www.sciencedirect.com Open in urlscan Pro
162.159.136.70  Public Scan

Submitted URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.004
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17306479?via%3Dihub
Submission: On October 02 via api from GB — Scanned from GB

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

GET /search#submit

<form class="QuickSearch" action="/search#submit" method="get" aria-label="form">
  <div class="search-input">
    <div class="search-input-container search-input-container-no-label"><label class="search-input-label u-hide-visually" for="article-quick-search">Search ScienceDirect</label><input type="search" id="article-quick-search" name="qs" value=""
        class="search-input-field" aria-label="Search ScienceDirect" aria-describedby="article-quick-search-description-message" placeholder="Search ScienceDirect"></div>
    <div class="search-input-message-container">
      <div aria-live="polite" class="search-input-validation-error"></div>
      <div id="article-quick-search-description-message"></div>
    </div>
  </div><button type="submit" class="button small u-margin-xs-left button-primary button-icon-only" aria-disabled="false" aria-label="Submit search"><svg focusable="false" viewBox="0 0 100 128" height="20" width="18.75" class="icon icon-search">
      <path
        d="m19.22 76.91c-5.84-5.84-9.05-13.6-9.05-21.85s3.21-16.01 9.05-21.85c5.84-5.83 13.59-9.05 21.85-9.05 8.25 0 16.01 3.22 21.84 9.05 5.84 5.84 9.05 13.6 9.05 21.85s-3.21 16.01-9.05 21.85c-5.83 5.83-13.59 9.05-21.84 9.05-8.26 0-16.01-3.22-21.85-9.05zm80.33 29.6l-26.32-26.32c5.61-7.15 8.68-15.9 8.68-25.13 0-10.91-4.25-21.17-11.96-28.88-7.72-7.71-17.97-11.96-28.88-11.96s-21.17 4.25-28.88 11.96c-7.72 7.71-11.97 17.97-11.97 28.88s4.25 21.17 11.97 28.88c7.71 7.71 17.97 11.96 28.88 11.96 9.23 0 17.98-3.07 25.13-8.68l26.32 26.32 7.03-7.03">
      </path>
    </svg></button><input type="hidden" name="origin" value="article"><input type="hidden" name="zone" value="qSearch">
</form>

Text Content

JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the
features on this page. Skip to main contentSkip to article
ScienceDirect
 * Journals & Books

 * 
 * Search

RegisterSign in

 * Access through your institution
 * Purchase PDF

Search ScienceDirect



ARTICLE PREVIEW

 * Abstract
 * Introduction
 * Section snippets
 * References (34)
 * Cited by (90)
 * Recommended articles (6)


TRANSPORT POLICY

Volume 71, 30 November 2018, Pages 130-137




BEYOND EMISSIONS AND ECONOMICS: RETHINKING THE CO-BENEFITS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES
(EVS) AND VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G)

Author links open overlay panelLance Noel a, Gerardo Zarazua de Rubens a,
Johannes Kester a, Benjamin K. Sovacool a b
Show more
Add to Mendeley
Share
Cite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.004Get rights and content




ABSTRACT

Electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid are one option to achieve the transition
to decarbonizing society. Despite perceived advantages of cost-savings and
carbon reductions, such technologies have faced various barriers that has
prevented wide-scale adoption. While much literature has carefully investigated
the techno-economics dimensions to electric mobility, we ask: what are the full
set of benefits that EVs and V2G offer? To provide an answer, the authors
conducted 227 semi-structured interviews with transportation and electricity
experts from over 200 institutions across the Nordic region. Results show that
there is an extensive range of benefits for both EVs and V2G, with experts
suggesting 29 and 25 categories of benefits for EVs and V2G, respectively.
Though the experts covered the obvious benefits of economic savings, emissions,
and renewable energy integration, several other novel benefits were identified.
The second and third most common discussed EV benefit was noise reduction and
better performance, which are typically not widely discussed. Similarly, we find
that V2G benefits covered topics like vehicle-to-home and solar integration, as
well as more novel benefits, like vehicle-to-telescope and emergency power
backup. The article concludes with a discussion of future research and benefits
in the context of energy research and analysis.


INTRODUCTION

Electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) are often regarded as a key
aspect of the sociotechnical transition to decarbonize transportation. In order
to optimize this transition, it is essential for policymakers to understand the
entirety of the benefits EVs and V2G may offer, as well as the challenges they
would pose. A variety of previous papers have explored the potential benefits of
EVs and V2G could bring to society, such as climate change mitigation, local
health emissions, and lower cost of ownership, though they often only discuss
these benefits in the context of the barriers EVs and V2G also face (Sovacool
and Hirsh, 2009, Egbue and Long, 2012, Sovacool et al., 2017, Sovacool et al.,
2018). Other papers have focused on characterizing a single benefit, such as the
quantification of emissions benefits EVs and V2G offer (Buekers et al., 2014,
Archsmith et al., 2015, Sioshansi and Denholm, 2009) or reducing the heat island
effect (Li et al., 2015). No previous work has sought solely to comprehensively
describe the full range of co-benefits of EVs and V2G.

For example, papers that compare the costs and benefits of EVs and V2G focus
exclusively on how emissions and economics impact the cost-effectiveness of EVs
in context of alternative transport options (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman,
2003, Lemoine et al., 2008, Villar et al., 2013, Noel and McCormack, 2014).
While some may recognize there are other benefits EVs could offer, such as
noise, they are not included in their analysis, due to some benefits being
admittedly difficult to monetize and include in comparisons (Carlsson and
Johansson-Stenman, 2003). Similarly, the benefits of V2G tend to focus on the
economic and emissions benefits of services provided to the grid (Sovacool and
Hirsh, 2009, Lopes et al., 2009, Noel and McCormack, 2014). Likewise, EVs and
V2G are often included in analyses of large-scale renewable integration, but are
also only evaluated on their economic and emission costs and benefits (Jacobson
and Delucchi, 2011, Budischak et al., 2013, Noel et al., 2017). Nonetheless,
there may be more benefits to EVs and V2G beyond these two, and if not included,
these papers may unintentionally suggest suboptimal transport and
decarbonization policy. We endeavor to describe the full context of benefits of
EVs and V2G beyond costs and carbon.

This paper aims to explore the benefits of EVs and V2G past the current narrow
techno-economic focus in the literature by characterizing the entirety of the
benefits these technologies could offer. To describe the benefits, the authors
conducted 227 semi-structured interviews with 257 participants from over 200
institutions across the five Nordic countries. Given the electrical nature of
EVs and V2G, those interviewed were selected to represent the diverse array of
stakeholders involved with the transportation and power systems, technology,
policy and practice. Selected experts were from national government ministries,
agencies, and departments; local government ministries, agencies, and
departments; regulatory authorities and bodies; universities and research
institutes; power transmission, distribution and supply utilities; automobile
manufacturers and car dealerships; private sector companies; and industry groups
and civil society organizations.

We find that the experts presented a diversity of benefits for both EVs and V2G,
advancing different benefits of each, 29 and 25 respectively. We find that the
experts discussed the obvious benefits of emissions and economics for both EVs
and V2G, as well as several novel benefits not included in the aforementioned EV
cost-benefit analyses. The benefits tended to focus more on an individual level,
as opposed to societal benefits, such as noise and advantageous performance for
EVs, and V2G integration to homes with solar panel. We present the full results
below, and then conclude with a discussion of the implications for future EV
research and transport policy.


SECTION SNIPPETS


MATERIALS & METHODS

To explore the benefits surrounding electric mobility, namely electric vehicles
and vehicle-to-grid technology, the authors relied primarily on original data
collected through semi-structured research interviews. This methodology was
applied on a regional context taking the five Nordic countries as place of
study, since it is recognized that these countries have traditionally had
aggressive push of climate, energy and transport policy agendas emerging as
leading nations in electric vehicle


EV BENEFITS

In total, our data collection and analysis resulted in 29 different categories
of the benefits that the experts identified, with Fig. 1 summarizing the
frequency of each benefit. Here we discuss, the five most commonly discussed EV
benefits (emissions, noise, performance, economic savings, and renewable energy
integration), and the summarize the remaining benefits.

While there was a great variety of the types of benefits discussed, by far the
most dominant benefit of EVs was the impact they


CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

In both the cases of EVs and V2G, the benefits expressed by the experts went
extensively beyond the central benefits presented in the literature. While our
sample of experts acknowledged the central EV benefits around economics and
emissions, they also discussed a wide variety of creative benefits. V2G benefits
also captured the common themes of the literature like renewable energy
integration and various grid services, but also submitted interesting benefits
of lesser economic focus. We


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are appreciative to the respondents for their time and openness, to
Xiao Lin for her help in gathering some of the data, and to the Research
Councils United Kingdom (RCUK) Energy Program Grant EP/K011790/1 “Center on
Innovation and Energy Demand,” the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF)
Sapere Aude Grant 4182-00033B “Societal Implications of a Vehicle-to-Grid
Transition in Northern Europe,” which have supported elements of the work
reported here. Any opinions, findings,




REFERENCES (34)

 * James Archsmith et al.
   
   
   FROM CRADLE TO JUNKYARD: ASSESSING THE LIFE CYCLE GREENHOUSE GAS BENEFITS OF
   ELECTRIC VEHICLES
   
   
   RES. TRANSPORT. ECON.
   
   (2015)
 * Cory Budischak et al.
   
   
   COST-MINIMIZED COMBINATIONS OF WIND POWER, SOLAR POWER AND ELECTROCHEMICAL
   STORAGE, POWERING THE GRID UP TO 99.9% OF THE TIME
   
   
   J. POWER SOURCES
   
   (2013)
 * Jurgen Buekers et al.
   
   
   HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS RELATED TO ELECTRIC VEHICLE INTRODUCTION IN
   EU COUNTRIES
   
   
   TRANSPORT. RES. TRANSPORT ENVIRON.
   
   (2014)
 * Ona Egbue et al.
   
   
   BARRIERS TO WIDESPREAD ADOPTION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES: AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER
   ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS
   
   
   ENERGY POL.
   
   (2012)
 * Mark Z. Jacobson et al.
   
   
   PROVIDING ALL GLOBAL ENERGY WITH WIND, WATER, AND SOLAR POWER, PART I:
   TECHNOLOGIES, ENERGY RESOURCES, QUANTITIES AND AREAS OF INFRASTRUCTURE, AND
   MATERIALS
   
   
   ENERGY POL.
   
   (2011)
 * Willett Kempton et al.
   
   
   VEHICLE-TO-GRID POWER IMPLEMENTATION: FROM STABILIZING THE GRID TO SUPPORTING
   LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY
   
   
   J. POWER SOURCES
   
   (2005)
 * Henrik Lund et al.
   
   
   INTEGRATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY INTO THE TRANSPORT AND ELECTRICITY SECTORS
   THROUGH V2G
   
   
   ENERGY POL.
   
   (2008)
 * Patrick Mushove et al.
   
   
   HEADS OR TAILS? STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FOR CONSERVATION AREA
   MANAGEMENT
   
   
   GLOBAL ENVIRON. CHANGE
   
   (2005)
 * Lance Noel et al.
   
   
   “COST MINIMIZATION OF GENERATION, STORAGE, AND NEW LOADS, COMPARING COSTS
   WITH AND WITHOUT EXTERNALITIES
   
   
   APPLIED ENERGY
   
   (2017)
 * Lance Noel et al.
   
   
   A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A V2G-CAPABLE ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS COMPARED TO A
   TRADITIONAL DIESEL SCHOOL BUS
   
   
   APPL. ENERGY
   
   (2014)

Mehdi Noori et al.


LIGHT-DUTY ELECTRIC VEHICLES TO IMPROVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ELECTRICITY GRID
THROUGH VEHICLE-TO-GRID TECHNOLOGY: ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL NET REVENUE AND
EMISSIONS SAVINGS


APPL. ENERGY

(2016)
Benjamin K. Sovacool et al.


BEYOND BATTERIES: AN EXAMINATION OF THE BENEFITS AND BARRIERS TO PLUG-IN HYBRID
ELECTRIC VEHICLES (PHEVS) AND A VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G) TRANSITION


ENERGY POL.

(2009)
Libby Topp et al.


THE EXTERNAL VALIDITY OF RESULTS DERIVED FROM ECSTASY USERS RECRUITED USING
PURPOSIVE SAMPLING STRATEGIES


DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEND.

(2004)
Geng Wu et al.


TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL VEHICLES:
A PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS AND PROJECTION ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS


ENERGY POL.

(2015)
Paul Dragos Aligica


INSTITUTIONAL AND STAKEHOLDER MAPPING: FRAMEWORKS FOR POLICY ANALYSIS AND
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE


PUBL. ORGAN. REV.

(2006)
Paul Atkinson


ETHNOMETHODOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW


ANNU. REV. SOCIOL.

(1988)
Glenn Beamer


ELITE INTERVIEWS AND STATE POLITICS RESEARCH


STATE POLIT. POL. Q.

(2002)
View more references


CITED BY (90)


 * FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS TO FACILITATE CLIMATE ACTION AND ENERGY
   TRANSITIONS
   
   2023, Energy and Climate Change
   Show abstract
   
   The scientific literature on climate actions, generally, and energy
   transitions, specifically, places a high premium on rigor and
   attention-to-detail when communicating their findings. While this is
   necessary, it may not always be most readily accessible to diverse audiences.
   This perspective describes the authors’ opinions on balancing future research
   directions and communication strategies to increase acceptance of widespread
   climate action among policymakers and the public. We suggest four approaches
   to do so: (1) use of co-benefits to appeal to diverse audiences, (2) reducing
   polarization in discussions, (3) use of more optimistic tones, and (4)
   finding the right balance between quantitative findings and qualitative
   narratives.


 * A REVIEW OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION FOR BUILDING
   DECARBONIZATION
   
   2023, Journal of Building Engineering
   Show abstract
   
   Building energy consumption has increased rapidly in the past decade, in
   particular for heat demand and electric vehicles, owning to the development
   of economy and improvement of living standard. Distributed Energy Systems
   (DESs), which can effectively improve the share of renewable energy in the
   energy mix, lower the energy cost and reduce environmental impact, is a
   promising approach to meet the increased energy demand. This paper presents a
   review of the system architecture of DESs for building decarbonization,
   including hybrid energy systems, energy storage technologies, building
   flexible loads, and electric vehicles. The uncertainties from both the
   environment and human interventions challenge the energy management due to
   the asynchrony between energy generation and energy consumption. Thus, the
   system should be optimally designed and operated to enhance the reliability,
   affordability, and flexibility of the DES. The paper highlights the adoption
   of optimization approaches. Finally, future trends and challenges are
   discussed. It is concluded that the digital transformation featured with IoT,
   AI, advanced machine learning, sophisticated optimization approaches, and
   Blockchain is the enabler for future smart cities.


 * HOW TO INTEGRATE USERS INTO SMART CHARGING – A CRITICAL AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
   
   2023, Energy Research and Social Science
   Show abstract
   
   Many countries worldwide have adopted policies to foster the transformation
   from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles (EV) to reach
   national climate goals. An uptake of EVs however, irrevocably leads to an
   increased power demand. To meet this problem, smart charging concepts are on
   the rise. As smart charging implies an active role of the EV user, studying
   the user in the smart charging system is vital for a successful market
   ramp-up. Despite the user's primary role, many studies only include a limited
   set of user characteristics into their research design. We aim to create
   transparency on how the user is characterized in current research and on how
   different disciplines deal with and consider the user in their research.
   Learning how different research strands deal with the user of smart charging
   is the main objective of this review.
   
   This systematic review provides an overview of 183 peer-reviewed journal
   articles from the past 20 years of research on smart charging. We find that
   the type of data that is included to characterize the user of smart charging
   is related to the research focus. While technology-centered research topics
   typically approach the user in terms of mobility and charging behavior, or
   smart charging preferences, human-centered research retrieves qualitative as
   well as quantitative data that enables in-depth knowledge about values, norms
   and perceptions of smart charging. Finally, we identified two topics that can
   be characterized as being integrative, as they create an interface for
   combining human-centered and technology-centered perspectives in a unique
   manner.


 * OPTIMAL MECHANISM DESIGN OF PUBLIC POLICIES FOR PROMOTING ELECTROMOBILITY: A
   DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING FORMULATION
   
   2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
   Show abstract
   
   Electromobility is considered a promising future of road transportation,
   driving the current industrial and market shift to the era of Electric
   Vehicles (EVs). As electromobility’s ecosystem depends on electricity
   generated by the energy sector, decision-makers face the tedious task of
   enacting policies that alter the transport and energy sectors simultaneously
   to promote EVs. This paper proposes an Optimal Mechanism Design framework for
   planning the shift to electromobility from the urban level. The framework
   fuses concepts of Mechanism Design, optimization methods and Cost-Benefit
   Analysis (CBA), incorporating all important elements for a comprehensive and
   sound policy-making procedure, such as market dynamics and the associated
   financial, social and technological dimensions for the transport and energy
   sectors. The policies considered incorporate EV promotion incentives,
   taxation, charging infrastructure, electricity taxation and infrastructure
   such as power plants and Renewable Energy Sources (RES) to support the
   growing energy needs. Market mechanisms comprise direct links between policy
   actions and sustainability outcomes. The framework identifies and optimizes
   these mechanisms to maximize the CBA sustainability indicators. The framework
   is applied to Nicosia, Cyprus’s capital, where accelerated EV adoption
   appears to maximize the transport sector's socioenvironmental sustainability
   and the energy sector's financial sustainability. On the other hand, delayed
   EV adoption maximizes the energy sector's socioenvironmental sustainability
   and the transport sector's financial sustainability. Taxation policies are
   used to limit EV penetration, whilst funding incentives are used to
   accelerate EV adoption. The results provide decision-makers with a new tool
   for optimally planning EV adoption using a policy mixture that optimizes
   financial and socioenvironmental performance.


 * IS IT WORTH PROMOTING BATTERY SWAPPING? A SOCIAL WELFARE PERSPECTIVE ON
   PROVIDER- AND CONSUMER-SIDE INCENTIVES
   
   2023, Journal of Environmental Management
   Show abstract
   
   In countries that promote further EV diffusion, battery swapping opens up a
   market outlet for time-sensitive consumers as well as another green policy
   channel. To better understand this phenomenon from the perspective of
   policy-making, this study establishes a Hotelling model of a competitive
   market comprising a battery swapping service provider and a charging service
   provider. The analyses of three scenarios, no subsidization, consumer
   subsidization, and provider subsidization, reveal how to maximize social
   welfare. Considering subsidy amount, consumer time preferences, service time,
   and operating costs, the findings provide valuable insights for policymakers.
   Whereas incentive programs are generally helpful for battery swapping
   development and social welfare improvement, it is more effective to subsidize
   service providers than end consumers. Considering subsidy opportunity cost,
   it is necessary to control incentive amount and make continuous adjustments
   to promote battery swapping services without harming charging services.


 * THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE CO-BENEFITS IN BUILDING APPLICATIONS TRANSFERRED FROM
   A RENEWABLE ENERGY PERSPECTIVE
   
   2023, Journal of Energy Storage
   Show abstract
   
   Although one of the main aims of using renewable energy sources in building
   applications is to reduce the environmental impact caused by the high global
   energy demand of buildings, it can also produce other positive effects, known
   as co-benefits. Thermal energy storage technologies are often used in
   building applications, either integrated into the renewable system or
   independently, for energy savings or energy efficiency reasons. This paper
   demonstrates that it is possible to identify the co-benefits of the use of
   thermal energy storage in buildings by cross-sectorizing the renewable energy
   and thermal energy storage sectors. To this end, this article first reviews
   the literature on the co-benefits of renewable energy for building
   applications, followed by an evaluation on how these co-benefits can be
   attributed to thermal energy storage in buildings. As a result of a keywords
   analysis, the main co-benefits of thermal energy storage were identified
   related to environmental, health, economic, cost, and policies aspects.

View all citing articles on Scopus


RECOMMENDED ARTICLES (6)

 * Research article
   
   
   IMPERFECT REVERSIBILITY OF FUEL DEMAND FOR ROAD TRANSPORT: ASYMMETRIC AND
   HYSTERETIC EFFECTS OF INCOME AND PRICE CHANGES IN KOREA
   
   Transport Policy, Volume 71, 2018, pp. 116-125
   Show abstract
   
   Existing literature lacks empirical evidence of the potential nonlinear
   effects of income and price on transport fuel demand. This paper fills this
   gap by investigating whether the demand responses to income and price changes
   are asymmetric and hysteretic. To this end, we decompose both income and
   price into two- and three-component series (one- and two-threshold cases). In
   the one-threshold case, demand effects for income are symmetric, but
   asymmetric for fuel price. The results of the two-threshold case show
   hysteretic effects for price but not for income. More specifically, the
   results reveal that small price changes do not significantly influence fuel
   demand for road transport, but substantial increases and cuts in price
   asymmetrically affect fuel demand, supporting the presence of an inaction
   band. These findings lead to the conclusion that income has linear demand
   effects, but demand effects for fuel price are nonlinear; therefore,
   disregarding nonlinearities in fuel price changes can be restrictive.

 * Research article
   
   
   EXPLORING PROSPECTIVE BENEFITS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FOR OPTIMAL ENERGY
   CONDITIONING IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
   
   Energy, Volume 157, 2018, pp. 679-689
   Show abstract
   
   A potentially beneficial new opportunity is emerging around the exchange of
   energy between electric vehicles and the electrical energy grid, particularly
   as more low-carbon energy sources are connecting to the grid. Accordingly,
   this paper presents an optimization framework to activate the potential
   capabilities of electric vehicles equipped with bidirectional chargers for
   energy conditioning (including energy management and power quality
   improvement) of the future distribution networks. The proposed nonlinear
   optimization seeks to concurrently enhance the operation performance (using
   the network voltage deviation index) as well as power quality of the grid
   (using total harmonic distortion index). The proposed model is tested on a
   33-bus distribution network to demonstrate its efficiency and performance.

 * Research article
   
   
   LEVERAGING USER-BASED INNOVATION IN VEHICLE-TO-X AND VEHICLE-TO-GRID
   ADOPTION: A NORDIC CASE STUDY
   
   Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 287, 2021, Article 125591
   Show abstract
   
   While vehicle-to-grid technology could provide substantial benefits to
   consumers and society, its adoption has been confined to a niche and
   relatively stagnant. In this article, we study the role of user-based
   innovations in increasing the acceptance and adoption of niche technologies
   such as vehicle-to-grid. To do so, we connect three interrelated
   concepts—tinkering, testing and tacit knowledge—and then theorize how they
   interact in three theories—diffusion of innovation, social construction of
   technology, and the multi-level perspective. Drawing from a rich set of
   original data, we then apply the theorization of user-based innovation to the
   adoption of vehicle-to-grid in the Nordic region, by focusing on how users
   can influence an emerging state-of-the-art innovation, vehicle-to-X. We find
   that the three concepts of tinkering, testing, and tacit knowledge should be
   encouraged in order to accelerate and stabilize the adoption of
   vehicle-to-grid. We conclude the study by examining how the theorization of
   tinkering may benefit the understanding of other technologies’ diffusion
   pathways and recommend directions for future research.

 * Research article
   
   
   THE COPRODUCTION OF ELECTRIC MOBILITY: SELECTIVITY, CONFORMITY AND
   FRAGMENTATION IN THE SOCIOTECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE OF VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G)
   STANDARDS
   
   Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 207, 2019, pp. 400-410
   Show abstract
   
   In this article we explore how a single standard dealing with vehicle-to-grid
   (V2G) mobility, ISO 15118, is coproduced in divergent ways across Asia,
   Europe, and North America. Specifically, ISO 15118 enables V2G as it oversees
   the communication between electric vehicles (EVs) and electric vehicle
   service equipment. It allows for bidirectional electricity flows and thereby
   offers electricity grids the use of EV batteries for grid services like
   frequency control and demand side management. We observe that highly
   technical and invisible standards like these are understudied in the energy
   literature and commonly misinterpreted as purely technical in scope. Hence in
   our contribution we offer such a study and use ISO 15118 to show how even in
   the most technical and invisible of cases, politics is still at work. We
   argue that standards, through a process of coproduction, are of vital
   importance for the governance of energy systems and play a major role in
   energy transitions through the various nontechnical assumptions scripted into
   them. Drawing from a synthesis of the literature on standardization,
   innovation studies, and science and technology studies, we thus analyse the
   implementation of ISO 15118 in the United States, China, Denmark and the
   Netherlands. We find a detailed technical standard that is implemented with
   differing degrees and in different sociotechnical and institutional contexts.
   We conclude by suggesting what this selectivity, compliance and fragmentation
   means for electric mobility and energy policymaking more generally.

 * Research article
   
   
   VEHICLE-TO-GRID IN THE UK FLEET MARKET: AN ANALYSIS OF UPSCALING POTENTIAL IN
   A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
   
   Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 290, 2021, Article 125203
   Show abstract
   
   Vehicle fleets are considered an important context for the deployment of
   innovations such as electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology.
   Fleet vehicles constitute a significant share of vehicle registrations, yet
   little research has been conducted into how the make-up of the changing fleet
   market could influence upscaling of innovations. This paper presents an
   in-depth study of the fleet market in the United Kingdom and assesses
   synergies between V2G and vehicle fleets by analysing socio-technical trends.
   The approach taken allows for analysing the role of users and markets in
   upscaling socio-technical transitions. The paper provides a system-level
   account of the fleet market, and shows how changing user characteristics, the
   rise of telematics, Low Emission Zones and changes to business operations and
   labour relations present specific drivers and challenges for V2G. It is
   concluded that user-related changes in the market environment are highly
   influential in shaping the upscaling trajectory of sustainable innovations
   such as V2G.

 * Research article
   
   
   DO WE HAVE A CAR FOR YOU? ENCOURAGING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AT
   POINT OF SALE
   
   Energy Policy, Volume 100, 2017, pp. 79-88
   Show abstract
   
   This study investigates shopping experiences at dealerships selling electric
   vehicles (EVs) in Ontario, Canada. In 2014, twenty mystery shoppers were
   trained and sent into 24 EV-certified dealerships (with a total of 95
   shopping experiences) to observe the sales approach towards EVs. Results show
   that a common barrier for shoppers is the unavailability of EVs at the
   dealership – including a lack of EV models on site to view or test-drive as
   well as a three- to four-month waiting period to receive the vehicle once
   ordered. A multiple regression model was developed to explore which factors
   influence the likelihood of deciding to purchase an EV. Findings suggest
   that, controlling for brand, the key success factors are a salesperson's
   positive attitude and the availability of an EV on site. It is important for
   future policy makers to acknowledge the influential role of market
   intermediaries, such as dealerships, in the adoption of EVs. The research
   findings demonstrate a potential for government agencies to work with
   dealerships and/or salespeople to improve EV uptake by encouraging the
   presence of floor models and vehicles for test-driving on site, and by
   increasing the accuracy of information being provided to customers.


View full text
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
 * About ScienceDirect
 * Remote access
 * Shopping cart
 * Advertise
 * Contact and support
 * Terms and conditions
 * Privacy policy

We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and
ads. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies.

All content on this site: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and
contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the Creative
Commons licensing terms apply.