newrepublic.com Open in urlscan Pro
199.232.192.233  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

You are using an outdated browser.
Please upgrade your browser
and improve your visit to our site.

Skip Navigation
SubscribeThe New RepublicSign InThe New Republic
The New Republic
 * LATEST
   
 * BREAKING NEWS
   
 * POLITICS
   
 * CLIMATE
   
 * CULTURE
   
 * MAGAZINE
   
 * NEWSLETTERS
   
 * PODCASTS
   
 * GAMES

SubscribeSign In
Politics Homepage
 * Election 2024
 * Congress
 * Supreme Court Watch
 * Media

The New Republic
The New Republic
 * LATEST
   
 * BREAKING NEWS
   
 * POLITICS
   
 * CLIMATE
   
 * CULTURE
   
 * MAGAZINE
   
 * NEWSLETTERS
   
 * PODCASTS
   
 * GAMES

SubscribeSign In
Politics Homepage
 * Election 2024
 * Congress
 * Supreme Court Watch
 * Media

Timothy Noah/
February 7, 2024
GONE, BABY, GONE


THE PERVERSE CRUELTY OF BIG TECH LAYOFFS


ONCE CAPITALISM’S SIGNAL THAT YOUR COMPANY WAS FAILING, UNDER TODAY’S DERANGED
RULES IT’S CAPITALISM’S CONFIRMATION THAT YOUR COMPANY IS RED HOT.

Artur Widak/Getty Images


“We have a strong economy,” Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve, told
Scott Pelley of 60 Minutes on Sunday’s broadcast. “Growth is going on at a solid
pace. The labor market is strong: 3.7 percent unemployment. And inflation is
coming down.” The interview was taped three days before it aired, depriving
Powell of the opportunity to add that the economy created 353,000 new jobs in
January. Powell might also have mentioned that gross domestic product rose 3.3
percent in the last quarter of 2023. Both indicators exceeded expectations.

Even the public is starting to recognize that the economy is in excellent
health. Consumer confidence rose in January for the third straight month, and
the percentage of Americans who told Gallup in January that the economy was
“excellent” or “good” rose to 27 percent, up from 19 percent in November. Still,
that’s half as many as judged the economy “excellent” or “good” in March 2020,
when the Covid pandemic began, and the current “soft landing” from the Fed’s
inflation-taming interest rate hikes is doing zero to improve Biden’s approval
rating, which remains stuck below 40 percent.



Why are people so slow to recognize a strong economy when they see one? The
usual explanation is that they’re still pissed off about inflation. But another
reason might be the persistence of layoffs, especially in the tech industry.
Since the start of 2024, 132 tech companies have laid off 33,224 employees,
according to the website Layoffs.fyi, including 2,500 at PayPal, 1,900 at
Microsoft, and 1,000 at Google. That’s a problem, right? Especially when you
consider that tech stocks dominate the S&P 500.



But as logical and sane as it may be to conclude that layoffs signal something’s
amiss, in today’s economy that presumption is a fallacy. Layoffs do not, in
fact, signal anything. Consider: In any given month, the number of people who
get laid off is about two million. There’s a little fluctuation, but the number
never rises to three million or falls to one million. The biggest fluctuations
tend to be spikes in November and December, when layoffs typically increase to
accommodate calendar-year budgets. Merry Christmas! You’re fired!

To consider this year’s tech layoffs noteworthy (except to the people who lost
their jobs), you have to ignore what happened during the previous two years. In
2023 1,190 tech companies laid off 262,735 workers, according to Layoffs.fyi. In
2022, it was 1,065 tech companies laying off 165,269. Across all industries,
layoffs have been a flat line on a graph for more than 20 years, the sole
exception being the if-you-blinked-you-missed-it recession of February–April
2020, when Covid spiked the unemployment rate to 13 percent and layoffs briefly
peaked at about 13 million.



Otherwise, layoffs are an accepted fact of economic life—so much so that in
2013, when Congress compelled the Bureau of Labor Statistics to cut its (teensy)
budget by 5 percent, the agency eliminated its Mass Layoff Statistics program,
which collected detailed (and quite useful) information about which industries
did the laying off, which regions had the most layoffs, what the demographics
were of those who got laid off, and so on.

This conception of layoffs as something unpleasant but fairly routine, like your
semiannual trip to the dentist, is a relatively recent development. In his 2006
book, The Disposable American: Layoffs and Their Consequences, Louis Uchitelle,
a former business reporter for The New York Times, argues that through the
1970s, “companies avoided layoffs” because “they were a sign of corporate
failure and a violation of acceptable business behavior.” That began to change
in the 1980s when the Fed, under Paul Volker and his successor, Alan Greenspan,
concluded the natural unemployment rate was somewhere between 5.5 and 6 percent;
anything below that, they believed, would resurrect the Great Inflation of 1965
to 1982. Consequently, whenever unemployment fell below 6 percent or
thereabouts, the Fed jacked up interest rates, boosting unemployment in the name
of curbing inflation.

“Tight labor markets are a barrier to layoffs,” Uchitelle writes, “and that
barrier came down.” Labor unions were fast declining, reducing their power to
contest the Fed’s new doctrine. Deregulation and deindustrialization, which had
begun under President Jimmy Carter, further normalized layoffs, along with the
corporate mergers, outsourcing, and offshoring that accelerated under President
Ronald Reagan. So did rising pressures to boost quarterly profits from pension
funds, which expanded during this period from 13 percent to 21 percent of all
traded shares.



The last gasp of the old order, Uchitelle suggests, was a February 1996 Newsweek
cover story by the veteran business journalist Allan Sloan, headlined “Corporate
Killers.” Observing something “new and nasty,” Sloan named it “in-your-face
capitalism”:

> You lose your job, your ex-employer’s stock price rises, the CEO gets a fat
> raise. Something is just plain wrong when stock prices keep rising on Wall
> Street while Main Street is littered with the bodies of workers discarded by
> big companies.

Sloan’s cover piece made a splash. The Clinton White House responded with a
white paper from the Council of Economic Advisers that stated, erroneously, that
although layoffs had risen under Reagan and President George H.W. Bush, they
were falling under Clinton. Clinton also invited about one hundred top corporate
executives to a White House conference on corporate responsibility where in the
end “nothing,” Uchitelle reports, “was said about curtailing layoffs.” One
attendee, CSX chairman John Snow, who would later be Treasury secretary under
President George W. Bush, said the opposite: “We must start with the reality
that corporations cannot guarantee a lifetime job any more than corporations
have a guarantee of immortality.”

After that, according to Uchitelle, layoffs died as a political issue; within a
decade Uchitelle’s New York Times colleague David Leonhardt would condemn
“Corporate Killers” as “one of the more alarmist covers you’ll see.” Clinton and
successive Democrats justified their indifference to the issue by pointing to
low unemployment, which near the end of Clinton’s presidency fell below 4
percent. That was basically Leonhardt’s reasoning too. “Just three years after
that article,” Leonhardt wrote, “with the ’90s boom at its peak, polls showed
American optimism at an all-time high.” Low unemployment, writes Uchitelle,
“became a substitute for job security.”



But why must the price of low unemployment be two million layoffs per month? It
certainly wasn’t before the 1970s. In 1968 and 1969, back when the corporate
layoff taboo still held, unemployment was below our current 3.7 percent. In 1966
and 1967, it was a whisker higher (3.8 percent). A recent Washington Post story
asked why, if the economy is booming, tech companies were laying off workers. It
traced the problem to a sell-off of tech stocks in 2022. But that was two years
ago! Tech stocks rebounded in 2023, rising in excess of 50 percent as the market
got excited about artificial intelligence.

Now tech stocks are “red hot,” according to Barron’s, and the very A.I. that
revived them has become the reason to lay workers off. The idea is that A.I.
will progress so rapidly that that many fewer employees will be required even at
the tech companies that develop it. There’s also talk about tech companies
having over-hired during Covid, when homebound customers showered money on
technology products. A likelier reason for the layoffs is that tech CEOs want
shareholders to believe that as A.I. reduces the need for human workers, money
previously diverted to salaries will fund ever more stock buybacks and
dividends. Far from signaling that your company is sinking, layoffs now signal
that your company is thriving.

Tech was the last holdout. It resisted using layoffs as just another management
tool because it wanted to cultivate creative teams and pamper them with
cafeteria sushi bars and ping-pong tables and refrigerators overflowing with
exotic tropical fruits. Tech workers were once special—the brainworkers in whom
Clinton placed his faith as the tech sector boomed through the late 1990s. Now
tech workers are just like every other schmuck salaryman, biding their time
until they’re right-sized into oblivion. They have joined the two million for
whom a layoff is little more than corporate America genuflecting to the Charging
Bull sculpture at Broadway and Morris Street in New York’s financial district.
The shareholder is king, the worker a necessary burden who becomes less
necessary by the hour.


Timothy Noah

Timothy Noah is a New Republic staff writer and author of The Great Divergence:
America’s Growing Inequality Crisis and What We Can Do About It.


Read More:
Politics, Corporations, Big Tech, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Economy, Google,
Microsoft, PayPal, Layoffs, Employment

Editor’s Picks
Dystopias
How Big Tech Is Ruining the Dream of AI
Mike Pearl
Dystopias
Mike Pearl
How Big Tech Is Ruining the Dream of AI
Breaking

The Bidenomics Winning Streak Continues: 209,000 Jobs Added
Timothy Noah
Breaking
Timothy Noah
The Bidenomics Winning Streak Continues: 209,000 Jobs Added
SOS
The Incompetent Bosses Driving American Journalism Into the Ground
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
SOS
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
The Incompetent Bosses Driving American Journalism Into the Ground
Dystopias

The People of Solano County Versus the Next Tech-Billionaire Dystopia
Gil Duran
Dystopias
Gil Duran
The People of Solano County Versus the Next Tech-Billionaire Dystopia
Breaking News
LOSING TICKET

Texas GOP Official Begs Party to Stop Focusing on Abortion
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
LOSING TICKET
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
Texas GOP Official Begs Party to Stop Focusing on Abortion
gop in disarray

This MAGA Conspiracy Theorist Might Be the Next George Santos
Hafiz Rashid
gop in disarray
Hafiz Rashid
This MAGA Conspiracy Theorist Might Be the Next George Santos
authoritarian

Trump’s Shocking Scheme: A Permanent Get Out of Jail Free Card
Talia Jane
authoritarian
Talia Jane
Trump’s Shocking Scheme: A Permanent Get Out of Jail Free Card

 * BREAKING NEWS
 * POLITICS
 * CLIMATE
 * CULTURE
 * MAGAZINE
 * PODCASTS
 * GAMES

 * Events
 * Travel
 * Bookstore
 * Donate
 * Advertise
 * FAQ
 * Press
 * Jobs
 * Submissions

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

 * Subscribe to The New Republic
 * Sign Up for Our Newsletters

 * Terms and Conditions
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookies Settings
 * Copyright 2024 © The New Republic. All rights reserved.


By clicking “Accept All Cookies,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your
device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our
marketing efforts.
Cookies Settings Reject All Accept All Cookies



PRIVACY PREFERENCE CENTER

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect
information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or
your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to
provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow
certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the
services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find
out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You
cannot opt out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are
deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as
prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your
account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.).
More information about your privacy
Allow All


MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES

TARGETING COOKIES

Targeting Cookies

These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may
be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you
relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information
but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you
do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

FUNCTIONAL COOKIES

Functional Cookies

These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and
personalization. They may be set by us or by third-party providers whose
services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies, some or
all of these services may not function properly.

PERFORMANCE COOKIES

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and
improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the
most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All
information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you
do not allow these cookies, we will not know when you have visited our site and
will not be able to monitor its performance.

STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES

Always Active

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched
off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you
that amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences,
logging in, or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you
about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These
cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Back Button


COOKIE LIST



Search Icon
Filter Icon

Clear
checkbox label label
Apply Cancel
Consent Leg.Interest
checkbox label label
checkbox label label
checkbox label label

Reject All Confirm My Choices