www.wired.com Open in urlscan Pro
151.101.2.194  Public Scan

Submitted URL: https://links.newsletters.komando.com/u/click?_t=a82899456f054d88b14868a211fcef2c&_m=6ffa4e3985f4435a96ef697310bcbd16&_e=3wYcOgOtQ0YOh...
Effective URL: https://www.wired.com/story/this-ai-bot-fills-out-job-applications-for-you-while-you-sleep/
Submission: On January 04 via api from CA — Scanned from CA

Form analysis 1 forms found in the DOM

Name: newsletter-subscribePOST

<form class="form-with-validation NewsletterSubscribeFormValidation-iCYa-Dt dweEln" id="newsletter-subscribe" name="newsletter-subscribe" novalidate="" method="POST"><span class="TextFieldWrapper-Pzdqp gLbdoV text-field"
    data-testid="TextFieldWrapper__email"><label class="BaseWrap-sc-gjQpdd BaseText-ewhhUZ TextFieldLabel-klrYvg iUEiRd bguvtk dGjIbL text-field__label text-field__label--single-line" for="newsletter-subscribe-text-field-email"
      data-testid="TextFieldLabel__email">
      <div class="TextFieldLabelText-cvvxBl ccLIEk">Your email</div>
      <div class="TextFieldInputContainer-jcMPhb oFrOs"><input aria-describedby="privacy-text" aria-invalid="false" id="newsletter-subscribe-text-field-email" required="" name="email" placeholder="Enter your email"
          class="BaseInput-fAzTdK TextFieldControlInput-eFUxkf eGzzTT ebwfTz text-field__control text-field__control--input" type="email" data-testid="TextFieldInput__email" value=""></div>
    </label><button class="BaseButton-bLlsy ButtonWrapper-xCepQ fhIjxp csoGqE button button--utility TextFieldButton-csBrgY edxbrw" data-event-click="{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;Button&quot;}" data-testid="Button" type="submit"><span
        class="ButtonLabel-cjAuJN hzwRuG button__label">SUBMIT</span></button></span>
  <div id="privacy-text" tabindex="-1" class="NewsletterSubscribeFormDisclaimer-bTVtiV kdZDAH"><span>
      <p>By signing up you agree to our <a href="https://www.condenast.com/user-agreement" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">User Agreement</a> (including the
        <a href="https://www.condenast.com/user-agreement#introduction-arbitration-notice" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">class action waiver and arbitration provisions</a>), our
        <a href="https://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Privacy Policy &amp; Cookie Statement</a> and to receive marketing and account-related emails from WIRED. You can unsubscribe at any time.
        This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google<a href="https://policies.google.com/privacy" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Privacy Policy</a>
        and<a href="https://policies.google.com/terms" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> Terms of Service</a> apply.</p>
    </span></div>
</form>

Text Content

Skip to main content

Open Navigation Menu
Menu
Story Saved

To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.

Close Alert


This AI Bot Fills Out Job Applications for You While You Sleep
 * Backchannel
 * Business
 * Culture
 * Gear
 * Ideas
 * Politics
 * Science
 * Security
 * Merch

Story Saved

To revist this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.

Close Alert

Sign In

SUBSCRIBE


GET WIRED


FOR JUST $29.99 $5

SUBSCRIBE


Search
Search
 * Backchannel
 * Business
 * Culture
 * Gear
 * Ideas
 * Politics
 * Science
 * Security
 * Merch

 * Podcasts
 * Video
 * Artificial Intelligence
 * Climate
 * Games
 * Newsletters
 * Magazine
 * Events
 * Wired Insider
 * Jobs
 * Coupons

Chevron
ON SALE NOWGet WIRED - now only $29.99 $5This is your last free article. See the
future here first with 1 year of unlimited access.SUBSCRIBE NOW
Already a subscriber? Sign in

Get WIRED - now only $29.99 $5. SUBSCRIBE NOW




Caitlin Harrington

Business
Nov 6, 2023 7:00 AM


THIS AI BOT FILLS OUT JOB APPLICATIONS FOR YOU WHILE YOU SLEEP

AI-powered services like LazyApply zip through the grunt work of job
applications, helping one programmer apply for 5,000 jobs. But they can make
mistakes, and some recruiters scorn the technology.
Photograph: PM Images/Getty Images

Save this storySave
Save this storySave

In July, software engineer Julian Joseph became the latest victim of the tech
industry’s sweeping job cuts. Facing his second layoff in two years, he dreaded
spending another couple months hunched over his laptop filling out repetitive
job applications and blasting them into the void.



Joseph specializes in user interface automation and figured someone must have
roboticized the unpleasant task of applying for jobs. Casting about online, he
came upon a company called LazyApply. It offers an AI-powered service called Job
GPT that promises to automatically apply to thousands of jobs “in a single
click.” All he had to fill in was some basic information about his skills,
experience, and desired position.

After Joseph paid $250 for a lifetime unlimited plan and installed LazyApply’s
Chrome extension, he watched the bot zip through applications on his behalf on
sites like LinkedIn and Indeed, targeting jobs that matched his criteria.
Thirsting for efficiency, he installed the app on his boyfriend’s laptop too,
and he went to bed with two computers furiously churning through reams of
applications. By morning, the bot had applied to close to 1,000 jobs on his
behalf.



The tool wasn’t perfect. It appeared to guess the answers to questions on some
applications, with sometimes confused results. But in a brute force kind of way,
it worked. After LazyApply completed applications for some 5,000 jobs, Joseph
says he landed around 20 interviews, a hit rate of about a half percent.
Compared to the 20 interviews he’d landed after manually applying to 200 to 300
jobs, the success rate was dismal. But given the time Job GPT saved, Joseph felt
it was worth the investment. LazyApply didn’t respond to a question about how
the service works.

Many job seekers will understand the allure of automating applications. Slogging
through different applicant tracking systems to reenter the same information,
knowing that you are likely to be ghosted or auto-rejected by an algorithm, is a
grind, and technology hasn’t made the process quicker. The average time to make
a new hire reached an all-time high of 44 days this year, according to a study
across 25 countries by the talent solutions company AMS and the Josh Bersin
Company, an HR advisory firm. “The fact that this tool exists suggests that
something is broken in the process,” Joseph says. “I see it as taking back some
of the power that’s been ceded to the companies over the years.”

Growth Industry

Recruiters are less enamored with the idea of bots besieging their application
portals. When Christine Nichlos, CEO of the talent acquisition company People
Science, told her recruiting staff about the tools, the news raised a collective
groan. She and some others see the use of AI as a sign that a candidate isn’t
serious about a job. “It's like asking out every woman in the bar, regardless of
who they are,” says a recruiting manager at a Fortune 500 company who asked to
remain anonymous because he wasn’t authorized to speak on behalf of his
employer.



Other recruiters are less concerned. “I don’t really care how the résumé gets to
me as long as the person is a valid person,” says Emi Dawson, who runs the tech
recruiting firm NeedleFinder Recruiting. For years, some candidates have
outsourced their applications to inexpensive workers in other countries. She
estimates that 95 percent of the applications she gets come from totally
unqualified candidates, but she says her applicant tracking software filters
most of them out—perhaps the fate of some of the 99.5 percent of Joseph’s
LazyApply applications that vanished into the ether.



LazyApply has plenty of competition, some of which involve humans to pick up any
slack. A company called Sonara charges up to $80 per month to auto-complete as
many as 420 applications and recommends jobs from a database compiled through
partnerships with applicant tracking firms and companies that scrape job
listings. Users can teach the algorithm about their preferences by liking and
unliking jobs, and it offers to run jobs past the user before firing up its
automated application filler. Human staff take over where the AI falls short,
for instance, on certain free-text answers.

Featured Video



Pro Interpreters vs. AI Challenge: Who Translates Faster and Better?



Most Popular
 * Ideas
   Forget Growth. Optimize for Resilience
   
   Paul Ford

 * Gear
   Our Favorite Paper Planners for Organizing Your Life
   
   Medea Giordano

 * Science
   Former NBA Star Rick Fox Is Making a Play for Carbon-Neutral Concrete
   
   Peter Guest

 * Science
   This Ultrasound Bra Could Detect Cancer Sooner
   
   Grace Browne

 * 





For $39 a month, a service called Massive will fill out up to 50 automated
applications per week and has humans review every application for accuracy. Some
companies offer additional services, like AI-generated cover letters and
messages to hiring managers. LazyApply will even help users quit a job, by
automating their resignation letter.



Many of these services hinge on the notion that job hunting is a numbers game.
Dawson allows that for early career candidates, there’s some truth to the idea.
“But if you’re an established professional, it’s quality over quantity,” she
says. “The number one way to find a job is through referrals,” says Nichlos,
whose firm calculates that about a third of hires are made this way. “That
hasn’t changed in a really long time.”

When Sonara founder Victor Schwartz was applying for jobs during his senior year
studying computer science and machine learning at Duke University in 2019, he
heard similar advice: Network, network, network. He found it puzzling. “What do
you mean?” he would respond. “I’m 22 and coming out of school.” Without a
professional network to tap, Schwartz would spend hours applying through
LinkedIn or Indeed, only to get ghosted, sometimes after multiple interview
rounds. “It felt like this world was conspiring against me,” he says.


SCIENCE

Your weekly roundup of the best stories on health care, the climate crisis,
genetic engineering, robotics, space, and more. Delivered on Wednesdays.
Your email

SUBMIT

By signing up you agree to our User Agreement (including the class action waiver
and arbitration provisions), our Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement and to
receive marketing and account-related emails from WIRED. You can unsubscribe at
any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.

Schwartz began working on Sonara in 2019, reasoning that even if networking is
effective, most people won’t do it “because it’s terrifying.” Initially, he
hired a team in Brazil to manually complete applications. Sonara launched its
AI-powered service in March and currently has 5,000 users, Schwartz says. He’s
working on a feature that would automatically tailor résumés to individual job
descriptions before submission.

Auto-apply services tend not to disclose that a bot did the work in lieu of a
person, but recruiters can spot telltale signs. An application that rolls in
within seconds of a job post going up is a giveaway, as is a candidate not
knowing which jobs they’ve applied to. “One of the worst things I can hear from
somebody who just sent me their résumé is that they had no idea they just did
that,” says Marcus Ronaldi, who owns Ronaldi Recruiting and specializes in
accounting and chemical and mechanical engineering roles. After recommending a
candidate to a company, he’ll sometimes hear back that they already applied,
meaning he can’t represent them—but he'll find the candidate didn’t know it
themself, because they outsourced the process to a bot.

Most Popular
 * Ideas
   Forget Growth. Optimize for Resilience
   
   Paul Ford

 * Gear
   Our Favorite Paper Planners for Organizing Your Life
   
   Medea Giordano

 * Science
   Former NBA Star Rick Fox Is Making a Play for Carbon-Neutral Concrete
   
   Peter Guest

 * Science
   This Ultrasound Bra Could Detect Cancer Sooner
   
   Grace Browne

 * 





Dawson recalls one candidate who she guessed was using AI because they didn’t
know how many jobs they’d applied to and struggled to respond when she contacted
them to say her client was interested. “The candidate was overwhelmed by how
many things they had going on at one time,” she says, “It's OK to apply for many
jobs, but it's also really important to pay close attention to what's in front
of you.”

Spray and Pray

Indiscriminately spraying applications all over the internet could have other
implications—especially if the advent of services like LazyApply prompt the
companies behind applicant management software to respond. “Some of these tools
are really sophisticated. They could identify you as a spammer,” says Josh
Bersin, CEO of the eponymous HR advisory firm. Nichlos thinks AI could better
help both job hunters and recruiters if it identified a small pool of the most
suitable roles for a person to apply for—or a recruiter to offer up. That might
work best if AI tools focused on one specialty. “We need to get more myopic,”
she says.



Dan Vykhopen’s company Massive is working on the matching problem. “Filling out
applications is easy” for AI, he says. “Matching is hard.” Massive aggregates
information about a company, such as its culture and leaders, from sources like
startup databases Crunchbase and Harmonic and job review site Glassdoor. Job
seekers can use that data to hone their job search, using criteria such as the
quality of the benefits, the experience of the founders, or the success of the
investors. Right now, Massive focuses on tech jobs because the industry is
easier to map, says Vykhopen, but he hopes to expand in the future.

Gabrielle Judge, a TikTok influencer who coined the term “lazy girl job” to
describe the ideal of a reasonably compensated but undemanding job, created an
online course advising job seekers on how to leverage AI. (She’s a paid
influencer for Sonara.) She recommends that applicants use AI as one weapon in a
diverse arsenal that includes networking and conventional web search. “If you're
only using AI as your job-seeking strategy, you could be missing out on some
really cool dream roles you might find if you did some manual searching,” she
says.

Most Popular
 * Ideas
   Forget Growth. Optimize for Resilience
   
   Paul Ford

 * Gear
   Our Favorite Paper Planners for Organizing Your Life
   
   Medea Giordano

 * Science
   Former NBA Star Rick Fox Is Making a Play for Carbon-Neutral Concrete
   
   Peter Guest

 * Science
   This Ultrasound Bra Could Detect Cancer Sooner
   
   Grace Browne

 * 





Julian Joseph agrees. He says having LazyApply handle the grunt work frees him
up to network and pursue other strategies without having to worry that he’s
missing out on the latest job ads. Yet not all the interviews the tool landed
him were great matches. He was searching for “DevOps” roles involving
development and deployment of software for Salesforce’s cloud platform, but
LazyApply sometimes applied to sales jobs that involved simply using Salesforce
applications. Other times, the bot found jobs that turned out to be better than
advertised. One role, for instance, didn’t advertise itself as remote, his
preference, but he learned during the interview that remote work was an option.

“The tool helped me to find jobs that I might have skipped over,” Joseph says.
Even interviewing for a bad match felt like a better use of his time than the
grind of filling out applications. “Even if it’s not a perfect fit, I’m getting
better at interviewing. And I’m learning more about what I want.” He’s received
an offer for a contract job he found through LazyApply, and he also landed
interviews at Apple and the White House. He found those last two opportunities
through his own connections.






YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE …

 * 📩 Get the long view on tech with Steven Levy’s Plaintext newsletter

 * The spy who dumped the CIA, went to therapy, and now makes incredible TV

 * Blood, guns, and broken scooters: The chaotic rise and fall of Bird

 * A demographic time bomb is about to hit the beef industry

 * Inside America’s school internet censorship machine

 * Dispatch from the future: The must-have gadgets and gear of 2053

 * 🌲 Our Gear team has branched out with a new guide to the best sleeping pads
   and fresh picks for the best coolers and binoculars

Caitlin Harrington is a staff writer at WIRED. Before coming to WIRED as a
research fellow, Harrington worked as an editorial fellow at San Francisco
magazine and as a certified medical dosimetrist in the radiation oncology field.
She earned her bachelor’s degree in English from Boston University and lives
in... Read more
Staff Writer
 * X

Topicsartificial intelligencealgorithmsdevelopersLinkedInWorkremote
workLaborJobsRecruiting
More from WIRED
AI May Not Steal Your Job, but It Could Stop You Getting Hired
In her new book The Algorithm, journalist Hilke Schellmann investigates software
that automates résumé screening and promotion recommendations, raising concerns
about discrimination.

Caitlin Harrington

A New Trick Uses AI to Jailbreak AI Models—Including GPT-4
Adversarial algorithms can systematically probe large language models like
OpenAI’s GPT-4 for weaknesses that can make them misbehave.

Will Knight

OpenAI’s Ilya Sutskever Has a Plan for Keeping Super-Intelligent AI in Check
The Superalignment team led by OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever has devised
a way to guide the behavior of AI models as they get ever smarter.

Will Knight


Google’s NotebookLM Aims to Be the Ultimate Writing Assistant
Author Steven Johnson helped Google create an app that can analyze a writer’s
research material and help them extract and explore the key themes. Maybe too
well.

Steven Levy

Innovation-Killing Noncompete Agreements Are Finally Dying
More US states are moving to bar companies from binding workers with noncompete
agreements. Research shows the move could boost wages and innovation.

Caitlin Harrington

Generative AI Learned Nothing From Web 2.0
Generative AI companies’ struggles with content moderation, sketchy labor
practices, and disinformation show them fighting the same problems that tripped
up social platforms before them.

Vittoria Elliott

How to Use OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Create Your Own Custom GPT
I created an experimental chatbot with 50 of my WIRED articles. Try it out for
yourself.

Reece Rogers

My Surprisingly Unbiased Week With Elon Musk’s ‘Politically Biased’ Chatbot
Some Elon Musk fans are concerned that Grok, xAI's answer to ChatGPT, is too
politically liberal. The nature of the underlying AI technology will make
“fixing” its outlook difficult.

Will Knight


Sponsored Links by Taboola
by Taboolaby Taboola
Online Shopping Tools

Amazon Hates When You Do This, But They Can’t Stop You (It’s Genius)Online
Shopping Tools


Undo
leafhomesystems

Don't Pay For New Gutters. Get This 3-In-1 System Insteadleafhomesystems
Learn More


Undo
Best Men&#39;s Shoes

The Best Orthopedic Men's Shoes for All Day Walking and StandingBest Men's Shoes
Shop Now


Undo
Sponsored LinksSponsored Links
Promoted LinksPromoted Links

Online Shopping Tools

Amazon Left Scrambling As Shoppers Find out About Secret DealsOnline Shopping
Tools


Undo
Expert Market

Groundbreaking Dash Cams For 10+ Trucks (Nov23 Prices)Expert Market


Undo
Mrjoint Relief

Breakthrough Shoulder Relief Device Has Taken The World By Storm.Mrjoint Relief
Learn More


Undo







ONE YEAR FOR $29.99 $5

SUBSCRIBE
WIRED is where tomorrow is realized. It is the essential source of information
and ideas that make sense of a world in constant transformation. The WIRED
conversation illuminates how technology is changing every aspect of our
lives—from culture to business, science to design. The breakthroughs and
innovations that we uncover lead to new ways of thinking, new connections, and
new industries.

More From WIRED

 * Subscribe
 * Newsletters
 * FAQ
 * WIRED Staff
 * Editorial Standards
 * Archive
 * RSS
 * Accessibility Help

Reviews and Guides

 * Reviews
 * Buying Guides
 * Coupons
 * Mattresses
 * Electric Bikes
 * Fitness Trackers
 * Streaming Guides

 * Advertise
 * Contact Us
 * Customer Care
 * Jobs
 * Press Center
 * Condé Nast Store

© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance
of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your
California Privacy Rights. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that
are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with
retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission
of Condé Nast. Ad Choices

SELECT INTERNATIONAL SITE

United StatesLargeChevron
 * UK
 * Italia
 * Japón
 * Czech Republic & Slovakia

 * Facebook
 * X
 * Pinterest
 * YouTube
 * Instagram
 * Tiktok


Do Not Sell My Personal Info