www.jpost.com
Open in
urlscan Pro
34.149.213.158
Public Scan
Submitted URL: https://m.jpost.com/opinion/article-802577
Effective URL: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-802577
Submission: On May 24 via manual from US — Scanned from FR
Effective URL: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-802577
Submission: On May 24 via manual from US — Scanned from FR
Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOMText Content
Advertisement NY Conf Israel News Health & Wellness WORLD NEWS Middle East Business & Innovation Opinion JP Store Login Log Out Archaeology Israel Real Estate Judaism Kabbalah Science Antisemitism JP Spanish Podcasts JP Shopping Conversation Corner Premium Jerusalem Post Opinion HAS THE NEW YORK TIMES BACKED DOWN FROM COVERING HAMAS'S SEXUAL CRIMES? - ANALYSIS PREVIOUS STUDIES SHOW CRITICISM OF THE HAMAS ATTACK VANISHED FROM THE NY TIMES. NEW DATA SUGGESTS THAT THIS APATHY ALSO APPLIES TO HAMAS'S SEXUAL VIOLENCE By LILAC SIGAN MAY 24, 2024 22:38 * * * * THE NEW YORK Times building in Manhattan. (photo credit: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters) You can call the New York Times' coverage of the war annoying, outrageous or unfair, but above all it is heartbreaking. Yet another reason why the hearts of Jews and Israelis have been broken again and again since October 7. Israel is not understood these days. From inside it, it is also hard to comprehend the wave of hatred that arose amongst those we considered friends, all the way to the arrest warrants for Israeli leaders in The Hague. We remember exactly what happened here almost eight months ago, and know that the wave of hatred did not start with Israeli actions in Gaza. It started on the day of the horrific massacre and mass abduction, and since then our hearts have been broken a little more every day. Last week, I published the huge gaps between the skyrocketing criticism directed at Israel in the New York Times in the first seven months of the war, and the low level of criticism directed at Hamas. There was also a mirror image: the raging empathy towards Palestinians versus the meager empathy towards Israelis, including the hostages. Speak Hebrew like a Local - Free Intro Session Sponsored by Citizen Café Tel Aviv Beckham Marries The Richest Heiress In The World Sponsored by Investing Magazine [Gallery] What Las Vegas Secretly Looked Like in the 1950s Sponsored by DailyChoices What is Outbrain This week will focus on the scope of coverage devoted to different aspects of the war, which also lacked logical proportionality. Sometimes, obsessive coverage of certain topics actually created a reality instead of reflecting the one which exists. For example: 172 headlines dealt with the humanitarian situation in Gaza, but not even one of them reported the violent looting of aid trucks by Hamas terrorists. Aside from the overwhelming concern for Palestinians, which can somehow be understood, only 7 articles referred to the suffering of entire evacuated or destroyed communities in northern Israel. There is no doubt Palestinians suffer more, but does this justify such marginal coverage of Israeli distress, at a ratio of 1:24? Seven articles out of 1,398 do not allow an understanding of both sides in the conflict and what they are going through. Demonstrators hold signs against the international silence over sexual violence perpetrated against Israeli women during the attack by Hamas on October 7, at a protest in Jerusalem, in November. (credit: REUTERS/DEDI HAYUN) Apart from these 7 articles on damage, deaths and evacuees, bombardment and fighting in the north received a total of only 13 more articles, some of which were devoted to reporting on the Lebanese and Syrian side. The northern front hardly received any attention, although just this week, the number of bomb sirens in northern Israel exceeded the number in the south since October 7. That’s how topics that feature what Israelis have been experiencing were minimized. RAPE IS NOT AN OPINION The biggest disappointment from the Times coverage is on the issue of the barbaric rape that took place in Israel on the day of the massacre. For a moment it seemed different - on December 28, the Times published an extensive, well-founded and broad investigation into the brutal rape, most of whose victims were murdered. After shameful silence from the feminists of the world, suddenly these victims were given a voice that globalized some of the testimonies that shook Israeli society to its core. What is Outbrain The Times was not the first to expose the rape cases, but it was the first to publish an in-depth investigation which echoed widely. The exposure was estimated at about 10 million readers, and 1,000 mentions in other media outlets. On the day of publication, editor-in-chief Joe Kahn sent an email to the entire newsroom praising the investigation as a "signature piece" of war coverage, and the team that carried it out "in a sensitive and detailed way" on a topic that is “highly politicized". His words turned out to be very true: it appears that for many in the newsroom rape is not a barbaric and reprehensible crime, but rather a political issue. The rape issue appeared in only 7 of the Times' important headlines, despite being a central and traumatic event. 4 out of 7 were not reported but expressed in opinion pieces, 3 of which were written by Bret Stephens, the newspaper's sole pro-Israel writer. Even the launching of Sheryl Sandberg's documentary about the systemic Hamas rape was not reported as news but only in the context of an opinion piece, as if the rape cases are a pro-Israel opinion. In the news headlines, the rape issue appeared only twice: once in the courageous interview with former hostage Amit Soussana, and once in a headline about the UN report that confirmed the systemic rape and was published in early March. The seventh time the issue appeared was not exactly coverage – it was an article that contradicted one of the testimonies in the original Times investigation. A soldier from a special unit testified that he saw the bodies of two girls who were raped in Kibbutz Beeri, but the new article reported that the kibbutz announced that the only two bodies of girls that were found in the same room after the massacre were not sexually violated. Beyond that, the chaotic day of October 7 was not mentioned, or that it is reasonable to assume that the stunned special unit soldier did not quite remember whether he saw the girls in Kibbutz Beeri or in Nahal Oz or another kibbutz, since he fought for dear life in several kibbutzes on that day and the bodies, as we know, were many. PLEASING THE PROGRESSIVES Strangely enough, the original rape investigation was not included in the Today's Headlines newsletters. Strange, because all the main headlines are included in these newsletters, certainly a headline that was prominently featured on the front page. A possible explanation is that the attention the investigation received panicked the pro-Palestinian supporters. They feared it would damage their narrative, and began attacking the Times for merely publishing the investigation. Some journalists at the Times claimed "professional flaws" and leaked them to radical news sites that tried to undermine the journalistic work with an orchestrated digital lynching. Subsequently, progressive journalism professors were also recruited to appeal to the Times to re-examine the investigation, in an unprecedented step that has never been taken by journalism professors before for a single article. So why this one in particular? The internal struggle in the Times newsroom regarding the sex crime investigation was covered by dozens of media outlets for months. It was accompanied by an internal probe to find the leakers, threats from the union claiming the probe was persecuting journalists of "Middle Eastern" descent, and ultimately the entire saga was quieted down and ended with nothing. The only injured party was the Israeli reporter who worked on the investigation - she was originally recruited to cover the sex crimes, but was fired after being exposed for "liking" a pro-Israeli tweet on October 7. Somehow, no one protested or thought her dismissal was due to persecution or outrageous. Apparently, the Times understood that you can slam Israel without fear, but it's better to restrain stories of Hamas terrorists who raped Israeli women, because it's "highly political." The Israeli reporter who was fired was not replaced by someone else who took on the case. The original intention was to submit the investigation for the Pulitzer Prize, but in the end, seven other articles were submitted, six of which criticized Israel. We can only assume that the Times simply succumbed to the progressive onslaught - it didn’t want to jeopardize the prize given the criticism against the allegedly "political" investigation. Recommended byWhat is Outbrain Instead of bravely submitting it and standing by the truth, the Times apparently chose to submit articles that would be more suitable for the venue where the prize is awarded - the school of journalism at Columbia University.Downplaying the intense Iranian attack. Here is an example of a single case that received the same level of coverage as the October 7 sex crimes: the shooting of three students of Palestinian descent in Vermont. Although it was a single case which was not even a clear hate crime specifically against Palestinians, it was covered from every possible angle. Neighbors and relatives were interviewed, every development in the investigation was closely monitored, and all in the context of the most important headlines of the day. The Times tries to avoid the use of loaded or harsh words, but here too there are exceptions. The word "rape" appeared in only 3 headlines out of 1,398 since the beginning of the war, but the word "genocide" appeared 22 times in the context of Israel (and once more in the context of Jews at campus protests). The word "starvation" appeared 13 times in headlines and the word "famine" appeared 17 more times. The thing is, the rape actually did happen, while starvation and genocide are unfounded accusations. So why aren't they defined as political? Of all the collective traumas we experienced as Israelis, the way the Iranian attack on April 14 was reported was the most heartbreaking of all. This overwhelming event was covered with 15 headlines, but only 3 of them described the attack itself, and they were phrased laconically as if it was merely a mundane audiovisual show. None of them mentioned the number of ballistic missiles and UAV’s, and none reflected the drama that plunged an entire country into dystopian anxiety. The remaining headlines dealt with with the subject with a cold, military, political or global analysis, with a balance of "both sides", and recommendations regarding the restrained way in which Israel should or should not respond. The only empathetic headline referred to a 7-year-old girl from the Bedouin community who was physically injured in the attack. Five more headlines were devoted to describing the Israeli retaliation. Just for comparison - 12 dramatic and loaded headlines were devoted to the unfortunate case of shooting the World Central Kitchen aid convoy, some of which reprimanded Israel as if it was done intentionally. But hundreds of ballistic missiles and UAV’s in an unprecedented attack by a country whose intention is to annihilate Israel, elicited far less emotion or graphic descriptions, and required roughly the same level of coverage, according to the editors.The news is more biased than the opinions Surprisingly, the bias in the opinion articles was significantly less severe than the bias in the news reports. Out of 240 opinion pieces selected as part of the most important headlines during the war, 72 exclusively criticized Israel (30% of the articles) and 23 exclusively criticized Hamas (9.6%). But out of 1,158 articles that are not supposed to constitute opinion but rather balanced reporting, 49.1% were exclusively critical of Israel, while critical reports of Hamas reached only 5.3%. Criticism of Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis combined appeared in only 10.6% of the news reports. Qatar, by the way, which donated billions to elite universities, was mentioned with a critical tone in only one headline out of 204 headlines dealing with campus protests. And amazingly enough, there was not a single opinion piece in the Times during the war that criticized Hezbollah. On a personal note, it's heartbreaking not only as an Israeli, but also as a journalist. Because when the New York Times practices journalism like this, it sets the tone for journalism as a whole. It legitimizes the propaganda industry that is only disguised as journalism, also known as "opinion journalism". It isn’t good for Israel, but it is also very bad for democracy. The bottom line is that Israel received rampant and disproportionate criticism, probably intensified by its current extremist government. But that doesn’t explain why Hamas and Iran received very limited criticism. Something about these reporting proportions is distorted and dangerous not only for Israel, but for American values. It's easy to see that the subtext aligns with the lack of proportionality at elite universities, in the media, and now also in The Hague.Methodology The war articles were collected daily from the New York Times newsletter called Today's Headlines, which aggregates the most important headlines of the passing day (about 50 per day). A total of 1,398 articles were collected from 10/7/23 to 5/7/24. Each article was coded by two criteria: was empathy toward an individual or group expressed in the headline, and was criticism toward a particular person or entity expressed. Articles in which no criticism or empathy was expressed were coded as 0. THE TIMES’ COMMENT In regard to this study, a spokesperson for the Times said that “It’s moments like this when our independent reporting matters most. The New York Times has invested more than any other US newspaper to help readers understand the complexities of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict over the past decade and we have some of the world’s most experienced reporters, photographers and analysts on the ground to ensure our reporting of the Oct. 7 terrorist attack in Israel and the ongoing Israel-Gaza war is nuanced, steeped in context and expertise. Regarding the Dec. 28 investigation, we're confident in the accuracy of our reporting and are continuing to report on the issue of sexual violence during this conflict.” Related Tags sexual assault sexual abuse New York Times The October 7 Massacre Israel-Hamas War 2024 Take Israel home with the new Jerusalem Post Store Shop now >> Skip Ads by You Might Also Like What is Outbrain What is Outbrain Skip Ads by Hot Opinion BRING THEM HOME NOW: HAMAS VIDEO HIGHLIGHTS URGENCY OF HOSTAGE TALKS By JPOST EDITORIAL A QUIET CHINESE RAPPROCHEMENT WITH EUROPE - OPINION By SALEM ALKETBI ETHICALLY BANKRUPT: THE US NEEDS TO TAKE A SERIOUS LOOK AT CORRUPT COURTS By DOUGLAS BLOOMFIELD ISRAEL'S RAFAH OPERATION HURTS EGYPT'S PLANS By ELIE PODEH THE TIGHTENING OF ARMENIAN-IRANIAN TIES By MORDECHAI KEDAR Recommended Stories The Nazi-Arab alliance: A neglected aspect of Holocaust education - opinion JPost - Opinion Unpacking the ICC's absurdity - opinion JPost - Opinion 'I have friends in Palestine': The tragic irony of a peace activist held by Hamas - comment JPost - Opinion My Word: The Hague’s moral haze leaves a stain on history JPost - Opinion The modern exodus and messianic fulfillment is today's Israel - opinion JPost - Opinion The US should sanction or shut down the ICC to save Judaism - opinion JPost - Opinion Israel's government would be foolish to dismiss Arab League's Manama Declaration - opinion JPost - Opinion What mainstream media isn’t reporting during the Israel-Hamas war - comment JPost - Opinion What is Outbrain Most Read 1 LAST YEAR'S SWEDISH EUROVISION WINNER SAYS SHE WON'T HAND OVER TROPHY TO ISRAELI CONTESTANT 2 DONALD TRUMP: 'IF I DON'T GET ELECTED, IT'S GOING TO BE A BLOODBATH FOR THE COUNTRY!' 3 JEWISH CHILDREN SAVAGELY BEATEN BY MAN IN NEW YORK CITY ATTACK 4 IRAN’S AERIAL ATTACK IN APRIL IRREVOCABLY SHIFTED HOW ITS NUCLEAR THREAT IS VIEWED 5 UN SEEMINGLY HALVES ESTIMATE OF GAZAN WOMEN, CHILDREN KILLED Advertisement * * * * * * * * * Information About Us Contact us Feedback Terms Of Service Privacy Policy Subscriber Agreement JPost Jobs Cancel Subscription Sitemap פרסום בג'רוזלם פוסט Customer Service Advertise with Us The Jerusalem Post Group Breaking News World News Iran News MDA Heroes The Jerusalem Report Jerusalem Post Lite חדשות מעריב Real Estate Listings Hype Special Content 50 Jews JP Store BrandBlend Home Services Tools and services JPost Premium Ulpan Online JPost Newsletter Our Magazines Learn Hebrew RSS feed JPost.com Archive Digital Library Lists of Jewish holidays Law לוח חגים ומועדים 2023 זמני כניסת שבת Sites Of Interest Poalim Online JNF-USA Who is Hamas The Jerusalem Post Customer Service Center can be contacted with any questions or requests: Telephone: *2421 * Extension 4 Jerusalem Post or 03-7619056 Fax: 03-5613699 E-mail: subs@jpost.com The center is staffed and provides answers on Sundays through Thursdays between 07:00 AM and 14:00 PM and Fridays only handles distribution requests between 7:00 AM and 12:30 PM For international customers: The center is staffed and provides answers on Sundays through Thursdays between 7AM and 14PM Israel time Toll Free number 1-800-448-9291 Telephone +972-3-761-9056 Fax: 972-3-561-3699 E-mail: subs@jpost.com Copyright © 2024 Jpost Inc. All rights reserved • Terms of Use • Privacy Policy Designed by WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY We and our partners store and/or access information on a device, such as unique IDs in cookies to process personal data. You may accept or manage your choices by clicking below, including your right to object where legitimate interest is used, or at any time in the privacy policy page. These choices will be signaled to our partners and will not affect browsing data. ARE YOU HAPPY TO ACCEPT COOKIES? Store and/or access information on a device. Precise geolocation data, and identification through device scanning. Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. List of Partners (vendors) Happy to accept cookies Reject All Manage my cookies ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent and legitimate interest. You may exercise your right to consent or object to a legitimate interest, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. More information Allow All MANAGE CONSENT PREFERENCES STRICTLY NECESSARY COOKIES Always Active These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information. View Vendor Details PERFORMANCE COOKIES Performance Cookies These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance. View Vendor Details FUNCTIONAL COOKIES Functional Cookies These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. View Vendor Details TARGETING COOKIES Targeting Cookies These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising. View Vendor Details SOCIAL MEDIA COOKIES Social Media Cookies These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools. View Vendor Details STORE AND/OR ACCESS INFORMATION ON A DEVICE Store and/or access information on a device Cookies, device identifiers, or other information can be stored or accessed on your device for the purposes presented to you. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab View Vendor Details PRECISE GEOLOCATION DATA, AND IDENTIFICATION THROUGH DEVICE SCANNING Precise geolocation data, and identification through device scanning * USE PRECISE GEOLOCATION DATA Switch Label Your precise geolocation data can be used in support of one or more purposes. This means your location can be accurate to within several meters. * ACTIVELY SCAN DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS FOR IDENTIFICATION Switch Label Your device can be identified based on a scan of your device's unique combination of characteristics. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab View Vendor Details PERSONALISED ADS AND CONTENT, AD AND CONTENT MEASUREMENT, AUDIENCE INSIGHTS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development * SELECT BASIC ADS Switch Label Ads can be shown to you based on the content you’re viewing, the app you’re using, your approximate location, or your device type. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * CREATE A PERSONALISED ADS PROFILE Switch Label A profile can be built about you and your interests to show you personalised ads that are relevant to you. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * SELECT PERSONALISED ADS Switch Label Personalised ads can be shown to you based on a profile about you. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * CREATE A PERSONALISED CONTENT PROFILE Switch Label A profile can be built about you and your interests to show you personalised content that is relevant to you. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * SELECT PERSONALISED CONTENT Switch Label Personalised content can be shown to you based on a profile about you. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * MEASURE AD PERFORMANCE Switch Label The performance and effectiveness of ads that you see or interact with can be measured. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * MEASURE CONTENT PERFORMANCE Switch Label The performance and effectiveness of content that you see or interact with can be measured. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * APPLY MARKET RESEARCH TO GENERATE AUDIENCE INSIGHTS Switch Label Market research can be used to learn more about the audiences who visit sites/apps and view ads. Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection * DEVELOP AND IMPROVE PRODUCTS Switch Label Your data can be used to improve existing systems and software, and to develop new products Object to Legitimate Interests Remove Objection List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab View Vendor Details ENSURE SECURITY, PREVENT FRAUD, AND DEBUG Always Active Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent fraudulent activity, and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab TECHNICALLY DELIVER ADS OR CONTENT Always Active Your device can receive and send information that allows you to see and interact with ads and content. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab MATCH AND COMBINE OFFLINE DATA SOURCES Always Active Data from offline data sources can be combined with your online activity in support of one or more purposes List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab LINK DIFFERENT DEVICES Always Active Different devices can be determined as belonging to you or your household in support of one or more of purposes. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab RECEIVE AND USE AUTOMATICALLY-SENT DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS FOR IDENTIFICATION Always Active Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends, such as IP address or browser type. List of IAB Vendors | View Full Legal Text Opens in a new Tab Back Button VENDORS LIST Search Icon Filter Icon Clear checkbox label label Apply Cancel Consent Leg.Interest checkbox label label checkbox label label checkbox label label Confirm My Choices