www.theguardian.com Open in urlscan Pro
2a04:4e42::367  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

https://www.google.co.uk/search

<form action="https://www.google.co.uk/search" class="dcr-g8v7m4"><label for="src-component-672574" class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-19ilr9m">Search input </div>
  </label><input type="text" id="src-component-672574" aria-required="true" aria-invalid="false" aria-describedby="" required="" name="q" placeholder="Search" data-link-name="nav2 : search" tabindex="-1" class="selectableMenuItem dcr-12e1qm"><label
    class="dcr-0">
    <div class="dcr-19ilr9m">google-search </div>
    <div class="dcr-190ztmi"><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
        <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd"
          d="M9.273 2c4.023 0 7.25 3.295 7.25 7.273a7.226 7.226 0 0 1-7.25 7.25C5.25 16.523 2 13.296 2 9.273 2 5.295 5.25 2 9.273 2Zm0 1.84A5.403 5.403 0 0 0 3.84 9.274c0 3 2.409 5.454 5.432 5.454 3 0 5.454-2.454 5.454-5.454 0-3.023-2.454-5.432-5.454-5.432Zm7.295 10.887L22 20.16 20.16 22l-5.433-5.432v-.932l.91-.909h.931Z">
        </path>
      </svg><span class="dcr-1p0hins">Search</span></div>
  </label><button type="submit" aria-live="polite" aria-label="Search with Google" data-link-name="nav2 : search : submit" tabindex="-1" class="dcr-a7qyd9">
    <div class="src-button-space"></div><svg width="30" viewBox="-3 -3 30 30" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
      <path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M1 12.956h18.274l-7.167 8.575.932.932L23 12.478v-.956l-9.96-9.985-.932.932 7.166 8.575H1v1.912Z"></path>
    </svg>
  </button><input type="hidden" name="as_sitesearch" value="www.theguardian.com"></form>

Text Content

Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Print subscriptions
Sign in
Search jobs
Search
US edition
 * US edition
 * UK edition
 * Australia edition
 * International edition

The Guardian - Back to homeThe Guardian


SUPPORT THE GUARDIAN

Fund independent journalism with $5 per month
Support us

Support us
 * News
 * Opinion
 * Sport
 * Culture
 * Lifestyle

ShowMoreShow More
 * News
   * View all News
   * US news
   * World news
   * Environment
   * Soccer
   * US politics
   * Business
   * Tech
   * Science
   * Newsletters
   * Fight for democracy
   
 * Opinion
   * View all Opinion
   * The Guardian view
   * Columnists
   * Letters
   * Opinion videos
   * Cartoons
   
 * Sport
   * View all Sport
   * Soccer
   * NFL
   * Tennis
   * MLB
   * MLS
   * NBA
   * NHL
   * F1
   * Golf
   
 * Culture
   * View all Culture
   * Film
   * Books
   * Music
   * Art & design
   * TV & radio
   * Stage
   * Classical
   * Games
   
 * Lifestyle
   * View all Lifestyle
   * Fashion
   * Food
   * Recipes
   * Love & sex
   * Home & garden
   * Health & fitness
   * Family
   * Travel
   * Money
 * Search input
   google-search
   Search
   
   
    * Support us
    * Print subscriptions

   US edition
   * UK edition
   * Australia edition
   * International edition
   
 * * Search jobs
   * Digital Archive
   * Guardian Puzzles app
   * Guardian Licensing
   * The Guardian app
   * Video
   * Podcasts
   * Pictures
   * Inside the Guardian
   * Guardian Weekly
   * Crosswords
   * Wordiply
   * Corrections
   * Facebook
   * Twitter
 * * Search jobs
   * Digital Archive
   * Guardian Puzzles app
   * Guardian Licensing

 * World
 * Europe
 * US
 * Americas
 * Asia
 * Australia
 * Middle East
 * Africa
 * Inequality
 * Global development


‘They have not allowed the right to denounce them as unpatriotic: they swiftly
co-opted the national flag and made it a symbol of dissent.’ A mass protest in
Jerusalem against Netanyahu’s judiciary bill on 23 July 2023. Photograph:
Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
‘They have not allowed the right to denounce them as unpatriotic: they swiftly
co-opted the national flag and made it a symbol of dissent.’ A mass protest in
Jerusalem against Netanyahu’s judiciary bill on 23 July 2023. Photograph:
Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
OpinionBenjamin Netanyahu



ISRAELIS’ DEFIANCE OF NETANYAHU HOLDS A LESSON FOR ANYONE WHO CARES ABOUT
DEMOCRACY

Jonathan Freedland



Mass protests by ordinary people against the man who was Trumpian before Trump
are part of a worldwide struggle

Fri 28 Jul 2023 12.14 EDTLast modified on Fri 28 Jul 2023 14.28 EDT
 * 
 * 
 * 



Beware the strongman leader who fears jail. Donald Trump is running for
president in part because he sees a return to the White House as a literal
get-out-of-jail-free card: reinstalled in the Oval Office, he would be able to
pardon himself for the mounting pile of serious federal crimes for which he is
indicted. His legal strategy is his political strategy.

But the exemplar of the phenomenon is the man who was Trumpian before Trump: the
prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. It is Netanyahu – and the war he
is currently waging against his own country – whom all those who care about the
wider future of democracy should be watching. For Israel has become the test
case in the global fight against ultranationalist populism.




On Monday, Netanyahu’s coalition passed a new law curbing the powers of Israel’s
judiciary. No longer will the supreme court be able to block the government from
taking action the judges deem “extremely unreasonable”. That matters, because in
Israel the courts are pretty well the only restraint on government power: there
is no second chamber, no established constitution. And Monday’s vote was merely
the first in a series of moves designed to gut the power of the judiciary:
opponents, who have been out on the streets in huge numbers since January, call
it a “judicial coup”.

There are multiple motives in play here, but the crucial one is that Netanyahu
is several steps down the road that Trump dreads: he is on trial for corruption.
He is due to testify in the coming months, which is sufficiently perilous a
prospect that he’s willing to abuse the power of his office to avoid it. Thanks
to the law passed this week, that could mean an attempt either to sack the
attorney general or strip her of authority over prosecutions, clearing the way
for a new, more sympathetic official who might – purely coincidentally, you
understand – decide to review existing cases, before concluding that all charges
against Netanyahu should be dropped and the trial halted.

“He can find a way to make it stop,” Dana Weiss, analyst for Israel’s Channel
12, told this week’s Unholy podcast. Of course, that would make a mockery of the
rule of law. But, as the New Yorker editor, David Remnick, puts it, Netanyahu
“is willing to erode the liberty of his people to insure his own”.

Do “liberty” and the “rule of law” sound a little abstract? Then take a look at
Netanyahu’s coalition partners, who gave him the votes he needed on Monday. They
consist of ultra-orthodox fundamentalists, nationalist extremists and overt
racists, who together make up the most rightwing government in Israel’s history.
Among them is Itamar Ben-Gvir, who in 2008 was convicted by an Israeli court of
incitement to racism and support for a terrorist organisation (and who,
incidentally, was blamed by Sinéad O’Connor for the death threats that led her
to withdraw from a pro-peace concert in Jerusalem in 1997, when Ben-Gvir was
just 21). He is now Israel’s security minister, in charge of the police.



Netanyahu may be driven chiefly by the desire to save his skin, but these people
are happy to help because an eviscerated judiciary allows them to realise their
own dreams. For the ultra-orthodox, the big prize is exemption from conscription
into military service, but for Ben-Gvir and his fellow extremist nationalist,
finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, who is also in charge of settlement
construction, the goal is ever tighter control, if not annexation, of the
occupied West Bank. En route, there are countless steps the far right is itching
to take – all of which would make life, already harsh for Palestinians,
unbearable.

Of course, the ambition does not end there. The government barely hides its
intention to reshape the Israeli political landscape, ensuring the playing field
is tilted permanently in its favour. That is why Netanyahu and his ministers are
targeting not only the courts but the media, another institution with an
irritating habit of holding power to account. They are keen to funnel public
money into the Fox News-style Channel 14, while putting the other, straighter
networks under tough new rules, including crippling fines for coverage that
fails to meet the government definition of “balance”. The result would be an
environment in which the right might never lose another election.

All of this matters to Israelis, to Palestinians and to those Jews around the
world who feel themselves bound up with the country and its fate. To fear for
the future of Israeli democracy is not to pretend that it was perfect before
Netanyahu: how could it be when the occupation of Palestinian territory is now
in its 57th year? To quote the slogan of one wing of the protest movement:
“Democracy and occupation cannot coexist.” And yet, that cannot be an excuse for
inaction: Netanyahu’s judicial coup will make things worse, including and
especially for Palestinians.

But it also matters to those who are a long way from Israel-Palestine and have
no direct stake in it. For this is part of a wider struggle against what is now,
somewhat paradoxically, an international phenomenon: ultranationalist populism.

Those fighting this global battle certainly see it that way. Polish and
Hungarian campaigners recognise in Netanyahu’s drive to turn Israel into an
illiberal democracy the transformation wreaked in their own countries. Activists
have travelled between Warsaw, Budapest and Jerusalem trading lessons, advice
and even solidarity videos. “Tell your people that this must not happen because
you might end up like Poland,” urged the country’s former president Lech Wałęsa
in a message to Israelis. Meanwhile, Israel’s Haaretz newspaper uses the slogan
“Democracy can die in daylight too”, a nod to the Washington Post’s Trump-era
motto: “Democracy dies in darkness.” Different countries, same struggle.



Israel is a key test because the pro-democracy movement there has moved faster
and more intensively than perhaps any other. For 29 straight weeks, Israeli
protesters have filled the streets in colossal numbers. They have not allowed
the right to denounce them as unpatriotic: on the contrary, they swiftly
co-opted the national flag and made it a symbol of dissent. They command
majorities in the opinion polls and have the support of trade unions and
business leaders who, at a critical point, mounted what was in effect a joint
strike. Most crucially of all, they have the support of an estimated 15,000
military reservists, including those from elite units, fighter pilots among
them, who have either refused, or threatened to refuse, to serve.

In March, this combined pressure succeeded in persuading Netanyahu that he
should not stage his judicial coup in a single wave of shock and awe, but should
instead salami-slice it, bit by bit. This week, he forced the first slice down
the throat of a reluctant Israeli public. In other words, despite massive
economic and civil disruption and a mutiny that military officials warn has
seriously degraded Israel’s ability to defend itself, Netanyahu went ahead
anyway. The tactics had changed, but his pursuit of the goal had not wavered.

That prompts a troubling question for all those engaged in the fight against
nationalist populism, wherever they are. If all the strength and numbers
Israel’s pro-democracy movement has mustered are not enough, what exactly will
it take? Can it really be that a nation is powerless to stop a leader bent on
destroying his country to save himself? That thought is almost too bleak to
contemplate. Which is why everyone who cares about democracy, including those
who are distant from Israel, should desperately want those protesters to
succeed. We need them to win.

 * Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist

 * Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would
   like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for
   publication in our letters section, please click here.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I was hoping you would
consider taking the step of supporting the Guardian’s journalism. 

From Elon Musk to Rupert Murdoch, a small number of billionaire owners have a
powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s
happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner
or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public
interest – not profit motives.

And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media – the tendency, born of a
desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of
neutrality. While fairness guides everything we do, we know there is a right and
a wrong position in the fight against racism and for reproductive justice. When
we report on issues like the climate crisis, we’re not afraid to name who is
responsible. And as a global news organization, we’re able to provide a fresh,
outsider perspective on US politics – one so often missing from the insular
American media bubble. 

Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism
because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you.
Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible
to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.

If you can, please consider supporting us just once from $1, or better yet,
support us every month with a little more. Thank you.

Betsy Reed

Editor, Guardian US





Contribution frequency
Single
Monthly
Annual

Contribution amount
$5 per month
$7 per month
Other
Continue

Remind me in September
Topics
 * Benjamin Netanyahu
 * Opinion

 * Israel
 * Donald Trump
 * Middle East and north Africa
 * Protest
 * comment

 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Reuse this content


MOST VIEWED

 * ‘SOMETHING WEIRD IS GOING ON’: SEARCH FOR ANSWERS AS ANTARCTIC SEA ICE STAYS
   AT HISTORIC LOWS
   
   

 * FRANCE 2-1 BRAZIL: WOMEN’S WORLD CUP 2023 – AS IT HAPPENED
   
   

 * FAD DIETS, MIDDAY SUN AND … COFFEE ON THE SOFA: 12 DOCTORS ON THE EVERYDAY
   DANGERS THEY AVOID
   
   

 * $450 PADDLES AND MILLIONS IN PRIZE MONEY: HAS PICKLEBALL SOLD OUT?
   
   

 * STATES’ RIGHTS MAKE A COMEBACK AS REPUBLICANS RUSH TO DEFY WASHINGTON
   
   





MOST VIEWED


MOST VIEWED



 * World
 * Europe
 * US
 * Americas
 * Asia
 * Australia
 * Middle East
 * Africa
 * Inequality
 * Global development

 * News
 * Opinion
 * Sport
 * Culture
 * Lifestyle

Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning
Sign up for our email

 * About us
 * Help
 * Complaints & corrections
 * SecureDrop
 * Work for us
 * California resident – Do Not Sell
 * Privacy policy
 * Cookie policy
 * Terms & conditions
 * Contact us

 * All topics
 * All writers
 * Digital newspaper archive
 * Facebook
 * YouTube
 * Instagram
 * LinkedIn
 * Twitter
 * Newsletters

 * Advertise with us
 * Guardian Labs
 * Search jobs


Back to top
© 2023 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights
reserved. (modern)