry to facilitate book historical research. Proceedings of
the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3603163.3609061
30. Cotumaccio N, D’Agostino G, Policriti A and Prezza N. (2023).
Co-lexicographically Ordering Automata and Regular Languages - Part I.
Journal of the ACM. 70:4. (1-73). Online publication date: 31-Aug-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3607471
31. Diaz-Ordoñez M, Rodríguez Baena D and Yun-Casalilla B. (2023). A new
approach for the construction of historical databases—NoSQL
Document-oriented databases: the example of AtlantoCracies . Digital
Scholarship in the Humanities. 10.1093/llc/fqad033. 38:3. (1014-1032).
Online publication date: 31-Aug-2023.
https://academic.oup.com/dsh/article/38/3/1014/7136726
32. Vrgoč D, Rojas C, Angles R, Arenas M, Arroyuelo D, Buil-Aranda C, Hogan A,
Navarro G, Riveros C and Romero J. (2023). MillenniumDB: An Open-Source
Graph Database System. Data Intelligence. 10.1162/dint_a_00229. 5:3.
(560-610). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.
https://direct.mit.edu/dint/article/5/3/560/117375/MillenniumDB-An-Open-Source-Graph-Database-System
33. Park S and Cheng T. (2023). Framework for constructing multimodal
transport networks and routing using a graph database: A case study in
London. Transactions in GIS. 10.1111/tgis.13071. 27:5. (1391-1417). Online
publication date: 1-Aug-2023.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.13071
34. Niknam G, Molaei S, Zare H, Pan S, Jalili M, Zhu T and Clifton D. (2023).
DyVGRNN. Neural Networks. 165:C. (596-610). Online publication date:
1-Aug-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2023.05.048
35. Equi M, Mäkinen V, Tomescu A and Grossi R. (2023). On the Complexity of
String Matching for Graphs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms. 19:3. (1-25).
Online publication date: 31-Jul-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3588334
36. Sunuwar D and Singh M. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Relational and
Graph Databases for Data Provenance: Performance, Queries, and Security
Considerations 2023 World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF).
10.1109/WCONF58270.2023.10235151. 979-8-3503-1120-4. (1-7).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10235151/
37. Walke D, Micheel D, Schallert K, Muth T, Broneske D, Saake G and Heyer R.
(2023). The importance of graph databases and graph learning for clinical
applications. Database. 10.1093/database/baad045. 2023. Online publication
date: 10-Jul-2023.
https://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/baad045/7222237
38. Hernandez-Bocanegra D and Ziegler J. (2023). Explaining Recommendations
through Conversations: Dialog Model and the Effects of Interface Type and
Degree of Interactivity. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent
Systems. 13:2. (1-47). Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3579541
39. Van Houdt B. (2023). On the Cost of Near-Perfect Wear Leveling in
Flash-Based SSDs. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation
of Computing Systems. 8:1-2. (1-22). Online publication date: 30-Jun-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3576855
40. Boneva I, Groz B, Hidders J, Murlak F and Staworko S. Static Analysis of
Graph Database Transformations. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM
SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems.
(251-261).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3584372.3588654
41. Wang G, Yu J, Nguyen M, Zhang Y, Yongchareon S and Han Y. (2023).
Motif-based graph attentional neural network for web service
recommendation. Knowledge-Based Systems. 269:C. Online publication date:
7-Jun-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110512
42. Chen X, Wang B, Jin Z, Feng Y, Li X, Feng X and Liu Q. (2023). Tabby:
Automated Gadget Chain Detection for Java Deserialization Vulnerabilities
2023 53rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems
and Networks (DSN). 10.1109/DSN58367.2023.00028. 979-8-3503-4793-7.
(179-192).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10202660/
43. Olawoyin A, Leung C and Cuzzocrea A. (2023). Evolution of Big Data Models
from Hierarchical Models to Knowledge Graphs 2023 IEEE 47th Annual
Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC).
10.1109/COMPSAC57700.2023.00201. 979-8-3503-2697-0. (1325-1330).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10197017/
44. Habib S, Khan H, Hamilton-Wright A and Hengartner U. (2023). Revisiting
the Security of Biometric Authentication Systems Against Statistical
Attacks. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security. 26:2. (1-30). Online
publication date: 31-May-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3571743
45. Bhuiyan F and Rahman A. (2023). Log-related Coding Patterns to Conduct
Postmortems of Attacks in Supervised Learning-based Projects. ACM
Transactions on Privacy and Security. 26:2. (1-24). Online publication
date: 31-May-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3568020
46. Dambra S, Bilge L and Balzarotti D. (2023). A Comparison of Systemic and
Systematic Risks of Malware Encounters in Consumer and Enterprise
Environments. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security. 26:2. (1-30).
Online publication date: 31-May-2023.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3565362
47. Singh D. (2023). Future Field Systems using Graph Database and IoT 2023
3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative
Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE). 10.1109/ICACITE57410.2023.10182586.
979-8-3503-9926-4. (2183-2186).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10182586/
48. Bansal A. HGQL: Supporting Schematic Hypergraphs in GraphQL. Proceedings
of the 27th International Database Engineered Applications Symposium.
(9-16).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3589462.3589481
49. Zhang Y, Liu J, Hou K and Lin Y. (2023). Building a Knowledge Base of
Bridge Maintenance Using Knowledge Graph. Advances in Civil Engineering.
10.1155/2023/6047489. 2023. (1-16). Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ace/2023/6047489/
50. Di Pierro D, Ferilli S and Redavid D. (2023). LPG-Based Knowledge Graphs:
A Survey, a Proposal and Current Trends. Information.
10.3390/info14030154. 14:3. (154).
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/3/154
51. Aldwairi M, Jarrah M, Mahasneh N and Al-khateeb B. (2023). Graph-based
data management system for efficient information storage, retrieval and
processing. Information Processing & Management.
10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103165. 60:2. (103165). Online publication date:
1-Mar-2023.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306457322002667
52. Zheng J and Li Y. (2023). Machine learning model of tax arrears prediction
based on knowledge graph. Electronic Research Archive.
10.3934/era.2023206. 31:7. (4057-4076).
http://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/era.2023206
53. Hood C, Nagpure V and Zdunek K. (2023). A Knowledge Graph Approach to
Spectrum Explainability. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4528668.
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4528668
54. Peng Z, Luo M, Huang W, Li J, Zheng Q, Sun F and Huang J. Learning
Representations by Graphical Mutual Information Estimation and
Maximization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
Intelligence. 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3147886. 45:1. (722-737).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9699378/
55. Aydin A. A Comparative Perspective on Technologies of Big Data Value
Chain. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3323160. 11. (112133-112146).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10281364/
56. Kaufmann M and Meier A. (2023). NoSQL-Datenbanksysteme. SQL- &
NoSQL-Datenbanken. 10.1007/978-3-662-67092-7_7. (251-275).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-67092-7_7
57. Guimarães P, León A and Santos M. (2023). An Automated Patterns-Based
Model-to-Model Mapping and Transformation System for Labeled Property
Graphs. Research Challenges in Information Science: Information Science
and the Connected World. 10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_11. (171-186).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-33080-3_11
58. Azzi R, Kilany Chamoun R, Serhrouchni A and Sokhn M. (2023). A Healthcare
Delivery System Powered by Semantic Data Description and Blockchain.
Advances in Information and Communication. 10.1007/978-3-031-28076-4_19.
(224-242).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-28076-4_19
59. Kaufmann M and Meier A. (2023). NoSQL Databases. SQL and NoSQL Databases.
10.1007/978-3-031-27908-9_7. (223-244).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-27908-9_7
60. Schweitzer G, Bitzer M and Vielhaber M. (2023). Lifecycle Engineering in
the Context of a Medical Device Company – Leveraging MBSE, PLM and AI.
Product Lifecycle Management. PLM in Transition Times: The Place of Humans
and Transformative Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_54. (557-566).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_54
61. Mertens N, Wohlfahrt T, Hartmann N and Reddy C. (2023). Automatic
Transformation of HVAC Diagrams into Machine-Readable Format. Product
Lifecycle Management. PLM in Transition Times: The Place of Humans and
Transformative Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_40. (410-419).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_40
62. Nai R, Sulis E, Pasteris P, Giunta M and Meo R. (2023). Exploitation
and Merge of Information Sources for Public Procurement Improvement.
Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in
Databases. 10.1007/978-3-031-23618-1_6. (89-102).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-23618-1_6
63. Liu S and Kim K. (2023). Ontological Knowledge Graph Framework for 4D
Printed Product Design: Elongated Homogenous Rod Case. Flexible Automation
and Intelligent Manufacturing: The Human-Data-Technology Nexus.
10.1007/978-3-031-17629-6_12. (101-109).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-17629-6_12
64. Ding Y, Xu Z, Zhu Q, Li H, Luo Y, Bao Y, Tang L and Zeng S. (2022).
Integrated data-model-knowledge representation for natural resource
entities. International Journal of Digital Earth.
10.1080/17538947.2022.2047802. 15:1. (653-678). Online publication date:
31-Dec-2022.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2022.2047802
65. Schäfer J, Tang M, Luu D, Bergmann A and Wiese L. (2022). Graph4Med: a web
application and a graph database for visualizing and analyzing medical
databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 10.1186/s12859-022-05092-0. 23:1.
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-022-05092-0
66. Kim B, Koo K, Enkhbat U, Kim S, Kim J and Moon B. (2022). M2Bench.
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 16:4. (747-759). Online publication
date: 1-Dec-2022.
https://doi.org/10.14778/3574245.3574259
67. Nguyen Tien T and Nguyen K. Decision graph for timely delivery of
multi-AGVs in healthcare environment. Proceedings of the 11th
International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology.
(186-192).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3568562.3568652
68. Al-Zahrani B, Alshehri S, Cherif A and Imine A. (2022). Property Graph
Access Control Using View-Based and Query-Rewriting Approaches 2022
IEEE/ACS 19th International Conference on Computer Systems and
Applications (AICCSA). 10.1109/AICCSA56895.2022.10017709.
979-8-3503-1008-5. (1-2).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10017709/
69. Schuk V, Pombo Jiménez M and Martin U. (2022). Technical specifications to
meet the requirements of an Automatic Code Compliance Checking tool and
current developments in infrastructure construction. Results in
Engineering. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100650. 16. (100650). Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2022.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590123022003206
70. Niknam G, Molaei S, Zare H, Clifton D and Pan S. (2022). Graph
Representation Learning based on Deep Generative Gaussian Mixture Models.
Neurocomputing. 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.11.087. Online publication date:
1-Dec-2022.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925231222014916
71. Rani A, Goyal N and Gadia S. (2022). Social data provenance framework
based on zero-information loss graph database. Social Network Analysis and
Mining. 10.1007/s13278-022-00889-6. 12:1. Online publication date:
1-Dec-2022.
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13278-022-00889-6
72. Dou H, Mei J, Zhang Y, Chen P and Zheng Z. (2022). JointConf: Jointly
autotuning configuration parameters for modularized graph databases.
Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 10.1002/smr.2495. 34:12.
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2495
73. Müller C, Bernhard L and Wilhelm D. (2022). Usage of a graph database for
the selection of sterile items in the OR. International Journal of
Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 10.1007/s11548-022-02795-w. 18:5.
(871-875).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11548-022-02795-w
74. Saleh D, Kartika Y, Akbar Z, Krisnadhi A and Fatriasari W. On Generating
SHACL Shapes from Collective Collection of Plant Trait Data. Proceedings
of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and
Its Applications. (326-330).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3575882.3575945
75. Steinmetz D, Merz F, Burmester G, Ma H and Hartmann S. A Modeling Rule
for Improving the Performance of Graph Models. Conceptual Modeling.
(336-346).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_24
76. Lygerakis F, Kampelis N and Kolokotsa D. (2022). Knowledge Graphs’
Ontologies and Applications for Energy Efficiency in Buildings: A Review.
Energies. 10.3390/en15207520. 15:20. (7520).
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7520
77. Lumsden I, Luettgau J, Lama V, Scully-Allison C, Brink S, Isaacs K, Pearce
O and Taufer M. (2022). Enabling Call Path Querying in Hatchet to Identify
Performance Bottlenecks in Scientific Applications 2022 IEEE 18th
International Conference on e-Science (e-Science).
10.1109/eScience55777.2022.00039. 978-1-6654-6124-5. (256-266).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9973727/
78. Ahmed B and Sami N. Simulation System for Producing Real World Dataset to
Predict the Covid-19 Contamination Process⋆. Computational Collective
Intelligence. (272-282).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16014-1_22
79. Santra A, Komar K, Bhowmick S and Chakravarthy S. (2022). From base data
to knowledge discovery – A life cycle approach – Using multilayer
networks. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 141:C. Online publication date:
1-Sep-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102058
80. Bender B, Bertheau C, Körppen T, Lauppe H and Gronau N. (2022). A proposal
for future data organization in enterprise systems—an analysis of
established database approaches. Information Systems and e-Business
Management. 20:3. (441-494). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-022-00555-6
81. Bansal A. Hypergraphs as Conflict-Free Partially Replicated Data Types.
Database and Expert Systems Applications. (417-432).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12423-5_32
82. Altulyan M, Yao L, Wang X, Huang C, Kanhere S and Sheng Q. (2021). A
Survey on Recommender Systems for Internet of Things: Techniques,
Applications and Future Directions. The Computer Journal.
10.1093/comjnl/bxab049. 65:8. (2098-2132). Online publication date:
11-Aug-2022.
https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/65/8/2098/6278157
83. Kapsalis P, Kormpakis G, Alexakis K, Karakolis E, Mouzakitis S and
Askounis D. (2022). A Reasoning Engine Architecture for Building Energy
Metadata Management 2022 13th International Conference on Information,
Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA).
10.1109/IISA56318.2022.9904419. 978-1-6654-6390-4. (1-7).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9904419/
84. Zhang J, Li W, Yuan L, Qin L, Zhang Y and Chang L. (2022). Shortest-path
queries on complex networks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 15:11.
(2640-2652). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022.
https://doi.org/10.14778/3551793.3551820
85. Luo R, Nettasinghe B and Krishnamurthy V. Controlling Segregation in
Social Network Dynamics as an Edge Formation Game. IEEE Transactions on
Network Science and Engineering. 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3162789. 9:4.
(2317-2329).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9743602/
86. Nahar K and Gill A. (2022). Integrated identity and access management
metamodel and pattern system for secure enterprise architecture. Data &
Knowledge Engineering. 140:C. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2022.102038
87. Kotiranta P, Junkkari M and Nummenmaa J. (2022). Performance of Graph and
Relational Databases in Complex Queries. Applied Sciences.
10.3390/app12136490. 12:13. (6490).
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/13/6490
88. Parnas Gulnes M, Soylu A and Roman D. (2021). A graph-based approach for
representing, integrating and analysing neuroscience data: the case of the
murine basal ganglia. Data Technologies and Applications.
10.1108/DTA-12-2020-0303. 56:3. (358-381). Online publication date:
22-Jun-2022.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/DTA-12-2020-0303/full/html
89. Angles R, Hogan A, Lassila O, Rojas C, Schwabe D, Szekely P and Vrgoč D.
Multilayer graphs. Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGMOD Joint International
Workshop on Graph Data Management Experiences & Systems (GRADES) and
Network Data Analytics (NDA). (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3534540.3534696
90. Figueira D, Jez A and Lin A. Data Path Queries over Embedded Graph
Databases. Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on
Principles of Database Systems. (189-201).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3517804.3524159
91. Ilyas I, Rekatsinas T, Konda V, Pound J, Qi X and Soliman M. Saga: A
Platform for Continuous Construction and Serving of Knowledge at Scale.
Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data.
(2259-2272).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3514221.3526049
92. Andriamampianina L, Ravat F, Song J and Vallès-Parlangeau N. Querying
Temporal Property Graphs. Advanced Information Systems Engineering.
(355-370).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_21
93. Reznichenko V. (2022). 60 Years of Databases (part four). PROBLEMS IN
PROGRAMMING. 10.15407/pp2022.02.057:2. (57-95). Online publication date:
1-Jun-2022.
http://pp.isofts.kiev.ua/ojs1/article/view/500
94. Hogan A, Blomqvist E, Cochez M, D’amato C, Melo G, Gutierrez C, Kirrane S,
Gayo J, Navigli R, Neumaier S, Ngomo A, Polleres A, Rashid S, Rula A,
Schmelzeisen L, Sequeda J, Staab S and Zimmermann A. (2021). Knowledge
Graphs. ACM Computing Surveys. 54:4. (1-37). Online publication date:
31-May-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3447772
95. Khan S, Nguyen P, Abdul-Rahman A, Freeman E, Turkay C and Chen M. Rapid
Development of a Data Visualization Service in an Emergency Response. IEEE
Transactions on Services Computing. 10.1109/TSC.2022.3164146. 15:3.
(1251-1264).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9747990/
96. Li W, Gao M, Wen D, Zhou H, Ke C and Qin L. (2022). Manipulating
Structural Graph Clustering 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on
Data Engineering (ICDE). 10.1109/ICDE53745.2022.00251. 978-1-6654-0883-7.
(2749-2761).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9835630/
97. Schweitzer G, Mörsdorf S, Bitzer M and Vielhaber M. (2022). Detection of
Cause-Effect Relationships in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Based
on an Engineering Graph. Proceedings of the Design Society.
10.1017/pds.2022.115. 2. (1129-1138). Online publication date: 1-May-2022.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2732527X22001158/type/journal_article
98. Kuai H, Tao X and Zhong N. (2022). Web Intelligence meets Brain
Informatics: Towards the future of artificial intelligence in the
connected world. World Wide Web. 25:3. (1223-1241). Online publication
date: 1-May-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-022-01030-5
99. Sharma C and Sinha R. (2022). FLASc: a formal algebra for labeled property
graph schema. Automated Software Engineering. 29:1. Online publication
date: 1-May-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-022-00336-y
100. Koegl A, Hubwieser P, Talbot M, Krugel J, Striewe M and Goedicke M.
(2022). Efficient Structural Analysis of Source Code for Large Scale
Applications in Education 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education
Conference (EDUCON). 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766748. 978-1-6654-4434-7.
(24-30).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9766748/
101. Kejriwal M. (2022). Knowledge Graphs: A Practical Review of the Research
Landscape. Information. 10.3390/info13040161. 13:4. (161).
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/13/4/161
102. Cotumaccio N. (2022). Graphs can be succinctly indexed for pattern
matching in $O(\vert E\vert ^{2}+\vert V\vert ^{5/2})$ time 2022 Data
Compression Conference (DCC). 10.1109/DCC52660.2022.00035.
978-1-6654-7893-9. (272-281).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9810716/
103. Ahmadi Z, Parand F and Matinfar F. (2021). A fuzzy logic‐based approach
for fuzzy queries over NoSQL graph database . Concurrency and Computation:
Practice and Experience. 10.1002/cpe.6542. 34:1. Online publication date:
10-Jan-2022.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.6542
104. Marwaha H, Sharma A and Sharma V. (2022). Role of Graph Theory in
Computational Neuroscience. Futuristic Design and Intelligent
Computational Techniques in Neuroscience and Neuroengineering.
10.4018/978-1-7998-7433-1.ch005. (86-97).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-7433-1.ch005
105. Yuan Y, Soh D, Yang X, Guo K and Quek T. (2022). GRACGE: Graph Signal
Clustering and Multiple Graph Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Signal
Processing. 70. (2015-2030). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2022.3167145
106. Xu Z, Wu H, Chen X, Wang Y and Yue Z. Building a Natural Language Query
and Control Interface for IoT Platforms. IEEE Access.
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186760. 10. (68655-68668).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9808139/
107. Akid H, Frey G, Ayed M and Lachiche N. Performance of NoSQL Graph
Implementations of Star vs. Snowflake Schemas. IEEE Access.
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171256. 10. (48603-48614).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9769769/
108. Sun N, Li C, Chan H, Dung Le B, Islam M, Zhang L, Islam M and Armstrong W.
Defining Security Requirements With the Common Criteria: Applications,
Adoptions, and Challenges. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3168716. 10.
(44756-44777).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9761799/
109. Benjamin S, Christopher R and Carl H. (2023). Feature modeling for
configurable and adaptable modular buildings. Advanced Engineering
Informatics. 51:C. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101514
110. Giabelli A, Malandri L, Mercorio F and Mezzanzanica M. (2022). GraphLMI: A
data driven system for exploring labor market information through graph
databases. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 81:3. (3061-3090). Online
publication date: 1-Jan-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09115-x
111. Șimonca I, Corbea A and Belciu A. (2022). Analytical Capabilities of
Graphs in Oracle Multimodel Database. Education, Research and Business
Technologies. 10.1007/978-981-16-8866-9_9. (97-109).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-16-8866-9_9
112. Ma Z, Li G and Ma R. (2022). RDF Data and Management. Modeling and
Management of Fuzzy Semantic RDF Data. 10.1007/978-3-031-11669-8_1.
(1-31).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-11669-8_1
113. Natani G and Watanabe S. (2021). Knowledge Graph-based Data Transformation
Recommendation Engine 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big
Data). 10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671905. 978-1-6654-3902-2. (4617-4623).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9671905/
114. Daverio P, Chaudhry H, Margara A and Rossi M. (2021). Temporal Pattern
Recognition in Graph Data Structures 2021 IEEE International Conference on
Big Data (Big Data). 10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671837. 978-1-6654-3902-2.
(2753-2763).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9671837/
115. Purohit S, Van N and Chin G. (2021). Semantic Property Graph for Scalable
Knowledge Graph Analytics 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data
(Big Data). 10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671547. 978-1-6654-3902-2.
(2672-2677).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9671547/
116. Zheng X, Xiao Y, Song W, Tong F, Liu S and Zhao D. (2021). COVID19-OBKG:
An Ontology-Based Knowledge Graph and Web Service for COVID-19 2021 IEEE
International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).
10.1109/BIBM52615.2021.9669535. 978-1-6654-0126-5. (2456-2462).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9669535/
117. Qassimi S, Abdelwahed E, Hafidi M and Qazdar A. (2021). Towards a
folksonomy graph-based context-aware recommender system of annotated
books. Journal of Big Data. 10.1186/s40537-021-00457-3. 8:1. Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2021.
https://journalofbigdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40537-021-00457-3
118. Bollen E, Hendrix R, Kuijpers B and Vaisman A. (2021). Towards the
Internet of Water: Using graph databases for hydrological analysis on the
Flemish river system. Transactions in GIS. 10.1111/tgis.12801. 25:6.
(2907-2938). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.12801
119. Sharma C, Sinha R and Johnson K. (2021). Practical and comprehensive
formalisms for modelling contemporary graph query languages. Information
Systems. 102:C. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2021.101816
120. Lourdusamy R and Mattam X. (2021). A Knowledgebase Model Using RDF
Knowledge Graph for ClinicalDecision Support Systems. Semantic Web for
Effective Healthcare. 10.1002/9781119764175.ch10. (215-247). Online
publication date: 23-Nov-2021.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119764175.ch10
121. Soleymani F and Paquet E. (2021). Deep graph convolutional reinforcement
learning for financial portfolio management – DeepPocket. Expert Systems
with Applications: An International Journal. 182:C. Online publication
date: 15-Nov-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115127
122. Hogan A, Blomqvist E, Cochez M, d'Amato C, Melo G, Gutierrez C, Kirrane S,
Gayo J, Navigli R, Neumaier S, Ngomo A, Polleres A, Rashid S, Rula A,
Schmelzeisen L, Sequeda J, Staab S and Zimmermann A. (2021). Knowledge
Graphs. Synthesis Lectures on Data, Semantics, and Knowledge.
10.2200/S01125ED1V01Y202109DSK022. 12:2. (1-257). Online publication date:
8-Nov-2021.
https://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/10.2200/S01125ED1V01Y202109DSK022
123. Kim L, Yahia E, Segonds F, Véron P and Mallet A. (2021). i-Dataquest.
Computers in Industry. 132:C. Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103527
124. Hajibabaee P, Malekzadeh M, Heidari M, Zad S, Uzuner O and Jones J.
(2021). An Empirical Study of the GraphSAGE and Word2vec Algorithms for
Graph Multiclass Classification 2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information
Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON).
10.1109/IEMCON53756.2021.9623238. 978-1-6654-0066-4. (0515-0522).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9623238/
125. Hüseynli A and Akcayol M. Bloom Filter Based Graph Database CRUD
Optimization for Stream Data. 2021 11th IEEE International Conference on
Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology
and Applications (IDAACS). (1056-1061).
https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS53288.2021.9661054
126. Huang S, Yen H, Liu Y, Tseng K, Kung J, Lin C, Li Y, Chen Y and Wang C.
(2021). Cluster Tool Performance Analysis using Graph Database 2021 IEEE
34th International System-on-Chip Conference (SOCC).
10.1109/SOCC52499.2021.9739223. 978-1-6654-2931-3. (230-235).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9739223/
127. Fernau H and Gajjar K. The Space Complexity of Sum Labelling. Fundamentals
of Computation Theory. (230-244).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86593-1_16
128. Figueira D. Foundations of Graph Path Query Languages. Reasoning Web.
Declarative Artificial Intelligence . (1-21).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95481-9_1
129. Debrouvier A, Parodi E, Perazzo M, Soliani V and Vaisman A. (2021). A
model and query language for temporal graph databases. The VLDB Journal —
The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases. 30:5. (825-858).
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-021-00675-4
130. Mavrogiorgos K, Kiourtis A, Mavrogiorgou A and Kyriazis D. A Comparative
Study of MongoDB, ArangoDB and CouchDB for Big Data Storage. Proceedings
of the 2021 5th International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing.
(8-14).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3481646.3481648
131. de Anda-Jauregui G and Hernandez-Lemus E. (2021). Identification of
Potential Adverse Drug Reactions using Random Walk on Network Models 2021
Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC).
10.1109/ENC53357.2021.9534826. 978-1-6654-2612-1. (1-6).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9534826/
132. Fan W, He T, Lai L, Li X, Li Y, Li Z, Qian Z, Tian C, Wang L, Xu J, Yao Y,
Yin Q, Yu W, Zhou J, Zhu D and Zhu R. (2021). GraphScope. Proceedings of
the VLDB Endowment. 14:12. (2879-2892). Online publication date:
1-Jul-2021.
https://doi.org/10.14778/3476311.3476369
133. Nahar K, Gill A and Roach T. (2021). Developing an access control
management metamodel for secure digital enterprise architecture modeling.
SECURITY AND PRIVACY. 10.1002/spy2.160. 4:4. Online publication date:
1-Jul-2021.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spy2.160
134. Angles R, Bonifati A, Dumbrava S, Fletcher G, Hare K, Hidders J, Lee V, Li
B, Libkin L, Martens W, Murlak F, Perryman J, Savković O, Schmidt M,
Sequeda J, Staworko S and Tomaszuk D. PG-Keys: Keys for Property Graphs.
Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data.
(2423-2436).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3457561
135. Arenas M, Gutierrez C and Sequeda J. Querying in the Age of Graph
Databases and Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the 2021 International
Conference on Management of Data. (2821-2828).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3457545
136. DEĞERLİ A. (2021). AĞ TOPLUMU YAKLAŞIMI İLE AKADEMİK BİR SOSYAL AĞ MODELİ
İÇİN GRAF VERİ TABANI ÖNERİSİ. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi.
10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/1.68-88. (68-88).
https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2021.9/1.68-88
137. Ramis Ferrer B, Mohammed W, Ahmad M, Iarovyi S, Zhang J, Harrison R and
Martinez Lastra J. (2021). Comparing ontologies and databases: a critical
review of lifecycle engineering models in manufacturing. Knowledge and
Information Systems. 63:6. (1271-1304). Online publication date:
1-Jun-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-021-01558-4
138. Schneider S, Lambers L and Orejas F. (2021). A logic-based incremental
approach to graph repair featuring delta preservation. International
Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT). 23:3. (369-410).
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-020-00584-x
139. Timón-Reina S, Rincón M and Martínez-Tomás R. (2021). An overview of graph
databases and their applications in the biomedical domain. Database.
10.1093/database/baab026. 2021. Online publication date: 18-May-2021.
https://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/baab026/6277712
140. Nicolaescu A, Mastorakis S and Psaras I. Store Edge Networked Data (SEND):
A Data and Performance Driven Edge Storage Framework. IEEE INFOCOM 2021 -
IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. (1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488804
141. Kuhn M and Franke J. (2021). Data continuity and traceability in complex
manufacturing systems: a graph-based modeling approach. International
Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing.
10.1080/0951192X.2021.1901320. (1-18).
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1901320
142. Komatani K, Fujioka Y, Nakashima K, Hayashi K and Nakano M. Knowledge
Graph Completion-based Question Selection for Acquiring Domain Knowledge
through Dialogues. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on
Intelligent User Interfaces. (531-541).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3397481.3450653
143. Kashef M, Liu Y, Montgomery K and Candell R. (2020). Wireless
Cyber-Physical System Performance Evaluation Through a Graph Database
Approach. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering.
10.1115/1.4048205. 21:2. Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021.
https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/computingengineering/article/doi/10.1115/1.4048205/1086513/Wireless-CyberPhysical-System-Performance
144. Qiao R, Feng K, He H and Zhong X. (2020). Graph Pattern Matching:
Capturing Bisimilar Subgraph. International Journal of Pattern Recognition
and Artificial Intelligence. 10.1142/S0218001421500117. 35:03. (2150011).
Online publication date: 15-Mar-2021.
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218001421500117
145. Krommyda M and Kantere V. (2021). Spatial Data Management in IoT Systems:
Solutions and Evaluation. International Journal of Semantic Computing.
10.1142/S1793351X21300016. 15:01. (117-139). Online publication date:
1-Mar-2021.
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1793351X21300016
146. Giabelli A, Malandri L, Mercorio F, Mezzanzanica M and Seveso A. (2021).
Skills2Job. Applied Soft Computing. 101:C. Online publication date:
1-Mar-2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107049
147. Zhou Z, Shi C, Shen X, Cai L, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhao Y and Chen W.
Context-aware Sampling of Large Networks via Graph Representation
Learning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030440. 27:2. (1709-1719).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9224191/
148. Šestak M, Heričko M, Družovec T and Turkanović M. (2021). Applying
k-vertex cardinality constraints on a Neo4j graph database. Future
Generation Computer Systems. 10.1016/j.future.2020.09.036. 115. (459-474).
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167739X19324094
149. Rabuzin K and Šestak M. (2021). Graph Database Management Systems.
Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fifth Edition.
10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch053. (778-790).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch053
150. Kattepur A. (2021). Knowledge-Driven Autonomous Robotic Action Planning
for Industry 4.0. Innovations in the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
and Smart Factory. 10.4018/978-1-7998-3375-8.ch011. (149-171).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-3375-8.ch011
151. Nadal S, Abello A, Romero O, Vansummeren S and Vassiliadis P. Graph-driven
Federated Data Management. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
Engineering. 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3077044. (1-1).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9422168/
152. Wu X, Jiang T, Zhu Y and Bu C. Knowledge Graph for China's Genealogy. IEEE
Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3073745.
(1-1).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9409650/
153. Samaraweera G and Chang J. Security and Privacy Implications on Database
Systems in Big Data Era: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data
Engineering. 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2929794. 33:1. (239-258).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8765784/
154. Mostajabi F, Safaei A and Sahafi A. A Systematic Review of Data Models for
the Big Data Problem. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112880. 9.
(128889-128904).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9537765/
155. Ruiz-Saavedra S, García-González H, Arboleya S, Salazar N, Emilio
Labra-Gayo J, Díaz I, Gueimonde M, González S and de los Reyes-Gavilán C.
(2021). Intestinal microbiota alterations by dietary exposure to chemicals
from food cooking and processing. Application of data science for risk
prediction. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.037. 19. (1081-1091).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2001037021000416
156. Ziegler J, Reimann P, Keller F and Mitschang B. (2021). A Metadata Model
to Connect Isolated Data Silos and Activities of the CAE Domain. Advanced
Information Systems Engineering. 10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_13. (213-228).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_13
157. Ahmed A, Enns K and Thomo A. (2021). Triangle Enumeration for
Billion-Scale Graphs in RDBMS. Advanced Information Networking and
Applications. 10.1007/978-3-030-75075-6_13. (160-173).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-75075-6_13
158. Jalali A. (2021). Graph-Based Process Mining. Process Mining Workshops.
10.1007/978-3-030-72693-5_21. (273-285).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-72693-5_21
159. Ahmed A and Thomo A. (2021). PageRank for Billion-Scale Networks in RDBMS.
Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.
10.1007/978-3-030-57796-4_9. (89-100).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-57796-4_9
160. Matter H, Buning C, Stefanescu D, Ruf S and Hessler G. (2020). Using Graph
Databases to Investigate Trends in Structure–Activity Relationship
Networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00947. 60:12. (6120-6134). Online publication date:
28-Dec-2021.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00947
161. Ma F, Ma S and Liu Q. (2020). Graphical Probability Model and Heritage
Tourism Routine Design 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software
Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C).
10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00094. 978-1-7281-8915-4. (535-541).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9282680/
162. Rizvi S and Fong P. (2020). Efficient Authorization of Graph-database
Queries in an Attribute-supporting ReBAC Model. ACM Transactions on
Privacy and Security. 23:4. (1-33). Online publication date: 30-Nov-2020.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3401027
163. Komar K, Santra A, Bhowmick S and Chakravarthy S. EERMLN: EER Approach for
Modeling, Mapping, and Analyzing Complex Data Using Multilayer Networks
(MLNs). Conceptual Modeling. (555-572).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62522-1_41
164. Wu H, Fu Z and Wang Y. (2020). A medical network clustering method with
weighted graph structure. Measurement and Control.
10.1177/0020294020952469. 53:9-10. (1751-1759). Online publication date:
1-Nov-2020.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020294020952469
165. Chen L, Goranci G, Henzinger M, Peng R and Saranurak T. (2020). Fast
Dynamic Cuts, Distances and Effective Resistances via Vertex Sparsifiers
2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00109. 978-1-7281-9621-3. (1135-1146).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9317991/
166. Canbaz Y, Dogrusoz U, Celiksoy M, Gungor F and Kurban K. (2020). Hydra:
detecting fraud in financial transactions via graph based representation
and visual analysis 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary
Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT).
10.1109/ISMSIT50672.2020.9255191. 978-1-7281-9090-7. (1-6).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9255191/
167. Badica C and Mladin S. (2020). Conference Support System through
Scientometry and Collaboration Analytics 2020 24th International
Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC).
10.1109/ICSTCC50638.2020.9259731. 978-1-7281-9809-5. (546-552).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9259731/
168. Lambers L, Schneider S and Weisgut M. (2020). Model-Based Testing of Read
Only Graph Queries 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing,
Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW).
10.1109/ICSTW50294.2020.00022. 978-1-7281-1075-2. (24-34).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9155876/
169. Zhang W, Shang R and Jiao L. (2020). Complex network graph embedding
method based on shortest path and MOEA/D for community detection. Applied
Soft Computing. 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106764. (106764). Online publication
date: 1-Oct-2020.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S156849462030702X
170. Frozza A and Mello R. (2020). JS4Geo: a canonical JSON Schema for
geographic data suitable to NoSQL databases. Geoinformatica. 24:4.
(987-1019). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-020-00415-w
171. Reina F, Huf A, Presser D and Siqueira F. Modeling and Enforcing Integrity
Constraints on Graph Databases. Database and Expert Systems Applications.
(269-284).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59003-1_18
172. Krommyda M and Kantere V. (2020). Spatial Data Management in IoT systems:
A study of available storage and indexing solutions 2020 Second
International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI).
10.1109/TransAI49837.2020.00033. 978-1-7281-8699-3. (146-153).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9253152/
173. Mondal S, Basu A and Mukherjee N. (2020). Building a trust-based doctor
recommendation system on top of multilayer graph database. Journal of
Biomedical Informatics. 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103549. (103549). Online
publication date: 1-Aug-2020.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1532046420301775
174. Arsintescu B, Deo S and Harris W. (2019). PathQuery Pregel:
high-performance graph query with bulk synchronous processing. Pattern
Analysis and Applications. 10.1007/s10044-019-00841-z. 23:3. (1493-1504).
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2020.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10044-019-00841-z
175. Veerman J and Lyons R. (2020). A Primer on Laplacian Dynamics in Directed
Graphs. Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems.
10.33581/1561-4085-2020-23-2-196-206. 23:2. (196-206). Online publication
date: 9-Jul-2020.
http://www.j-npcs.org/abstracts/vol2020/v23no2/v23no2p196.html
176. Chen D, Jalilifard A, Veloso A and Ziviani N. (2020). Modeling
Pharmacological Effects with Multi-Relation Unsupervised Graph Embedding
2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).
10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9206668. 978-1-7281-6926-2. (1-7).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9206668/
177. Arias J. (2020). The Benefits of Graph Databases for the Computation of
Clinical Quality Measures 2020 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on
Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). 10.1109/CBMS49503.2020.00088.
978-1-7281-9429-5. (433-436).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9182798/
178. Patibandla R. (2020). Regularization of Graphs. Recommender System with
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. 10.1002/9781119711582.ch19.
(373-386). Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119711582.ch19
179. Sunkle S, Saxena K, Patil A, Kulkarni V, Jain D, Chacko R and Rai B.
Information Extraction and Graph Representation for the Design of
Formulated Products. Advanced Information Systems Engineering. (433-448).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_27
180. Pivert O, Scholly E, Smits G and Thion V. (2020). Fuzzy quality-Aware
queries to graph databases. Information Sciences: an International
Journal. 521:C. (160-173). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.035
181. Azad P, Navimipour N, Rahmani A and Sharifi A. (2020). The role of
structured and unstructured data managing mechanisms in the Internet of
things. Cluster Computing. 23:2. (1185-1198). Online publication date:
1-Jun-2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-019-02986-2
182. Lu J and Holubová I. (2019). Multi-model Databases. ACM Computing Surveys.
52:3. (1-38). Online publication date: 31-May-2020.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3323214
183. Gómez L, Kuijpers B and Vaisman A. Online analytical processsing on graph
data. Intelligent Data Analysis. 10.3233/IDA-194576. 24:3. (515-541).
https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/IDA-194576
184. Polyvyanyy A, Pika A and Hofstede A. (2020). Scenario-based process
querying for compliance, reuse, and standardization. Information Systems.
10.1016/j.is.2020.101563. (101563). Online publication date: 1-May-2020.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306437920300569
185. Ahmed A, Hassan Z and Shabbir M. (2020). Interpretable Multi-Scale Graph
Descriptors via Structural Compression. Information Sciences.
10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.032. Online publication date: 1-May-2020.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020025520304266
186. Jovanovic P, Nadal S, Romero O, Abelló A and Bilalli B. (2020). Quarry: A
User-centered Big Data Integration Platform. Information Systems
Frontiers. 10.1007/s10796-020-10001-y.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10001-y
187. Lin P, Song Q, Wu Y and Pi J. (2020). Repairing Entities using Star
Constraints in Multirelational Graphs 2020 IEEE 36th International
Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 10.1109/ICDE48307.2020.00027.
978-1-7281-2903-7. (229-240).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9101352/
188. Candell R, Kashef M, Liu Y, Montgomery K and Foufou S. (2020). A Graph
Database Approach to Wireless IIoT Workcell Performance Evaluation 2020
IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).
10.1109/ICIT45562.2020.9067199. 978-1-7281-5754-2. (251-258).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9067199/
189. Shimomura L, Oyamada R, Vieira M and Kaster D. (2020). A survey on
graph-based methods for similarity searches in metric spaces. Information
Systems. 10.1016/j.is.2020.101507. (101507). Online publication date:
1-Feb-2020.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306437920300181
190. Polyakov I, Chepovskiy A and Chepovskiy A. (2020). Data Compression in Big
Graph Warehouse. Journal of Mathematical Sciences.
10.1007/s10958-020-04686-4.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10958-020-04686-4
191. Bayitaa S, Nanor E, Kpiebaareh M, Agyemang B and Wu W. Graph Based
Analytics Enhanced by Deep Learning. Proceedings of 2020 6th International
Conference on Computing and Data Engineering. (39-43).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3379247.3379286
192. Sunkle S, Jain D, Saxena K, Patil A, Chacko R and Rai B. (2020). Generate
and Test for Formulated Product Variants With Information Extraction and
an In-Silico Model. Advanced Digital Architectures for Model-Driven
Adaptive Enterprises. 10.4018/978-1-7998-0108-5.ch010. (223-250).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-7998-0108-5.ch010
193. Dhiman A and Toshniwal D. An Approximate Model for Event Detection From
Twitter Data. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007004. 8.
(122168-122184).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9133064/
194. Chen F, Wang Y, Wang B and Kuo C. (2020). (2020). Graph representation
learning: a survey. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information
Processing. 10.1017/ATSIP.2020.13. 9:1.
http://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/SIP-151
195. Guzzi P and Roy S. (2020). Biological network databases. Biological
Network Analysis. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819350-1.00011-6. (77-93).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128193501000116
196. Chen J, Song Q, Zhao C and Li Z. (2020). Graph Database and Relational
Database Performance Comparison on a Transportation Network. Advances in
Computing and Data Sciences. 10.1007/978-981-15-6634-9_37. (407-418).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-15-6634-9_37
197. Wang X and Chen W. (2020). Knowledge Graph Data Management: Models,
Methods, and Systems. Web Information Systems Engineering.
10.1007/978-981-15-3281-8_1. (3-12).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-15-3281-8_1
198. Zhuge H. (2020). Cyber-Physical-Social Semantic Link Network.
Cyber-Physical-Social Intelligence. 10.1007/978-981-13-7311-4_3. (55-141).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-13-7311-4_3
199. Khosrowjerdi H, Nemati H and Meinke K. (2020). Spatio-Temporal
Model-Checking of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Graph Queries. Tests and
Proofs. 10.1007/978-3-030-50995-8_4. (59-79).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-50995-8_4
200. Banning E. (2020). Compilations: Designing and Using Archaeological
Databases. The Archaeologist's Laboratory. 10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3_4.
(43-58).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-47992-3_4
201. Lukyanenko R and Parsons J. (2020). Easier Crowdsourcing Is Better:
Designing Crowdsourcing Systems to Increase Information Quality and User
Participation. Design Science Research. Cases.
10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_3. (43-72).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_3
202. Fensel D, Şimşek U, Angele K, Huaman E, Kärle E, Panasiuk O, Toma I,
Umbrich J and Wahler A. (2020). How to Build a Knowledge Graph. Knowledge
Graphs. 10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_2. (11-68).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_2
203. Fensel D, Şimşek U, Angele K, Huaman E, Kärle E, Panasiuk O, Toma I,
Umbrich J and Wahler A. (2020). Introduction: What Is a Knowledge Graph?.
Knowledge Graphs. 10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_1. (1-10).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_1
204. Sharma C and Sinha R. A Schema-First Formalism for Labeled Property Graph
Databases. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Big
Data Computing, Applications and Technologies. (71-80).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3365109.3368782
205. Prabhu S, Murthy K and Subramanyam N. (2019). Validating Tantra Framework
using entropy. Social Network Analysis and Mining.
10.1007/s13278-019-0562-1. 9:1. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13278-019-0562-1
206. Mennicke S. Modal Schema Graphs for Graph Databases. Conceptual Modeling.
(498-512).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_41
207. Steinmetz D, Merz F, Ma H and Hartmann S. A Graph Model for Taxi Ride
Sharing Supported by Graph Databases. Conceptual Modeling. (108-116).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_10
208. Sheng S, Zhou P and Wu X. (2019). CEPV: A Tree Structure Information
Extraction and Visualization Tool for Big Knowledge Graph 2019 IEEE
International Conference on Big Knowledge (ICBK). 10.1109/ICBK.2019.00037.
978-1-7281-4607-2. (221-228).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8944537/
209. Qian Q, Wang Y and Zhao S. (2019). Materials data specification: Methods
and use cases. Computational Materials Science.
10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109086. 169. (109086). Online publication date:
1-Nov-2019.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0927025619303775
210. Wirawan P, Er Riyanto D, Nugraheni D and Yasmin Y. (2019). Graph Database
Schema for Multimodal Transportation in Semarang. Journal of Information
Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence.
10.20473/jisebi.5.2.163-170. 5:2. (163).
https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JISEBI/article/view/12013
211. Meixner K, Winkler D, Wapp M, Rosendahl R and Biffl S. Investigating the
Performance of selected Data Storage Concepts for AutomationML Models.
IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics
Society. (2785-2791).
https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2019.8927275
212. Gómez L, Kuijpers B and Vaisman A. (2019). Analytical queries on semantic
trajectories using graph databases. Transactions in GIS.
10.1111/tgis.12556. 23:5. (1078-1101). Online publication date:
1-Oct-2019.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tgis.12556
213. Wu J and Nakamoto Y. (2019). RelSeeker: Relationship-based Query Language
in a Graph Database for Social Networks 2019 Sixth International
Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS).
10.1109/SNAMS.2019.8931872. 978-1-7281-2946-4. (268-273).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8931872/
214. Barakat O, Ventre P, Salsano S and Fu X. (2019). Busoni: Policy
Composition and Northbound Interface for IPv6 Segment Routing Networks
2019 IEEE 27th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP).
10.1109/ICNP.2019.8888104. 978-1-7281-2700-2. (1-4).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8888104/
215. Veerman J and Kummel E. (2019). Diffusion and consensus on weakly
connected directed graphs. Linear Algebra and its Applications.
10.1016/j.laa.2019.05.014. 578. (184-206). Online publication date:
1-Oct-2019.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002437951930223X
216. Surinx D, Van den Bussche J and Van Gucht D. (2019). A framework for
comparing query languages in their ability to express boolean queries.
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 87:1-2. (157-184).
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09639-5
217. Reyes A, Hernandez A, Gutierrez R, Bolivar N, Jimenez D, Bastidas J and
Solano J. (2019). A Novel Extended Graph Strategy to Model Microgrids 2019
International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST).
10.1109/SEST.2019.8849117. 978-1-7281-1156-8. (1-6).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8849117/
218. Anikin D, Borisenko O and Nedumov Y. (2019). Labeled Property Graphs: SQL
or NoSQL? 2019 Ivannikov Memorial Workshop (IVMEM).
10.1109/IVMEM.2019.00007. 978-1-7281-4623-2. (7-13).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8880730/
219. Álvarez-García S, Freire B, Ladra S and Pedreira Ó. (2022). Compact and
efficient representation of general graph databases. Knowledge and
Information Systems. 60:3. (1479-1510). Online publication date:
1-Sep-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1275-x
220. Wang Q, He S, Zheng X and Zeng D. (2019). Marketing Pattern Risks
Detection Based on Semi-Supervised Learning 2019 IEEE International
Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI).
10.1109/ISI.2019.8823291. 978-1-7281-2504-6. (229-229).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8823291/
221. Sharma C, Sinha R and Leitao P. (2019). IASelect: Finding Best-fit Agent
Practices in Industrial CPS Using Graph Databases 2019 IEEE 17th
International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).
10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972272. 978-1-7281-2927-3. (1558-1563).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8972272/
222. Yerashenia N and Bolotov A. (2019). Computational Modelling for Bankruptcy
Prediction: Semantic Data Analysis Integrating Graph Database and
Financial Ontology 2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics
(CBI). 10.1109/CBI.2019.00017. 978-1-7281-0650-2. (84-93).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8808039/
223. Pivert O, Slama O and Thion V. (2019). Expression and efficient evaluation
of fuzzy quantified structural queries to fuzzy graph databases. Fuzzy
Sets and Systems. 366:C. (3-17). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.06.002
224. Petnga L. (2019). Graph‐based Assessment and Analysis of System
Architecture Models. INCOSE International Symposium.
10.1002/j.2334-5837.2019.00644.x. 29:1. (922-936). Online publication
date: 1-Jul-2019.
https://incose.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2019.00644.x
225. Chaudhry H. FlowGraph. Proceedings of the 13th ACM International
Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems. (272-275).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3328905.3332303
226. Tahboub R, Wu X, Essertel G and Rompf T. Towards compiling graph queries
in relational engines. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGPLAN International
Symposium on Database Programming Languages. (30-41).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3315507.3330200
227. Costa B and Cura L. An Neo4j implementation for designing fuzzy graph
databases. Proceedings of the 23rd International Database Applications &
Engineering Symposium. (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3331076.3331082
228. Ma H, Alipourlangouri M, Wu Y, Chiang F and Pi J. (2019). Ontology-based
entity matching in attributed graphs. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.
12:10. (1195-1207). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019.
https://doi.org/10.14778/3339490.3339501
229. Barakat O, Koll D and Fu X. Gavel: A Fast and Easy-to-Use Plain Data
Representation for Software-Defined Networks. IEEE Transactions on Network
and Service Management. 10.1109/TNSM.2019.2903440. 16:2. (606-617).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8661512/
230. Hajeer M and Dasgupta D. Handling Big Data Using a Data-Aware HDFS and
Evolutionary Clustering Technique. IEEE Transactions on Big Data.
10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2782785. 5:2. (134-147).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8197362/
231. Heidari S, Simmhan Y, Calheiros R and Buyya R. (2018). Scalable Graph
Processing Frameworks. ACM Computing Surveys. 51:3. (1-53). Online
publication date: 31-May-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3199523
232. Moore J, Boland M, Camara P, Chervitz H, Gonzalez G, Himes B, Kim D,
Mowery D, Ritchie M, Shen L, Urbanowicz R and Holmes J. (2019). Preparing
next-generation scientists for biomedical big data: artificial
intelligence approaches. Personalized Medicine. 10.2217/pme-2018-0145.
16:3. (247-257). Online publication date: 1-May-2019.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2217/pme-2018-0145
233. Sinha R, Dowdeswell B, Zhabelova G and Vyatkin V. (2018). TORUS. ACM
Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems. 3:2. (1-25). Online publication
date: 30-Apr-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3203208
234. Kattepur A and P B. RoboPlanner. Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP
Symposium on Applied Computing. (953-956).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297568
235. Quaas K and Shirmohammadi M. (2019). Synchronizing Data Words for Register
Automata. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 20:2. (1-27). Online
publication date: 4-Apr-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3309760
236. Davoudian A, Chen L and Liu M. (2018). A Survey on NoSQL Stores. ACM
Computing Surveys. 51:2. (1-43). Online publication date: 31-Mar-2019.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3158661
237. Lukyanenko R, Parsons J and Samuel B. (2018). Representing instances: the
case for reengineering conceptual modelling grammars. European Journal of
Information Systems. 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1488567. 28:1. (68-90). Online
publication date: 2-Jan-2019.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1488567
238. Van Erven G, Carvalho R, Cordeiro da Silva W, Lifschitz S, Vera-Olivera H
and Holanda M. Designing Graph Databases With GRAPHED. Journal of Database
Management. 10.4018/JDM.2019010103. 30:1. (41-60).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JDM.2019010103
239. Lukyanenko R and Parsons J. (2019). Beyond Micro-Tasks. Crowdsourcing.
10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch076. (1510-1535).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch076
240. Lukyanenko R and Parsons J. (2019). Beyond Micro-Tasks. Social
Entrepreneurship. 10.4018/978-1-5225-8182-6.ch072. (1403-1428).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-8182-6.ch072
241. Guerreiro S. Challenges of Meta Access Control Model Enforcement to an
Increased Interoperability. Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in
Business Operations and Management. 10.4018/978-1-5225-7362-3.ch018.
(247-258).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-7362-3.ch018
242. Kejriwal M, Lopez V, Sequeda J, Fionda V, Pirrò G, Consens M, Kejriwal M,
Lopez V and Sequeda J. (2019). Querying knowledge graphs with extended
property paths. Semantic Web. 10:6. (1127-1168). Online publication date:
1-Jan-2019.
https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-190365
243. Yuan Y, Soh D, Yang H and Quek T. Learning Overlapping Community-based
Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over
Networks. 10.1109/TSIPN.2019.2936361. (1-1).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8807284/
244. Reddy K. Interactive Graph Data Integration System With Spatial-Oriented
Visualization and Feedback-Driven Provenance. IEEE Access.
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928847. 7. (101336-101344).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8763970/
245. Tushkanova O and Samoylov V. (2019). Knowledge Net: Model and System for
Accumulation, Representation, and Use of Knowledge. IFAC-PapersOnLine.
10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.351. 52:13. (1150-1155).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405896319313291
246. Paulin A. (2019). Choosing Fitting Technology. Smart City Governance.
10.1016/B978-0-12-816224-8.00012-1. (219-236).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128162248000121
247. Dhillon S. (2019). Biological Databases. Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics
and Computational Biology. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20198-2. (96-117).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128096338201982
248. Bolla S, Tirumalasetty S and Jyothi S. (2019). Anatomization of
Document-Based NoSQL Databases. Innovations in Computer Science and
Engineering. 10.1007/978-981-13-7082-3_65. (569-577).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-13-7082-3_65
249. Meier A and Kaufmann M. (2019). NoSQL Databases. SQL & NoSQL Databases.
10.1007/978-3-658-24549-8_7. (201-218).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-658-24549-8_7
250. Paradies M, Plantikow S and Rest O. (2019). Graph Data Management Systems.
Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_82.
(822-830).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_82
251. Gutiérrez C, Hidders J and Wood P. (2019). Graph Data Models. Encyclopedia
of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_81. (830-835).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-77525-8_81
252. Bhattacharyya A, Baldin I, Xin Y and Anyanwu K. (2019). Evaluating
Generalized Path Queries by Integrating Algebraic Path Problem Solving
with Graph Pattern Matching. Semantic Systems. The Power of AI and
Knowledge Graphs. 10.1007/978-3-030-33220-4_8. (101-116).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-33220-4_8
253. Qassimi S and Abdelwahed E. (2019). Semantic Graph-Based Recommender
System. Application in Cultural Heritage. New Trends in Model and Data
Engineering. 10.1007/978-3-030-32213-7_8. (109-121).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-32213-7_8
254. Comyn-Wattiau I and Akoka J. (2019). Query-Based Reverse Engineering of
Graph Databases – From Program to Model. New Trends in Databases and
Information Systems. 10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_22. (188-197).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_22
255. Vaisman A, Besteiro F and Valverde M. (2019). Modelling and Querying Star
and Snowflake Warehouses Using Graph Databases. New Trends in Databases
and Information Systems. 10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_18. (144-152).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_18
256. Schneider S, Lambers L and Orejas F. (2019). A Logic-Based Incremental
Approach to Graph Repair. Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering.
10.1007/978-3-030-16722-6_9. (151-167).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-16722-6_9
257. Akintoye S, Bagula A, Isafiade O, Djemaiel Y and Boudriga N. (2019). Data
Model for Cloud Computing Environment. e-Infrastructure and e-Services for
Developing Countries. 10.1007/978-3-030-16042-5_19. (199-215).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-16042-5_19
258. Ramler R, Buchgeher G, Klammer C, Pfeiffer M, Salomon C, Thaller H and
Linsbauer L. (2019). Benefits and Drawbacks of Representing and Analyzing
Source Code and Software Engineering Artifacts with Graph Databases.
Software Quality: The Complexity and Challenges of Software Engineering
and Software Quality in the Cloud. 10.1007/978-3-030-05767-1_9. (125-148).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-05767-1_9
259. JASKIERNY L. (2018). REVIEW OF THE DATA MODELING STANDARDS AND DATA MODEL
TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES. Applied Computer Science. 10.35784/acs-2018-32.
14:4. (93-108).
https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/acs/article/view/3268
260. Lissandrini M, Brugnara M and Velegrakis Y. (2018). Beyond
macrobenchmarks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 12:4. (390-403).
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018.
https://doi.org/10.14778/3297753.3297759
261. Musa A, Dehmer M, Yli-Harja O and Emmert-Streib F. (2018). Exploiting
Genomic Relations in Big Data Repositories by Graph-Based Search Methods.
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. 10.3390/make1010012. 1:1.
(205-210).
http://www.mdpi.com/2504-4990/1/1/12
262. Fortini P and Davis C. Analysis, Integration and Visualization of Urban
Data From Multiple Heterogeneous Sources. Proceedings of the 1st ACM
SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Advances on Resilient and Intelligent Cities.
(17-26).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3284566.3284569
263. Schneider S, Lambers L and Orejas F. (2018). Automated reasoning for
attributed graph properties. International Journal on Software Tools for
Technology Transfer (STTT). 20:6. (705-737). Online publication date:
1-Nov-2018.
/doi/10.5555/3288063.3288080
264. Yang C, Feng Y, Li P, Shi Y and Han J. (2018). Meta-Graph Based HIN
Spectral Embedding: Methods, Analyses, and Insights 2018 IEEE
International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 10.1109/ICDM.2018.00081.
978-1-5386-9159-5. (657-666).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8594890/
265. Schneider S, Lambers L and Orejas F. (2018). Automated reasoning for
attributed graph properties. International Journal on Software Tools for
Technology Transfer. 10.1007/s10009-018-0496-3. 20:6. (705-737). Online
publication date: 1-Nov-2018.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10009-018-0496-3
266. Bonifati A, Fletcher G, Voigt H and Yakovets N. (2018). Querying Graphs.
Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. 10.2200/S00873ED1V01Y201808DTM051.
10:3. (1-184). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
https://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/10.2200/S00873ED1V01Y201808DTM051
267. Ayed R. (2018). Social Networks Analysis in a Business Intelligence
Context 2018 IEEE/ACS 15th International Conference on Computer Systems
and Applications (AICCSA). 10.1109/AICCSA.2018.8612832. 978-1-5386-9120-5.
(1-8).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8612832/
268. Castelltort A and Martin T. (2018). Handling scalable approximate queries
over NoSQL graph databases: Cypherf and the Fuzzy4S framework. Fuzzy Sets
and Systems. 10.1016/j.fss.2017.08.002. 348. (21-49). Online publication
date: 1-Oct-2018.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165011417303093
269. Mattern H and König M. (2018). BIM-based modeling and management of design
options at early planning phases. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 38:C.
(316-329). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.08.007
270. Angles R, Arenas M, Barceló P, Hogan A, Reutter J and Vrgoč D. (2017).
Foundations of Modern Query Languages for Graph Databases. ACM Computing
Surveys. 50:5. (1-40). Online publication date: 30-Sep-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3104031
271. Castelltort A, Laurent A, Pivert O, Slama O and Thion V. (2018). Fuzzy
Preference Queries to NoSQL Graph Databases. NoSQL Data Models.
10.1002/9781119528227.ch6. (167-201). Online publication date:
15-Aug-2018.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119528227.ch6
272. Głuch G, Marcinkowski J and Ostropolski-Nalewaja P. Can One Escape Red
Chains?. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in
Computer Science. (492-501).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3209108.3209120
273. Morgado C, Busichia Baioco G, Basso T and Moraes R. (2018). A Security
Model for Access Control in Graph-Oriented Databases 2018 IEEE
International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security
(QRS). 10.1109/QRS.2018.00027. 978-1-5386-7757-5. (135-142).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8424965/
274. Verginadis Y, Patiniotakis I and Mentzas G. (2018). Metadata Schema for
Data-Aware Multi-Cloud Computing 2018 Innovations in Intelligent Systems
and Applications (INISTA). 10.1109/INISTA.2018.8466270. 978-1-5386-5150-6.
(1-9).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8466270/
275. Mezzanzanica M, Mercorio F, Cesarini M, Moscato V and Picariello A.
(2018). GraphDBLP. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 77:14.
(18657-18688). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5503-2
276. Mayer C, Mayer R, Grunert J, Rothermel K and Tariq M. Q-graph. Proceedings
of the 1st ACM SIGMOD Joint International Workshop on Graph Data
Management Experiences & Systems (GRADES) and Network Data Analytics
(NDA). (1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3210259.3210265
277. Biscarini F, Cozzi P and Orozco‐ter Wengel P. (2018). Lessons learnt on
the analysis of large sequence data in animal genomics. Animal Genetics.
10.1111/age.12655. 49:3. (147-158). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2018.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/age.12655
278. Liu M, Shang W, Cao J, Pan C, Lin W and Fu H. (2018). The Design and
Implementation of Script Authoring Assistant System of Film and Television
Big Data 2018 IEEE/ACIS 17th International Conference on Computer and
Information Science (ICIS). 10.1109/ICIS.2018.8466381. 978-1-5386-5892-5.
(579-584).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8466381/
279. Bolla S and Sudhir T. (2018). Pinning Optimal DBDBs for User Delivered
Sentiments 2018 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing
and Control Systems (ICICCS). 10.1109/ICCONS.2018.8662989.
978-1-5386-2842-3. (899-904).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8662989/
280. Francis N, Green A, Guagliardo P, Libkin L, Lindaaker T, Marsault V,
Plantikow S, Rydberg M, Selmer P and Taylor A. Cypher. Proceedings of the
2018 International Conference on Management of Data. (1433-1445).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3190657
281. Angles R, Arenas M, Barcelo P, Boncz P, Fletcher G, Gutierrez C, Lindaaker
T, Paradies M, Plantikow S, Sequeda J, van Rest O and Voigt H. G-CORE.
Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data.
(1421-1432).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3190654
282. Jamkhedkar P, Johnson T, Kanza Y, Shaikh A, Shankaranarayanan N and
Shkapenyuk V. A Graph Database for a Virtualized Network Infrastructure.
Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data.
(1393-1405).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3190653
283. Zou J, Lang B, Zhao J and Zhao Y. Achieving effective and efficient
attributed graph data management using lucene. Proceedings of the 1st
International Conference on Big Data Technologies. (7-13).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3226116.3226119
284. Colaso A, Prieto P, Herrero J, Abad P, Menezo L, Puente V and Gregorio J.
Memory Hierarchy Characterization of NoSQL Applications through
Full-System Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed
Systems. 10.1109/TPDS.2017.2787150. 29:5. (1161-1173).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8239962/
285. Kovacs L, Varga E and Balla T. (2018). Efficiency analysis of ontology
servers 2018 19th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC).
10.1109/CarpathianCC.2018.8399655. 978-1-5386-4762-2. (353-358).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8399655/
286. Hogan A. Profiling Graphs. Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference
2018. (1481-1482).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191603
287. Libkin L, Reutter J, Soto A and Vrgoč D. (2018). TriAL. ACM Transactions
on Database Systems. 43:1. (1-46). Online publication date: 31-Mar-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3154385
288. Rizvi S and Fong P. Efficient Authorization of Graph Database Queries in
an Attribute-Supporting ReBAC Model. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM
Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy. (204-211).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3176258.3176331
289. Kostylev E, Reutter J and Vrgoč D. (2018). Containment of queries for
graphs with data. Journal of Computer and System Sciences.
10.1016/j.jcss.2017.09.005. 92. (65-91). Online publication date:
1-Mar-2018.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002200001730137X
290. Küçükkeçeci C and Yazıcı A. (2018). Big Data Model Simulation on a Graph
Database for Surveillance in Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. Big Data
Research. 10.1016/j.bdr.2017.09.003. 11. (33-43). Online publication date:
1-Mar-2018.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214579617300102
291. Shen Y, Yuan K, Chen D, Colloc J, Yang M, Li Y and Lei K. (2018). An
ontology-driven clinical decision support system (IDDAP) for infectious
disease diagnosis and antibiotic prescription. Artificial Intelligence in
Medicine. 86:C. (20-32). Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2018.01.003
292. Ramezanian S, Meskanen T and Niemi V. (2018). Privacy Preserving Queries
on Directed Graph 2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New
Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). 10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328714.
978-1-5386-3662-6. (1-5).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8328714/
293. Parsons J and Lukyanenko R. (2018). Beyond Micro-Tasks. Journal of
Database Management. 29:1. (1-22). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.
https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2018010101
294. Ma X, Beaulieu S, Fu L, Fox P, Di Stefano M and West P. Documenting
Provenance for Reproducible Marine Ecosystem Assessment in Open Science.
Information Retrieval and Management. 10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch045.
(1051-1077).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch045
295. Guerreiro S. Challenges of Meta Access Control Model Enforcement to an
Increased Interoperability. Encyclopedia of Information Science and
Technology, Fourth Edition. 10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch056. (651-661).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch056
296. YANG S, WANG J, SHI L, TAN Y and QIAO F. (2018). Engineering management
for high-end equipment intelligent manufacturing. Frontiers of Engineering
Management. 10.15302/J-FEM-2018050. 5:4. (420).
http://engineering.cae.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2018050
297. Pienta R, Hohman F, Endert A, Tamersoy A, Roundy K, Gates C, Navathe S and
Chau D. VIGOR: Interactive Visual Exploration of Graph Query Results. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744898. 24:1. (215-225).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8019832/
298. Poulovassilis A. (2018). Applications of Flexible Querying to Graph Data.
Graph Data Management. 10.1007/978-3-319-96193-4_4. (97-142).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-96193-4_4
299. Angles R and Gutierrez C. (2018). An Introduction to Graph Data
Management. Graph Data Management. 10.1007/978-3-319-96193-4_1. (1-32).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-96193-4_1
300. Villa F, Moreno F and Guzmán J. (2018). An Analysis of a Methodology that
Transforms the Entity-Relationship Model into a Conceptual Model for a
Graph Database. Emerging Technologies in Computing.
10.1007/978-3-319-95450-9_6. (70-83).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-95450-9_6
301. Surinx D, Van den Bussche J and Van Gucht D. (2018). A Framework for
Comparing Query Languages in Their Ability to Express Boolean Queries.
Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems.
10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_20. (360-378).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_20
302. Van Erven G, Silva W, Carvalho R and Holanda M. (2018). GRAPHED: A Graph
Description Diagram for Graph Databases. Trends and Advances in
Information Systems and Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_111.
(1141-1151).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_111
303. Sędziwy A and Kotulski L. (2018). Using a Multi-agent System for
Overcoming Flickering Effect in Distributed Large-Scale Customized
Lighting Design. Intelligent Information and Database Systems.
10.1007/978-3-319-75417-8_35. (372-381).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-75417-8_35
304. Paradies M, Plantikow S and Rest O. (2018). Graph Data Management Systems.
Encyclopedia of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_82-1.
(1-9).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_82-1
305. Gutierrez C, Hidders J and Wood P. (2018). Graph Data Models. Encyclopedia
of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_81-1. (1-6).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_81-1
306. Asaad C and Baïna K. (2018). NoSQL Databases – Seek for a Design
Methodology. Model and Data Engineering. 10.1007/978-3-030-00856-7_2.
(25-40).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-00856-7_2
307. San Martín M and Gutierrez C. (2018). Transforming Social Networks Data.
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_389. (3170-3182).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_389
308. Cerinšek M and Batagelj V. (2018). Sources of Network Data. Encyclopedia
of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_313.
(2843-2851).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_313
309. Wood P. (2018). Graph Database. Encyclopedia of Database Systems.
10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_183. (1639-1643).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_183
310. Gupta A. (2018). Graph Data Management in Scientific Applications.
Encyclopedia of Database Systems. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_1298.
(1636-1639).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_1298
311. Soga K, Casey G, Kumar K and Zhao B. (2017). Briefing: High-performance
computing for city-scale modelling and simulations. Proceedings of the
Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction.
10.1680/jsmic.17.00026. 170:4. (80-85). Online publication date:
1-Dec-2017.
https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/jsmic.17.00026
312. Liu S, Lin G, Chai B, Dai J, Zhou A, Chen F and Pan J. (2017). The future
of graph database applications: An electric utility perspective 2017 IEEE
2nd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control
Conference (ITNEC). 10.1109/ITNEC.2017.8284941. 978-1-5090-6414-4.
(223-227).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8284941/
313. Chai B, Qiu H, Liu S, Zhang B, Gao K, Zhou A and Chen F. (2017). A study
of topology analysis engine based on graph databases in electric utilities
2017 IEEE 2nd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and
Automation Control Conference (ITNEC). 10.1109/ITNEC.2017.8284800.
978-1-5090-6414-4. (585-588).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8284800/
314. Almeida R, da Silva W, Castro K, Walter M, Araujo A, Holanda M and
Lifschitz S. (2017). AProvBio: An architecture for data provenance in
bioinformatics workflows using graph database 2017 IEEE International
Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).
10.1109/BIBM.2017.8217989. 978-1-5090-3050-7. (2139-2144).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8217989/
315. Zhang Y, Chen R and Chen H. Sub-millisecond Stateful Stream Querying over
Fast-evolving Linked Data. Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating
Systems Principles. (614-630).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3132747.3132777
316. Santisteban J and Ticona-Herrera R. (2017). Modeling a Persistent Graph
2017 Sixteenth Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(MICAI). 10.1109/MICAI-2017.2017.00011. 978-1-5386-7199-3. (15-22).
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8575560/
317. Tang P, Pitera J, Zubarev D and Chawla N. (2017). Materials Science
Literature-Patent Relevance Search: A Heterogeneous Network Analysis
Approach 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced
Analytics (DSAA). 10.1109/DSAA.2017.8. 978-1-5090-5004-8. (146-154).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8259773/
318. Gutfraind A and Genkin M. (2017). A graph database framework for covert
network analysis: An application to the Islamic State network in Europe.
Social Networks. 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.10.004. 51. (178-188). Online
publication date: 1-Oct-2017.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378873316302428
319. Zhu Y, Yan E and Song I. (2017). A natural language interface to a
graph-based bibliographic information retrieval system. Data & Knowledge
Engineering. 10.1016/j.datak.2017.06.006. 111. (73-89). Online publication
date: 1-Sep-2017.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169023X17302823
320. Gómez L, Kuijpers B and Vaisman A. Performing OLAP over Graph Data.
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Real-Time Business
Intelligence and Analytics. (1-8).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3129292.3129293
321. Aleithe M, Skowron P, Franczyk B and Sommer B. Data modeling of smart
urban object networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web
Intelligence. (1104-1109).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3117759
322. Krleža D and Fertalj K. (2017). Graph Matching Using Hierarchical Fuzzy
Graph Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 25:4.
(892-904). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2586962
323. Hall R, Murray C and Verdonk M. (2017). The Fragment Network: A Chemistry
Recommendation Engine Built Using a Graph Database. Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00809. 60:14. (6440-6450). Online
publication date: 27-Jul-2017.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00809
324. Rigaux P and Thion V. Quality Awareness over Graph Pattern Queries.
Proceedings of the 21st International Database Engineering & Applications
Symposium. (90-97).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3105831.3105871
325. D'Onofrio S, Wehrle M, Portmann E and Myrach T. Striving for semantic
convergence with fuzzy cognitive maps and graph databases. 2017 IEEE
International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015657
326. Baier J, Daroch D, Reutter J and Vrgoč D. Evaluating Navigational RDF
Queries over the Web. Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext
and Social Media. (165-174).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078731
327. Schulz H, Nocke T, Heitzler M and Schumann H. (2016). A systematic view on
data descriptors for the visual analysis of tabular data. Information
Visualization. 10.1177/1473871616667767. 16:3. (232-256). Online
publication date: 1-Jul-2017.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1473871616667767
328. Ravikumar G and Khaparde S. A Common Information Model Oriented Graph
Database Framework for Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.
10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631242. 32:4. (2560-2569).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7752988/
329. Lin X, Peng Y, Choi B and Xu J. (2017). Human-Powered Data Cleaning for
Probabilistic Reachability Queries on Uncertain Graphs. IEEE Transactions
on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 29:7. (1452-1465). Online publication
date: 1-Jul-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2684166
330. Pasquier T, Singh J, Eyers D and Bacon J. Camflow: Managed Data-Sharing
for Cloud Services. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing.
10.1109/TCC.2015.2489211. 5:3. (472-484).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7295590/
331. Paradies M and Voigt H. (2017). Big Graph Data Analytics on Single
Machines – An Overview. Datenbank-Spektrum. 10.1007/s13222-017-0255-8.
17:2. (101-112). Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13222-017-0255-8
332. Meyer H, Schering A and Heuer A. (2017). The Hydra.PowerGraph System.
Datenbank-Spektrum. 10.1007/s13222-017-0253-x. 17:2. (113-129). Online
publication date: 1-Jul-2017.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13222-017-0253-x
333. Reutter J, Romero M and Vardi M. (2017). Regular Queries on Graph
Databases. Theory of Computing Systems. 61:1. (31-83). Online publication
date: 1-Jul-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-016-9676-2
334. De Virgilio R. Smart RDF Data storage in Graph Databases. Proceedings of
the 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid
Computing. (872-881).
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2017.108
335. Jamkhedkar P, Johnson T, Kanza Y, Shaikh A, Shankarnarayanan N, Shkapenyuk
V and Woodhull G. Virtualized Network Service Topology Exploration Using
Nepal. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management
of Data. (1611-1614).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3058733
336. Xirogiannopoulos K and Deshpande A. Extracting and Analyzing Hidden Graphs
from Relational Databases. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International
Conference on Management of Data. (897-912).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3035918.3035949
337. Francis N and Libkin L. Schema Mappings for Data Graphs. Proceedings of
the 36th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database
Systems. (389-401).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3034786.3056113
338. Akintoye S, Bagula A, Djemaiel Y and Boudriga N. (2017). Lightweight cloud
computing for development: A graph based data model 2017 IST-Africa Week
Conference (IST-Africa). 10.23919/ISTAFRICA.2017.8102365. . (1-14).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8102365/
339. Tripathi G, Sharma B and Rajvanshi S. (2017). A combination of Internet of
Things (IoT) and graph database for future battlefield systems 2017
International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation
(ICCCA). 10.1109/CCAA.2017.8230010. 978-1-5090-6471-7. (1252-1257).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8230010/
340. Barceló P and Muñoz P. (2017). Graph Logics with Rational Relations. ACM
Transactions on Computational Logic. 18:2. (1-41). Online publication
date: 30-Apr-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3070822
341. Zhang X. On the Primitivity of SPARQL 1.1 Operators. Proceedings of the
26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. (875-876).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054260
342. Niewiadomski A, Penczek W, Skaruz J, Szreter M and Prola A. (2017).
Combining ontology reductions with new approaches to automated abstract
planning of Planics. Applied Soft Computing. 53:C. (352-379). Online
publication date: 1-Apr-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.007
343. Barakat O, Koll D and Fu X. (2017). Gavel: Software-defined network
control with graph databases 2017 20th Conference on Innovations in
Clouds, Internet and Networks (ICIN). 10.1109/ICIN.2017.7899425.
978-1-5090-3672-1. (279-286).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7899425/
344. Zhu Y, Yan E and Song I. (2017). The use of a graph-based system to
improve bibliographic information retrieval. Journal of the Association
for Information Science and Technology. 68:2. (480-490). Online
publication date: 1-Feb-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23677
345. Yoon B, Kim S and Kim S. (2017). Use of Graph Database for the Integration
of Heterogeneous Biological Data. Genomics & Informatics.
10.5808/GI.2017.15.1.19. 15:1. (19).
http://genominfo.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.5808/GI.2017.15.1.19
346. Lampoltshammer T, Guadamuz A, Wass C and Heistracher T. Openlaws.eu.
Achieving Open Justice through Citizen Participation and Transparency.
10.4018/978-1-5225-0717-8.ch009. (173-190).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-0717-8.ch009
347. Ma X, Beaulieu S, Fu L, Fox P, Di Stefano M and West P. Documenting
Provenance for Reproducible Marine Ecosystem Assessment in Open Science.
Oceanographic and Marine Cross-Domain Data Management for Sustainable
Development. 10.4018/978-1-5225-0700-0.ch005. (100-126).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-5225-0700-0.ch005
348. SCHULTZ P and WISNESKY R. (2017). Algebraic data integration. Journal of
Functional Programming. 10.1017/S0956796817000168. 27.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0956796817000168/type/journal_article
349. Tuteja S and Kumar R. (2017). A System Architecture for Mapping
Application Data into Complex Graph. Information, Communication and
Computing Technology. 10.1007/978-981-10-6544-6_15. (148-155).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-6544-6_15
350. Jimenez S and Dueñas G. (2017). G-WordNet: Moving WordNet 3.0 and Its
Resources to a Graph Database. Advances in Computing.
10.1007/978-3-319-66562-7_8. (100-114).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-66562-7_8
351. Manica E, Dorneles C and Galante R. (2017). Orion: A Cypher-Based Web Data
Extractor. Database and Expert Systems Applications.
10.1007/978-3-319-64468-4_21. (275-289).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64468-4_21
352. Furtado P. (2017). Scalability and Realtime on Big Data, MapReduce, NoSQL
and Spark. Business Intelligence. 10.1007/978-3-319-61164-8_4. (79-104).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-61164-8_4
353. Voigt H. (2017). Declarative Multidimensional Graph Queries. Business
Intelligence. 10.1007/978-3-319-61164-8_1. (1-37).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-61164-8_1
354. Lebedev A, Lee J, Rivera V and Mazzara M. (2017). Link Prediction Using
Top-k Shortest Distances. Data Analytics. 10.1007/978-3-319-60795-5_10.
(101-105).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-60795-5_10
355. Zhou F, Xu Z, Li Y, Xu J and Peng S. (2017). Private Graph Intersection
Protocol. Information Security and Privacy. 10.1007/978-3-319-59870-3_13.
(235-248).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59870-3_13
356. Goz F and Mutlu A. (2017). Concept Discovery in Graph Databases. Hybrid
Artificial Intelligent Systems. 10.1007/978-3-319-59650-1_6. (63-74).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59650-1_6
357. Lombardi T. (2017). Macroanalysis in the Arts and Sciences. New Directions
for Computing Education. 10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_6. (87-100).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-54226-3_6
358. Akid H and Ben Ayed M. (2017). Towards NoSQL Graph Data Warehouse for Big
Social Data Analysis. Intelligent Systems Design and Applications.
10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_95. (965-973).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_95
359. Reutter J and Vrgoč D. (2017). Navigational and Rule-Based Languages for
Graph Databases. Reasoning Web: Logical Foundation of Knowledge Graph
Construction and Query Answering. 10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7_3. (90-123).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49493-7_3
360. Khan A and Ranu S. (2017). Big-Graphs: Querying, Mining, and Beyond.
Handbook of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_16.
(531-582).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_16
361. Junghanns M, Petermann A, Neumann M and Rahm E. (2017). Management and
Analysis of Big Graph Data: Current Systems and Open Challenges. Handbook
of Big Data Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_14. (457-505).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49340-4_14
362. Küçükkeçeci C and Yazıcı A. (2017). A Graph-Based Big Data Model for
Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks. Advances in Big Data.
10.1007/978-3-319-47898-2_22. (205-215).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-47898-2_22
363. Shvorob I. (2017). New Approach for Saving Semistructured Medical Data.
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.
10.1007/978-3-319-45991-2_3. (29-40).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45991-2_3
364. Wood P. (2017). Graph Database. Encyclopedia of Database Systems.
10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_183-2. (1-4).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_183-2
365. Gupta A. (2017). Graph Data Management in Scientific Applications.
Encyclopedia of Database Systems. 10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_1298-2. (1-4).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_1298-2
366. San Martín M and Gutierrez C. (2017). Transforming Social Networks Data.
Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.
10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_389-1. (1-13).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_389-1
367. Cerinšek M and Batagelj V. (2017). Sources of Network Data. Encyclopedia
of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_313-1.
(1-9).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_313-1
368. Ueta K, Xue X, Nakamoto Y and Murakami S. (2016). A Distributed Graph
Database for the Data Management of IoT Systems 2016 IEEE International
Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and
Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing
(CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData).
10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData.2016.74. 978-1-5090-5880-8.
(299-304).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7917102/
369. Castelltort A and Laurent A. (2016). Rogue behavior detection in NoSQL
graph databases. Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems.
10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.004. 3:2. (70-82). Online publication date:
1-Dec-2016.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352664516300177
370. Kuzmin K, Lu X, Mukherjee P, Zhuang J, Gaiteri C and Szymanski B. (2016).
Supporting novel biomedical research via multilayer collaboration
networks. Applied Network Science. 10.1007/s41109-016-0015-y. 1:1. Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2016.
https://appliednetsci.springeropen.com/articles/10.1007/s41109-016-0015-y
371. Emmanuel I and Stanier C. Defining Big Data. Proceedings of the
International Conference on Big Data and Advanced Wireless Technologies.
(1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3010089.3010090
372. Zhang X, Feng Z, Wang X, Rao G and Wu W. Context-Free Path Queries on RDF
Graphs. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2016. (632-648).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46523-4_38
373. (2016). Approximation and relaxation of semantic web path queries. Web
Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 40:C.
(1-21). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2016.08.001
374. Dai D, Carns P, Ross R, Jenkins J, Muirhead N and Chen Y. (2016). An
asynchronous traversal engine for graph-based rich metadata management.
Parallel Computing. 58:C. (140-156). Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2016.06.002
375. Fionda V, Gutierrez C and Pirrò G. (2016). Building knowledge maps of Web
graphs. Artificial Intelligence. 239:C. (143-167). Online publication
date: 1-Oct-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.07.003
376. Weale T, Gadepally V, Hutchison D and Kepner J. (2016). Benchmarking the
graphulo processing framework 2016 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing
Conference (HPEC). 10.1109/HPEC.2016.7761640. 978-1-5090-3525-0. (1-5).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7761640/
377. Ma Z, Capretz M and Yan L. (2016). Storing massive Resource Description
Framework (RDF) data: a survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review.
10.1017/S0269888916000217. 31:4. (391-413). Online publication date:
1-Sep-2016.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0269888916000217/type/journal_article
378. Ravve E. (2016). Incremental computations over strongly distributed
databases. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience. 28:11.
(3061-3076). Online publication date: 10-Aug-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3597
379. Kahng M, Navathe S, Stasko J and Chau D. (2016). Interactive browsing and
navigation in relational databases. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.
9:12. (1017-1028). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.
https://doi.org/10.14778/2994509.2994520
380. Zhang H, Lu F and Xu J. (2016). Modeling and Querying Moving Objects with
Social Relationships. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.
10.3390/ijgi5070121. 5:7. (121).
http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/5/7/121
381. Pokorný J. Conceptual and Database Modelling of Graph Databases.
Proceedings of the 20th International Database Engineering & Applications
Symposium. (370-377).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2938503.2938547
382. Grabon M, Michaliszyn J, Otop J and Wieczorek P. Querying data graphs with
arithmetical regular expressions. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (1088-1094).
/doi/10.5555/3060621.3060772
383. Johnson T, Kanza Y, Lakshmanan L and Shkapenyuk V. Nepal. Proceedings of
the 1st ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Network Data Analytics. (1-8).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2980523.2980530
384. Junghanns M, Petermann A, Teichmann N, Gómez K and Rahm E. Analyzing
extended property graphs with Apache Flink. Proceedings of the 1st ACM
SIGMOD Workshop on Network Data Analytics. (1-8).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2980523.2980527
385. Zellweger H. (2016). Tree Visualizations in Structured Data Recursively
Defined by the Aleph Data Relation 2016 20th International Conference
Information Visualisation (IV). 10.1109/IV.2016.75. 978-1-4673-8942-6.
(21-26).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7557898/
386. Ben Ammar A. (2016). Graph database partitioning: A study 2016 7th
International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems &
Applications (IISA). 10.1109/IISA.2016.7785355. 978-1-5090-3429-1. (1-9).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7785355/
387. Shang Z, Li F, Yu J, Zhang Z and Cheng H. Graph Analytics Through
Fine-Grained Parallelism. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference
on Management of Data. (463-478).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2915238
388. Cohen S. Data Management for Social Networking. Proceedings of the 35th
ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems.
(165-177).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2902251.2902306
389. Benzi K, Ricaud B and Vandergheynst P. Principal Patterns on Graphs:
Discovering Coherent Structures in Datasets. IEEE Transactions on Signal
and Information Processing over Networks. 10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2524500. 2:2.
(160-173).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7398168/
390. Mohan A, Ebrahimi M, Lu S and Kotov A. (2016). A NoSQL Data Model for
Scalable Big Data Workflow Execution 2016 IEEE International Congress on
Big Data (BigData Congress). 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2016.15.
978-1-5090-2622-7. (52-59).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7584920/
391. Abdelhamid S, Kuhlman C, Marathe M and Ravi S. (2016). Network Services
and Their Compositions for Network Science Applications. Procedia Computer
Science. 80:C. (472-483). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.326
392. Sharma S. (2016). Expanded cloud plumes hiding Big Data ecosystem. Future
Generation Computer Systems. 59:C. (63-92). Online publication date:
1-Jun-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.01.003
393. Libkin L, Martens W and Vrgoč D. (2016). Querying Graphs with Data.
Journal of the ACM. 63:2. (1-53). Online publication date: 4-May-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2850413
394. Gadepally V, Kepner J and Reuther A. (2016). Storage and Database
Management for Big Data. Big Data. 10.1201/b19694-4. (15-41). Online
publication date: 3-May-2016.
http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/10.1201/b19694-4
395. Raji P and Surendran S. (2016). RDF approach on social network analysis
2016 International Conference on Research Advances in Integrated
Navigation Systems (RAINS). 10.1109/RAINS.2016.7764416. 978-1-5090-1111-7.
(1-4).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7764416/
396. Chavarria-Miranda D, Castellana V, Morari A, Haglin D and Feo J. (2016).
GraQL: A Query Language for High-Performance Attributed Graph Databases
2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium
Workshops (IPDPSW). 10.1109/IPDPSW.2016.216. 978-1-5090-3682-0.
(1453-1462).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7530036/
397. Singh K and Singh V. (2016). Answering graph pattern query using
incremental views 2016 International Conference on Computing,
Communication and Automation (ICCCA). 10.1109/CCAA.2016.7813689.
978-1-5090-1666-2. (54-59).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7813689/
398. Ramesh D, Sinha A and Singh S. (2016). Data modelling for discrete time
series data using Cassandra and MongoDB 2016 3rd International Conference
on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT).
10.1109/RAIT.2016.7507966. 978-1-4799-8579-1. (598-601).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7507966/
399. Daltio J and Medeiros C. (2016). A View Handler for Semantic Graphs 2016
IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC).
10.1109/ICSC.2016.32. 978-1-5090-0662-5. (238-241).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7439339/
400. Inoue T, Iwashita H, Kawahara J and Minato S. (2016). Graphillion.
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT).
18:1. (57-66). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2016.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-014-0352-z
401. Orel O, Zakošek S and Baranovič M. (2017). Property Oriented
Relational-To-Graph Database Conversion. Automatika.
10.7305/automatika.2017.02.1581. 57:3. (836-845). Online publication date:
1-Jan-2016.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.7305/automatika.2017.02.1581
402. Barceló P, Romero M and Vardi M. (2016). Semantic Acyclicity on Graph
Databases. SIAM Journal on Computing. 10.1137/15M1034714. 45:4.
(1339-1376). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016.
http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/15M1034714
403. Singh K and Singh V. (2016). MoVie: A scalable algorithm for answering
graph pattern query using incremental views 2016 Fourth International
Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC).
10.1109/PDGC.2016.7913116. 978-1-5090-3669-1. (61-66).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7913116/
404. Patel A and Dharwa J. (2016). An integrated hybrid recommendation model
using graph database 2016 International Conference on ICT in Business
Industry & Government (ICTBIG). 10.1109/ICTBIG.2016.7892680.
978-1-5090-5515-9. (1-5).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7892680/
405. Noel S, Harley E, Tam K, Limiero M and Share M. (2016). CyGraph. Cognitive
Computing: Theory and Applications. 10.1016/bs.host.2016.07.001.
(117-167).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169716116300426
406. Zhai X, Pan H, Xie X, Zhang Z and Han Q. (2016). Storage and Parallel
Loading System Based on Mode Network for Multimode Medical Image Data.
Social Computing. 10.1007/978-981-10-2098-8_25. (211-216).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-2098-8_25
407. He X and Yang B. (2016). An Improved Keyword Search on Big Data Graph with
Graphics Processors. Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems.
10.1007/978-981-10-0356-1_41. (390-397).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-0356-1_41
408. Meier A and Kaufmann M. (2016). NoSQL-Datenbanken. SQL- &
NoSQL-Datenbanken. 10.1007/978-3-662-47664-2_7. (221-240).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-47664-2_7
409. Cignoni G and Cossu G. (2016). The Global Virtual Museum of Information
Science & Technology, a Project Idea. International Communities of
Invention and Innovation. 10.1007/978-3-319-49463-0_7. (101-114).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-49463-0_7
410. Dang M and Nguyen T. (2016). Using Graph Database for Evidence Correlation
on Android Smartphones. Future Data and Security Engineering.
10.1007/978-3-319-48057-2_15. (209-216).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-48057-2_15
411. Kaufmann M, Waldis A, Siegfried P, Wilke G, Portmann E and Hemmje M.
(2016). Intuitive Knowledge Connectivity: Design and Prototyping of
Cross-Platform Knowledge Networks. Knowledge Science, Engineering and
Management. 10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_27. (337-348).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_27
412. Sayah T, Coquery E, Thion R and Hacid M. (2016). Access Control
Enforcement for Selective Disclosure of Linked Data. Security and Trust
Management. 10.1007/978-3-319-46598-2_4. (47-63).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-46598-2_4
413. Warnke T and Uhrmacher A. (2016). Spatiotemporal Pattern Matching in
RoboCup. Multiagent System Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-319-45889-2_7.
(89-104).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45889-2_7
414. Pivert O, Slama O and Thion V. (2016). Fuzzy Quantified Structural Queries
to Fuzzy Graph Databases. Scalable Uncertainty Management.
10.1007/978-3-319-45856-4_18. (260-273).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-45856-4_18
415. Spyratos N and Sugibuchi T. (2016). PROPER - A Graph Data Model Based on
Property Graphs. Information Search, Integration, and Personalization.
10.1007/978-3-319-43862-7_2. (23-45).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-43862-7_2
416. Laurent D. (2016). On Monotonic Deductive Database Updating Under the Open
World Assumption. Information Search, Integration, and Personalization.
10.1007/978-3-319-43862-7_1. (3-22).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-43862-7_1
417. Zhang H, Lu F and Chen J. (2016). A Geo-Social Data Model for Moving
Objects. Data Mining and Big Data. 10.1007/978-3-319-40973-3_11.
(115-122).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-40973-3_11
418. Strobin L and Niewiadomski A. (2016). Integration of Multiple Graph
Datasets and Their Linguistic Summaries: An Application to Linked Data.
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. 10.1007/978-3-319-39378-0_29.
(333-343).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-39378-0_29
419. Castelltort A and Laurent A. (2016). Extracting Fuzzy Summaries from NoSQL
Graph Databases. Flexible Query Answering Systems 2015.
10.1007/978-3-319-26154-6_15. (189-200).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26154-6_15
420. Di Mascio T, Gobbo F and Tarantino L. (2016). Requirements and Open Issues
for ISs Supporting Dynamic Community Bonding in Emergency Situations.
Empowering Organizations. 10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_20. (257-271).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_20
421. Wang S, Jin J, Rivett P and Kitazawa A. (2015). Technical Survey Graph
Databases and Applications . International Journal of Semantic Computing.
10.1142/S1793351X15500129. 09:04. (523-545). Online publication date:
1-Dec-2015.
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1793351X15500129
422. Pääkkönen P and Pakkala D. (2015). Reference Architecture and
Classification of Technologies, Products and Services for Big Data
Systems. Big Data Research. 2:4. (166-186). Online publication date:
1-Dec-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.001
423. Cañas C, Pacheco E, Kemme B, Kienzle J and Jacobsen H. GraPS. Proceedings
of the 16th Annual Middleware Conference. (1-12).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2814576.2814812
424. Makris C and Theodoridis E. (2015). Computational Methods for Modeling
Biological Interaction Networks. Pattern Recognition in Computational
Molecular Biology. 10.1002/9781119078845.ch26. (505-524). Online
publication date: 19-Nov-2015.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119078845.ch26
425. Libkin L, Tan T and Vrgoč D. (2015). Regular expressions for data words.
Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 81:7. (1278-1297). Online
publication date: 1-Nov-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2015.03.005
426. Rodriguez M. The Gremlin graph traversal machine and language (invited
talk). Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Database Programming
Languages. (1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2815072.2815073
427. George K and Mathew T. Big database stores a review on various big data
datastores. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Green
Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT). (567-573).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIoT.2015.7380529
428. Islam M, Chengfei Liu and Jianxin Li . (2015). Efficient Answering of
Why-Not Questions in Similar Graph Matching. IEEE Transactions on
Knowledge and Data Engineering. 27:10. (2672-2686). Online publication
date: 1-Oct-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2015.2432798
429. Surinx D, Fletcher G, Gyssens M, Leinders D, Van den Bussche J, Van Gucht
D, Vansummeren S and Wu Y. (2015). Relative expressive power of
navigational querying on graphs using transitive closure. Logic Journal of
IGPL. 10.1093/jigpal/jzv028. 23:5. (759-788). Online publication date:
1-Oct-2015.
https://academic.oup.com/jigpal/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzv028
430. Kendea M, Gkantouna V, Rapti A, Sioutas S, Tzimas G and Tsolis D. Graph
DBs vs. Column-Oriented Stores. Revised Selected Papers of the First
International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Cloud Computing - Volume
9511. (62-74).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29919-8_5
431. Dai D, Carns P, Ross R, Jenkins J, Blauer K and Chen Y. GraphTrek.
Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cluster
Computing. (284-293).
https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2015.48
432. Pabón M and Collazos C. A Visual Query Language for Data Graphs.
Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer
Interaction. (1-2).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2829875.2829918
433. Ravikumar G and Khaparde S. (2015). CIM oriented graph database for
network topology processing and applications integration 2015 50th
International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).
10.1109/UPEC.2015.7339843. 978-1-4673-9682-0. (1-7).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7339843/
434. Bronselaer A, Van Britsom D and De Tré G. (2015). Pointwise multi-valued
fusion. Information Fusion. 25:C. (121-133). Online publication date:
1-Sep-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2014.10.001
435. Cavoto P, Cardoso V, Lebbe R and Santanchè A. FishGraph. Proceedings of
the 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on e-Science. (177-186).
https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2015.61
436. Roughan M and Tuke J. The Hitchhikers Guide to Sharing Graph Data.
Proceedings of the 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of
Things and Cloud. (435-442).
https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2015.76
437. Nakamoto Y. (2015). Exploring a Uniform Framework for a Mobile
Collaborative Work Support Platform 2015 IEEE 12th Intl Conf on Ubiquitous
Intelligence and Computing and 2015 IEEE 12th Intl Conf on Autonomic and
Trusted Computing and 2015 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Scalable Computing and
Communications and Its Associated Workshops (UIC-ATC-ScalCom).
10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP.2015.109. 978-1-4673-7211-4. (537-542).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7518288/
438. Pivert O, Smits G and Thion V. (2015). Expression and efficient processing
of fuzzy queries in a graph database context 2015 IEEE International
Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7337849.
978-1-4673-7428-6. (1-8).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7337849/
439. Figueira D and Libkin L. (2015). Synchronizing Relations on Words. Theory
of Computing Systems. 57:2. (287-318). Online publication date:
1-Aug-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-014-9584-2
440. Lampoltshammer T and Wiegand S. (2015). Improving the Computational
Performance of Ontology-Based Classification Using Graph Databases. Remote
Sensing. 10.3390/rs70709473. 7:7. (9473-9491).
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/7/9473
441. Dehghani R and Ramsin R. (2015). Methodologies for developing knowledge
management systems: an evaluation framework. Journal of Knowledge
Management. 10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0438. 19:4. (682-710). Online publication
date: 13-Jul-2015.
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/JKM-10-2014-0438
442. Figueira D and Libkin L. Path Logics for Querying Graphs. Proceedings of
the 2015 30th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
(LICS). (329-340).
https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2015.39
443. Abay N, Mutlu A and Karagoz P. (2015). A path-finding based method for
concept discovery in graphs 2015 6th International Conference on
Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA).
10.1109/IISA.2015.7388092. 978-1-4673-9311-9. (1-6).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7388092/
444. Sun R, Zhang L, Chen Z and Hao Z. A Balanced Vertex Cut Partition Method
in Distributed Graph Computing. Revised Selected Papers, Part II, of the
5th International Conference on Intelligence Science and Big Data
Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques - Volume 9243.
(43-54).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_5
445. Przyjaciel-Zablocki M, Schätzle A and Lausen G. TriAL-QL. Proceedings of
the 18th International Workshop on Web and Databases. (48-54).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2767109.2767115
446. Van Gucht D, Williams R, Woodruff D and Zhang Q. The Communication
Complexity of Distributed Set-Joins with Applications to Matrix
Multiplication. Proceedings of the 34th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems. (199-212).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2745754.2745779
447. Berro A, Megdiche I and Teste O. (2015). Holistic Statistical Open Data
integration based on integer linear programming 2015 IEEE 9th
International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science
(RCIS). 10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128908. 978-1-4673-6630-4. (468-479).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7128908/
448. Uyar A and Aliyu F. (2015). (2015). Evaluating search features of Google
Knowledge Graph and Bing Satori. Online Information Review.
10.1108/OIR-10-2014-0257. 39:2. (197-213). Online publication date:
13-Apr-2015.. Online publication date: 13-Apr-2015.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/OIR-10-2014-0257/full/html
449. Fletcher G, Gyssens M, Leinders D, Surinx D, Van den Bussche J, Van Gucht
D, Vansummeren S and Wu Y. (2015). Relative expressive power of
navigational querying on graphs. Information Sciences: an International
Journal. 298:C. (390-406). Online publication date: 20-Mar-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.11.031
450. Lim S, Lee S, Ganesh G, Brown T and Sukumar S. (2015). Graph Processing
Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences 2015 IEEE International
Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS).
10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095783. 978-1-4799-1957-4. (42-51).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7095783/
451. Goyal V, Agarwal A, Pilli E and Mehta S. (2015). Information integration
for movies data using graph database 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES).
10.1109/SPICES.2015.7091523. 978-1-4799-1823-2. (1-5).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7091523/
452. Fionda V, Pirrò G and Gutierrez C. (2015). NautiLOD. ACM Transactions on
the Web. 9:1. (1-43). Online publication date: 23-Jan-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2697393
453. Henkel R, Wolkenhauer O and Waltemath D. (2015). Combining computational
models, semantic annotations and simulation experiments in a graph
database. Database. 10.1093/database/bau130. 2015. Online publication
date: 1-Jan-2015.
https://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/bau130/2433130
454. Urma R and Mycroft A. (2015). Source-code queries with graph
databases-with application to programming language usage and evolution.
Science of Computer Programming. 97:P1. (127-134). Online publication
date: 1-Jan-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.11.010
455. (2015). References. RDF Database Systems.
10.1016/B978-0-12-799957-9.00010-9. (227-233).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780127999579000109
456. Fletcher G, Gyssens M, Leinders D, Bussche J, Gucht D, Vansummeren S and
Wu Y. (2015). The impact of transitive closure on the expressiveness of
navigational query languages on unlabeled graphs. Annals of Mathematics
and Artificial Intelligence. 73:1-2. (167-203). Online publication date:
1-Jan-2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-013-9346-x
457. Dimitrov D, Singh L and Mann J. (2015). Query Operators for Comparing
Uncertain Graphs. Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered
Systems XVIII. 10.1007/978-3-662-46485-4_5. (115-152).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-46485-4_5
458. Pokorný J. (2015). Graph Databases: Their Power and Limitations. Computer
Information Systems and Industrial Management.
10.1007/978-3-319-24369-6_5. (58-69).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-24369-6_5
459. Castelltort A and Laurent A. (2015). Fuzzy Historical Graph Pattern
Matching A NoSQL Graph Database Approach for Fraud Ring Resolution.
Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations.
10.1007/978-3-319-23868-5_11. (151-167).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-23868-5_11
460. Ghrab A, Romero O, Skhiri S, Vaisman A and Zimányi E. (2015). A Framework
for Building OLAP Cubes on Graphs. Advances in Databases and Information
Systems. 10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_7. (92-105).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_7
461. Lange M and Lozes E. (2015). Conjunctive Visibly-Pushdown Path Queries.
Fundamentals of Computation Theory. 10.1007/978-3-319-22177-9_25.
(327-338).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-22177-9_25
462. Blanco D, Arias A, Cañete V and Suárez J. (2015). OBEliSK: Novel
Knowledgebase of Object Features and Exchange Strategies. Computer Vision
- ECCV 2014 Workshops. 10.1007/978-3-319-16181-5_34. (448-454).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-16181-5_34
463. Trojer T, Farwick M, Häusler M and Breu R. (2015). Living Modeling of IT
Architectures: Challenges and Solutions. Software, Services, and Systems.
10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_26. (458-474).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-15545-6_26
464. Amirian P, Basiri A, Gales G, Winstanley A and McDonald J. (2015). The
Next Generation of Navigational Services Using OpenStreetMap Data: The
Integration of Augmented Reality and Graph Databases. OpenStreetMap in
GIScience. 10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_11. (211-228).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_11
465. Berro A, Megdiche I and Teste O. (2015). A Content-Driven ETL Processes
for Open Data. New Trends in Database and Information Systems II.
10.1007/978-3-319-10518-5_3. (29-40).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-10518-5_3
466.
467. Lukyanenko R, Parsons J and Wiersma Y. (2014). The IQ of the Crowd.
Information Systems Research. 25:4. (669-689). Online publication date:
1-Dec-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0537
468. Mesiti M, Re M and Valentini G. (2014). Think globally and solve locally:
secondary memory-based network learning for automated multi-species
function prediction. GigaScience. 10.1186/2047-217X-3-5. 3:1. Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2014.
https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article-lookup/doi/10.1186/2047-217X-3-5
469. Wu Y, Zhong Z, Xiong W and Jing N. (2014). Geo-Link: Correlations of
Heterogeneous Geo-Spatial Entities. Arabian Journal for Science and
Engineering. 10.1007/s13369-014-1475-y. 39:12. (8811-8824). Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2014.
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13369-014-1475-y
470. Sun Y and Jara A. (2014). An extensible and active semantic model of
information organizing for the Internet of Things. Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing. 18:8. (1821-1833). Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0786-z
471. Pivert O, Thion V, Jaudoin H and Smits G. On a Fuzzy Algebra for Querying
Graph Databases. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 26th International
Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. (748-755).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.116
472. Pinheiro R, Aires B, Araujo A, Holanda M, Walter M and Lifschitz S.
(2014). Storing provenance data of genome project workflows using graph
database 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and
Biomedicine (BIBM). 10.1109/BIBM.2014.6999292. 978-1-4799-5669-2. (16-22).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6999292/
473. Kim K and Eijkhout V. (2014). A Parallel Sparse Direct Solver via
Hierarchical DAG Scheduling. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software.
41:1. (1-27). Online publication date: 27-Oct-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2629641
474. Hempe N, Waspe R and Rossmann J. Combining Complex Simulations with
Realistic Virtual Testing Environments — The eRobotics-Approach for
Semantics-Based Multi-domain VR Simulation Systems. Proceedings of the 4th
International Conference on Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for
Autonomous Robots - Volume 8810. (110-121).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11900-7_10
475. Vaikuntam A and Perumal V. Evaluation of contemporary graph databases.
Proceedings of the 7th ACM India Computing Conference. (1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2675744.2675752
476. Zheng Y, Capra L, Wolfson O and Yang H. (2014). Urban Computing. ACM
Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. 5:3. (1-55). Online
publication date: 1-Oct-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2629592
477. Savkli C, Carr R, Chapman M, Chee B and Minch D. (2014). Socrates 2014
IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC).
10.1109/HPEC.2014.7040993. 978-1-4799-6233-4. (1-6).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7040993/
478. Gröger C, Schwarz H and Mitschang B. The Deep Data Warehouse. Proceedings
of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object
Computing Conference. (210-217).
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2014.36
479. Martinez S and Pavlich-Mariscal J. (2014). Formal design of a model
repository based on knowledge representation using graphs 2014 9th
Computing Colombian Conference (9CCC). 10.1109/ColumbianCC.2014.6955346.
978-1-4799-6717-9. (249-254).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6955346/
480. Zhang X and Van den Bussche J. (2014). On the primitivity of operators in
SPARQL. Information Processing Letters. 10.1016/j.ipl.2014.03.014. 114:9.
(480-485). Online publication date: 1-Sep-2014.
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002001901400057X
481. Barceló P and Muñoz P. Graph logics with rational relations. Proceedings
of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on
Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE
Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS). (1-10).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603122
482. Sakr S, Elnikety S and He Y. (2014). Hybrid query execution engine for
large attributed graphs. Information Systems. 41. (45-73). Online
publication date: 1-May-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2013.10.007
483. Spyropoulou E, De Bie T and Boley M. (2014). Interesting pattern mining in
multi-relational data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 28:3.
(808-849). Online publication date: 1-May-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-013-0319-9
484. Rezaei Mahdiraji A and Baumann P. Processing scientific mesh queries in
graph databases. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World
Wide Web. (1163-1168).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2580061
485. Ding Y, Zhou M, Zhao Z, Eisenstat S and Shen X. (2014). Finding the limit.
ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. 42:1. (607-622). Online
publication date: 5-Apr-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2654822.2541945
486. Park Y, Shankar M, Park B and Ghosh J. (2014). Graph databases for
large-scale healthcare systems: A framework for efficient data management
and data services 2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data
Engineering Workshops (ICDEW). 10.1109/ICDEW.2014.6818295.
978-1-4799-3481-2. (12-19).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6818295/
487. Kendall-Morwick J and Leake D. (2014). Facilitating representation and
retrieval of structured cases. Information Systems. 40. (106-114). Online
publication date: 1-Mar-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2012.11.007
488. McColl R, Ediger D, Poovey J, Campbell D and Bader D. A performance
evaluation of open source graph databases. Proceedings of the first
workshop on Parallel programming for analytics applications. (11-18).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2567634.2567638
489. Agarwal P and Owzar K. (2015). Next Generation Distributed Computing for
Cancer Research. Cancer Informatics. 10.4137/CIN.S16344. 13s7.
(CIN.S16344). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.4137/CIN.S16344
490. Barceló P, Libkin L and Reutter J. (2014). Querying Regular Graph
Patterns. Journal of the ACM. 61:1. (1-54). Online publication date:
1-Jan-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2559905
491. Ying X, Xin S and He Y. (2014). Parallel chen-han (PCH) algorithm for
discrete geodesics. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 33:1. (1-11). Online
publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2534161
492. Xu K, Cao Y, Ma L, Dong Z, Wang R and Hu S. (2014). A practical algorithm
for rendering interreflections with all-frequency BRDFs. ACM Transactions
on Graphics. 33:1. (1-16). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2533687
493. Daraghmi E and Yuan S. (2014). We are so close, less than 4 degrees
separating you and me!. Computers in Human Behavior. 30. (273-285). Online
publication date: 1-Jan-2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.014
494. (2014). References. Digital Asset Ecosystems.
10.1016/B978-1-84334-716-3.50012-9. (155-176).
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9781843347163500129
495. Pandit D, Chaki N and Chattopadhyay S. (2014). Hyper Object Data Model: A
Simple Data Model for Handling Semi-Structured Data. Emerging Trends in
Computing and Communication. 10.1007/978-81-322-1817-3_32. (315-325).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-81-322-1817-3_32
496. Kendall-Morwick J and Leake D. (2014). A Study of Two-Phase Retrieval for
Process-Oriented Case-Based Reasoning. Successful Case-based Reasoning
Applications-2. 10.1007/978-3-642-38736-4_2. (7-27).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-38736-4_2
497. Daltio J and Medeiros C. (2014). Handling Multiple Foci in Graph
Databases. Data Integration in the Life Sciences.
10.1007/978-3-319-08590-6_6. (58-65).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-08590-6_6
498. Jankun-Kelly T, Dwyer T, Holten D, Hurter C, Nöllenburg M, Weaver C and Xu
K. (2014). Scalability Considerations for Multivariate Graph
Visualization. Multivariate Network Visualization.
10.1007/978-3-319-06793-3_10. (207-235).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-06793-3_10
499. Wycislik L and Warchal L. (2014). A Performance Comparison of Several
Common Computation Tasks Used in Social Network Analysis Performed on
Graph and Relational Databases. Man-Machine Interactions 3.
10.1007/978-3-319-02309-0_70. (651-659).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-02309-0_70
500. Navarro L, Appel A and Junior E. (2014). GraphDB – Storing Large Graphs on
Secondary Memory. New Trends in Databases and Information Systems.
10.1007/978-3-319-01863-8_20. (177-186).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-01863-8_20
501. San Martín M and Gutierrez C. (2014). Transforming and Integrating Social
Networks and Social Media Data. Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis
and Mining. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_389. (2202-2214).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_389
502. Cerinšek M and Batagelj V. (2014). Sources of Network Data. Encyclopedia
of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_313.
(1946-1954).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_313
503. Baglioni M, Pieroni S, Geraci F, Mariani F, Molinaro S, Pellegrini M and
Lastres E. (2013). A New Framework for Distilling Higher Quality
Information from Health Data via Social Network Analysis 2013 IEEE 13th
International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW).
10.1109/ICDMW.2013.142. 978-1-4799-3142-2. (48-55).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6753902/
504. Lukyanenko R and Parsons J. Is Traditional Conceptual Modeling Becoming
Obsolete?. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Conceptual
Modeling - Volume 8217. (61-73).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_6
505. Bao Z, Tay Y and Zhou J. sonSchema. Proceedings of the 32nd International
Conference on Conceptual Modeling - Volume 8217. (197-211).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_18
506. (2013). Next-Generation Field Guides. BioScience.
10.1525/bio.2013.63.11.8. 63:11. (891-899). Online publication date:
1-Nov-2013.
https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-lookup/doi/10.1525/bio.2013.63.11.8
507. Fionda V and Pirro' G. Querying graphs with preferences. Proceedings of
the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge
Management. (929-938).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505758
508. Rezaei Mahdiraji A, Baumann P and Berti G. ImG-complex. Proceedings of the
22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management.
(1619-1624).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2505733
509. Hu B, Carvalho N and Matsutsuka T. (2013). Towards Big Linked Data.
International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining. 9:4. (19-43). Online
publication date: 1-Oct-2013.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdwm.2013100102
510. Jouili S and Reynaga A. imGraph. Proceedings of the 2013 International
Conference on Social Computing. (732-737).
https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.109
511. Castelltort A and Laurent A. (2013). Representing history in
graph-oriented NoSQL databases: A versioning system 2013 Eighth
International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM).
10.1109/ICDIM.2013.6694022. 978-1-4799-0615-4. (228-234).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6694022/
512. Mahdiraji A and Baumann P. (2013). Database support for unstructured
meshes. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 6:12. (1404-1409). Online
publication date: 28-Aug-2013.
https://doi.org/10.14778/2536274.2536326
513. Rapti A, Theodoridis E and Tsakalidis A. Evaluation of Protein-Protein
Interaction Management Systems. Proceedings of the 2013 24th International
Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. (100-104).
https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2013.39
514. Ghrab A, Skhiri S, Jouili S and Zimányi E. An Analytics-Aware Conceptual
Model for Evolving Graphs. Proceedings of the 15th International
Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery - Volume 8057.
(1-12).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40131-2_1
515. Zhang Q, Chen Z, Lv A, Zhao L, Liu F and Zou J. A Universal Storage
Architecture for Big Data in Cloud Environment. Proceedings of the 2013
IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and
IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.
(476-480).
https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenCom-iThings-CPSCom.2013.96
516. Yang S, Tang W and He B. (2013). A Parallel Query Processing Technique for
Keyword Search over Data Graph. Applied Mechanics and Materials.
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.380-384.2609. 380-384. (2609-2613).
https://www.scientific.net/AMM.380-384.2609
517. Halpin H and Mcneill F. (2013). Discovering meaning on the go in large
heterogenous data. Artificial Intelligence Review. 40:2. (107-126). Online
publication date: 1-Aug-2013.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9377-4
518. Mazuran M, Serra E and Zaniolo C. (2013). Extending the power of datalog
recursion. The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data
Bases. 22:4. (471-493). Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-012-0299-1
519. Poulovassilis A. Database research challenges and opportunities of big
graph data. Proceedings of the 29th British National conference on Big
Data. (29-32).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39467-6_6
520. Schmitt O and Majchrzak T. (2013). Document-Based Databases for Medical
Information Systems and Crisis Management. International Journal of
Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management.
10.4018/ijiscram.2013070104. 5:3. (63-80). Online publication date:
1-Jul-2013.
https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijiscram.2013070104
521. Liu Y and Vitolo T. Graph Data Warehouse. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE
International Congress on Big Data. (433-434).
https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.Congress.2013.72
522. De Virgilio R, Maccioni A and Torlone R. Converting relational to graph
databases. First International Workshop on Graph Data Management
Experiences and Systems. (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2484425.2484426
523. Libkin L, Reutter J and Vrgoč D. Trial for RDF. Proceedings of the 32nd
ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI symposium on Principles of database systems.
(201-212).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2463664.2465226
524. Barceló Baeza P. Querying graph databases. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM
SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI symposium on Principles of database systems.
(175-188).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2463664.2465216
525. Barceló Baeza P, Romero M and Vardi M. Semantic acyclicity on graph
databases. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI symposium on
Principles of database systems. (237-248).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2463664.2463671
526. Liptchinsky V, Satzger B, Zabolotnyi R and Dustdar S. Expressive languages
for selecting groups from graph-structured data. Proceedings of the 22nd
international conference on World Wide Web. (761-770).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488455
527. Shijie Zhang , Jiong Yang and Sun B. (2013). SuReQL: A subgraph match
based relational model for large graphs 2013 IEEE 29th International
Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2013).
10.1109/ICDEW.2013.6547452. 978-1-4673-5304-5. (212-215).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6547452/
528. Ames S, Gokhale M and Maltzahn C. (2013). QMDS. International Journal of
Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems. 28:2. (159-183). Online
publication date: 1-Apr-2013.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2012.658802
529. Libkin L, Martens W and Vrgoč D. Querying graph databases with XPath.
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Database Theory.
(129-140).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2448496.2448513
530. Hellings J, Kuijpers B, Van den Bussche J and Zhang X. Walk logic as a
framework for path query languages on graph databases. Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Database Theory. (117-128).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2448496.2448512
531. Barceló P, Reutter J and Libkin L. (2013). Parameterized regular
expressions and their languages. Theoretical Computer Science. 474.
(21-45). Online publication date: 1-Feb-2013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.12.036
532. Dąbrowski R, Timoszuk G and Stencel K. (2013). One Graph to Rule Them All
Software Measurement and Management. Fundamenta Informaticae. 128:1-2.
(47-63). Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.
/doi/10.5555/2594991.2594996
533. Sakr S and Al-Naymat G. An Overview of Graph Indexing and Querying
Techniques. Bioinformatics. 10.4018/978-1-4666-3604-0.ch011. (222-239).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-4666-3604-0.ch011
534. Farley T, Kiefer J, Lee P, Von Hoff D, Trent J, Colbourn C and Mousses S.
(2013). The BioIntelligence Framework: a new computational platform for
biomedical knowledge computing. Journal of the American Medical
Informatics Association. 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000646. 20:1. (128-133).
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013.
https://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-lookup/doi/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000646
535. Soussi R, Cuvelier E, Aufaure M, Louati A and Lechevallier Y. (2013).
DB2SNA: An All-in-One Tool for Extraction and Aggregation of Underlying
Social Networks from Relational Databases. The Influence of Technology on
Social Network Analysis and Mining. 10.1007/978-3-7091-1346-2_23.
(521-545).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-7091-1346-2_23
536. Barceló P, Fontaine G and Lin A. (2013). Expressive Path Queries on Graphs
with Data. Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning.
10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_5. (71-85).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-45221-5_5
537. Dimitrov D, Singh L and Mann J. (2013). Comparison Queries for Uncertain
Graphs. Database and Expert Systems Applications.
10.1007/978-3-642-40173-2_13. (124-140).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-40173-2_13
538. Kirrane S, Mileo A and Decker S. (2013). Applying DAC Principles to the
RDF Graph Data Model. Security and Privacy Protection in Information
Processing Systems. 10.1007/978-3-642-39218-4_6. (69-82).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-39218-4_6
539. Libkin L, Tan T and Vrgoč D. (2013). Regular Expressions with Binding over
Data Words for Querying Graph Databases. Developments in Language Theory.
10.1007/978-3-642-38771-5_29. (325-337).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-38771-5_29
540. de Cesare S, Foy G and Partridge C. (2013). Re-engineering Data with 4D
Ontologies and Graph Databases. Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image
Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications. 10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_29.
(304-316).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_29
541. Pereira A and Appel A. (2013). Modeling and Storing Complex Network with
Graph-Tree. New Trends in Databases and Information Systems.
10.1007/978-3-642-32518-2_29. (305-315).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-32518-2_29
542. Dąbrowski R. On architecture warehouses and software intelligence.
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Future Generation
Information Technology. (251-262).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35585-1_35
543. Hu B, Carvalho N, Laera L and Matsutsuka T. Towards big linked data.
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information
Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. (167-176).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2428736.2428764
544. Soussi R. SPIDER-graph. Proceedings of the 31st international conference
on Conceptual Modeling. (543-552).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_44
545. Hoang D, Tjoa A and Priebe T. (2012). Query-by-example approach towards
on-demand multidimensional analysis. International Journal of Business
Intelligence and Data Mining. 7:3. (137-151). Online publication date:
1-Oct-2012.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2012.049551
546. Zhang J, Liu H and Yu H. (2012). The motive for constructing a high level
data model on cloud databases 2012 World Congress on Information and
Communication Technologies (WICT). 10.1109/WICT.2012.6409257.
978-1-4673-4805-8. (1198-1203).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6409257/
547. Indrawan-Santiago M. Database Research. Proceedings of the 2012 15th
International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems. (45-51).
https://doi.org/10.1109/NBiS.2012.95
548. Šipetić M. Design and implementation of a space model server for indoor
location-based services. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on
Ubiquitous Computing. (572-575).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370312
549. Jayathilake D, Sooriaarachchi C, Gunawardena T, Kulasuriya B and Dayaratne
T. (2012). A study into the capabilities of NoSQL databases in handling a
highly heterogeneous tree 2012 IEEE 6th International Conference on
Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS).
10.1109/ICIAFS.2012.6419890. 978-1-4673-1975-1. (106-111).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6419890/
550. Martínez-Bazan N, Águila-Lorente M, Muntés-Mulero V, Dominguez-Sal D,
Gómez-Villamor S and Larriba-Pey J. Efficient graph management based on
bitmap indices. Proceedings of the 16th International Database Engineering
& Applications Sysmposium. (110-119).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2351476.2351489
551. Barcelo P, Figueira D and Libkin L. Graph Logics with Rational Relations
and the Generalized Intersection Problem. Proceedings of the 2012 27th
Annual IEEE/ACM Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. (115-124).
https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2012.23
552. Hadjali A, Mokhtari A and Pivert O. (2012). Expressing and processing
complex preferences in route planning queries. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
196. (82-104). Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.01.006
553. Barricelli B, Valtolina S and Marzullo M. ArchMatrix. Proceedings of the
International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. (681-684).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254684
554. Losemann K. Foundations of regular expressions in XML schema languages and
SPARQL. Proceedings of the on SIGMOD/PODS 2012 PhD Symposium. (39-44).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2213598.2213609
555. Sheng C, Tao Y and Li J. (2012). Exact and approximate algorithms for the
most connected vertex problem. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 37:2.
(1-39). Online publication date: 1-May-2012.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2188349.2188354
556. Wood P. (2012). Query languages for graph databases. ACM SIGMOD Record.
41:1. (50-60). Online publication date: 25-Apr-2012.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2206869.2206879
557. Ritter D. From network mining to large scale business networks.
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web.
(989-996).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188233
558. Cheng R, Hong J, Kyrola A, Miao Y, Weng X, Wu M, Yang F, Zhou L, Zhao F
and Chen E. Kineograph. Proceedings of the 7th ACM european conference on
Computer Systems. (85-98).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2168836.2168846
559. Low Y, Bickson D, Gonzalez J, Guestrin C, Kyrola A and Hellerstein J.
(2012). Distributed GraphLab. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 5:8.
(716-727). Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012.
https://doi.org/10.14778/2212351.2212354
560. Angles R. A Comparison of Current Graph Database Models. Proceedings of
the 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops.
(171-177).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2012.31
561. Libkin L and Vrgoč D. Regular path queries on graphs with data.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Database Theory.
(74-85).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2274576.2274585
562. Libkin L and Vrgoč D. Regular expressions for data words. Proceedings of
the 18th international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial
Intelligence, and Reasoning. (274-288).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_22
563. Aspinall D, Denney E and Lüth C. Querying proofs. Proceedings of the 18th
international conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial
Intelligence, and Reasoning. (92-106).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28717-6_10
564. Fletcher G, Gyssens M, Leinders D, Van den Bussche J, Van Gucht D,
Vansummeren S and Wu Y. The impact of transitive closure on the boolean
expressiveness of navigational query languages on graphs. Proceedings of
the 7th international conference on Foundations of Information and
Knowledge Systems. (124-143).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28472-4_8
565. Dries A, Nijssen S and De Raedt L. BiQL. Bisociative Knowledge Discovery.
(147-165).
/doi/10.5555/2363300.2363314
566. Alkhateeb F and Euzenat J. Querying RDF Data. Graph Data Management.
10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch015. (335-353).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch015
567. Sakr S and Al-Naymat G. An Overview of Graph Indexing and Querying
Techniques. Graph Data Management. 10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch004.
(71-88).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch004
568. Srinivasa S. Data, Storage and Index Models for Graph Databases. Graph
Data Management. 10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch003. (47-70).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch003
569. Rodriguez M and Neubauer P. The Graph Traversal Pattern. Graph Data
Management. 10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch002. (29-46).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-61350-053-8.ch002
570. Ritter D. (2012). The Business Graph Protocol. Information and Software
Technologies. 10.1007/978-3-642-33308-8_19. (226-240).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-33308-8_19
571. Zhao Z, Ahn G, Hu H and Mahi D. (2012). SocialImpact: Systematic Analysis
of Underground Social Dynamics. Computer Security – ESORICS 2012.
10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_50. (877-894).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_50
572. Dries A, Nijssen S and De Raedt L. (2012). BiQL: A Query Language for
Analyzing Information Networks. Bisociative Knowledge Discovery.
10.1007/978-3-642-31830-6_11. (147-165).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31830-6_11
573. Luo Y, Picalausa F, Fletcher G, Hidders J and Vansummeren S. (2012).
Storing and Indexing Massive RDF Datasets. Semantic Search over the Web.
10.1007/978-3-642-25008-8_2. (31-60).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-25008-8_2
574. Hoang D, Priebe T and Tjoa A. Hypergraph-based multidimensional data
modeling towards on-demand business analysis. Proceedings of the 13th
International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based
Applications and Services. (36-43).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2095536.2095545
575. Ivanova V and Stromback L. Creating Infrastructure for Tool-Independent
Querying and Exploration of Scientific Workflows. Proceedings of the 2011
IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience. (287-294).
https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2011.47
576. Sahoo S, Nguyen V, Bodenreider O, Parikh P, Minning T and Sheth A. (2011).
A unified framework for managing provenance information in translational
research. BMC Bioinformatics. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-461. 12:1. Online
publication date: 1-Dec-2011.
https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-12-461
577. (2011). References. Data Management of Protein Interaction Networks.
10.1002/9781118103746.refs. (157-176). Online publication date:
4-Nov-2011.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118103746.refs
578. YU G, GU Y, BAO Y and WANG Z. (2011). Large Scale Graph Data Processing on
Cloud Computing Environments. Chinese Journal of Computers.
10.3724/SP.J.1016.2011.01753. 34:10. (1753-1767). Online publication date:
28-Oct-2011.
http://pub.chinasciencejournal.com/article/getArticleRedirect.action?doiCode=10.3724/SP.J.1016.2011.01753
579. Tausch N, Philippsen M and Adersberger J. A statically typed query
language for property graphs. Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on
International Database Engineering & Applications. (219-225).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2076623.2076653
580. Dąbrowski R, Stencel K and Timoszuk G. Software is a directed multigraph.
Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Software architecture.
(360-369).
/doi/10.5555/2041790.2041838
581. Beheshti S, Benatallah B, Motahari-Nezhad H and Sakr S. A query language
for analyzing business processes execution. Proceedings of the 9th
international conference on Business process management. (281-297).
/doi/10.5555/2040283.2040308
582. Gutierrez C. Modeling the web of data. Proceedings of the 7th
international conference on Reasoning web: semantic technologies for the
web of data. (416-444).
/doi/10.5555/2033313.2033321
583. Ames S, Gokhale M and Maltzahn C. QMDS. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Sixth
International Conference on Networking, Architecture, and Storage.
(268-277).
https://doi.org/10.1109/NAS.2011.33
584. Inaba K, Hidaka S, Hu Z, Kato H and Nakano K. Graph-transformation
verification using monadic second-order logic. Proceedings of the 13th
international ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practices of
declarative programming. (17-28).
https://doi.org/10.1145/2003476.2003482
585. Braunschweig K, Thiele M and Lehner W. A flexible graph-based data model
supporting incremental schema design and evolution. Proceedings of the
11th international conference on Current Trends in Web Engineering.
(302-306).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27997-3_29
586. Arenas M and Pérez J. Querying semantic web data with SPARQL. Proceedings
of the thirtieth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of
database systems. (305-316).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1989284.1989312
587. Barceló P, Libkin L and Reutter J. Querying graph patterns. Proceedings of
the thirtieth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database
systems. (199-210).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1989284.1989307
588. Takada S. Finding web services via BPEL fragment search. Proceedings of
the 3rd International Workshop on Search-Driven Development: Users,
Infrastructure, Tools, and Evaluation. (9-12).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1985429.1985432
589. Prat-Pérez A, Dominguez-Sal D and Larriba-Pey J. Social based layouts for
the increase of locality in graph operations. Proceedings of the 16th
international conference on Database systems for advanced applications -
Volume Part I. (558-569).
/doi/10.5555/1997305.1997356
590. Martinez-Bazan N, Gomez-Villamor S and Escale-Claveras F. DEX. Proceedings
of the 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering
Workshops. (124-127).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2011.5767616
591. Fletcher G, Gyssens M, Leinders D, Van den Bussche J, Van Gucht D,
Vansummeren S and Wu Y. Relative expressive power of navigational querying
on graphs. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Database
Theory. (197-207).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1938551.1938578
592. Sakr S and Al-Naymat G. Querying Graph Databases. Advanced Database Query
Systems. 10.4018/978-1-60960-475-2.ch013. (304-322).
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-60960-475-2.ch013
593. Dąbrowski R, Stencel K and Timoszuk G. (2011). Software Is a Directed
Multigraph. Software Architecture. 10.1007/978-3-642-23798-0_38.
(360-369).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-23798-0_38
594. Beheshti S, Benatallah B, Motahari-Nezhad H and Sakr S. (2011). A Query
Language for Analyzing Business Processes Execution. Business Process
Management. 10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_22. (281-297).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_22
595. Gutierrez C. (2011). Modeling the Web of Data (Introductory Overview).
Reasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data.
10.1007/978-3-642-23032-5_8. (416-444).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-23032-5_8
596. Plantikow S and Jorra M. (2011). Latency-Optimal Walks in Replicated and
Partitioned Graphs. Database Systems for Adanced Applications.
10.1007/978-3-642-20244-5_3. (14-27).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-20244-5_3
597. Prat-Pérez A, Dominguez-Sal D and Larriba-Pey J. (2011). Social Based
Layouts for the Increase of Locality in Graph Operations. Database Systems
for Advanced Applications. 10.1007/978-3-642-20149-3_40. (558-569).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-20149-3_40
598. Soussi R, Aufaure M and Baazaoui H. (2011). Graph Database for
Collaborative Communities. Community-Built Databases.
10.1007/978-3-642-19047-6_9. (205-234).
https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-19047-6_9
599. Dominguez-Sal D, Martinez-Bazan N, Muntes-Mulero V, Baleta P and
Larriba-Pey J. (2011). A Discussion on the Design of Graph Database
Benchmarks. Performance Evaluation, Measurement and Characterization of
Complex Systems. 10.1007/978-3-642-18206-8_3. (25-40).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-18206-8_3
600. Cannataro M, Guzzi P and Veltri P. (2010). Protein-to-protein
interactions. ACM Computing Surveys. 43:1. (1-36). Online publication
date: 1-Nov-2010.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1824795.1824796
601. Pérez J, Arenas M and Gutierrez C. (2010). nSPARQL. Web Semantics:
Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 8:4. (255-270). Online
publication date: 1-Nov-2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2010.01.002
602. Dries A and Nijssen S. Analyzing graph databases by aggregate queries.
Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Mining and Learning with Graphs.
(37-45).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1830252.1830258
603. Iordanov B. HyperGraphDB. Proceedings of the 2010 international conference
on Web-age information management. (25-36).
/doi/10.5555/1927585.1927589
604. Saber M, Aref M and Gharib T. (2010). An efficient filtering technique for
super-graph query processing 2010 Fifth International Conference on
Digital Information Management (ICDIM). 10.1109/ICDIM.2010.5664712.
978-1-4244-7572-8. (174-181).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5664712/
605. Sakr S and Al‐Naymat G. (2010). Graph indexing and querying: a review.
International Journal of Web Information Systems.
10.1108/17440081011053104. 6:2. (101-120). Online publication date:
22-Jun-2010.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17440081011053104/full/html
606. Tao Y, Sheng C and Li J. Finding maximum degrees in hidden bipartite
graphs. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of data. (891-902).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1807167.1807263
607. Vicknair C, Macias M, Zhao Z, Nan X, Chen Y and Wilkins D. A comparison of
a graph database and a relational database. Proceedings of the 48th Annual
Southeast Regional Conference. (1-6).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1900008.1900067
608. Soussi R, Aufaure M and Baazaoui H. Towards Social Network Extraction
Using a Graph Database. Proceedings of the 2010 Second International
Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications.
(28-34).
https://doi.org/10.1109/DBKDA.2010.19
609. Ciglan M and Nørvåg K. SGDB. Proceedings of the 15th international
conference on Database systems for advanced applications. (45-56).
/doi/10.5555/1880853.1880859
610. Terje Bjørke J, Nilsen S and Varga M. (2010). Visualization of network
structure by the application of hypernodes. International Journal of
Approximate Reasoning. 51:3. (275-293). Online publication date:
1-Feb-2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.09.003
611. Laha A. On the issues of building information warehouses. Proceedings of
the Third Annual ACM Bangalore Conference. (1-8).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1754288.1754290
612. Grefenstette G and Wilber L. (2010). Search-Based Applications: At the
Confluence of Search and Database Technologies. Synthesis Lectures on
Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.
10.2200/S00320ED1V01Y201012ICR017. 2:1. (1-141). Online publication date:
1-Jan-2010.
http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00320ED1V01Y201012ICR017
613. Iordanov B. (2010). HyperGraphDB: A Generalized Graph Database. Web-Age
Information Management. 10.1007/978-3-642-16720-1_3. (25-36).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-16720-1_3
614. Ciglan M and Nørvåg K. (2010). SGDB – Simple Graph Database Optimized for
Activation Spreading Computation. Database Systems for Advanced
Applications. 10.1007/978-3-642-14589-6_5. (45-56).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-14589-6_5
615. Fletcher G and Beck P. Scalable indexing of RDF graphs for efficient join
processing. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and
knowledge management. (1513-1516).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646159
616. Dries A, Nijssen S and De Raedt L. A query language for analyzing
networks. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and
knowledge management. (485-494).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646016
617. Benazzouz Y, Beaune P, Ramparany F and Chotard L. (2009). Context
data-driven approach for ubiquitous computing applications 2009 Fourth
International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM).
10.1109/ICDIM.2009.5356771. 978-1-4244-4253-9. (1-6).
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5356771/
618. Arenas M, Gutierrez C and Pérez J. Foundations of RDF Databases. Reasoning
Web. Semantic Technologies for Information Systems. (158-204).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03754-2_4
619. Hoareau C and Satoh I. From model checking to data management in pervasive
computing. Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Pervasive
services. (41-48).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1568199.1568206
620. Roussopoulos N and Karagiannis D. Conceptual Modeling. Conceptual
Modeling: Foundations and Applications. (139-152).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_9
621. Jin R, Xiang Y, Ruan N and Fuhry D. 3-HOP. Proceedings of the 2009 ACM
SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. (813-826).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1559845.1559930
622. San Martín M and Gutierrez C. Representing, Querying and Transforming
Social Networks with RDF/SPARQL. Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic
Web Conference on The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. (293-307).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_24
623. Hoareau C and Satoh I. (2009). Modeling and Processing Information for
Context-Aware Computing: A Survey. New Generation Computing. 27:3.
(177-196). Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-009-0060-5
624. Ronen R and Shmueli O. SoQL. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International
Conference on Data Engineering. (1595-1602).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2009.172
625. Gupta A. (2009). Graph Data Management in Scientific Applications.
Encyclopedia of Database Systems. 10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1298.
(1261-1263).
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1298
626. Pérez J, Arenas M and Gutierrez C. nSPARQL. Proceedings of the 7th
International Conference on The Semantic Web. (66-81).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1_5
627. Lobo J and Pappas V. C2. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Workshop on Policies
for Distributed Systems and Networks. (29-36).
https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2008.45
628. Arenas M, Gutierrez C and Pérez J. An Extension of SPARQL for RDFS.
Semantic Web, Ontologies and Databases. (1-20).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70960-2_1
629. Yang B and O'Hallaron D. (1997). Parallel breadth-first BDD construction.
ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 32:7. (145-156). Online publication date: 1-Jul-1997.
https://doi.org/10.1145/263767.263784
630. Dahlbom B and Mathiassen L. (1997). The future of our profession.
Communications of the ACM. 40:6. (80-89). Online publication date:
1-Jun-1997.
https://doi.org/10.1145/255656.255706
631. Parsons J and Wand Y. (1997). Choosing classes in conceptual modeling.
Communications of the ACM. 40:6. (63-69). Online publication date:
1-Jun-1997.
https://doi.org/10.1145/255656.255700
632. Perez J, Arenas M and Gutiirrez C. nSPARQL: A Navigational Language for
RDF. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3199487.
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3199487
633. Poulovassilis A, Selmer P and Wood P. Approximation and Relaxation of
Semantic Web Path Queries. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.3199265.
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3199265
Show All Cited By
INDEX TERMS
1. Survey of graph database models
1. Computer systems organization
1. Architectures
1. Other architectures
1. Heterogeneous (hybrid) systems
2. Information systems
1. Data management systems
1. Database design and models
1. Data model extensions
2. Database management system engines
3. Information integration
1. Extraction, transformation and loading
4. Query languages
2. Information systems applications
3. Mathematics of computing
1. Discrete mathematics
1. Graph theory
1. Graph enumeration
2. Hypergraphs
3. Network flows
4. Paths and connectivity problems
4. Theory of computation
1. Design and analysis of algorithms
1. Graph algorithms analysis
1. Network flows
2. Theory and algorithms for application domains
1. Database theory
1. Database query languages (principles)
RECOMMENDATIONS
* DEMYSTIFYING GRAPH DATABASES: ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMY OF DATA ORGANIZATION,
SYSTEM DESIGNS, AND GRAPH QUERIES
Numerous irregular graph datasets, for example social networks or web graphs,
may contain even trillions of edges. Often, their structure changes over time
and they have domain-specific rich data associated with vertices and edges.
Graph database systems ...
Read More
* A GRAPH-ORIENTED OBJECT DATABASE MODEL
A graph-oriented object database model (GOOD) is introduced as a theoretical
basis for database systems in which manipulation as well as conceptual
representation of data is transparently graph-based. In the GOOD model, the
scheme as well as the ...
Read More
* IBM RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS: THE EARLY YEARS
The relational data model, proposed by E.F. Codd in 1970, inspired several
research projects at IBM and elsewhere. Among these was System R, which
demonstrated the commercial viability of relational database systems. This
article describes the research ...
Read More
COMMENTS
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.
LOGIN OPTIONS
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to
get full access on this article.
Sign in
FULL ACCESS
Get this Article
* Information
* Contributors
* PUBLISHED IN
ACM Computing Surveys Volume 40, Issue 1
February 2008
172 pages
ISSN:0360-0300
EISSN:1557-7341
DOI:10.1145/1322432
Issue’s Table of Contents
Copyright © 2008 ACM
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not
made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear
this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for
components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting
with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers
or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.
Request permissions from Permissions@acm.org
SPONSORS
IN-COOPERATION
PUBLISHER
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
PUBLICATION HISTORY
* Published: 22 February 2008
* Accepted: 1 May 2007
* Revised: 1 October 2006
* Received: 1 November 2005
Published in csur Volume 40, Issue 1
PERMISSIONS
Request permissions about this article.
Request Permissions
CHECK FOR UPDATES
AUTHOR TAGS
* Database systems
* database models
* graph database models
* graph databases
* graph integrity constraints
* graph query languages
QUALIFIERS
* research-article
* Research
* Refereed
CONFERENCE
FUNDING SOURCES
* Millenium Nucleus, Center for Wed Research
* OTHER METRICS
View Article Metrics
* Bibliometrics
* Citations633
* ARTICLE METRICS
* 633
Total Citations
View Citations
* 17,463
Total Downloads
* Downloads (Last 12 months)882
* Downloads (Last 6 weeks)107
OTHER METRICS
View Author Metrics
* CITED BY
View all
PDF FORMAT
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDF
EREADER
View online with eReader.
eReader
DIGITAL EDITION
View this article in digital edition.
View Digital Edition
1. Abiteboul, S. 1997. Querying semi-structured data. In Proceedings of the
6th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). LNCS, vol. 1186.
Springer, 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
2. Abiteboul, S. and Hull, R. 1984. IFO: A formal semantic database model. In
Proceedings of the 3th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 119--132. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. Abiteboul, S., Quass, D., McHugh, J., Widom, J., and Wiener, J. L. 1997.
The Lorel query language for semistructured data. Int. J. Dig. Libr. 1, 1,
68--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
4. Abiteboul, S. and Vianu, V. 1997. Queries and computation on the Web. In
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT).
LNCS, vol. 1186. Springer, 262--275. Google ScholarDigital Library
5. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1988. Efficient search in very large
databases. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Very
Large Data Bases (VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 407--418. Google ScholarDigital
Library
6. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1989. Materialization and incremental
update of path information. In Proceedings of the 5th International
Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer Society, 374--383.
Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Agrawal, R. and Jagadish, H. V. 1994. Algorithms for searching massive
graphs. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 6, 2, 225--238. Google ScholarDigital
Library
8. Albert, R. and Barabási, A.-L. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex
networks. Rev. Mod. Phy. 74, 47.Google ScholarCross Ref
9. Alechina, N., Demri, S., and de Rijke, M. 2003. A modal perspective on
path constraints. J. Logic Computation 13, 6, 939--956.Google ScholarCross
Ref
10. Amann, B. and Scholl, M. 1992. Gram: A Graph Data Model and Query
Language. In European Conference on Hypertext Technology (ECHT). ACM,
201--211. Google ScholarDigital Library
11. Andries, M. and Engels, G. 1993. A hybrid query language for an extended
entity-relationship model. Tech. Rep. TR 93-15, Institute of Advanced
Computer Science, Universiteit Leiden. May.Google Scholar
12. Andries, M., Gemis, M., Paredaens, J., Thyssens, I., and den Bussche, J.
V. 1992. Concepts for graph-oriented object manipulation. In Proceedings
of the 3rd International Conference on Extending Database Technology
(EDBT). LNCS, vol. 580. Springer, 21--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
13. Angles, R. and Gutierrez, C. 2005. Querying RDF data from a graph database
perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference
(ESWC). Number 3532 in LNCS. 346--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
14. Aufaure-Portier, M.-A. and Trépied, C. 1976. A survey of query languages
for geographic information systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd
International Workshop on Interfaces to Databases. 431--438.Google Scholar
15. Azmoodeh, M. and Du, H. 1988. GQL, A graphical query language for semantic
databases. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM). LNCS, vol. 339.
Springer, 259--277. Google ScholarDigital Library
16. Beeri, C. 1988. Data models and languages for databases. In Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). LNCS, vol.
326. Springer, 19--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
17. Benkö, G., Flamm, C., and Stadler, P. F. 2003. A graph-based toy model of
chemistry. J. Chem. Inform. Computer Science (JCISD) 43, 1 (Jan),
1085--1093.Google Scholar
18. Berge, C. 1973. Graphs and Hypergraphs. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Google
ScholarDigital Library
19. Brandes, U. 2005. Network Analysis. Number 3418 in LNCS.
Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
20. Bray, T., Paoli, J., and Sperberg-McQueen, C. M. 1998. Extensible Markup
Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation 10, (February).
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210. Google ScholarDigital Library
21. Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata,
R., Tomkins, A., and Wiener, J. 2000. Graph structure in the Web. In
Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web conference on Computer
Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications
Networking. North-Holland Publishing Co., 309--320. Google ScholarDigital
Library
22. Buneman, P. 1997. Semistructured data. In Proceedings of the 16th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 117--121.
Google ScholarDigital Library
23. Buneman, P., Davidson, S., Hillebrand, G., and Suciu, D. 1996. A query
language and optimization techniques for unstructured data. SIGMOD Record.
25, 2, 505--516. Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Buneman, P., Fan, W., and Weinstein, S. 1998. Path constraints in
semistructured and structured databases. In Proceedings of the 17th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 129-- 138.
Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Cardelli, L., Gardner, P., and Ghelli, G. 2002. A spatial logic for
querying graphs. In Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP). LNCS. Springer, 597--610.
Google ScholarDigital Library
26. Chandra, A. K. 1988. Theory of database queries. In Proceedings of the 7th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 1--9.
Google ScholarDigital Library
27. Chen, P. P.-S. 1976. The entity-relationship model---toward a unified view
of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1, 1, 9--36. Google ScholarDigital
Library
28. Chomicki, J. 1994. Temporal query languages: a survey. In Proceedings of
the First International Conference on Temporal Logic (ICTL).
Springer-Verlag, 506--534. Google ScholarDigital Library
29. Codd, E. F. 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks.
Commun. ACM 13, 6, 377-- 387. Google ScholarDigital Library
30. Codd, E. F. 1980. Data models in database management. In Proceedings of
the 1980 Workshop on Data abstraction, Databases, and Conceptual Modeling.
ACM Press, 112--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
31. Codd, E. F. 1983. A relational model of data for large shared data banks.
Commun. ACM 26, 1, 64--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
32. Conklin, J. 1987. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Comput. 20,
9, 17--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
33. Consens, M. and Mendelzon, A. 1993. Hy+: A hygraph-based query and
visualization system. SIGMOD Record 22, 2, 511--516. Google ScholarDigital
Library
34. Consens, M. P. and Mendelzon, A. O. 1989. Expressing structural hypertext
queries in graphlog. In Proceedings of the 2th Conference on Hypertext.
ACM Press, 269--292. Google ScholarDigital Library
35. Cruz, I. F., Mendelzon, A. O., and Wood, P. T. 1987. A graphical query
language supporting recursion. In Proceedings of the Association for
Computing Machinery Special Interest Group on Management of Data. ACM
Press, 323--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
36. Cruz, I. F., Mendelzon, A. O., and Wood, P. T. 1989. G+: recursive
queries without recursion. In Proceedings of the 2th International
Conference on Expert Database Systems (EDS). Addison-Wesley, 645--
666.Google Scholar
37. Date, C. J. 1981. Referential integrity. In Proceedings of the 7th
International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). IEEE Computer
Society, 2--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
38. de S. Price, D. J. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science 149,
510--515.Google ScholarCross Ref
39. Deng, Y. and Chang, S.-K. 1990. A G-Net model for knowledge representation
and reasoning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3 (Dec), 295--310. Google
ScholarDigital Library
40. Deville, Y., Gilbert, D., van Helden, J., and Wodak, S. J. 2003. An
overview of data models for the analysis of biochemical pathways. In
Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Methods
in Systems Biology. Springer-Verlag, 174. Google ScholarDigital Library
41. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F. 2003. Evolution of Networks---From
Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press. Google
ScholarDigital Library
42. Fernández, M., Florescu, D., Kang, J., Levy, A., and Suciu, D. 1998.
Catching the boat with strudel: experiences with a Web-site management
system. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of Data. ACM Press, 414--425. Google ScholarDigital Library
43. Flesca, S. and Greco, S. 1999. Partially ordered regular languages for
graph queries. In Proceedings of the 26th International Colloquium on
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP). LNCS, vol. 1644. Springer,
321--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
44. Flesca, S. and Greco, S. 2000. Querying graph databases. In Proceedings of
the 7th International Conference on Extending Database
Technology---Advances in Database Technology (EDBT). LNCS, vol. 1777.
Springer, 510--524. Google ScholarDigital Library
45. Florescu, D., Levy, A., and Mendelzon, A. O. 1998. Database techniques for
the World-Wide Web: A survey. SIGMOD Record 27, 3, 59--74. Google
ScholarDigital Library
46. Fry, J. P. and Sibley, E. H. 1976. Evolution of data-base management
systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
47. Furche, T., Linse, B., Bry, F., Plexousakis, D., and Gottlob, G. 2006. RDF
querying: language constructs and evaluation methods compared. In
Reasoning Web. Number 4126 in LNCS. 1--52.Google Scholar
48. Gemis, M. and Paredaens, J. 1993. An object-oriented pattern matching
language. In Proceedings of the First JSSST International Symposium on
Object Technologies for Advanced Software. Springer-Verlag, 339--355.
Google ScholarDigital Library
49. Gemis, M., Paredaens, J., Thyssens, I., and den Bussche, J. V. 1993. GOOD:
A graph-oriented object database system. In Proceedings of the 1993 ACM
SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM Press,
505--510. Google ScholarDigital Library
50. Giugno, R. and Shasha, D. 2002. GraphGrep: A fast and universal method for
querying graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference in
Pattern recognition (ICPR).Google Scholar
51. Graves, M. Graph data models for genomics. http://www.xweave.com/people/in
graaves/pubs.Google Scholar
52. Graves, M. 1993. Theories and tools for designing application-specific
knowledge base data models. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Google ScholarDigital Library
53. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1994. Querying a genome
database using graphs. In Proceedings of the 3th International Conference
on Bioinformatics and Genome Research.Google Scholar
54. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1995a. A graph-theoretic
data model for genome mapping databases. In Proceedings of the 28th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer
Society, 32. Google ScholarDigital Library
55. Graves, M., Bergeman, E. R., and Lawrence, C. B. 1995b. Graph database
systems for genomics. IEEE Eng. Medicine Biol. Special issue on Managing
Data for the Human Genome Project 11, 6.Google Scholar
56. Griffith, R. L. 1982. Three principles of representation for semantic
networks. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 7, 3, 417--442. Google ScholarDigital
Library
57. Guha, R.V., Lassila, O., Miller, E., and Brickley, D. 1998. Enabling
inferencing. The Query Languages Workshop (QL).Google Scholar
58. Gutiérrez, A., Pucheral, P., Steffen, H., and Thévenin, J.-M. 1994.
Database graph views: A practical model to manage persistent graphs. In
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
(VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 391--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
59. Güting, R. H. 1994. GraphDB: modeling and querying graphs in databases. In
Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases
(VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann, 297--308. Google ScholarDigital Library
60. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., den Bussche, J. V., and Gucht, D. V. 1990a. A
graph-oriented object database model. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 417--424. Google
ScholarDigital Library
61. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., den Bussche, J. V., and Gucht, D. V. 1991. A
graph-oriented object database model. Tech. Rep. 91-27, University of
Antwerp (UIA), Belgium. (March).Google Scholar
62. Gyssens, M., Paredaens, J., and Gucht, D. V. 1990b. A graph-oriented
object model for database end-user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1990
ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM Press,
24--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
63. Hammer, J. and Schneider, M. 2004. The GenAlg project: developing a new
integrating data model, language, and tool for managing and querying
genomic information. SIGMOD Record 33, 2, 45--50. Google ScholarDigital
Library
64. Hammer, M. and McLeod, D. 1978. The semantic data model: a modelling
mechanism for data base applications. In Proceedings of the 1978 ACM
SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. ACM, 26--36. Google
ScholarDigital Library
65. Hanneman, R. A. 2001. Introduction to social network methods. Tech. Rep.,
Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside.Google
Scholar
66. Hayes, J. and Gutierrez, C. 2004. Bipartite graphs as intermediate model
for RDF. In Proceedings of the 3th International Semantic Web Conference
(ISWC). Number 3298 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 47--61.Google Scholar
67. Heuer, A. and Scholl, M. H. 1991. Principles of object-oriented query
languages. In Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft (BTW).
Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 270. Springer, 178--197.Google Scholar
68. Hidders, J. 2001. A graph-based update language for object-oriented data
models. Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google
Scholar
69. Hidders, J. 2002. Typing graph-manipulation operations. In Proceedings of
the 9th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT).
Springer-Verlag, 394--409. Google ScholarDigital Library
70. Hidders, J. and Paredaens, J. 1993. GOAL, A graph-based object and
association language. Advances in Database Systems: Implementations and
Applications, CISM, 247--265.Google Scholar
71. Hull, R. and King, R. 1987. Semantic database modeling: Survey,
applications, and research issues. ACM Comput. Surv. 19, 3, 201--260.
Google ScholarDigital Library
72. ISO. 1999. International Standard ISO/IEC 13250 Topic Maps.Google Scholar
73. Jagadish, H. V. and Olken, F. 2003. Data management for the biosciences:
report of the NLM Workshop on Data Management for Molecular and Cell
Biology. Tech. Rep. LBNL-52767, National Library of Medicine.Google
Scholar
74. Kerschberg, L., Klug, A. C., and Tsichritzis, D. 1976. A taxonomy of data
models. In Proceedings of Systems for Large Data Bases (VLDB). North
Holland and IFIP, 43--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
75. Kiesel, N., Schurr, A., and Westfechtel, B. 1996. GRAS: A graph-oriented
software engineering database system. In IPSEN Book. 397--425. Google
ScholarDigital Library
76. Kifer, M., Kim, W., and Sagiv, Y. 1992. Querying object-oriented
databases. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGMOD International Conference
on Management of Data. ACM Press, 393--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
77. Kim, W. 1990. Object-oriented databases: definition and research
directions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3, 327--341. Google
ScholarDigital Library
78. Klyne, G. and Carroll, J. 2004. Resource description framework (RDF)
concepts and abstract syntax.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/.Google Scholar
79. Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Sivakumar, D., Tomkins, A., and
Upfal, E. 2000. The Web as a graph. In Proceedings of the 19th Symposium
on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 1--10. Google
ScholarDigital Library
80. Kunii, H. S. 1987. DBMS with graph data model for knowledge handling. In
Proceedings of the 1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference on Exploring
technology: Today and Tomorrow. IEEE Computer Society Press, 138--142.
Google ScholarDigital Library
81. Kuper, G. M. and Vardi, M. Y. 1984. A new approach to database logic. In
Proceedings of the 3th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 86--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
82. Kuper, G. M. and Vardi, M. Y. 1993. The Logical Data Model. ACM Trans.
Database Syst. 18, 3, 379-- 413. Google ScholarDigital Library
83. Langou, B. and Mainguenaud, M. 1994. Graph data model operations for
network facilities in a geographical information system. In Proceedings of
the 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. Vol. 2.
1002--1019.Google Scholar
84. Lécluse, C., Richard, P., and Vélez, F. 1988. O2, an object-oriented data
model. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of Data. ACM Press, 424--433. Google ScholarDigital Library
85. Levene, M. and Loizou, G. 1995. A graph-based data model and its
ramifications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 7, 5, 809--823. Google
ScholarDigital Library
86. Levene, M. and Poulovassilis, A. 1990. The Hypernode model and its
associated query language. In Proceedings of the 5th Jerusalem Conference
on Information technology. IEEE Computer Society Press, 520--530. Google
ScholarDigital Library
87. Levene, M. and Poulovassilis, A. 1991. An object-oriented data model
formalised through hypergraphs. Data Knowl. Eng. 6, 3, 205--224. Google
ScholarDigital Library
88. Mainguenaud, M. 1992. Simatic XT: A data model to deal with multi-scaled
networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 16, 281--288.Google ScholarCross
Ref
89. Mainguenaud, M. 1995. Modelling the network component of geographical
information systems. Int. J. Geog. Inform. Syst. 9, 6, 575--593.Google
ScholarCross Ref
90. Mannino, M. V. and Shapiro, L. D. 1990. Extensions to query languages for
graph traversal problems. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2, 3, 353--363.
Google ScholarDigital Library
91. McGee, W. C. 1976. On user criteria for data model evaluation. ACM Trans.
Database Syst. 1, 4, 370--387. Google ScholarDigital Library
92. McGuinness, D. L. and van Harmelen, F. 2004. OWL Web ontology language
overview, W3C recommendation 10 (February).
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/.Google Scholar
93. Medeiros, C. B. and Pires, F. 1994. Databases for GIS. SIGMOD Record 23, 1
(March), 107--115. Google ScholarDigital Library
94. Mendelzon, A. O. and Wood, P. T. 1989. Finding regular simple paths in
graph databases. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on
Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 185--193.
Google ScholarDigital Library
95. Navathe, S. B. 1992. Evolution of data modeling for databases.
Communications of the ACM 35, 9, 112--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
96. Nejdl, W., Siberski, W., and Sintek, M. 2003. Design issues and challenges
for RDF- and schema-based peer-to-peer systems. SIGMOD Record 32, 3,
41--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
97. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks.
SIAM Rev. 45, 2, 167--256.Google ScholarDigital Library
98. Olken, F. 2003. Tutorial on graph data management for biology. IEEE
Computer Society Bioinformatics Conference (CSB).Google Scholar
99. Papakonstantinou, Y., Garcia-Molina, H., and Widom, J. 1995. Object
exchange across heterogeneous information sources. In Proceedings of the
11th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer
Society, 251--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
100. Paredaens, J. and Kuijpers, B. 1998. Data models and query languages for
spatial databases. Data & Knowledge Engineering (DKE) 25, 1--2, 29--53.
Google ScholarDigital Library
101. Paredaens, J., Peelman, P., and Tanca, L. 1995. G-Log: A graph-based query
language. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 7, 3, 436--453. Google
ScholarDigital Library
102. Peckham, J. and Maryanski, F. J. 1988. Semantic data models. ACM Comput.
Surv. 20, 3, 153--189. Google ScholarDigital Library
103. Pepper, S. and Moore, G. 2001. XML topic maps (XTM) 1.0---TopicMaps.Org
Specification. http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/xtm1-20010806.html.Google
Scholar
104. Poulovassilis, A. and Hild, S. G. 2001. Hyperlog: A graph-based system for
database browsing, querying, and update. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13,
2, 316--333. Google ScholarDigital Library
105. Poulovassilis, A. and Levene, M. 1994. A nested-graph model for the
representation and manipulation of complex objects. ACM Trans. Inform.
Syst. 12, 1, 35--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
106. Prud'hommeaux, E. and Seaborne, A. 2005. SPARQL Query Language for RDF,
W3C Working Draft 21 July.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/.Google Scholar
107. Ramakrishnan, R. and Ullman, J. D. 1993. A survey of research on deductive
database systems. J. Logic Prog. 23, 2, 125--149.Google ScholarCross Ref
108. Roussopoulos, N. and Mylopoulos, J. 1975. Using semantic networks for
database management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). ACM, 144--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
109. Samet, H. and Aref, W. G. 1995. Spatial data models and query processing.
In Modern Database Systems. 338--360. Google ScholarDigital Library
110. Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B., Schmidt, J. W., and Wetzel, I. 1993.
Integrity enforcement in object-oriented databases. In Proceedings of the
4th International Workshop on Foundations of Models and Languages for Data
and Objects. Google ScholarDigital Library
111. Shasha, D., Wang, J. T. L., and Giugno, R. 2002. Algorithmics and
applications of tree and graph searching. In Proceedings of the 21th
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS). ACM Press, 39-- 52.
Google ScholarDigital Library
112. Shekhar, S., Coyle, M., Goyal, B., Liu, D.-R., and Sarkar, S. 1997. Data
models in geographic information systems. Commun. ACM 40, 4, 103--111.
Google ScholarDigital Library
113. Sheng, L., Ozsoyoglu, Z. M., and Ozsoyoglu, G. 1999. A graph query
language and its query processing. In Proceedings of the 15th
International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer
Society, 572--581. Google ScholarDigital Library
114. Sheth, A., Aleman-Meza, B., Arpinar, I. B., Halaschek-Wiener, C.,
Ramakrishnan, C., Bertram, C., Warke, Y., Avant, D., Arpinar, F. S.,
Anyanwu, K., and Kochut, K. 2005. Semantic association identification and
knowledge discovery for national security applications. J. Database Manag.
16, 1 (Jan-March), 33--53.Google ScholarCross Ref
115. Shipman, D. W. 1981. The functional data model and the data language
DAPLEX. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 6, 1, 140--173. Google ScholarDigital
Library
116. Silberschatz, A., Korth, H. F., and Sudarshan, S. 1996. Data models. ACM
Comput. Surv. 28, 1, 105--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
117. Sowa, J. F. 1976. Conceptual graphs for a database interface. IBM J. Res.
Devel. 20, 4, 336--357.Google ScholarDigital Library
118. Sowa, J. F. 1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind
and Machine. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
119. Sowa, J. F. 1991. Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the
Representation of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
120. Stein, L. D. and Tierry-Mieg, J. 1999. AceDB: A genome database management
system. Comput. Sci. Eng. 1, 3, 44--52.Google ScholarDigital Library
121. Tansel, A., Clifford, J., Gadia, S., Jajodia, S., Segev, A., and
Snodgrass, R. T., Eds. 1993. Temporal Databases: Theory, Design, and
Implementation. Benjamin-Cummings. Google ScholarDigital Library
122. Taylor, R. W. and Frank, R. L. 1976. CODASYL data-base management systems.
ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1, 67--103. Google ScholarDigital Library
123. Thalheim, B. 1991. Dependencies in Relational Databases. Leipzig, Teubner
Verlag.Google Scholar
124. Thalheim, B. 1996. An overview on semantical constraints for database
models. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Intellectual
Systems and Computer Science.Google Scholar
125. Tompa, F. W. 1989. A data model for flexible hypertext database systems.
ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 7, 1, 85--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
126. Tsichritzis, D. C. and Lochovsky, F. H. 1976. Hierarchical data-base
management: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 8, 1, 105--123. Google
ScholarDigital Library
127. Tsvetovat, M., Diesner, J., and Carley, K. 2004. NetIntel: A database for
manipulation of rich social network data. Tech. Rep. CMU-ISRI-04-135,
Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for
Software Research International.Google Scholar
128. Tuv, E., Poulovassilis, A., and Levene, M. 1992. A storage manager for the
hypernode model. In Proceedings of the 10th British National Conference on
Databases. Number 618 in LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 59--77. Google
ScholarDigital Library
129. Vardi, M. Y. 1982. The complexity of relational query languages (extended
abstract). In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
(STOC). ACM Press, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
130. Vassiliadis, P. and Sellis, T. 1999. A survey of logical models for OLAP
Databases. SIGMOD Record 28, 4, 64--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
131. Vianu, V. 2003. A Web odyssey: From Codd to XML. SIGMOD Record 32, 2,
68--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
132. Watters, C. and Shepherd, M. A. 1990. A transient hypergraph-based model
for data access. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 8, 2, 77--102. Google
ScholarDigital Library
133. Weddell, G. E. 1992. Reasoning about functional dependencies generalized
for semantic data models. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 17, 1, 32--64. Google
ScholarDigital Library
134. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and
Haythornthwaite, C. 1996. Computer networks as social networks:
collaborative work,telework, and virtual community. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 22,
213--238.Google ScholarCross Ref
135. Yannakakis, M. 1990. Graph-theoretic methods in database theory. In
Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS).
ACM Press, 230--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
136. Zicari, R. 1991. A framework for schema updates in an object-oriented
database system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on
Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE Computer Society, 2--13. Google
ScholarDigital Library
* Figures
* Other
* None
*
SHARE THIS PUBLICATION LINK
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1322432.1322433
Copy Link
SHARE ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Share on
* X
* LinkedIn
* Reddit
* Facebook
* Email
*
*
*
* 136References
*
*
*
Close Figure Viewer
Browse AllReturnChange zoom level
CAPTION
View Issue’s Table of Contents
back
Close modal
NEW CITATION ALERT ADDED!
This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:
You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.
To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.
Manage my Alerts
Close modal
NEW CITATION ALERT!
Please log in to your account
Close modal
EXPORT CITATIONS
Select Citation formatBibTeXEndNoteACM Ref
* Please download or close your previous search result export first before
starting a new bulk export.
Preview is not available.
By clicking download,a status dialog will open to start the export process.
The process may takea few minutes but once it finishes a file will be
downloadable from your browser. You may continue to browse the DL while the
export process is in progress.
Download
* * Download citation
* Copy citation
FOOTER
CATEGORIES
* Journals
* Magazines
* Books
* Proceedings
* SIGs
* Conferences
* Collections
* People
ABOUT
* About ACM Digital Library
* ACM Digital Library Board
* Subscription Information
* Author Guidelines
* Using ACM Digital Library
* All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library
* ACM Computing Classification System
* Digital Library Accessibility
JOIN
* Join ACM
* Join SIGs
* Subscribe to Publications
* Institutions and Libraries
CONNECT
* Contact
* Facebook
* X
* Linkedin
* Feedback
* Bug Report
The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery.
Copyright © 2024 ACM, Inc.
* Terms of Usage
* Privacy Policy
* Code of Ethics
Your Search Results Download Request
We are preparing your search results for download ...
We will inform you here when the file is ready.
Download now!
Your Search Results Download Request
Your file of search results citations is now ready.
Download now!
Your Search Results Download Request
Your search export query has expired. Please try again.
✓
Danke für das Teilen!
AddToAny
Mehr…
Close crossmark popup