app.hubspot.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
2606:4700::6813:9a53
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://hubs.ly/Q01q5bV00
Effective URL: https://app.hubspot.com/documents/20820344/view/448735881?accessId=60f40c
Submission: On October 27 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Effective URL: https://app.hubspot.com/documents/20820344/view/448735881?accessId=60f40c
Submission: On October 27 via api from US — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to improve your website experience and provide more personalized services to you, both on this website and through other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy. We won't track your information when you visit our site. But in order to comply with your preferences, we'll have to use just one tiny cookie so that you're not asked to make this choice again. Accept Decline Skip links to display main content. ShareDownload Customer Case Study“We maximized productivityby increasing visibility in thewarehouse with Motion2AI”General Manager of [Company A]BACKGROUND[Company A] provides 2PL logistics services for LG Electronics. [Company A]’s CDCs handle bulky electronic products, such as refrigerators, microwaves, and dishwashers, whose sizes vary over different product groups and models.CHALLENGESThe floor-stacked operations of [Company A]’s 500,000+ sq. ft warehouses resulted in their operations team having limited visibility into their daily operations.Reliable headcount planning was not possible due to the considerable variance of workers’productivity depending on their skill sets, thedifficulty of transactions, and a lack of data tocontrol the variance. Similarly, their workerincentive program was not data-driven due toinaccurate information.While the multilocation picking processes are the most time-consuming, [Company A]’s TMS(transportation management system) doesn’tprovide a reliable routing strategy. As a result, each driver improvises the priority and the order of their picking transactions. On average, that resulted in a 35% inefficiency compared to the optimal routing scenario.586%14%Annual ROINet Operational Savings Page 1 of 4 1234