aviationweek.com Open in urlscan Pro
172.64.149.139  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://app.go.informamail03.com/e/er?s=966913078&lid=233879&elqTrackId=e9d8dcbf34b4497a8bcf206094508a24&elq=8b51321367eb4575ab8e...
Effective URL: https://aviationweek.com/podcasts/check-6/podcast-uk-election-kicks-britain-focused-defense-month?elq2=8b51321367eb4575ab...
Submission: On July 09 via manual from JP — Scanned from CA

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form class="header__search-form container">
  <input type="search" class="form-control header__search-field" autofocus="" placeholder="Search..." value="" max-length="128">
  <i class="icon icon--close header__close-search-form"></i>
</form>

Text Content

Press Alt+1 for screen-reader mode, Alt+0 to cancelAccessibility Screen-Reader
Guide, Feedback, and Issue Reporting
https://aviationweek.com/themes/custom/particle/dist/app-drupal/assets/awn-logo.svg

Skip to main content
 * Market Sector
    * Aerospace
    * Air Transport
    * MRO
    * Defense and Space
    * Business Aviation

 * Markets
    * Aerospace
      * Aircraft & Propulsion
      * Connected Aerospace
      * Emerging Technologies
      * Manufacturing & Supply Chain
      * Advanced Air Mobility
      * Commercial Space
      * Sustainability
    * Air Transport
      * Aircraft & Propulsion
      * Interiors & Connectivity
      * Airports & Networks
      * Airlines & Lessors
      * Safety, Ops & Regulation
      * Maintenance & Training
      * Sustainability
    * MRO
      * Aircraft & Propulsion
      * Interiors & Connectivity
      * Emerging Technologies
      * Supply Chain
      * Safety, Ops & Regulation
      * Workforce & Training
      * Sustainability
    * Defense and Space
      * Aircraft & Propulsion
      * Sensors & Electronic Warfare
      * Missile Defense & Weapons
      * Supply Chain
      * Budget, Policy & Operations
      * Space
      * Sustainability
    * Business Aviation
      * Aircraft & Propulsion
      * Interiors & Connectivity
      * Airports, FBOs & Suppliers
      * Flight Deck
      * Safety, Ops & Regulation
      * Maintenance & Training
      * Sustainability

 * Marketplace
 * Services
    * Services
      * Advertising
      * Marketing Services
      * Fleet, Data & APIs
      * Research & Consulting
      * Network and Route Planning
      * Marketplace

 * Store
   
   
    * MARKET SECTOR
      
      * Aerospace
      * Air Transport
      * MRO
      * Defense and Space
      * Business Aviation
    * Type View All Products
      * Intelligence Bundles
        * AWIN - Premium
        * AWIN - Aerospace and Defense
        * AWIN - Business Aviation
        * AWIN - Commercial Aviation
      * Market Briefings
        * Advanced Air Mobility Report - NEW!
        * Aerospace Daily & Defense Report
        * Aviation Daily
        * SpeedNews
        * The Weekly of Business Aviation
      * Directories
        * Air Charter Guide
        * Aviation Week Marketplace
        * Route Exchange
        * The Engine Yearbook
      * Data Services
        * AC-U-KWIK
        * Aircraft Bluebook
        * Airportdata.com
        * Airport Strategy and Marketing (ASM)
        * CAPA – Centre for Aviation
        * Fleet Discovery Civil
        * Fleet Discovery Military
        * Fleet & MRO Forecast
        * MRO Prospector
      * Publications
        * Air Transport World
        * Aviation Week & Space Technology
        * Aviation Week & Space Technology - Inside MRO
        * Business & Commercial Aviation
        * CAPA - Airline Leader
        * Routes magazine
        * ShowNews
      * Resources
        * Downloadable Reports

 * Events
    * Recent webinars
    * Events View All Events
      * MRO
        * MRO Americas
        * MRO Asia
        * MRO Australasia
        * MRO Baltics & Eastern Europe Region
        * MRO Europe
        * MRO Latin America
        * MRO Middle East
        * Military Aviation Logistics and Maintenance Symposium (MALMS)
      * Commercial Aviation/A&D
        * A&D Mergers and Acquisitions
        * A&D Programs
        * A&D Manufacturing
        * A&D Raw Materials
        * A&D SupplyChain
        * A&D SupplyChain Europe
        * Advanced Air Mobility
        * Aero-Engines Americas
        * Aero-Engines Europe
        * Aero-Engines Asia-Pacific
        * Digital Transformation Summit
        * Engine Leasing Trading & Finance Europe
        * Engine Leasing, Trading & Finance Americas
      * Air Transport
        * Routes Americas
        * Routes Europe
        * Routes World
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - Airlines in Transition
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - Americas
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - Latin America & Caribbean
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - Australia Pacific
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - Asia & Sustainability Awards
        * CAPA Airline Leader Summit - World & Awards for Excellence
        * GAD Americas
        * GAD World
      * Aerospace and Defense
        * A&D Mergers and Acquisitions Conference (ADMA)
        * A&D Manufacturing Conference
        * Aerospace Raw Materials & Manufacturers Supply Chain Conference (RMC)
        * A&D Programs
      * Awards
        * Aviation Week 20 Twenties
        * Aviation Week Laureate Awards
        * ATW Airline Awards
        * Program Excellence Awards and Banquet
        * CAPA Asia Aviation Summit & Awards for Excellence

 * About
    * About Aviation Week Network
      * Our Story
      * Content and Data Team
      * Aviation Week & Space Technology 100-Year
    * Contact Us
      * Subscriber Services
      * Advertising, Marketing Services & List Rentals
      * Content Sales
      * Events
      * PR & Communications
      * Content Licensing and Reprints
      * FAQ

 * Log In
 * Register
 * My Account
   * Profile
   * Sign Out
 * AWIN Access
 * My cart
 * 




    Back to
 1. Aviation Week Network Podcasts


SHARE

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


PODCAST: UK ELECTION KICKS OFF BRITAIN-FOCUSED DEFENSE MONTH


SHARE

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Robert Wall Tony Osborne Craig Caffrey July 05, 2024
Your browser does not support iframes, but you can visit

In the defense industry, all eyes are on the UK in July for RIAT and
Farnborough. We kick off the conversation with a special episode about the
British elections and what they (and those in France) mean for A&D.

Don't miss a single episode of the award-winning Check 6. Subscribe in Apple
Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts.

Discover all of our podcasts on our Apple Podcasts channel or
at aviationweek.com/podcasts.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Transcript

Robert Wall:

Welcome to this special episode of Aviation Week's Check 6 podcast. The UK just
had parliamentary elections, and with the aerospace and defense industry very
much focused on the UK this month with the global air chiefs' conference in less
than two weeks, the Royal International Air Tattoo and the Farnborough Air Show,
we thought this would be a good moment to look at what is going on in defense
over here.

But we'll also zoom out briefly to look at potentially a more important European
election, from a defense perspective, one unfolding across the Channel where
France, on Sunday, has the second round of parliamentary elections.

To walk you through all this are Tony Osborne, Aviation Week's London Bureau
Chief, and our green eye-shade guy, Craig Caffrey, Aviation Week's Head of
Defense Markets and Data. I'm Robert Wall, Executive Editor for Defense and
Space.

So, in the UK, Labour has won a huge majority. Defense Secretary, Grant Shapps,
has lost not just his job, he's lost his seat in Parliament. And former prime
minister, Liz Truss, is also out, as are many others. Tony, maybe you can recap
briefly for our listeners how defense featured in the campaign and perhaps give
us a glimpse of our likely new defense minister. 

 

Tony Osborne:

Thank you, Robert. Yes, what an exciting evening, and apologies if I sound a
little bit bleary-eyed, but I tried to watch the whole thing, particularly for
the Liz Truss debacle, that was just a fantastic moment in our history here.
It's the first time, actually, that a former serving prime minister has lost her
seat in a general election. Normally they disappear. They resign into the
distance and go into the sunset, but not in her case. It was quite a downfall
for her, just superb.

Anyway, defense has been a part of this, but, look, there's always been this
saying in British politics that defense doesn't buy votes. And I think,
actually, that's been the case in this election too. I mean, the big buzzwords
really have been things like migration, the cost of the National Health Service,
education and so on. Defense has really been down low in the list of priorities
in the run-up to this, certainly among voters.

But both the key parties, the Conservatives and Labour, have both said that they
want to get to 2.5%. If you remember, before the election, Prime Minister Rishi
Sunak announced he wanted to raise defense spending to 2.5% of GDP, when he was
in Poland. This was part of his grand plan. It was all going to be costed.
Labour has been a little less certain on this, and I know Craig will go into
this in a little bit more detail, but they've said that they will set out on a
path to spending 2.5%, in their manifesto, but they have not specifically said
when, whereas the Conservatives said that they would get there by 2030 and
they'd laid out a plan to do that.

The other thing that I think will be quite interesting is that Labour wants to
try and restore some kind of defense policy or defense relationship with the EU
countries. So, we've seen a lot of new initiatives come out of the European
Union, things like PESCO, the European Defence Fund, and I think the new Labour
government would like to get a level of action on that.

And also a new defense relationship with Germany is very high on the cards, it's
been reported this week. We know that the shadow defense secretary... I can just
briefly explain what shadow defense secretary is, for, perhaps, those who are
not familiar. When a party is in opposition they have a number of spokesmen in
key areas. So John Healey, who is the shadow defense spokesman, he will
essentially shadow the government's defense secretary who is Grant Shapps, who's
obviously lost his job, as Robert said. So there's a good chance that John
Healey will take that role in the new government when it's formed in the coming
days, perhaps even today. So John Healey has been doing a lot of visits to
Germany in recent months and there's talk that there'll be an initiative, or
close cooperation with Germany is in the running. 

 

Robert Wall:

Not to interrupt, but, I mean, the talk in town is really that even though he's
not a defense guy by background, folks generally seem to feel like he's taken to
the portfolio quite well and seem quite encouraged, if he in fact does get the
portfolio. 

 

Tony Osborne:

Absolutely, I think so too. I mean, yeah, he's not a defense guy by trade. He's
not got a military background and so on, but he's been having meetings with
various people. He's been having discussions with industry and so on so he seems
to be in a position to do that. He's been quite outspoken on a number of defense
issues, particularly in recent months, with Grant Shapps. He seems a certain
shoo-in, we're not a hundred percent sure, but he seems a shoo-in for the role.

And there's also been some sort of discussion... As well as this closer
alignment on the EU, Labour has been talking about looking at the relationship
with China, given that that's emerging as a big competitor across the globe.
Conservatives were also talking about that as well. And, interestingly, Labour
is talking about an industrial strategy, laying out what the UK needs to do in
terms of building its defense capability again. If you remember, the
Conservative government abandoned plans for a overarching industrial strategy,
so Labour wants to bring that back in, give certainty to the defense industry
about what is required in the coming years, setting out where the UK should
specialize in and perhaps what it should not and be willing to buy from
overseas. 

 

Robert Wall:

Great. Well, thank you. Craig, you're the numbers guy. Help us understand what
the situation right now is with the UK defense budget. Not all of our listeners
will know. And what would spending 2.5% of GDP mean in today's terms and maybe
today's terms are relevant because it's not like the UK has a ton of growth. 

 

Craig Caffrey:

Yeah, yeah, a really good point. I mean, I think that's one of the things we'll
talk about, actually, is the importance of economic growth to all this. But
yeah, I'm going to shout numbers at you for a while now, so apologies for that.
Shouldn't have data guy on if you don't want numbers shouted at you.

But, so yeah, currently the UK spends £51.7 billion on its core defense budget,
spends a total of £64.2 billion, which is $80 billion, something like that, so
2.3% of GDP, just over that, at the moment.

The capital budget, so money that goes towards investing in defense equipment,
things like that, is about 19 billion of that, so 36% of that core budget. And
procurement itself is about 11 billion.

So plenty of money, but not enough, it would seem, to fund the capabilities you
want. So, yeah, like you've both mentioned already, Conservative plan, outlined
rather cynically once they really knew they weren't going to be in power, to get
defense spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030. If you did that today, that would
increase the core budget.

The core budget, I should say this actually, the core budget is key here. The
core budget is the bit of the money that goes to the MOD that pays for military
capability. There is all this other kind of defense spending, pensions and aid
to Ukraine, things like that, that get added in there. But ultimately that
doesn't pay for our own military capability. So core budget is really the key.
And getting to 2.5% of GDP you'd probably get that core budget up to about 58
billion, which is an 11% increase on where we are. It would take the total
budget to about 70 billion, which is about 9% more.

To get there by 2030, so we did some maths in the background on this when it was
announced, that would require something like 3% real-terms growth annually. It
would take the budget to about £76 billion by 2030, which is 19% increase. So 3%
growth, when you consider that a lot of countries in Europe, especially
countries like Sweden, have been growing at 20% a year for the last few years,
to try and get to 2%, 3% is really not that much growth. In fact, the defense
budget at various points has grown at 3% a year in real terms just on the back
of economic growth. So we're not really talking about an exceptional amount of
new money being added.

I think the other thing to note is that, as Tony said, that whereas the
Conservatives outlined, "We'll do this by 2030," Labour, in their manifesto,
say, "We'll do it as soon as we can," in inverted commas. And I think when they
originally announced the 2.5% target, they said, "... as soon as resources
allow."

So essentially we're talking here about affordability. And a big problem there
is that, maybe not as a taxpayer it isn't a problem, but they have said, "We're
not going to raise tax." So if they're not going to raise tax, and they've also
set all these fiscal rules that mean we want debt to be going down by the end of
this parliament, and you've also got competing priorities, they need to
strengthen the NHS, they've got to invest in education, they've got to invest in
police, there's a cost of living crisis, affordability and how you get to that
2.5% is a bit of a challenge.

One thing to think is that they don't necessarily need to do it at the start of
this parliament at all because it's such slow growth that's needed, 3% a year,
you could easily back-load that. So maybe that we see this rush as the economy
starts to recover, but economic growth is really key to that. 

 

Robert Wall:

Can I just follow in here quickly on affordability? I mean, if you just go
through the list of what's in the plan already, GCAP -  the future fighter
program with the Italians and the Japanese - the nuclear submarine program under
AUKUS with the US and Australia, the nuclear deterrent, new warships, how does
it all fit in even if the budget creeps up a bit? 

 

Craig Caffrey:

Right. Right. And I think that's the key thing with Labour. So Labour have
definitely said the deterrent is safe and if you look at the equipment plan over
the next nine years, 30% of the equipment budget is on that deterrent, so you're
already [got to account that] nearly a third of everything that's got to be
spent there. The other thing is that the election overnight, Labour's performed
very well in Scotland and they won't want to jeopardize that going forward. So
you'd think the shipbuilding plan is pretty safe as well, so that's your Type 26
and Type 31 frigates, the Type 83 destroyer that's starting to come down the
line as well. So we're already counted for a lot there.

And, like I say, GCAP, I get the impression on GCAP that the UK is talking about
the amount of money it has available to fund this, but not necessarily the
amount of money it'll cost. We're talking about a very big aircraft here. I
think that the engines that the Japanese were working on were 24,000
foot-pounds, dry thrust. I think that's similar engine size to an F-22 so we're
talking a big aircraft, it's going to be expensive. So, yeah, I think,
potentially that needs more partners.

An interesting side point on that is what does Labour election do for a
potential Saudi involvement in GCAP? I'd say probably less pro than the
Conservatives, but I think they'd still explore that. Bear in mind as well, this
is all against the background of it was supposed to be a £17 billion black hole
in the equipment plan anyway. So you may get a point where you, and this
happened to the big increase we saw in spending when Boris Johnson was in power,
it might just get swallowed up by that black hole. Maybe what you're doing is
you're putting funding in there so there isn't a black hole anymore. You don't
actually get an additional capability. 

 

Robert Wall:

Yeah. 

 

Craig Caffrey:

Yeah, I mean, I think that's one other thing. I mean, if you look at air power,
I mean, Tony, I'd be interested to know what you think they'll prioritize, but I
think they want more A-7s, they need more F-35s, they want more P-8s. They've
got the New Medium Helicopter on the way. They've got GCAP. There's supposed to
be more A400Ms. So I think the key here, and what I'd love to see, and I'm not
sure we will see, is one of the things that Labour have said, is that they will
do a new Defense White Paper within 12 months of coming in. And some countries,
Australia being one of them, have outlined, "Right, here's the threat, here's
the capabilities we need and here's the equipment plan to achieve it and this is
how much money this equipment plan takes." And obviously that makes sense
because all that links together. What we tend to do is say, "Here's the things
we need," but we don't allocate the money. It's just, "If 2% of GDP is enough,
then great, because that's what we're allocating." But if it's not, then that's
how the black hole opens up. 

 

Robert Wall:

Well, Tony, maybe you can take it, just walk us through a bit of that. First,
what happens in the next few weeks, next few months? And then maybe you can talk
a bit about those issues that Craig raised about priorities, maybe what looks
safer to you, what looks less safe if it does come down to starting to chop a
bit? 

 

Tony Osborne:

Yeah, so, I mean, actually Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and that's going to take
some getting used to saying, there's a lot of things coming in the pipeline in
the next few weeks. I mean, you already alluded to that a few minutes ago.
You've got big shows, but actually one of the first things that's going to be on
Keir Starmer's list is the NATO meeting in Washington next week. And so he's
going to have to go to that fresh and be ready to start addressing some of those
concerns. We know that the UK may already sign on to several initiatives there,
definitely something on deep strike missiles, for example, is one of those areas
of interest.

Labour has said that they are going to have a defense review towards the end of
the year. Now, Liz Truss instituted one of those. So she instituted a very short
update to the previous defense and security review. Labour will probably
institute another one over the next six to 12 months to look again at defense
needs. That's probably the next big thing to come.

In terms of defense priorities, I think GCAP is going to have to be quite high
up on the list, to keep that going. One wonders what comes out of this
relationship with Germany that looks likely to be signed off. There's previously
been suggestions that maybe we could sucker Germany away from FCAS in Europe.
I'm not sure if that's something that's going to happen.

I think the other key priorities, again, as Craig alluded to, are going to be
shipbuilding in Scotland, Dreadnought, the nuclear submarine program for the
deterrent and AUKUS. And then obviously that sucks up so much money, whether
some of the other UK aerospace priorities then get funded is a different matter.
I think some of that may have to be re-looked at, five E-7s rather than three.
There's a natural progression towards a larger number of those for the defense
of UK airspace.

Yeah, hard to know where the defense review will take us. It really all depends
on how quickly Labour are going to be willing to build up that defense spending.
I think one of the biggest challenges will be, in the coming months, is the fact
that the UK has not had decent economic growth for quite some time.

In the first 14 years of the Conservative government we had the austerity which
cut back government spending. Then we had Brexit, which has been at an enormous
cost to the British economy in terms of impacting trade. It's impacted then,
later, on inflation. Following Brexit we've had Covid. And then with the Ukraine
war we had the significant cost of allowing people to afford heating their
homes. And also the impact of Covid was the fact that the UK paid for a lot of
people's incomes during that time to save jobs and save incomes.

So there is now a considerable amount of government debt and the interest on
that debt and the debt to income ratio, I think, is now closing in on a hundred
percent debt. And at that point nasty things can happen to your economy. So
there's a whole challenge around building growth when growth is virtually
stagnant and I think that's going to be one of the biggest challenges that the
Labour government faces in the coming years. Your thoughts, Craig, Robert? 

 

Robert Wall:

I totally agree, but I actually wanted to briefly go back to something you were
saying earlier, this idea, the stronger relationship between London and Berlin
and maybe peeling off the Germans from FCAS, the Franco-German-Spanish Future
Combat Aircraft program.

I think that's a great way for us to look at France actually, and particularly
because the strong European alliance, usually, between Paris and Berlin has
really been fraying. That has not been a healthy relationship and when you look
at what is going on politically in Paris now with the elections, that's probably
only going to get worse after the president called snap elections. It looks like
the far right is going to do very, very well in parliamentary elections. Macron
will still be president, but probably, or a good chance, that next week he will
not have support in parliament. So that'll make governing very, very hard in his
last few years. And what's more is the far right has basically said they are
very much emphasizing sovereignty on defense issues, speak, "We are not
interested, particularly, in cooperative programs." And so I find that very
interesting because I do wonder what does that mean for FCAS? And, Tony, I just
wonder if you have any thoughts on that. 

 

Tony Osborne:

Yeah. It's quite remarkable. I mean, Marine Le Pen's party has scaled back some
of its anger against things like NATO and the EU, but, yeah, it seems very
determined about national sovereignty programs. The FCAS, MGCS could get
impacted. And we know that relations haven't always been that great between
France and Germany in recent years and we've also seen the industrial challenges
around that. One wonders still, I have however, I've seen several reports saying
whether that party can actually achieve the majority that it suggested in the
first round is still a big question. But still, yeah, there is that whole
question of whether politics could now fracture that program rather than the
industrial setup that threatened it previously.

Whether the UK would then try and snatch Germany out of that, who knows? I mean,
it has been talked about in British newspapers several times. You would have to
literally disassemble the FCAS initiative and also the GCAP initiative and that
would just add delay. And that's always been the question about whether we add
Saudi Arabia to GCAP and that takes time, it's costly. The German parliamentary
process is slow as... They're going to have elections next year as well. So this
would all have to be patched up very quickly. Certainly the GCAP wants to
achieve its aims and so on. So I don't see it, but maybe closer cooperation
between the two programs perhaps. 

 

Robert Wall:

Well, Tony, you, out of Berlin of course, wrote about how the Germans are really
emphasizing and quite a bit, yeah, call it the loyal wingman or whatever we want
to call this, and maybe that's an avenue where the UK's path isn't quite so
clear yet under GCAP, although it's notionally part of it. Same with the Germans
under FCAS, but there does seem to be potential, at least, to imagine
something. 

 

Tony Osborne:

Well, it's quite interesting that Airbus are actually bringing that mock up that
they established, that they had at Berlin, to Farnborough and I don't think
anyone really expected that to happen. So that's quite an interesting
perspective. Maybe Airbus are eyeing an opportunity therefore, realizing that
the UK wants that close cooperation with Germany, maybe there's a chance to
market that system here too. 

 

Robert Wall:

Terrific. Yeah, thanks. And, Craig, maybe you can just come on in here and,
again, just help our listeners understand a bit. What is the budget situation in
France right now? What does it look like under Macron and what's the outlook
there? 

 

Craig Caffrey:

Probably the good news there is there is some stability regardless of what
happens. Last summer, so, I think, July last year, excuse my French on this, but
they approved the new la Loi de Programmation Militaire, which is the LPM, is
the five-year, five, six-year defense spending plan. It essentially dictates
what will be spent on defense between 2024 and 2030. That's been approved. And
the French tend to stick very closely to their LPMs. So, I think, really the
path of the budget's fairly safe. The whole plan, that '24 to '30 plan, included
413 billion euros, which is about $450 billion for that period. So spending, I
think, $63 billion as of 2024 rising to 78 billion by 2030. And that's in real
terms as well. So 3-4% real-terms growth annually, 23% growth over the period.
So not dissimilar to the kinds of growth that the UK is looking to go for for
that 2.5%, the difference being that what the French are doing is they're aiming
to get their core budget to 2% of GDP and the total spend will go up to around
2.3%, which is where the UK is now.

I think, really, in terms of the impact of Le Pen, it's more a problem for
Ukraine because I don't know to what extent she's going to back giving loads of
aid to Ukraine, which... But again, I don't think that's a massive deal. The
French haven't been a major donor, I think something like $3 billion worth of
aid so far. That's compared to Germany's 12 billion-ish, UK about 10 billion,
the Nordics have given about 14, the US, what, the latest package was over 60
billion. So, yeah, maybe it's more of a... I wonder how it'll affect the
relationship with the EU and its willingness to fund some of those programs. But
I don't think that a change of government will make a massive difference to
defense spending in France. I think it'll continue along the same lines, I
think. 

 

Tony Osborne:

Yeah, I think one of the first, immediate issues that's going to be facing a
Starmer government is dealing with new right-wing parties across Europe. We've
got the emergence now of a Center government here in the UK, maybe slightly
center-right, almost Conservative like, but across the Channel there could be a
right-wing government in France, but they might also have to face a Trump
America in the coming years. So we have a new government here, but they are
facing a potential dealing with right-wing allies, if you like, across the
world. I think that's going to be an extraordinary new challenge for this new
government as it emerges. 

Robert Wall:

Absolutely, Tony, we certainly do live in interesting times. Let's leave it
there for now. Thank you to all our listeners joining us for this special
podcast. And thanks to our producer, Guy Ferneyhough.

And with the Farnborough Airshow coming up, the Riyadh Airshow and the global
air chiefs' conference check back for plenty more Check 6 content from the UK
this month. So subscribe to us on Apple, Spotify or elsewhere. Cheerio. 


Robert Wall

Robert Wall is Executive Editor for Defense and Space. Based in London, he
directs a team of military and space journalists across the U.S., Europe and
Asia-Pacific.

Tony Osborne

Based in London, Tony covers European defense programs. Prior to joining
Aviation Week in November 2012, Tony was at Shephard Media Group where he was
deputy editor for Rotorhub and Defence Helicopter magazines.

Craig Caffrey

Craig works as a senior analyst on Aviation Week Network’s military and
commercial forecast databases, specializing in military aircraft markets and…

 * podcast_defense
 * United Kingdom (UK)
 * Global Combat Air Program (GCAP)
 * Future Combat Air System (FCAS)
 * Future Fighters


RELATED CONTENT

Podcast: What's Up With NGAD?
Podcast: The F-35 Has A Case Of Long COVID
Podcast: Shielding The Skies—Missile Defense In A Changing World
Podcast: China's Reclusive Stealth Bomber
Podcast: Why Did Boeing Pull A U-Turn On Spirit Aerosystems?




FOLLOW US ON

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


MARKETS

 * Aerospace
 * Air Transport
 * MRO
 * Defense and Space
 * Business Aviation


PRODUCTS

 * AWIN Intelligence Bundles
 * Market Briefings
 * Publications
 * Data Services
 * Directories
 * Resources


CONTACT US

 * Subscriber Services
 * Advertising, Marketing Services & List Rentals
 * Content Sales
 * Events
 * PR & Communications
 * Content Licensing and Reprints
 * FAQ


OTHER RESOURCES

 * Aviation Week Marketplace
 * Knowledge Center
 * Newsletters
 * ShowNews
 * Advertising - Media Kits

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. Informa Markets, a trading division of
Informa PLC.
 * Accessibility
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Policy
 * Terms of Use

Apple app store ID
6447645195
Apple app name
apple-itunes-app
App argument URL
https://shownews.aviationweek.com


Cookies Button


ABOUT COOKIES ON THIS SITE

We and our partners use cookies to enhance your website experience, learn how
our site is used, offer personalised features, measure the effectiveness of our
services, and tailor content and ads to your interests while you navigate on the
web or interact with us across devices. By clicking "Continue" or continuing to
browse our site you are agreeing to our and our partners use of cookies. For
more information seePrivacy Policy
CONTINUE




COOKIE POLICY

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your
browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you,
your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you
expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can
give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to
privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the
different category headings to find out more and change our default settings.
However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site
and the services we are able to offer.
More information
Allow All


MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES

STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy
preferences, logging in or filling in forms.    You can set your browser to
block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then
work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and
improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the
most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.    All
information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you
do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and
will not be able to monitor its performance.

FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and
personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose
services we have added to our pages.    If you do not allow these cookies then
some or all of these services may not function properly.

TARGETING COOKIES

Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may
be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you
relevant adverts on other sites.    They do not store directly personal
information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet
device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted
advertising.

Back Button


COOKIE LIST



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Confirm My Choices