vote.aavegotchi.com Open in urlscan Pro
2606:4700:3030::ac43:bf68  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://vote.aavegotchi.com/#/proposa
Effective URL: https://vote.aavegotchi.com/
Submission: On July 19 via api from FI — Scanned from FI

Form analysis 0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

snapshot
Connect wallet

AAVEGOTCHI


26K members
Join
Proposals
New proposal
Treasury
About
Settings




PROPOSALS

All

drwagmi.lens
Core
Active


GEODES, SCHEMATIC DISTRIBUTION, AND A FINAL NON-DROP TICKET RAFFLE

Author: dr.wagmi Gotchi ID: 16635 Discussion:
https://discord.com/channels/732491344970383370/1126256051528937624/1126256051528937624
Please note the author, gotchi, ID, and discussion are the same for this Geode
proposal and the Forge 2.0 Schematic proposal. Takeaway points: The table below
outlines the programmed odds for the multi-tier rarity geode The 14 Forge 2.0
Schematics will be distributed 60% through geodes and 40% by raffle This raffle
will be the last non-drop ticket raffle paving the way for a transition to GLTR
tickets Geodes: Geodes are currently only obtained by smelting wearables which
means you can only get new content by smelting old content and burning alloy in
the process. This allows for predictable distribution of new content over time.
A well-stocked prize pool will transparently drip new content to the community
and could be refilled at any time – refills could be new schematics or other
prizes, content, partnership items (Anata NFTs), etc. MikeyJay designed the
table below outlining odds for Multitier-Rarity Geodes. We plan to push this
live in August alongside the Forge 2.0 New Schematic Release. Schematics can be
minted and stored in the forge contract until the updated Geode contract is
ready. See Appendix A for details regarding geode odds and prize distribution:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zFjdeOae-Pg8r2DHIGvJu7RGennHzZDtZ0lv8v142S8/edit
image Forge 2.0 Schematic Distribution: We propose that the 14 new wearable
schematics be distributed 60% by multi-tier rarity geodes and 40% by traditional
raffle using FRENS-purchased tickets. This recommendation comes after soliciting
feedback from the community and Pixelcraft. It avoids a resource-intensive
auction which comes with a risk of poor user experience. It uses up all
remaining FRENS (unless users elect to wait for a drop ticket raffle) and sets
an expectation for no further FRENS-based tiered raffles. It also allows for the
fun, community-building event of a raffle and slow, drip distribution metered by
protocol engagement through the Geode mechanic. Overall, we think the 60:40
distribution strategy threads the needle and respects all stakeholders. See
below for the exact distribution strategy, rarity tiers, and slots of items:
image Final FRENS Tiered-Rarity Raffle The Forge Team proposes this raffle be
the last traditionally tiered FRENS raffle. This means that Common-Godlike
tickets purchased by FRENS will not be used again. They could be converted to
Drop Tickets for a final Drop Ticket raffle to be determined later by Pixelcraft
or the DAO. This is a significant step toward removing FRENS as a liability on
the DAO balance sheet. It paves the way for creation of a GLTR-based raffle
system to be used in the future if deemed necessary by PC or the DAO. Please see
the complementary proposal on the Forge 2.0 Schematics release for details on
the proposed schematics and methodology. The Forge Team

Ends in 4 days
drwagmi.lens
Core
Active


FORGE 2.0 NEW SCHEMATICS, METHODOLOGY, AND GODLIKE SETS

Takeaway Points: We propose 14 new schematics designed by the Forge Team
MikeyJay’s methodology was used for trait/set selection and should guide any
future releases We propose 4 new four-piece godlike sets to give all 16 gotchi
types access to such a set New godlikes maximally incorporate “old/classic”
wearables New Schematics The Forge Team has been working diligently on
standardizing and improving the process of new content releases. Intermittent
wearable releases have been a staple of engagement for our community and
comprise the majority of protocol engagement thus far. New content release comes
with extensive backend work, however, especially as the Pixelcraft team
transitions all assets to 3D in light of the rebranding and Gotchi Guardians. To
this end, it’s imperative that trait and set selection be deliberate and
equitable to all gotchi types. This will maximize the available wearables per
gotchi, satisfy unmet demand, balance rarity farming, and provide a more
balanced collection of assets on which 3rd party games can be built. Here are
the proposed new wearables with rarity tier, slot, and specific trait
modification: image Special Notes for this release: “Best choice” is defined by
highest impact on standard deviation impact for slot/rarity for each wearable.
In simpler terms, the best choice is the one that fills the most trait gaps.
Best choice was chosen for all wearables with a single exception of Godlike
Hands: o The Godlike Hands item was the best choice that provided a path to
balance four-piece godlike sets which needed NRG-, BRN- specifically. Specific
slot selection accounted for unmatched cores from the Forge 1.0 sale MikeyJay’s
methodology is outlined in this intensive 13 page document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D9e2FEh5NnYXrPEK28UF7GWpsI1ybOsCY94x1kGCpJs/edit
Specific trait selections by rarity tier and slot are outlined in this
spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Y8geMG-uI7yZMn3khWnTzwOLD7_r6kRQawU9kqeMGGg/edit#gid=562462486
The data set can be updated in the future and serve as a community-facing
guideline for new wearable releases. This will allow easy and transparent
assignment of traits to wearables developed by PC or third parties. It also
allows transparent insight into the highest need wearables so that the community
could hold high impact design competitions. Sets and Godlike Sets A major
critique of the Forge 1.0 wearable release was the introduction of a 4-piece
godlike set and general “power creep” with new content releases. This was the
second 4-piece godlike set and only allowed 3 out of 16 gotchi types access to a
4-piece godlike set. A major goal of this release was to provide all gotchi
types access to “end game” with a 4-piece godlike set. Another major goal was to
incorporate classic wearables and reduce power creep of newly released wearables
as much as possible. To meet this goal, we propose the introduction of 4 new
four-piece godlike sets composed of new and classic wearables. Here are the
proposed 4 new four-piece Godlike Sets: image Attached here is the spreadsheet
that outlines the number of sets accessible to each of the 16 gotchi types:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VigrwRsUfTSl5sKMYD_Sy7dBDhpNCSu91hTK4mVA-VU/edit#gid=1816507981
Regarding four-piece godlike sets, this snippet outlines current state and each
type of gotchi afforded a new four-piece godlike set with each addition. For
example, the addition of an NRG-,BRN+ godlike set allows 4 more gotchi types
access to a four-piece godlike set. The four new sets address all 16 gotchi
types: image This release maximally fills gaps in the wearable market and
provides all gotchi types access to a four-piece godlike set. It also provides a
transparent path forward for new content which can be used by all parties
building on the protocol. We are very excited about the art and can’t wait to
share more with the community if this and the corresponding distribution
proposal are accepted. The Forge Team

Ends in 4 days
0vix-protocol.eth
Core
Active


SIG-PROP: RETURN 0VIX FUNDS TO MULTISIG

Authors: 0VIX Protocol GotchiIDs: 22864 (@Maxicrouton) Quorum requirement: 20%
(9M) Vote duration: 7 days Discord Thread: Aavegotchi>DAO>0VIX Discussion
Introduction: To achieve a final resolution and ensure a definitive closure to
this more than 2 months old issue, we propose advancing with the conclusive vote
on sending the funds. These funds will be used to compensate users who have been
affected by the 0vix exploit. The longer the process takes, the more uncertainty
it brings for them. It is crucial to resolve this so that 0VIX can reopen the
markets and distribute the shares to the users in question. For anyone that
wants to read up on the topic here are the preceding CoreProps: 0vix exploit :
Return the funds How to return the GHST from the 0VIX exploit that was
transferred to the Aavegotchi DAO Treasury to 0VIX users Objectives: We all have
a strong desire to move forward and put this situation behind us, and we want to
take a moment to thank you for your help in bringing us to this point. Details:
The multisig address to which the funds shall be sent to is:
0xa50bB0c6e80618D215b48352df0644006289d2B7 It is controlled by the following
three signers: 0VIX deployer wallet: recipient of Vitalik's message and 0.01ETH
by Vitalik on Polygon zkEVM’s launch day PubKey:
0x7A10033Fb8F474F28C66caB7578F4aF9e6dAd37D Hamzah Khan: Polygon Head of DeFi &
Director of Growth PubKey: 0xc156C57231a9302D9f5C7b5eF22871cC25F40736
Benjamin.lens: QiDAO core team member PubKey:
0xd39c1775e98a73fd0a9c8ecac8c9fedb9bb81e45 Options: Option A: Accept the
proposal Option B: Further Discussion needed

Ends in 13 hours
0x027F...660c
Active


[AGIP87] OVER-THE-COUNTER (OTC) AGREEMENT FOR GHST HOLDINGS OF 0VIX USERS

Authors: 0VIX Protocol GotchiIDs: 22864 (@Maxicrouton) Quorum requirement: 20%
(9M) Vote duration: 7 days Discord Thread: Aavegotchi>DAO>0VIX Discussion
Preceding SigProp: Over-the-counter (OTC) Agreement for GHST Holdings of 0VIX
Users Link:
https://snapshot.org/#/aavegotchi.eth/proposal/0x42bbb17dd055adac28433a16b145ff45e732080402cf44e7d7dfec051555f16f
Modifications from sigprop : 1) Removed explicit multisig address as it will be
voted in a separate proposal focused on the returning of funds 2) Added
paragraph (lines 23-26) to explain on how OTC price will be calculated in a
verifiable way. Introduction: In order to prevent a negative market impact of a
sudden liquidation of 763,624 GHST tokens, an Over-the-Counter (OTC) transaction
for DAI held in the AAVEGOTCHI DAO treasury is being proposed. @Maxicrouton is
one of the main points of contact here that will assist with that transaction.
This method is preferable due to its ability to reduce a substantial price
pressure that could result from a sell order of this magnitude. Objectives: In
essence the goal is to secure a fair OTC deal that meets the needs and
expectations of all stakeholders involved. Aavegotchi DAO’s goal is to mitigate
the sell pressure on the GHST token while concurrently ensuring the rightful
owners of the funds receive their funds 0VIX users want to have a fair price and
get the maximum value from funds recuperated To circumvent market volatilities,
the OTC price will be defined by averaging Chainlink prices over the time period
that this CoreProp is voted on. To derive the price of the GHST / DAI pair from
Chainlink, the block-per-block price feeds on Polygon PoS will be used. The
final OTC price for swapping GHST into DAI will be determined as the simple
average of all the GHST/DAI pair prices derived at each block (~300k distinct
values). Upon passing of the CoreProp vote, a csv file and simple script will be
submitted to the Aavegotchi DAO with the final OTC price value for everyone to
verify publicly. Script link:
https://gist.github.com/pestopoppa/28630e7a6ae0215e071de7decf678e6a Option A:
Yes to the OTC deal at a fixed price. That option offers the key advantage of
price certainty and stability for both Aavegotchi DAO and 0VIX users. It
circumvents market volatility by averaging prices over the days that the
CoreProp is voted on, thus providing a quick execution route for the
transaction. Option B: This CoreProp has been discussed extensively over the
past days and weeks. If there are questions please refer to the 0VIX discussion
sub-channel on the AV DAO discord. If the community feels it requires even
further discussion, then please vote for this option. Options: Option A: OTC
deal at a fixed price Option B: Further Discussion needed The returning of funds
will be voted on separately and should appear on Snapshot after review by the
community. As it stands now the multi-sig co-signers would be Hamzah Khan, Head
of DeFi at Polygon Labs and Benjamin.lens, core-contributor at QiDAO.

Ends in 8 hours
Thrax
Core
Closed


[AGIP 86] GOTCHI BATTLER FUNDING

Author: Immaterial#0001 GotchiID: #16559 Hello frens, This sigprop is to obtain
funding for the development of Gotchi Battler. I've assembled a team of some of
the best builders in the community and we're excited to get started and build
what is hopefully a prize asset for the DAO and community for years to come.
Please read on to get an overview of the game, costs and deliverables and if you
want a deeper dive into the game including a trailer please visit the forum
post: https://dao.aavegotchi.com/t/gotchi-battler/4772 Thank you for your
support, as always! What is Gotchi battler? Gotchi Battler is an auto battler
game where 2 teams of 5 gotchis battle each other until 1 team is wiped out.
Each Gotchis stats and special move will be determined by its traits. To set up
a good team you’ll have to strategise what types of Gotchis mix well together
and what formation the team should be in. Once you’ve set up the team you can
sit back and watch your strategy play out in an epic Gotchi battle to the death!
Why Gotchi Battler? I created a long post detailing the motivation behind
building Gotchi Battler here:
https://dao.aavegotchi.com/t/gotchi-battler/4772/21?u=immaterial So please go
read that post but the TLDR headlines are: Gamify Protocol Rewards Increase
demand for protocol assets Strengthen the game lineup for Gotchichain DAO
revenue generation through future PvE expansions Cost breakdowns Name:
Immaterial (gotchiboard.com) Role: Ideation, Prototype, Specs, Management,
Backend/Frontend dev, Infrastructure. Monthly cost: $8k Months of work: 7
(Feb-September) Total cost: $56k Coinmandeer (gotchiboard.com) Role: Designer
Monthly cost: $8k Months of work: 1 Total cost: $8k Wildfyr Role: Battle
Mechanics Consultant Monthly cost: $4k Months of work: 1 Total cost: $4k
Maxicrouton Role: Backend specs, ½ Backend API, Smart contracts Monthly cost:
$8k Months of work: 3.5 (June-August + ½ September) Total cost: $28k Eitri
(aadventure.io) Role: Frontend Development Monthly cost: $8k Months of work: 2.5
(July-August + ½ September) Total cost: $20k Unity Developer (anon) Role: Unity
development Monthly cost: $8k Months of work: 2.5 (July-August + ½ September)
Total cost: $20k Bounties: $10k Total cost: $146k DAO payout schedule and
deliverables: 14th of July* Amount: 45k DAI Address:
0x10B989914A478Ed7DE2d2C4CC4e835bbd3de229b Description: For designs, battle
mechanics and upfront 1/2 payment for devs Deliverables: Web app designs Battle
mechanics V2 document 1st of September* Amount: 45k DAI Address:
0x10B989914A478Ed7DE2d2C4CC4e835bbd3de229b Description: 2nd 1/2 payment for devs
on completion of beta and funds for bounties Deliverables: Public beta version
of the game Bug bounty program 1st of October* Amount: 56k DAI Address:
0x10B989914A478Ed7DE2d2C4CC4e835bbd3de229b Description: Immaterial's payment on
completion of the project Deliverables Full general release of the game

Yes fund 11M GHST
87.55%

Do not fund 1.6M GHST
12.45%

Ended 2 weeks ago
0vix-protocol.eth
Core
Closed


SIG PROPOSAL: OVER-THE-COUNTER (OTC) AGREEMENT FOR GHST HOLDINGS OF 0VIX USERS

Authors: 0VIX Protocol GotchiIDs: 22864 (@Maxicrouton) Quorum requirement: 20%
(9M) Vote duration: 7 days Discord Thread: Aavegotchi>DAO>0VIX Discussion
Introduction: In order to prevent a negative market impact of a sudden
liquidation of 763,624 GHST tokens, an Over-the-Counter (OTC) transaction with
the AAVEGOTCHI DAO treasury is being proposed. @Maxicrouton is one of the main
points of contact here that will assist with that transaction. This method is
preferable due to its ability to reduce a substantial price pressure that could
result from a sell order of this magnitude. Objectives: In essence the goal is
to secure a fair OTC deal that meets the needs and expectations of all
stakeholders involved. Aavegotchi DAO’s goal is to mitigate the sell pressure on
the GHST token while concurrently ensuring the rightful owners of the funds
receive their funds 0VIX users want to have a fair price and get the maximum
value from funds recuperated Screen Shot 2023-06-30 at 1.45.14 PM.jpg Option A:
Yes to the OTC deal at a fixed price. That option offers the key advantage of
price certainty and stability for both Aavegotchi DAO and 0VIX users. It
circumvents market volatility by averaging prices over the days that the
CoreProp is voted on, thus providing a quick execution route for the
transaction. Option B: This SigProp has been discussed extensively over the past
days and weeks. If there are questions please refer to the 0VIX discussion
sub-channel on the AV DAO discord. If the community feels it requires even
further discussion, then please vote for this option. Options: Option A: Yes to
the OTC deal at a fixed price. Option B: Further Discussion needed Once the
coreprop has been successfully voted on, another proposal will be created to
vote on the funds to be sent from the treasury wallet of Aavegotchi DAO, where
they currently are held, to the multi-sig wallet of the 0VIX DAO on Polygon PoS
(0x7b2b0cBaDC25953A64D77B4785848b48B45E1017) as suggested by @Maxicrouton. As it
stands now the multi-sig co-signers would be Hamzah Khan, Head of DeFi at
Polygon Labs and Benjamin.lens, core-contributor at QiDAO.

OTC deal at a fixed price 9.2M GHST
82.68%

Further discussion needed 1.9M GHST
17.32%

Ended 2 weeks ago