www.theguardian.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2a04:4e42::367
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://ltpr4jjab.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001c2VSUCnvi2Rp53WlNTioe-EsYs8DxHeUb1LtPPEo4ehK1Dv_ezDbZdW_WZ5MAPCLuRT8fXKUZn4cQxZZvQhB...
Effective URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/06/kentucky-senate-child-support-unborn-children
Submission: On June 11 via api from LU — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/06/kentucky-senate-child-support-unborn-children
Submission: On June 11 via api from LU — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOMhttps://www.google.co.uk/search
<form action="https://www.google.co.uk/search" class="dcr-g8v7m4"><label for="gu-search-mobile" class="dcr-0">
<div class="dcr-6v110l">Search input </div>
</label><input type="text" id="gu-search-mobile" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false" aria-describedby="" required="" name="q" placeholder="Search" data-link-name="nav2 : search" tabindex="-1" class="selectableMenuItem dcr-1inekgs"><label
for="gu-search-mobile" class="dcr-0">
<div class="dcr-6v110l">google-search </div>
<div class="dcr-190ztmi"><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
<path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
d="M9.273 2c4.023 0 7.25 3.295 7.25 7.273a7.226 7.226 0 0 1-7.25 7.25C5.25 16.523 2 13.296 2 9.273 2 5.295 5.25 2 9.273 2Zm0 1.84A5.403 5.403 0 0 0 3.84 9.274c0 3 2.409 5.454 5.432 5.454 3 0 5.454-2.454 5.454-5.454 0-3.023-2.454-5.432-5.454-5.432Zm7.295 10.887L22 20.16 20.16 22l-5.433-5.432v-.932l.91-.909h.931Z">
</path>
</svg><span class="dcr-1p0hins">Search</span></div>
</label><button type="submit" aria-live="polite" aria-label="Search with Google" data-link-name="nav2 : search : submit" tabindex="-1" class="dcr-7lzcei">
<div class="src-button-space"></div><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
<path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M1 12.956h18.274l-7.167 8.575.932.932L23 12.478v-.956l-9.96-9.985-.932.932 7.166 8.575H1v1.912Z"></path>
</svg>
</button><input type="hidden" name="as_sitesearch" value="www.theguardian.com"></form>
Text Content
Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Close dialogue1/1Next imagePrevious imageToggle caption Skip to navigation Print subscriptions Sign in Search jobs Search Europe edition * Europe edition * UK edition * US edition * Australia edition * International edition The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian SUPPORT THE GUARDIAN Fund independent journalism with €10 per month Support us Support us * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle ShowMoreShow More * News * View all News * World news * UK news * Climate crisis * Ukraine * Environment * Science * Global development * Football * Tech * Business * Obituaries * Opinion * View all Opinion * The Guardian view * Columnists * Cartoons * Opinion videos * Letters * Sport * View all Sport * Football * Cricket * Rugby union * Tennis * Cycling * F1 * Golf * US sports * Culture * View all Culture * Books * Music * TV & radio * Art & design * Film * Games * Classical * Stage * Lifestyle * View all Lifestyle * Fashion * Food * Recipes * Love & sex * Health & fitness * Home & garden * Women * Men * Family * Travel * Money * Search input google-search Search * Support us * Print subscriptions Europe edition * UK edition * US edition * Australia edition * International edition * * Search jobs * Holidays * Digital Archive * Guardian Licensing * About Us * The Guardian app * Video * Podcasts * Pictures * Newsletters * Today's paper * Inside the Guardian * The Observer * Guardian Weekly * Crosswords * Wordiply * Corrections * * Search jobs * Holidays * Digital Archive * Guardian Licensing * About Us * World * Europe * US * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development Whitney Westerfield, a Republican state senator, in Frankfort, Kentucky, in February 2020. Photograph: Bryan Woolston/AP View image in fullscreen Whitney Westerfield, a Republican state senator, in Frankfort, Kentucky, in February 2020. Photograph: Bryan Woolston/AP Kentucky This article is more than 3 months old KENTUCKY SENATE PASSES BILL GRANTING RIGHT TO COLLECT CHILD SUPPORT FOR FETUSES This article is more than 3 months old Measure allows parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses Carter Sherman and agency Wed 6 Mar 2024 16.28 CETFirst published on Wed 6 Mar 2024 14.22 CET Share The Republican-led Kentucky senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing “fetal personhood”. The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation – Senate Bill 110 – won senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers. The Republican state senator Whitney Westerfield said afterward that the broad support reflects a recognition that pregnancy carries with it an obligation for the other parent to help cover the expenses incurred during those nine months. Westerfield is a staunch abortion opponent and sponsor of the bill. “I believe that life begins at conception,” Westerfield said while presenting the measure to his colleagues. “But even if you don’t, there’s no question that there are obligations and costs involved with having a child before that child is born.” The measure sets a strict time limit, allowing a parent to retroactively seek child support for pregnancy expenses up to a year after giving birth. “So if there’s not a child support order until the child’s eight, this isn’t going to apply,” Westerfield said when the bill was reviewed recently in a senate committee. “Even at a year and a day, this doesn’t apply. It’s only for orders that are in place within a year of the child’s birth.” The debate comes amid the backdrop of a recent Alabama supreme court ruling that frozen embryos are legally protected “extrauterine children”, which spotlighted the anti-abortion movement’s longstanding goal of giving embryos and fetuses legal and constitutional rights that are on par with or even competing against those of the people carrying them. These kinds of protections, if enacted, could rewrite vast swaths of US law, including undermining in vitro fertilization (IVF). In the wake of the Alabama ruling, multiple providers in the state announced that they would suspend their IVF procedures. More than half of all states have at least some measure on the books that defines a fetus or embryo as a person, or that could be honed into a legal spear to advance fetal personhood, according to an analysis by the pro-abortion rights group Pregnancy Justice. In Tennessee, for example, dozens of women have been charged under the state’s fetal assault law, often for suspected drug use. Kentucky is among at least six states where lawmakers have proposed measures similar to a Georgia law that allows child support to be sought back to conception. Georgia also allows prospective parents to claim an income tax deduction for dependent children before birth; Utah enacted a pregnancy tax break last year; and variations of those measures are before lawmakers in at least a handful of other states. In the wake of the outcry over Alabama, however, Florida lawmakers paused their push for a fetal personhood bill. The Kentucky bill underwent a major revision before winning senate passage. The original version would have allowed a child support action at any time following conception, but the measure was amended to have such an action apply only retroactively after the birth within the time limit. Despite the change, abortion-rights supporters will watch closely for any attempt by anti-abortion lawmakers to reshape the bill in a way that “sets the stage for personhood” for a fetus, said Tamarra Wieder, the Kentucky state director for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates. The measure still needs to clear a house committee and the full house. Any house change would send the bill back to the senate. Explore more on these topics * Kentucky * Republicans * news Share Reuse this content MOST VIEWED * CANADIAN DRUG ADVOCACY GROUP FOUNDERS CHARGED WITH TRAFFICKING * I JUMPED FROM A PLANE – AND MY PARACHUTE FAILED. AS I HURTLED TOWARDS EARTH, I FELT ODDLY CALM * THE BIG BRITISH BAMBOO CRISIS: ‘IT INVADED MY BEAUTIFUL HOME’ * MAN ARRESTED AFTER FOUR US ACADEMICS STABBED IN PARK DURING CHINA VISIT * JUDGE STRIKES REFERENCE TO TRUMP WAVING AROUND CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN INDICTMENT MOST VIEWED MOST VIEWED * World * Europe * US * Americas * Asia * Australia * Middle East * Africa * Inequality * Global development * News * Opinion * Sport * Culture * Lifestyle Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning Sign up for our email * Help * Complaints & corrections * SecureDrop * Work for us * * Privacy policy * Cookie policy * Terms & conditions * Contact us * All topics * All writers * Digital newspaper archive * Facebook * YouTube * Instagram * LinkedIn * X * Newsletters * Advertise with us * Search UK jobs Back to top © 2024 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr)