www.sciencedirect.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
162.159.136.70
Public Scan
Submitted URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.004
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17306479?via%3Dihub
Submission: On October 02 via api from GB — Scanned from GB
Effective URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967070X17306479?via%3Dihub
Submission: On October 02 via api from GB — Scanned from GB
Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOMGET /search#submit
<form class="QuickSearch" action="/search#submit" method="get" aria-label="form">
<div class="search-input">
<div class="search-input-container search-input-container-no-label"><label class="search-input-label u-hide-visually" for="article-quick-search">Search ScienceDirect</label><input type="search" id="article-quick-search" name="qs" value=""
class="search-input-field" aria-label="Search ScienceDirect" aria-describedby="article-quick-search-description-message" placeholder="Search ScienceDirect"></div>
<div class="search-input-message-container">
<div aria-live="polite" class="search-input-validation-error"></div>
<div id="article-quick-search-description-message"></div>
</div>
</div><button type="submit" class="button small u-margin-xs-left button-primary button-icon-only" aria-disabled="false" aria-label="Submit search"><svg focusable="false" viewBox="0 0 100 128" height="20" width="18.75" class="icon icon-search">
<path
d="m19.22 76.91c-5.84-5.84-9.05-13.6-9.05-21.85s3.21-16.01 9.05-21.85c5.84-5.83 13.59-9.05 21.85-9.05 8.25 0 16.01 3.22 21.84 9.05 5.84 5.84 9.05 13.6 9.05 21.85s-3.21 16.01-9.05 21.85c-5.83 5.83-13.59 9.05-21.84 9.05-8.26 0-16.01-3.22-21.85-9.05zm80.33 29.6l-26.32-26.32c5.61-7.15 8.68-15.9 8.68-25.13 0-10.91-4.25-21.17-11.96-28.88-7.72-7.71-17.97-11.96-28.88-11.96s-21.17 4.25-28.88 11.96c-7.72 7.71-11.97 17.97-11.97 28.88s4.25 21.17 11.97 28.88c7.71 7.71 17.97 11.96 28.88 11.96 9.23 0 17.98-3.07 25.13-8.68l26.32 26.32 7.03-7.03">
</path>
</svg></button><input type="hidden" name="origin" value="article"><input type="hidden" name="zone" value="qSearch">
</form>
Text Content
JavaScript is disabled on your browser. Please enable JavaScript to use all the features on this page. Skip to main contentSkip to article ScienceDirect * Journals & Books * * Search RegisterSign in * Access through your institution * Purchase PDF Search ScienceDirect ARTICLE PREVIEW * Abstract * Introduction * Section snippets * References (34) * Cited by (90) * Recommended articles (6) TRANSPORT POLICY Volume 71, 30 November 2018, Pages 130-137 BEYOND EMISSIONS AND ECONOMICS: RETHINKING THE CO-BENEFITS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES (EVS) AND VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G) Author links open overlay panelLance Noel a, Gerardo Zarazua de Rubens a, Johannes Kester a, Benjamin K. Sovacool a b Show more Add to Mendeley Share Cite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.004Get rights and content ABSTRACT Electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid are one option to achieve the transition to decarbonizing society. Despite perceived advantages of cost-savings and carbon reductions, such technologies have faced various barriers that has prevented wide-scale adoption. While much literature has carefully investigated the techno-economics dimensions to electric mobility, we ask: what are the full set of benefits that EVs and V2G offer? To provide an answer, the authors conducted 227 semi-structured interviews with transportation and electricity experts from over 200 institutions across the Nordic region. Results show that there is an extensive range of benefits for both EVs and V2G, with experts suggesting 29 and 25 categories of benefits for EVs and V2G, respectively. Though the experts covered the obvious benefits of economic savings, emissions, and renewable energy integration, several other novel benefits were identified. The second and third most common discussed EV benefit was noise reduction and better performance, which are typically not widely discussed. Similarly, we find that V2G benefits covered topics like vehicle-to-home and solar integration, as well as more novel benefits, like vehicle-to-telescope and emergency power backup. The article concludes with a discussion of future research and benefits in the context of energy research and analysis. INTRODUCTION Electric vehicles (EVs) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) are often regarded as a key aspect of the sociotechnical transition to decarbonize transportation. In order to optimize this transition, it is essential for policymakers to understand the entirety of the benefits EVs and V2G may offer, as well as the challenges they would pose. A variety of previous papers have explored the potential benefits of EVs and V2G could bring to society, such as climate change mitigation, local health emissions, and lower cost of ownership, though they often only discuss these benefits in the context of the barriers EVs and V2G also face (Sovacool and Hirsh, 2009, Egbue and Long, 2012, Sovacool et al., 2017, Sovacool et al., 2018). Other papers have focused on characterizing a single benefit, such as the quantification of emissions benefits EVs and V2G offer (Buekers et al., 2014, Archsmith et al., 2015, Sioshansi and Denholm, 2009) or reducing the heat island effect (Li et al., 2015). No previous work has sought solely to comprehensively describe the full range of co-benefits of EVs and V2G. For example, papers that compare the costs and benefits of EVs and V2G focus exclusively on how emissions and economics impact the cost-effectiveness of EVs in context of alternative transport options (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman, 2003, Lemoine et al., 2008, Villar et al., 2013, Noel and McCormack, 2014). While some may recognize there are other benefits EVs could offer, such as noise, they are not included in their analysis, due to some benefits being admittedly difficult to monetize and include in comparisons (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman, 2003). Similarly, the benefits of V2G tend to focus on the economic and emissions benefits of services provided to the grid (Sovacool and Hirsh, 2009, Lopes et al., 2009, Noel and McCormack, 2014). Likewise, EVs and V2G are often included in analyses of large-scale renewable integration, but are also only evaluated on their economic and emission costs and benefits (Jacobson and Delucchi, 2011, Budischak et al., 2013, Noel et al., 2017). Nonetheless, there may be more benefits to EVs and V2G beyond these two, and if not included, these papers may unintentionally suggest suboptimal transport and decarbonization policy. We endeavor to describe the full context of benefits of EVs and V2G beyond costs and carbon. This paper aims to explore the benefits of EVs and V2G past the current narrow techno-economic focus in the literature by characterizing the entirety of the benefits these technologies could offer. To describe the benefits, the authors conducted 227 semi-structured interviews with 257 participants from over 200 institutions across the five Nordic countries. Given the electrical nature of EVs and V2G, those interviewed were selected to represent the diverse array of stakeholders involved with the transportation and power systems, technology, policy and practice. Selected experts were from national government ministries, agencies, and departments; local government ministries, agencies, and departments; regulatory authorities and bodies; universities and research institutes; power transmission, distribution and supply utilities; automobile manufacturers and car dealerships; private sector companies; and industry groups and civil society organizations. We find that the experts presented a diversity of benefits for both EVs and V2G, advancing different benefits of each, 29 and 25 respectively. We find that the experts discussed the obvious benefits of emissions and economics for both EVs and V2G, as well as several novel benefits not included in the aforementioned EV cost-benefit analyses. The benefits tended to focus more on an individual level, as opposed to societal benefits, such as noise and advantageous performance for EVs, and V2G integration to homes with solar panel. We present the full results below, and then conclude with a discussion of the implications for future EV research and transport policy. SECTION SNIPPETS MATERIALS & METHODS To explore the benefits surrounding electric mobility, namely electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid technology, the authors relied primarily on original data collected through semi-structured research interviews. This methodology was applied on a regional context taking the five Nordic countries as place of study, since it is recognized that these countries have traditionally had aggressive push of climate, energy and transport policy agendas emerging as leading nations in electric vehicle EV BENEFITS In total, our data collection and analysis resulted in 29 different categories of the benefits that the experts identified, with Fig. 1 summarizing the frequency of each benefit. Here we discuss, the five most commonly discussed EV benefits (emissions, noise, performance, economic savings, and renewable energy integration), and the summarize the remaining benefits. While there was a great variety of the types of benefits discussed, by far the most dominant benefit of EVs was the impact they CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS In both the cases of EVs and V2G, the benefits expressed by the experts went extensively beyond the central benefits presented in the literature. While our sample of experts acknowledged the central EV benefits around economics and emissions, they also discussed a wide variety of creative benefits. V2G benefits also captured the common themes of the literature like renewable energy integration and various grid services, but also submitted interesting benefits of lesser economic focus. We ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are appreciative to the respondents for their time and openness, to Xiao Lin for her help in gathering some of the data, and to the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK) Energy Program Grant EP/K011790/1 “Center on Innovation and Energy Demand,” the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) Sapere Aude Grant 4182-00033B “Societal Implications of a Vehicle-to-Grid Transition in Northern Europe,” which have supported elements of the work reported here. Any opinions, findings, REFERENCES (34) * James Archsmith et al. FROM CRADLE TO JUNKYARD: ASSESSING THE LIFE CYCLE GREENHOUSE GAS BENEFITS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES RES. TRANSPORT. ECON. (2015) * Cory Budischak et al. COST-MINIMIZED COMBINATIONS OF WIND POWER, SOLAR POWER AND ELECTROCHEMICAL STORAGE, POWERING THE GRID UP TO 99.9% OF THE TIME J. POWER SOURCES (2013) * Jurgen Buekers et al. HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS RELATED TO ELECTRIC VEHICLE INTRODUCTION IN EU COUNTRIES TRANSPORT. RES. TRANSPORT ENVIRON. (2014) * Ona Egbue et al. BARRIERS TO WIDESPREAD ADOPTION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES: AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS ENERGY POL. (2012) * Mark Z. Jacobson et al. PROVIDING ALL GLOBAL ENERGY WITH WIND, WATER, AND SOLAR POWER, PART I: TECHNOLOGIES, ENERGY RESOURCES, QUANTITIES AND AREAS OF INFRASTRUCTURE, AND MATERIALS ENERGY POL. (2011) * Willett Kempton et al. VEHICLE-TO-GRID POWER IMPLEMENTATION: FROM STABILIZING THE GRID TO SUPPORTING LARGE-SCALE RENEWABLE ENERGY J. POWER SOURCES (2005) * Henrik Lund et al. INTEGRATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY INTO THE TRANSPORT AND ELECTRICITY SECTORS THROUGH V2G ENERGY POL. (2008) * Patrick Mushove et al. HEADS OR TAILS? STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FOR CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT GLOBAL ENVIRON. CHANGE (2005) * Lance Noel et al. “COST MINIMIZATION OF GENERATION, STORAGE, AND NEW LOADS, COMPARING COSTS WITH AND WITHOUT EXTERNALITIES APPLIED ENERGY (2017) * Lance Noel et al. A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A V2G-CAPABLE ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS COMPARED TO A TRADITIONAL DIESEL SCHOOL BUS APPL. ENERGY (2014) Mehdi Noori et al. LIGHT-DUTY ELECTRIC VEHICLES TO IMPROVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE ELECTRICITY GRID THROUGH VEHICLE-TO-GRID TECHNOLOGY: ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL NET REVENUE AND EMISSIONS SAVINGS APPL. ENERGY (2016) Benjamin K. Sovacool et al. BEYOND BATTERIES: AN EXAMINATION OF THE BENEFITS AND BARRIERS TO PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES (PHEVS) AND A VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G) TRANSITION ENERGY POL. (2009) Libby Topp et al. THE EXTERNAL VALIDITY OF RESULTS DERIVED FROM ECSTASY USERS RECRUITED USING PURPOSIVE SAMPLING STRATEGIES DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEND. (2004) Geng Wu et al. TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL VEHICLES: A PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS AND PROJECTION ACROSS MARKET SEGMENTS ENERGY POL. (2015) Paul Dragos Aligica INSTITUTIONAL AND STAKEHOLDER MAPPING: FRAMEWORKS FOR POLICY ANALYSIS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE PUBL. ORGAN. REV. (2006) Paul Atkinson ETHNOMETHODOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW ANNU. REV. SOCIOL. (1988) Glenn Beamer ELITE INTERVIEWS AND STATE POLITICS RESEARCH STATE POLIT. POL. Q. (2002) View more references CITED BY (90) * FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS TO FACILITATE CLIMATE ACTION AND ENERGY TRANSITIONS 2023, Energy and Climate Change Show abstract The scientific literature on climate actions, generally, and energy transitions, specifically, places a high premium on rigor and attention-to-detail when communicating their findings. While this is necessary, it may not always be most readily accessible to diverse audiences. This perspective describes the authors’ opinions on balancing future research directions and communication strategies to increase acceptance of widespread climate action among policymakers and the public. We suggest four approaches to do so: (1) use of co-benefits to appeal to diverse audiences, (2) reducing polarization in discussions, (3) use of more optimistic tones, and (4) finding the right balance between quantitative findings and qualitative narratives. * A REVIEW OF DISTRIBUTED ENERGY SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION FOR BUILDING DECARBONIZATION 2023, Journal of Building Engineering Show abstract Building energy consumption has increased rapidly in the past decade, in particular for heat demand and electric vehicles, owning to the development of economy and improvement of living standard. Distributed Energy Systems (DESs), which can effectively improve the share of renewable energy in the energy mix, lower the energy cost and reduce environmental impact, is a promising approach to meet the increased energy demand. This paper presents a review of the system architecture of DESs for building decarbonization, including hybrid energy systems, energy storage technologies, building flexible loads, and electric vehicles. The uncertainties from both the environment and human interventions challenge the energy management due to the asynchrony between energy generation and energy consumption. Thus, the system should be optimally designed and operated to enhance the reliability, affordability, and flexibility of the DES. The paper highlights the adoption of optimization approaches. Finally, future trends and challenges are discussed. It is concluded that the digital transformation featured with IoT, AI, advanced machine learning, sophisticated optimization approaches, and Blockchain is the enabler for future smart cities. * HOW TO INTEGRATE USERS INTO SMART CHARGING – A CRITICAL AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 2023, Energy Research and Social Science Show abstract Many countries worldwide have adopted policies to foster the transformation from internal combustion engine vehicles to electric vehicles (EV) to reach national climate goals. An uptake of EVs however, irrevocably leads to an increased power demand. To meet this problem, smart charging concepts are on the rise. As smart charging implies an active role of the EV user, studying the user in the smart charging system is vital for a successful market ramp-up. Despite the user's primary role, many studies only include a limited set of user characteristics into their research design. We aim to create transparency on how the user is characterized in current research and on how different disciplines deal with and consider the user in their research. Learning how different research strands deal with the user of smart charging is the main objective of this review. This systematic review provides an overview of 183 peer-reviewed journal articles from the past 20 years of research on smart charging. We find that the type of data that is included to characterize the user of smart charging is related to the research focus. While technology-centered research topics typically approach the user in terms of mobility and charging behavior, or smart charging preferences, human-centered research retrieves qualitative as well as quantitative data that enables in-depth knowledge about values, norms and perceptions of smart charging. Finally, we identified two topics that can be characterized as being integrative, as they create an interface for combining human-centered and technology-centered perspectives in a unique manner. * OPTIMAL MECHANISM DESIGN OF PUBLIC POLICIES FOR PROMOTING ELECTROMOBILITY: A DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING FORMULATION 2023, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Show abstract Electromobility is considered a promising future of road transportation, driving the current industrial and market shift to the era of Electric Vehicles (EVs). As electromobility’s ecosystem depends on electricity generated by the energy sector, decision-makers face the tedious task of enacting policies that alter the transport and energy sectors simultaneously to promote EVs. This paper proposes an Optimal Mechanism Design framework for planning the shift to electromobility from the urban level. The framework fuses concepts of Mechanism Design, optimization methods and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), incorporating all important elements for a comprehensive and sound policy-making procedure, such as market dynamics and the associated financial, social and technological dimensions for the transport and energy sectors. The policies considered incorporate EV promotion incentives, taxation, charging infrastructure, electricity taxation and infrastructure such as power plants and Renewable Energy Sources (RES) to support the growing energy needs. Market mechanisms comprise direct links between policy actions and sustainability outcomes. The framework identifies and optimizes these mechanisms to maximize the CBA sustainability indicators. The framework is applied to Nicosia, Cyprus’s capital, where accelerated EV adoption appears to maximize the transport sector's socioenvironmental sustainability and the energy sector's financial sustainability. On the other hand, delayed EV adoption maximizes the energy sector's socioenvironmental sustainability and the transport sector's financial sustainability. Taxation policies are used to limit EV penetration, whilst funding incentives are used to accelerate EV adoption. The results provide decision-makers with a new tool for optimally planning EV adoption using a policy mixture that optimizes financial and socioenvironmental performance. * IS IT WORTH PROMOTING BATTERY SWAPPING? A SOCIAL WELFARE PERSPECTIVE ON PROVIDER- AND CONSUMER-SIDE INCENTIVES 2023, Journal of Environmental Management Show abstract In countries that promote further EV diffusion, battery swapping opens up a market outlet for time-sensitive consumers as well as another green policy channel. To better understand this phenomenon from the perspective of policy-making, this study establishes a Hotelling model of a competitive market comprising a battery swapping service provider and a charging service provider. The analyses of three scenarios, no subsidization, consumer subsidization, and provider subsidization, reveal how to maximize social welfare. Considering subsidy amount, consumer time preferences, service time, and operating costs, the findings provide valuable insights for policymakers. Whereas incentive programs are generally helpful for battery swapping development and social welfare improvement, it is more effective to subsidize service providers than end consumers. Considering subsidy opportunity cost, it is necessary to control incentive amount and make continuous adjustments to promote battery swapping services without harming charging services. * THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE CO-BENEFITS IN BUILDING APPLICATIONS TRANSFERRED FROM A RENEWABLE ENERGY PERSPECTIVE 2023, Journal of Energy Storage Show abstract Although one of the main aims of using renewable energy sources in building applications is to reduce the environmental impact caused by the high global energy demand of buildings, it can also produce other positive effects, known as co-benefits. Thermal energy storage technologies are often used in building applications, either integrated into the renewable system or independently, for energy savings or energy efficiency reasons. This paper demonstrates that it is possible to identify the co-benefits of the use of thermal energy storage in buildings by cross-sectorizing the renewable energy and thermal energy storage sectors. To this end, this article first reviews the literature on the co-benefits of renewable energy for building applications, followed by an evaluation on how these co-benefits can be attributed to thermal energy storage in buildings. As a result of a keywords analysis, the main co-benefits of thermal energy storage were identified related to environmental, health, economic, cost, and policies aspects. View all citing articles on Scopus RECOMMENDED ARTICLES (6) * Research article IMPERFECT REVERSIBILITY OF FUEL DEMAND FOR ROAD TRANSPORT: ASYMMETRIC AND HYSTERETIC EFFECTS OF INCOME AND PRICE CHANGES IN KOREA Transport Policy, Volume 71, 2018, pp. 116-125 Show abstract Existing literature lacks empirical evidence of the potential nonlinear effects of income and price on transport fuel demand. This paper fills this gap by investigating whether the demand responses to income and price changes are asymmetric and hysteretic. To this end, we decompose both income and price into two- and three-component series (one- and two-threshold cases). In the one-threshold case, demand effects for income are symmetric, but asymmetric for fuel price. The results of the two-threshold case show hysteretic effects for price but not for income. More specifically, the results reveal that small price changes do not significantly influence fuel demand for road transport, but substantial increases and cuts in price asymmetrically affect fuel demand, supporting the presence of an inaction band. These findings lead to the conclusion that income has linear demand effects, but demand effects for fuel price are nonlinear; therefore, disregarding nonlinearities in fuel price changes can be restrictive. * Research article EXPLORING PROSPECTIVE BENEFITS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FOR OPTIMAL ENERGY CONDITIONING IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS Energy, Volume 157, 2018, pp. 679-689 Show abstract A potentially beneficial new opportunity is emerging around the exchange of energy between electric vehicles and the electrical energy grid, particularly as more low-carbon energy sources are connecting to the grid. Accordingly, this paper presents an optimization framework to activate the potential capabilities of electric vehicles equipped with bidirectional chargers for energy conditioning (including energy management and power quality improvement) of the future distribution networks. The proposed nonlinear optimization seeks to concurrently enhance the operation performance (using the network voltage deviation index) as well as power quality of the grid (using total harmonic distortion index). The proposed model is tested on a 33-bus distribution network to demonstrate its efficiency and performance. * Research article LEVERAGING USER-BASED INNOVATION IN VEHICLE-TO-X AND VEHICLE-TO-GRID ADOPTION: A NORDIC CASE STUDY Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 287, 2021, Article 125591 Show abstract While vehicle-to-grid technology could provide substantial benefits to consumers and society, its adoption has been confined to a niche and relatively stagnant. In this article, we study the role of user-based innovations in increasing the acceptance and adoption of niche technologies such as vehicle-to-grid. To do so, we connect three interrelated concepts—tinkering, testing and tacit knowledge—and then theorize how they interact in three theories—diffusion of innovation, social construction of technology, and the multi-level perspective. Drawing from a rich set of original data, we then apply the theorization of user-based innovation to the adoption of vehicle-to-grid in the Nordic region, by focusing on how users can influence an emerging state-of-the-art innovation, vehicle-to-X. We find that the three concepts of tinkering, testing, and tacit knowledge should be encouraged in order to accelerate and stabilize the adoption of vehicle-to-grid. We conclude the study by examining how the theorization of tinkering may benefit the understanding of other technologies’ diffusion pathways and recommend directions for future research. * Research article THE COPRODUCTION OF ELECTRIC MOBILITY: SELECTIVITY, CONFORMITY AND FRAGMENTATION IN THE SOCIOTECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE OF VEHICLE-TO-GRID (V2G) STANDARDS Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 207, 2019, pp. 400-410 Show abstract In this article we explore how a single standard dealing with vehicle-to-grid (V2G) mobility, ISO 15118, is coproduced in divergent ways across Asia, Europe, and North America. Specifically, ISO 15118 enables V2G as it oversees the communication between electric vehicles (EVs) and electric vehicle service equipment. It allows for bidirectional electricity flows and thereby offers electricity grids the use of EV batteries for grid services like frequency control and demand side management. We observe that highly technical and invisible standards like these are understudied in the energy literature and commonly misinterpreted as purely technical in scope. Hence in our contribution we offer such a study and use ISO 15118 to show how even in the most technical and invisible of cases, politics is still at work. We argue that standards, through a process of coproduction, are of vital importance for the governance of energy systems and play a major role in energy transitions through the various nontechnical assumptions scripted into them. Drawing from a synthesis of the literature on standardization, innovation studies, and science and technology studies, we thus analyse the implementation of ISO 15118 in the United States, China, Denmark and the Netherlands. We find a detailed technical standard that is implemented with differing degrees and in different sociotechnical and institutional contexts. We conclude by suggesting what this selectivity, compliance and fragmentation means for electric mobility and energy policymaking more generally. * Research article VEHICLE-TO-GRID IN THE UK FLEET MARKET: AN ANALYSIS OF UPSCALING POTENTIAL IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 290, 2021, Article 125203 Show abstract Vehicle fleets are considered an important context for the deployment of innovations such as electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology. Fleet vehicles constitute a significant share of vehicle registrations, yet little research has been conducted into how the make-up of the changing fleet market could influence upscaling of innovations. This paper presents an in-depth study of the fleet market in the United Kingdom and assesses synergies between V2G and vehicle fleets by analysing socio-technical trends. The approach taken allows for analysing the role of users and markets in upscaling socio-technical transitions. The paper provides a system-level account of the fleet market, and shows how changing user characteristics, the rise of telematics, Low Emission Zones and changes to business operations and labour relations present specific drivers and challenges for V2G. It is concluded that user-related changes in the market environment are highly influential in shaping the upscaling trajectory of sustainable innovations such as V2G. * Research article DO WE HAVE A CAR FOR YOU? ENCOURAGING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES AT POINT OF SALE Energy Policy, Volume 100, 2017, pp. 79-88 Show abstract This study investigates shopping experiences at dealerships selling electric vehicles (EVs) in Ontario, Canada. In 2014, twenty mystery shoppers were trained and sent into 24 EV-certified dealerships (with a total of 95 shopping experiences) to observe the sales approach towards EVs. Results show that a common barrier for shoppers is the unavailability of EVs at the dealership – including a lack of EV models on site to view or test-drive as well as a three- to four-month waiting period to receive the vehicle once ordered. A multiple regression model was developed to explore which factors influence the likelihood of deciding to purchase an EV. Findings suggest that, controlling for brand, the key success factors are a salesperson's positive attitude and the availability of an EV on site. It is important for future policy makers to acknowledge the influential role of market intermediaries, such as dealerships, in the adoption of EVs. The research findings demonstrate a potential for government agencies to work with dealerships and/or salespeople to improve EV uptake by encouraging the presence of floor models and vehicles for test-driving on site, and by increasing the accuracy of information being provided to customers. View full text © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. * About ScienceDirect * Remote access * Shopping cart * Advertise * Contact and support * Terms and conditions * Privacy policy We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies. All content on this site: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply.