www.washingtonpost.com Open in urlscan Pro
23.10.80.250  Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

GET https://www.washingtonpost.com/newssearch/

<form id="search-form" method="get" class="search-form dn flex-ns items-center relative" action="https://www.washingtonpost.com/newssearch/" role="search"><label for="query" aria-labelledby="searchTitle"><input type="text" id="query"
      autocomplete="off" name="query" class="no-shadow text-input brad-4 font-xxxs pa-0 b-none dn hidden" style="width:0;height:34px;line-height:20px;transition:all 0.25s cubic-bezier(0.49, 0.37, 0.45, 0.71)" placeholder="Search" aria-label="search"
      value=""></label><span id="searchTitle" class="dn">Search Input</span><button type="submit" name="btn-search" class="pa-0 focus-highlight btn btn-sm dn dib-ns btn-show-search-input btn-gray" aria-label="search"><svg
      class="content-box fill-white va-m" width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 16 16" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true" focusable="false" role="img">
      <title>Search</title>
      <path d="M10.974 9.56l3.585 3.585-1.414 1.414-3.585-3.585a5.466 5.466 0 1 1 1.414-1.414zm-1.04-3.094a3.466 3.466 0 1 0-6.934 0 3.466 3.466 0 0 0 6.933 0z" fill-rule="nonzero"></path>
    </svg></button></form>

<form class="mt-sm mb-md" autocomplete="off">
  <div class="relative flex"><input class="pl-sm pr-sm font--subhead font-xxs h-md light brad-2 b form-input-valid bg-white gray-darkest w-50-ns ma-0 border-box" id="paywall__input-field" type="email" required="" autocomplete="email" value=""
      style="transition: padding 200ms linear 200ms; border-top-right-radius: 0px; border-bottom-right-radius: 0px;"><label for="paywall__input-field" class="absolute"
      style="transition: all 200ms ease-in-out 0s; transform: translate3d(16px, -50%, 0px); transform-origin: left top; top: 50%; color: rgb(90, 90, 90);">Enter email address</label></div>
  <div class="db mt-xs mb-xs ease-in-out duration-400 left mt-xs"><label for="tosCheckbox" class="db gray-dark relative flex pt-xxs pb-xxs items-start "><span class="relative mr-xs" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;"><input id="tosCheckbox"
          class="tos-checkbox b bc-gray-light bg-white brad-2 relative outline-none appearance-none ma-0 " type="checkbox" data-testid="tosCheckbox" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;"><svg class="absolute top-50 left-0 -translate-y-50  dn"
          viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;">
          <title>Check</title>
          <path d="M10.052 16.245L3.265 9.46l-1.767 1.768 7.778 7.778a1.25 1.25 0 0 0 1.863-.107L23.415 3.413 21.456 1.86 10.052 16.245z" fill="#fff" fill-rule="nonzero"></path>
        </svg></span><span class="db font-xxxxs" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span data-testid="tosCheckboxText">I agree to The Washington Post's
          <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/terms-of-service/2011/11/18/gIQAldiYiN_story.html">Terms of Service</a> and
          <a target="_blank" style="color:inherit;" class="underline" href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/privacy-policy/2011/11/18/gIQASIiaiN_story.html">Privacy Policy</a>.</span><span class="font-xxs red"
          style="line-height: 0;">*</span></span></label><label for="mcCheckbox" class="db gray-dark relative flex pt-xxs pb-xxs items-start "><span class="relative mr-xs" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;"><input id="mcCheckbox"
          class="tos-checkbox b bc-gray-light bg-white brad-2 relative outline-none appearance-none ma-0 " type="checkbox" data-testid="mcCheckbox" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;"><svg class="absolute top-50 left-0 -translate-y-50  dn"
          viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="height: 16px; width: 16px;">
          <title>Check</title>
          <path d="M10.052 16.245L3.265 9.46l-1.767 1.768 7.778 7.778a1.25 1.25 0 0 0 1.863-.107L23.415 3.413 21.456 1.86 10.052 16.245z" fill="#fff" fill-rule="nonzero"></path>
        </svg></span><span class="db font-xxxxs" style="padding-top: 1px;"><span data-testid="mcCheckboxText">The Washington Post may use my email address to provide me occasional special offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out at
          any time.</span></span></label></div><button id="CTA_BUTTON_TEXT_CTA_WRAPPER" role="button" class="btn db dib-ns mt-sm btn-disabled ma-0 pointer dib btn subs-theme bg-blue" type="submit" disabled=""
    style="white-space: nowrap; box-sizing: border-box; border-radius: 31px; padding: 7px 32px; border: initial;"><span id="CTA_BUTTON_TEXT">Sign Up</span></button>
</form>

Text Content

Accessibility statementSkip to main content
Search InputSearch
SectionsMenu
SectionsMenu
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
Try four weeks free
Sign inProfileSolid
Sign inProfileSolid




Close
The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness
Politics
Fact Checker
Biden administration
The 202s
Polling
Redistricting tracker
Elections
Courts & Law


SUPREME COURT TAKES UP CASE OF A COACH AND HIS PRAYERS ON 50-YARD LINE


JOSEPH KENNEDY’S CASE BRINGS QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ABILITY OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES TO
LIVE OUT THEIR FAITH WHILE ON DUTY AND THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO
PROTECT SCHOOLCHILDREN FROM COERCION

By Robert Barnes
April 21, 2022 at 7:08 p.m. EDT
By Robert Barnes
April 21, 2022 at 7:08 p.m. EDT
Headphones
Listen to article
11 min


Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joseph Kennedy at
Bremerton Memorial Stadium in Washington on Nov. 5, 2015. (Larry Steagall/Kitsap
Sun via AP)
Comment on this story
Comment

Gift Article
Share

BREMERTON, Wash. — Almost everyone agrees it should not require two trips to the
U.S. Supreme Court to settle the case of a high school football coach who wants
to pray at the 50-yard line.

Maybe former Bremerton High School assistant coach Joseph Kennedy could have
conceded that his postgame prayer of gratitude could take place somewhere other
than midfield, or discouraged what one judge called a “spectacle” of stampeding
supporters and politicians who rushed after one game to kneel beside him on the
gridiron.

WpGet the full experience.Choose your planArrowRight

Maybe the school district could have offered an accommodation that didn’t
require Kennedy to climb to the stadium press box, or retreat to a janitor’s
office in the school, to offer his prayer. Instead, it prohibited him from any
“demonstrative religious activity” that is “readily observable to (if not
intended to be observed by) students and the attending public.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Nonetheless, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District arrives before the justices
Monday. It brings vexing questions about the ability of public employees to live
out their faith while on duty and the government’s competing responsibility to
protect schoolchildren from coercion and to remain neutral on the subject of
religion.

The case offers a court that has recently been overwhelmingly protective of
religious rights the chance to transform decades of Supreme Court jurisprudence
that started 60 years ago with the admonition that government cannot organize
and promote prayer in public schools.

Supreme Court’s conservatives critical of school tuition program excluding
religious teaching

Four justices sympathized with Kennedy a couple of years ago when the case first
reached the Supreme Court, but it was deemed premature for consideration. Now,
it pits red states against blue ones, some professional football players against
others, divides constitutional experts and has drawn more attention — 57
friend-of-the-court briefs — than any case at the Supreme Court this term,
except for the controversies over abortion and gun control.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



It also split the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, where a slim
majority of judges ruled for the school district. They cited Supreme Court
precedent that limits the speech rights of on-duty public employees, and said
the district was warranted in worrying that allowing Kennedy’s public prayer
would violate the constitution’s prohibition on government endorsement of
religion.

That ruling was denounced in a filing by 24 Republican U.S. senators and 32
representatives.

“The Ninth Circuit’s reasoning weaponizes the Establishment Clause, concluding
that it requires a school to root out any religious expression by its employees
— even to fire teachers, coaches, and staff who will not leave their faith at
home,” the brief states. “If left uncorrected, this ruling threatens religious
liberty … for all public employees.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



Those supporting the school district say that Kennedy has radically recast the
events that led to his dismissal and that his actions during the 2015 football
season were hardly private acts of faith. His Facebook post — “I think I just
might have been fired for praying” — drew national attention and elicited
support from prominent advocates, including former president Donald Trump and
Fox News pundits.

But the district’s supporters say Kennedy’s rights are no more important than
those of students and parents who do not want to mix religion and school
instruction.

Kennedy seeks to characterize the school district’s “concern for the religious
freedom and equality of its students as nothing more than hostility to his own
religious practice — a move that turns on its head decades of well-reasoned
school prayer jurisprudence,” said a brief filed by 11 law professors who
identify themselves as “church-state scholars.”

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



“It does not reflect religious hostility, but instead vindicates religious
equality, for a school to require that its employees avoid coercing or
compelling students (even subtly) to adopt favored religious beliefs or
practices.”

Kennedy and his wife — in a town where everyone seems connected, she is the
former human relations supervisor for the school district he sued — have moved
to Florida to care for her ailing father.

He returned to Bremerton last month to show reporters around his blue-collar
hometown of about 40,000. Seattle is a ferry ride away across the Puget Sound,
and the outline of the Olympic mountain range is visible from the home-team side
of the stadium where the BHS Knights play.

Story continues below advertisement



“It never should have been a big thing,” Kennedy said as he greeted former
students on the stadium track. “It was supposed to be me and God, that’s it.”
Asked if God cares where he prays, Kennedy said: “I don’t think he cares either
way. But that was my covenant. So I do.”

‘OTHERS CAN DO THE X’S AND O’S’



When Kennedy’s players would confide about their troubles, he would say he
understood, because he had seen worse.

Advertisement


He describes a terrible childhood in Bremerton and elsewhere, with uninterested
adoptive parents, foster homes and a stint at a boy’s home in Eastern
Washington.

“I was always in trouble. I got kicked out of just about every school here,”
Kennedy said on a drive through town, pointing out landmarks. “Always fighting
and in trouble for something, total disregard for authority. … I was a terrible
kid; I can admit that now.”

Story continues below advertisement



He was at times homeless, and one of the stops on the tour is a Catholic church
where he said he sneaked in and spent the night when he was 9. Another is the
apartment where he lived by himself during high school. He didn’t play football,
because he was too small.

Kennedy enlisted in the Marine Corps as soon as he got his diploma, an
experience, he said, that put him back on the right path. He said he was saved
when he asked God for help one night when he and his wife were having troubles.

Advertisement


He said it’s hard to explain how that felt: “When they say you’re saved, it
makes sense to me now what saved means. I was saved from who I was at that
time.”

Story continues below advertisement



A chance encounter with the BHS athletic director led to the part-time job
coaching the junior varsity and assisting with the varsity teams. He knew
nothing of football strategy. “Others could do the X’s and O’s; I wanted to help
them be the best young men they could be,” Kennedy said.

As he was considering the offer, he said he watched a movie popular in Christian
circles called “Facing the Giants,” where a football coach pledges his gratitude
to God. “I broke down. I was bawling my eyes out,” Kennedy said.

He said he told God he would take the coaching job. “And I will give you the
credit after every game, win or lose, right there on the battlefield,” he said.

Supreme Court says states that subsidize private education must include
religious schools

For years, Kennedy took a knee and bowed after games, and nothing came of it.
From the stands, it might have looked like nothing more than someone tying a
shoe. But then some of the Knights decided they would pray, as well. And they
invited players from opposing teams. There were prayers in the locker room and
photos of what looked like Kennedy praying while holding helmets of both teams.

Advertisement

Story continues below advertisement



The school district decided it had a problem in the 2015 season, when an
opposing coach told Bremerton’s principal that he “ ‘thought it was pretty cool
how [the District] would allow’ Kennedy’s religious activity,” the district said
in its court brief.

The homecoming game was the culmination. Kennedy was joined in his postgame
prayer by members of the public, a state legislator and the media. “Spectators
jumped over the fence to reach the field and people tripped over cables and
fell,” the district said in its brief. “School band members were knocked over.”

The next week, a group of Satanists demanded equal access to the field.

By then, Kennedy was represented by First Liberty Institute, a conservative
religious group that has brought other religious rights challenges to the
Supreme Court. Hiram Sasser III, a lawyer for the group, says his organization
did not see the case as another one of those.

Advertisement


While the district’s brief says Kennedy’s lawyers turned the impasse into a
media spectacle, Sasser says the district is at fault. He said he thought it
would be a two-week case that “everyone can walk away and feel good about. Then
it turned into World War III.”

The case divided Bremerton. Four of Paul Peterson’s children went to BHS. One
played football for Kennedy, and others were in the band. He and his wife were
regulars at football games, and he said he and Kennedy are friends. Now he is
among those who have filed an amicus brief supporting the district.

“Joe and I have talked personally outside of this, and I told him, ‘I like you
as a person, I respect your service to the country as a Marine.’ I respect him
as a man of great integrity, really,” Peterson said. “I just feel like he’s
off-base on this issue. What he’s pushing is an agenda.”

Eventually, Kennedy was suspended with pay. His contract was year-to-year, and,
for the first time, he received a negative evaluation. He did not apply for
another year and filed suit instead.

As the legal battle dragged on, Kennedy and his wife retired, sold their house
and moved to Pensacola, Fla. The Bremerton school district, represented by
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said that should make the
case moot, since it is unlikely Kennedy would move back to Bremerton for a job
that provides an annual stipend of $5,304.

But Kennedy told the Supreme Court in a sworn statement that if he were allowed
to return to his old job, “I can do so within 24 hours of reinstatement.”

WHAT THE COURT MUST DECIDE



The case calls for the Supreme Court once again to find the line between the
First Amendment’s establishment clause, which forbids government endorsement of
religion, and its free speech and free exercise clauses, which forbid restraints
on the private observance of religion.

The 9th Circuit majority said the district was justified in its actions. The
Supreme Court has recognized that public employees give up some of their First
Amendment rights, because their speech can be construed as being that of the
government. And the appeals court said that even if Kennedy’s prayers could be
seen as private speech, the district could take action to avoid the appearance
of an establishment clause violation.

Kennedy’s lawyers told the Supreme Court in his brief that the reasoning “is
incompatible with this court’s precedents and the traditions of religious
liberty they embody.”

“Teachers and coaches remain individuals with First Amendment rights on school
premises, and the suppression of the individual religious expression of teachers
and coaches is not permitted, let alone required, by the First Amendment,” the
brief says.

It cites the court’s landmark 1969 decision that neither students nor teachers
“shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the
schoolhouse gate.”

In an amicus brief filed by Minnesota Vikings quarterback Kirk Cousins and
others, the court is asked to imagine Kennedy taking a knee for another reason —
to protest racial injustice during the playing of the national anthem.

“That practice, like Kennedy’s prayers, is controversial — courageous to some
and offensive to others,” the brief says. “But if Joe Kennedy had taken a knee
to protest racial injustice, the District almost certainly would not have argued
that his speech was somehow the state’s. Rather, there would have been no
question that it was protected private speech.”

Kennedy starts with an advantage — four justices of the court in 2019 were
skeptical of the 9th Circuit’s handling of the case at an early stage. “What is
perhaps most troubling about the Ninth Circuit’s opinion is language that can be
understood to mean that a coach’s duty to serve as a good role model requires
the coach to refrain from any manifestation of religious faith,” wrote Justice
Samuel A. Alito Jr., joined by colleagues Clarence Thomas, Neil M. Gorsuch and
Brett M. Kavanaugh.

The district contends that Kennedy’s “breathless tale of authoritarian
government forbidding private religious expression … relies on creative
remodeling of both the facts and the law.” It said it permitted for years
Kennedy’s private prayers after games but stepped in only when they became
demonstrations of faith that reflected on the district.

“Public-school coaches can and do help students ‘be better people,’ ” the
district said in its brief. (School officials declined interview requests.) “But
spiritual guidance should come from students’ families and houses of worship,
not the government. … The District’s interests in protecting students from
religious coercion and in preventing employees from commandeering government
events outweigh Kennedy’s interest in praying with the students on the 50-yard
line.”

The case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.

Comment
3784 Comments
GiftOutline
Gift Article



Loading...


Advertisement

live updatespoliticsChevronRight

12:46 PM

TAKE A LOOK: ANTI-VANCE ADS CONTINUE IN OHIO DESPITE TRUMP ENDORSEMENT

12:06 PMNoted: Michigan GOP picks election deniers as secretary of state, AG
candidates
11:18 AMThis just in: Biden nominates new ambassador to Ukraine
11:00 AMOn our radar: Biden to welcome back-to-back NHL champs to White House

Advertisement


Advertisement

Company
 * About The Post
 * Newsroom Policies & Standards
 * Diversity and Inclusion
 * Careers
 * Media & Community Relations
 * WP Creative Group
 * Accessibility Statement

Get The Post
 * 
 * Become a Subscriber
 * Gift Subscriptions
 * Mobile & Apps
 * Newsletters & Alerts
 * Washington Post Live
 * Reprints & Permissions
 * Post Store
 * Books & E-Books
 * Newspaper in Education
 * Print Archives (Subscribers Only)
 * e-Replica
 * Today’s Paper

Contact Us
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Contact the Opinions team
 * Advertise
 * Licensing & Syndication
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability

Terms of Use
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices

washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * washingtonpost.com
 * © 1996-2022 The Washington Post
 * About The Post
 * Contact the Newsroom
 * Contact Customer Care
 * Request a Correction
 * Send a News Tip
 * Report a Vulnerability
 * Download the Washington Post App
 * Policies & Standards
 * Terms of Service
 * Privacy Policy
 * Cookie Settings
 * Print Products Terms of Sale
 * Digital Products Terms of Sale
 * Submissions & Discussion Policy
 * RSS Terms of Service
 * Ad Choices

3.4.1




close


YOU'RE ALL SET!

You'll receive this newsletter
collapse
NEWSLETTER WEEKDAYS


THE 5-MINUTE FIX NEWSLETTER MAKES KEEPING UP EASY

Every weekday afternoon, we help you understand what's happening in politics —
fast — with fresh analysis written just for your inbox.
Enter email address
CheckI agree to The Washington Post's Terms of Service and Privacy
Policy.*CheckThe Washington Post may use my email address to provide me
occasional special offers via email and through other platforms. I can opt out
at any time.
Sign Up

expand
NEWSLETTER WEEKDAYS
A 5-minute breakdown to track what's happening in politicsSign Up