www.ropesgray.com Open in urlscan Pro
172.64.155.254  Public Scan

URL: https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2024/05/fincen-and-sec-propose-affirmative-kyc-requirements-for-registered-in...
Submission: On May 20 via manual from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

<form class="TypeaheadInput_search-blue__form__hNhdL" autocomplete="off"><input class="TypeaheadInput_search-blue__form-input__02H65" placeholder="Type to search..." autocomplete="off" value=""><button type="submit"
    class="TypeaheadInput_search-blue__form-btn__n__0s TypeaheadInput_search__form-btn--disabled__HNh_T">Search<span class="TypeaheadInput_search-blue__form-icon__Rbw7E"><svg width="21" height="21" viewBox="0 0 21 21" fill="none"
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
        <path d="M9 17C13.4183 17 17 13.4183 17 9C17 4.58172 13.4183 1 9 1C4.58172 1 1 4.58172 1 9C1 13.4183 4.58172 17 9 17Z" stroke="currentcolor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
        <path d="M18.9984 18.9999L14.6484 14.6499" stroke="currentcolor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="square" stroke-linejoin="round"></path>
      </svg></span></button></form>

Text Content

Page Translations
 * Contact
 * Join our Mailing List

 * 
 * 
 * 

 * About
 * People
 * Services & Industries
 * Insights
 * News & Events
 * Locations
 * Careers

 * Contact
 * Join our Mailing List

 * 
 * 
 * 



Page Translations
Search

 * Home
 * Insights
 * FinCEN and SEC Propose Affirmative KYC Requirements for Registered Investment
   Advisers and Exempt Reporting Advisers

Share
 * LinkedIn
 * Facebook
 * Twitter
 * Email


FINCEN AND SEC PROPOSE AFFIRMATIVE KYC REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTERED INVESTMENT
ADVISERS AND EXEMPT REPORTING ADVISERS

Alert
May 14, 2024
7 minutes
Printer-friendly Version
Authors:
Ama A. Adams , Brendan C. Hanifin , Kurt Fowler

On May 13, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(“FinCEN”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) jointly released a
notice of proposed rulemaking (the “CIP Proposed Rule”) that would require
SEC-registered investment advisers (“RIAs”) and exempt reporting advisers
(“ERAs”) to establish, document, and maintain written customer identification
programs (“CIPs”). 

FinCEN previewed the CIP Proposed Rule in a separate, February 2024 notice of
proposed rulemaking that would require RIAs and ERAs to (1) develop and
implement anti-money laundering compliance programs (within 12 months after the
effective date of a final rule) and (2) monitor for and report suspicious
activity to FinCEN (the “AML/CFT Program and SAR Proposed Rule”). Our alert on
the February 2024 AML/CFT Program and SAR Proposed Rule is available here.

CIP PROPOSED RULE

The CIP Proposed Rule would require RIAs and ERAs to establish CIPs that closely
track the customer identification requirements that currently apply to banks,
broker-dealers, and mutual funds (among other financial institutions).
Specifically, RIAs and ERAs would be required to establish:

 * A written CIP;
 * Risk-based procedures for performing identification and verification of
   customers that open accounts, which include:
   * collection of certain minimum identifying information of customers (e.g.,
     name, date of birth or formation, address, and identification number),
     prior to opening an account; and
   * verification of the identity of each customer, using the foregoing
     information, through documentary or non-documentary means, within a
     reasonable time before or after the customer’s account is opened;
 * Procedures for making and maintaining a record of information collected under
   the CIP, as well as verification performed, for at least five years;
 * Procedures for determining whether a customer appears on any list of known or
   suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations issued by any federal
   government agency and designated as such by the Treasury Department in
   consultation with federal functional regulators; and
 * Procedures for providing customers with adequate notice of the RIA’s or ERA’s
   CIP requirements.

The CIP Proposed Rule would take effect six months from the publication of a
final rule but, in any event, no sooner than the compliance date of the AML/CFT
Program and SAR Proposed Rule, if adopted.

INITIAL REACTIONS

CUSTOMERS AND ACCOUNTS

Under the CIP Proposed Rule, CIP obligations would be triggered by a customer’s
opening of an account, defined as follows:

 * Account means any contractual or other business relationship between a person
   and an investment adviser under which the investment adviser provides
   investment advisory services.
 * Customer means a person (individual or entity) that opens a new account.
   * The definition of customer would not include (1) a financial institution
     regulated by a federal functional regulator or bank regulated by a state
     bank regulator; (2) certain domestic government entities; (3) certain
     entities that are publicly listed on U.S. securities exchanges; or (4)
     persons that have an existing account with the RIA or ERA, provided that
     the RIA or ERA has a reasonable belief that it knows the true identity of
     the person.

While the above definitions resemble the equivalent definitions in the
broker-dealer CIP rule, it is not entirely clear how they would be interpreted
to apply to private fund structures.

For example, in its “Paperwork Reduction Act” discussion, the CIP Proposed Rule
includes the following language in a footnote, which appears to imply that the
customers of RIAs and ERAs are the funds that they advise (as opposed to
investors in those funds):

Estimates herein assume that (i) the median number of customers per exempt
reporting adviser is two and (ii) the median number of customers per registered
investment adviser is 100. For purposes of the number of “customers” with
respect to exempt reporting advisers, we used the number of private funds
reported by exempt reporting advisers on Schedule D, Section 7.B.1 of Form ADV,
as of October 5, 2023. For purposes of the number of “customers” with respect to
registered advisers, we used the number of “clients” reported by advisers on
Item 5.D of Form ADV, as of October 5, 2023. This estimate is based on the
median number of clients per registered investment adviser with at least one
client. “Customers” does not include the investors in a private fund.

However, this interpretation would appear inconsistent with concerns that have
been expressed by FinCEN leadership, such as gaps in anti-money laundering
regulation of RIAs and ERAs permitting entry into the U.S. financial system to
bad actors. In addition, such an interpretation appears at odds with the CIP
Proposed Rule’s contemplated CIP requirements for natural person investors and
screening against lists of known or suspected terrorists or terrorist
organizations.

RELIANCE

Under the CIP Proposed Rule, RIAs and ERAs would be permitted to rely on another
financial institution to perform any of the procedures associated with the
adviser’s CIP, provided:

 * Such reliance is reasonable under the circumstances;
 * The other financial institution is subject to a rule implementing 31 U.S.C.
   5318(h) and regulated by a federal functional regulator; and
 * The other financial institution enters into a contract with the investment
   adviser requiring it to certify annually to the investment adviser that it
   has implemented its anti-money laundering/countering the financing of
   terrorism program, and that it will perform (or its agent will perform)
   specified requirements of the investment adviser’s CIP.

RIAs and ERAs would remain responsible for ensuring compliance with the CIP
Proposed Rule and would be expected to actively monitor the implementation of
their CIPs. In practice, many RIAs and ERAs effectively outsource elements of
their current, voluntary know-your-customer procedures to third parties that are
unlikely to meet the above criteria, including non-U.S.-based administrators and
external counsel. Therefore, adoption of the CIP Proposed Rule in its current
form—assuming CIP requirements are interpreted to apply to investors in private
funds—may necessitate wide-scale retooling of existing know-your-customer
procedures across a broad swath of the U.S. private funds market.

EXISTING INVESTORS

As noted above, the CIP Proposed Rule would exclude from the definition of
“customer” persons that have an existing account with the RIA or ERA, provided
that the RIA or ERA “has a reasonable belief that it knows the true identity of
the person.” Assuming that FinCEN and the SEC interpret “customer” to include
investors in private funds, depending on the facts, there may be an argument
that investment advisers’ prior due diligence of such investors would satisfy
the adviser’s obligations under the CIP Proposed Rule. In this regard, the
preamble to the CIP Proposed Rule states that a covered adviser generally would
not need to re-verify a customer’s identity if the customer’s identity
previously was verified “in accordance with procedures consistent with the
proposed rule.” A final rule, if adopted, may clarify whether existing
procedures adopted prior to publication of the final rule—e.g., pursuant to
non-U.S. know-your-customer requirements—would satisfy this standard.

HARMONIZATION WITH EXISTING KNOW-YOUR-CUSTOMER PROCEDURES

Many RIAs and ERAs voluntarily have adopted certain know-your-customer
procedures, including to comply with the anti-money laundering requirements of
non-U.S. jurisdictions. While non-U.S. know-your-customer requirements
historically have been more stringent than U.S. requirements applicable to
investment advisers, RIAs and ERAs should not assume—without review—that their
existing know-your-customer procedures will satisfy the minimum requirements
that would be imposed under the CIP Proposed Rule. For example, the CIP Proposed
Rule would require collection of a taxpayer identification number (i.e., Social
Security Number) for natural person customers, whereas collection of passport
information may suffice under the know-your-customer requirements of non-U.S.
jurisdictions.

The AML/CFT Program and SAR Proposed Rule requires RIAs and ERAs to implement
risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due diligence that
includes (1) understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships for
the purpose of developing a customer risk profile; and (2) conducting ongoing
monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and update customer
information. RIAs and ERAs will need to ensure that their anti-money laundering
programs include both procedures for identifying and verifying new customers,
pursuant to the CIP Proposed Rule, and ongoing monitoring, pursuant to the
AML/CFT Program and SAR Proposed Rule (assuming both rules ultimately are
adopted).

Along similar lines, pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act, FinCEN will
undertake a forthcoming rulemaking process to revise FinCEN’s Customer Due
Diligence (“CDD”) Rule, which currently requires certain financial institutions
(including banks and broker dealers), inter alia, to establish written policies
and procedures for identifying and verifying the beneficial owners of legal
entity customers opening accounts. It is possible that the forthcoming CDD Rule
updates could extend similar requirements to RIAs and ERAs, which covered
advisers would need to account for in updating their anti-money laundering
compliance programs.


RELATED SERVICES

 * Anti-Money Laundering


AUTHORS

Ama A. Adams
Partner
Washington, D.C.+1 202 508 4655
Ama.Adams@ropesgray.com
See Bio
Brendan C. Hanifin
Partner
Chicago+1 312 845 1311
Brendan.Hanifin@ropesgray.com
See Bio
Kurt Fowler
Associate
Chicago+1 312 845 1108
Kurt.Fowler@ropesgray.com
See Bio


RELATED CONTENT

View All
Alert

Recent Developments in Asset Management M&A Transactions
May 20, 2024
Viewpoints

A Big Week for Forced Labor Regulation: Record Expansion of the UFLPA Entity
List and a New Florida Law
May 18, 2024
Viewpoints

This Week in Data/Cyber/Tech: Why Privacy Notices Aren't a Waste of Money; and
Avoiding BCC Data Breaches.
May 17, 2024
Load More


STAY UP TO DATE WITH ROPES & GRAY

Subscribe to Our Podcast

Ropes & Gray attorneys provide timely analysis on legal developments, court
decisions and changes in legislation and regulations.

Subscribe to AppleSubscribe to GoogleSubscribe to Spotify
Follow Us on Social

Stay in the loop with all things Ropes & Gray, and find out more about our
people, culture, initiatives and everything that’s happening.

Follow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on X
Join Our Mailing List

We regularly notify our clients and contacts of significant legal developments,
news, webinars and teleconferences that affect their industries.

Join Our Mailing List
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * Advertising
 * Alumni
 * Cookie Policy
 * Join Our Mailing List
 * Legal Notices
 * Privacy
 * Contact

© 2024 Ropes & Gray LLP.
All rights reserved. Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.



By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your
device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our
marketing efforts. For more information about how we use cookies and similar
technologies, click here.

 * Functional Cookies
   
   FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

 * Strictly Necessary Cookies
   
   STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

 * Targeting Cookies
   
   TARGETING COOKIES

 * Social Media Cookies
   
   SOCIAL MEDIA COOKIES

 * Performance Cookies
   
   PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Cookies Settings
Save Choices
Reject CookiesAccept All Cookies




PRIVACY PREFERENCE CENTER

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your
browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you,
your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you
expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can
give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to
privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the
different category headings to find out more and change our default settings.
However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site
and the services we are able to offer.
More information
Allow All


MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES

FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and
personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose
services we have added to our pages.    If you do not allow these cookies then
some or all of these services may not function properly.

STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy
preferences, logging in or filling in forms.    You can set your browser to
block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then
work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

TARGETING COOKIES

Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may
be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you
relevant adverts on other sites.    They do not store directly personal
information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet
device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted
advertising.

SOCIAL MEDIA COOKIES

Social Media Cookies

These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to
the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They
are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a
profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on
other websites you visit.    If you do not allow these cookies you may not be
able to use or see these sharing tools.

PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and
improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the
most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site.    All
information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you
do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and
will not be able to monitor its performance.

Back Button


PERFORMANCE COOKIES



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Reject All Confirm My Choices

ShareThis Copy and Paste