digitalsignage.dds-entwicklung.de Open in urlscan Pro
92.205.167.177  Public Scan

Form analysis
0 forms found in the DOM

Text Content

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WILLKOMMEN BEI
DDS ENTWICKLUNG


NEWS


NACH WAGNER-REVOLTE : USA ERWÄGEN LIEFERUNG VON STREUBOMBEN AN DIE UKRAINE


RENAULT-BILLIGMARKE: 30 PROZENT PLUS IM ERSTEN QUARTAL – WAS DACIA GERADE SO
ERFOLGREICH MACHT


MARKUS DUESMANN: DER AUDI-CHEF KÄMPFT UM SEINEN JOB – VOR ALLEM EINE ABTEILUNG
MACHT IHM PROBLEME

Quelle: handelsblatt.com Stand: 28.06.2023, 10:41 Uhr


WETTER


JETZT




0°C






SPÄTER




0°C




MORGEN




0°C







WIRTSCHAFT


JOURNEE-CHEF LORENZ IM INTERVIEW: "DAS METAVERSE IST KEINE VISION, SONDERN
REALITÄT"


FOKUSSIERUNG AUF EIGENE SÜSSWAREN: IKEA STREICHT MARABOU-SCHOKOLADE AUS DEM
PRODUKTKATALOG


ENDE DER DURSTSTRECKE: KONJUNKTURDATEN GEBEN WALL STREET AUFTRIEB

Quelle: n-tv.de Stand: 28.06.2023, 10:41 Uhr


DIGITAL


SUCHE NACH FUNKSTÖRUNGEN: „MANCHMAL ERINNERT DAS AN EINE ART SCHNITZELJAGD, DIE
SICH ÜBER TAGE HINZIEHEN KANN“


MOBILFUNK: EU HAT EINWÄNDE GEGEN FUSION VON ORANGE UND MÁSMÓVIL IN SPANIEN


ENERGIEWENDE: ERNEUERBARE DECKEN MEHR ALS HÄLFTE DES STROMVERBRAUCHS

Quelle: wiwo.de Stand: 28.06.2023, 10:41 Uhr


GRÜNDEN


JIMDO: KLEINERES TEAM UND NEUES PRODUKT SOLLEN TURNAROUND BRINGEN


GANZ ALLEIN EINEN MILLIONENFONDS AUFBAUEN? SO GEHT’S, VERRATEN DIESE SOLO-VCS


SO VIEL VERDIENT JOKO WINTERSCHEIDT MIT SEINER STARTUP-SCHOKOLADE

Quelle: gruenderszene.de Stand: 28.06.2023, 10:41 Uhr


GADGETS


GOOGLE IS NO LONGER BUILDING ITS OWN AUGMENTED REALITY GLASSES



Google has killed a project internally known as "Iris" that it established to
build augmented reality glasses, according to Business Insider. The tech giant
worked on the glasses' development for several years, but it reportedly shelved
Iris following waves of layoffs and company reshuffles over the past few months.
Another event that factored into Google's decision was the departure of Clay
Bavor, the company's former chief of augmented and virtual reality, to form a
startup with Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor. In addition, Google reportedly kept
changing its strategy for the Iris glasses, which became a source of frustration
for team members working on the project. 

When The Verge reported about the Iris augmented reality glasses in early 2022,
it said that Google could launch the device in 2024. The Iris AR glasses were
supposed to look like a pair of ordinary glasses. and an early version
reportedly resembled a product called "Focals" by North, a Canadian startup that
Google had acquired in 2020. Google also demoed a newer version in a video
showing a real-time AR translation feature. 

While the company has stopped working on its own AR hardware, Business Insider
says it still very much has big augmented reality ambitions. Instead of building
its own hardware, Google has apparently chosen to focus on creating an "Android
for AR" instead. The company is reportedly hoping to adopt the same business
model it's using for its mobile platform and license its AR software to
manufacturers. At the moment, Google is busy developing Android XR for Samsung's
"extended reality" wearable devices and, according to Insider, on a new platform
called "micro XR" for glasses. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at
https://www.engadget.com/google-is-no-longer-building-its-own-augmented-reality-glasses-062555498.html?src=rss




NINTENDO SAYS IT'LL BE EASY TO TRANSFER OVER TO ITS NEXT CONSOLE



Nintendo has a bad reputation for its online infrastructure, often being
ridiculed for lagging behind in adopting the latest technologies or features
(such as requiring a smartphone for voice chat). This includes transitioning
user data between your old console and a new one. Fortunately, it sounds like
Nintendo is at least looking into making that easier before the launch of its
next console.

In a shareholder meeting late last week, when asked if your Nintendo Switch
purchases would carry over to future game consoles, President and CEO Shuntaro
Furukawa says (via Google Translate), “In the transition from Nintendo Switch to
the next-generation console, we would like to make every effort to ensure that
customers can make the transition smoothly while using their Nintendo account.”
This seems to imply that Nintendo is at least looking into possibly allowing
current Nintendo Switch titles purchased through the eShop to be carried over to
whatever comes next. Of course, Nintendo doesn’t make comments about future
hardware that hasn’t been announced yet, so take this with a grain of salt.

As a reminder, previous-generation Nintendo Wii U games did not carry over to
the Switch. This is in stark contrast to Sony and Microsoft, where most
last-generation console games work on new consoles. And unlike Microsoft and
Sony, Nintendo likes to spice up its controller design with virtually every new
console. So sometimes it’s impossible to make a game work on both the new and
old console generation.

At the very least, Nintendo is considering making improvements for its future
console. It’s always been a major disappointment, especially for digital game
buyers, that previously-owned titles did not carry over to the new console. It’s
especially infuriating when the PlayStation 5 can play most PlayStation 4
titles, and Xbox Series S and X can play most Xbox One titles and in some cases
Xbox 360 titles. And in Microsoft’s case, the company lets you carry over
certain physical titles as well. So, Nintendo has a few options on the table for
carrying over existing games. Regardless of what Nintendo’s next console is
like, hopefully it’ll work with all the Switch games people have amassed over
the years.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at
https://www.engadget.com/nintendo-says-itll-be-easy-to-transfer-over-to-its-next-console-211411270.html?src=rss




THE BEST MICROSD CARDS IN 2023



If you want to add storage space to a Nintendo Switch, GoPro or Raspberry Pi,
you need a microSD card. But while several cards will be fast enough for most
use cases, some inexpensive options will perform better than others. To help you
find a reliable storage booster, we recently put a dozen microSD cards through a
range of benchmark tests.


WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A MICROSD CARD


CAPACITY

The first thing to figure out when buying a microSD card is how much space you
need. Modern cards are usually available in sizes ranging from 32GB to 512GB,
while a handful offer 1TB models as well. 2TB cards are theoretically possible
but still in the prototype stage.

For most, a 128GB or 256GB model should be the sweet spot between price and
capacity. But if you need more room – say, for stashing a bunch of games on a
Steam Deck – a 512GB card could make more sense and often provides a better
cost-per-GB ratio. These days, you can find a decent 128GB card for around $15
or less, a decent 256GB card for less than $30 and (with sales) a decent 512GB
card could be as little as $40 (though most cost closer to $50 or $60). There’s
a starker increase when you go up to 1TB cards, which typically cost around
$100.

Note that a microSD card’s performance may differ depending on what capacity you
buy. SanDisk says its 128GB Extreme card delivers sequential write speeds up to
90 MB/s, for example, while the higher-capacity models in the same line offer up
to 130 MB/s.

When we talk about microSD cards today, we usually refer to cards that use the
microSDXC (eXtended Capacity) standard, which have a capacity between 32GB and
2TB. Your device needs to support this for it to work with a microSDXC card.
This will almost never be an issue these days, but some older devices (a
Nintendo 3DS for instance) are only compatible with microSDHC (High Capacity)
cards, which range from 2GB to 32GB.


READ AND WRITE SPEEDS

MicroSD cards are primarily judged on their read and write speeds, which are
usually measured in megabytes per second (MB/s). Generally speaking, most
microSD cards have faster read speeds than write speeds. These metrics can then
be broken down into sequential and random performance. Sequential read and write
speeds matter when you’re trying to access or save long, constant streams of
data, such as opening a large video or copying a big batch of files from a PC.
If you want to use a microSD card for media storage, this is particularly
important.

Random performance, meanwhile, is about how quickly a card can read and write
small files scattered throughout the device. Since random read/write speeds are
much lower than sequential ones, storage device makers tend not to advertise
them as loudly. But they’re important if you use a card with a gaming device or
a single-board computer like the Raspberry Pi, where it often has to rapidly
save and access small bits of data in random locations.

SD Association


SPEED RATINGS

If you look at a microSD card, you’ll see a buffet of numbers, letters and
symbols. Most of these refer to the card’s speed class and performance ratings,
which are determined by the SD Association.

A card’s Video Speed Class, or V-rating, details its minimum sequential write
speed, which is especially important when recording video from a camera. It
ranges from V6 to V90. Most of the cards we tested had a V30 rating, so they
have a sequential write speed of at least 30 MB/s. This should be enough to
support up to 4K video at lower bitrates. Higher-rated V60 and V90 cards are
usually better for capturing 8K, but they come at a much higher cost.

The UHS Speed Class, or U-rating, also refers to a card’s minimum sequential
write speed. It comes in two varieties: U3, which mandates a minimum of 30 MB/s,
and U1, which is rated for 10 MB/s.

The older Speed Class rating overlaps with the other two systems. It’s signified
by a C symbol and goes from Class 2 to Class 10, with the number (again)
indicating minimum sequential write speed. This rating is less relevant
nowadays, but you may still see a “C10” logo on some cards.

The Application Performance spec, marked by an A symbol, is an indicator of
random read/write speeds. This is measured in IOPS, or input/output operations
per second, rather than MB/s. There are two categories here: A1 cards offer a
minimum random read speed of 1,500 IOPS and a minimum random write speed of 500
IOPS, while A2 cards bump those up to 4,000 IOPS and 2,000 IOPS, respectively.
Both ratings also guarantee sequential write speeds of at least 10 MB/s.

Most people should look for a card with V30, U3 and A2 ratings. It’s totally
possible to get a solid card without those: A U1 card might be worth it if you
just need a cheap option with a high capacity to hold files, for example. V60
and V90 cards are worth a look if you’re serious about shooting high-resolution
photos and video as well. But generally speaking, cards with the certifications
above should provide the best blend of price and performance today.

It’s important to emphasize that these ratings are baselines. Many V30 cards
offer significantly higher write speeds than 30 MB/s, for instance, and some A1
cards can outperform some A2 models in practice. The speeds advertised by
manufacturers aren’t always 100 percent accurate, either: Sometimes the card
will be slower in real-world use, other times it may actually be a bit faster.


UHS BUS SPEEDS

The other spec to note is the card’s bus interface. Most microSD cards available
today are UHS-I, which have a theoretical maximum speed of 104 MB/s. There are
also UHS-II cards, which have an extra row of pins on the back and can reach up
to 312 MB/s. (A newer UHS-III standard exists as well but hasn’t seen wide
adoption just yet.) These are labeled on the card with a Roman numeral I or II.

The absolute fastest microSD cards right now are UHS-II cards, and they’re
usually the ones with V60 or V90 ratings. If you shoot lots of 4K to 8K video or
frequently use burst mode to capture ultra high-res photos, the performance
gains of a good UHS-II card can save you time.

But these are much more expensive than UHS-I cards: This 128GB model from
ProGrade Digital, for example, is a relative bargain at $55. You need a device
that’s compatible with the UHS-II interface to see any benefits, too, and as we
were putting this guide together, stock for UHS-II cards was spotty. For now,
the higher speeds aren’t worth the price premium for the vast majority of
people, so we mostly stuck to UHS-I options.

Kris Naudus / Engadget


A NOTE ON CARD READERS, THE NINTENDO SWITCH AND STEAM DECK

While the UHS-I spec has a theoretical maximum of 104 MB/s, some UHS-I cards can
exceed that speed through proprietary extensions. You need a compatible card
reader and host device to take advantage of that extra performance, though. If
you find a UHS-I card advertising speeds higher than 104 MB/s, this is what’s
going on. You can see these limits in action with a Nintendo Switch or Steam
Deck: Both of those gaming devices support the UHS-I interface and don’t go
beyond its official speed, flattening any sequential gains some cards may have
elsewhere. The broader takeaway: Your microSD card will only be as fast as the
slowest link in your chain.


WARRANTY

Many microSD cards are designed to be durable, with protection from water,
extreme temperatures, X-rays and drops. Still, in case of catastrophe, a long
warranty is always good to have. Many manufacturers offer lifetime limited
warranties, though we’ve noticed that “endurance” cards marketed to withstand
more hours of writing are usually covered for a much shorter period of time.


AVOIDING COUNTERFEITS

The memory card market has had a particular problem with scammers selling fake
products. To guard against this, only buy from a known brand and a reputable
retailer such as Best Buy, B&H Photo or Adorama. If you shop at Amazon, only buy
if the shipper and seller is Amazon.com. (Though a handful of users have
reported receiving counterfeits even from Amazon directly in the past.)
Remember: If a price seems too good to be true, it probably is. Be wary of any
retailer offering significantly a lower price than others.

Once you receive a card, check its packaging for any irregularities. You can run
benchmark tests like CrystalDiskMark or BlackMagic Disk Speed Test to verify its
speeds aren’t drastically lower than what’s advertised (or possible, given its
specs). You can also use software that’s designed to verify the true capacity
and performance of your card, such as H2testw and FakeFlashTest.


HOW WE TESTED

We put 12 microSD cards through a series of tests to verify their sequential and
random performance. These included benchmarks like CrystalDiskMark, BlackMagic
Disk Speed Test, ATTO Disk Benchmark and AJA System Test, as well as a few
“real-world” tests. We copied and pasted a small folder of photos about 1.15GB
in size to and from each card, then did the same with a larger 12.2GB folder
containing multiple file types and subfolders, timing the process each time. We
also checked how each card performed on the Steam Deck, downloading games of
varying sizes – including Stardew Valley, Aperture Desk Job, Metal Gear Rising:
Revengeance and Apex Legends – then timing how long it took to launch each game
and load save files.

We used a Kingston USB 3.2 UHS-II reader to test each card on both Windows 11
and macOS Ventura. For the former, we used an Alienware gaming PC with an Intel
Core i9-10900F, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 GPU, 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD. For the
latter, we used a 2021 16-inch MacBook Pro with an Apple M1 Pro chip, 16GB of
RAM and a 512GB SSD. To use our card reader on the MacBook, we used Apple’s
USB-C Digital AV Multiport Adapter.

We tested the 128GB version of each card wherever possible, though for a couple
of cards – the SanDisk Extreme and Samsung Pro Plus – we were only able to test
their 256GB models. We also reformatted each card before testing with the SD
Association’s Memory Card Formatter tool.


BEST FOR MOST: SAMSUNG PRO PLUS



The Samsung Pro Plus offered just about the best sequential write performance of
the cards we tested (around 130 MB/s in CrystalDiskMark) and topped them all in
terms of random read/write speeds, so it should work well whether you’re buying
for a camera, tablet or gaming handheld. Unsurprisingly, it has all the
requisite ratings: U3, V30 and A2. Its sequential read performance isn’t quite
as quick as some of our alternate picks below, but it’s not far behind. In our
large file transfer test, for instance, it was only four seconds off the fastest
models.

The Pro Plus costs $19 for 128GB, $30 for 256GB and $60 for 512GB, so it’s not
the cheapest option available, but it’s still affordable. Samsung also sells the
card with a USB reader that’ll help it reach its maximum speeds. Either way, it
comes with a 10-year limited warranty.

If you opt to buy the Pro Plus, make sure you get the latest-generation model,
which Samsung launched in April 2023. At the moment, the company is still
selling the prior iteration of the Pro Plus, which looks identical but isn’t as
quick, especially when it comes to random read/write speeds. (Look for the model
with sequential read speeds rated at 180 MB/s and sequential write speeds rated
at 130 MB/s.) We tested the 256GB version of the Pro Plus due to stock issues
with the 128GB model, but this shouldn’t have a major impact on real-world
performance, as Samsung rates both cards identically.


RUNNER UP: KINGSTON CANVAS GO PLUS



If the Samsung Pro Plus is unavailable or you just want to save a few bucks, the
Kingston Canvas Go Plus is a strong alternative. It delivered the highest
sequential read speeds of any card we tested across CrystalDiskMark, ATTO and
the BlackMagic Disk Speed Test, just edging out SanDisk’s Extreme and Nintendo
Switch-branded cards. It effectively tied with those two cards in our large file
transfer test. Its sequential write speeds (just over 100 MB/s on
CrystalDiskMark) are where it lags behind the Pro Plus, but they should still be
quick enough for many uses. Its random read/write speeds were only bested by
Samsung’s card, too, so it’s still a good option for apps and games.

This is a U3-, V30- and A2-rated card backed by a lifetime limited warranty. At
$17 for 128GB and usually less than $30 for 256GB, it’s slightly cheaper than
the Pro Plus and about as affordable as most cards with this level of
performance. A 512GB model is available too, though, it’s often priced in the
high $60 to $70 range. At that point, you should get one of our alternate picks
if they’re cheaper.


BEST VALUE: SAMSUNG EVO SELECT



The Samsung Evo Select is a step behind our top picks, particularly when it
comes to sequential write speeds (just under 70 MB/s on CrystalDiskMark), so
it’s not an ideal pick for a camera. Still, it’s perfectly usable for many
needs, and it’s regularly available for cheap at both Amazon and Samsung’s
online store. In the past, we've seen its 128GB, 256GB and 512GB models fall as
low as for $12, $18 and $40, respectively. All of those are about on par with
the SanDisk Ultra, a frequently recommended cheapo card, despite the Evo Select
having higher V30, U3 and A2 ratings.

The Evo Select’s sequential read speeds were just about in line with its
advertised peak of 130 MB/s, which will be totally fine for many. Its random
read/writes clearly trailed the Pro Plus and Canvas Go Plus, but were about on
par with pricier cards like the SanDisk Extreme, Lexar Professional 1066x and
SanDisk microSDXC for Nintendo Switch. Like the Pro Plus, it’s backed by a
10-year warranty. If you just want to save a few dollars on a chunk of extra
storage, it’s a good value.


ANOTHER GOOD OPTION: SANDISK MICROSDXC CARD FOR NINTENDO SWITCH



The SanDisk microSDXC Card for Nintendo Switch is another worthwhile option if
you see it available for less than the Pro Plus and Canvas Go Plus. Its
sequential read speeds were about the same as the Kingston card in our
benchmarks, but its sequential writes were slightly slower (and farther behind
the Pro Plus). Its random read/writes were a step behind according to
CrystalDiskMark, as well. The 128GB version of this card is usually priced a
smidge higher than the Canvas Go Plus, but lately the 512GB version has gone for
$10 or so less. SanDisk backs the card with a lifetime warranty, too. Note that
we tested the Apex Legends version of the 128GB card. SanDisk also sells a Super
Mario model, but we can’t speak to how that one performs.


ANOTHER GOOD OPTION: LEXAR PROFESSIONAL 1066X



Similarly, the Lexar Professional 1066x is a decent alternative to the Pro Plus
if you want to save a little cash. It’s another V30, U3 and A2 card, and like
the Pro Plus, its sequential write speeds were a bit faster than the Canvas Go
Plus and SanDisk Switch card in our benchmarks. Those write speeds weren’t as
quick as Pro Plus, and its sequential reads trailed all three cards. Random
read/writes also lagged behind the Pro Plus and Canvas Go Plus, and we noticed
its speeds peak and dip more noticeably in our file transfer test. Still, it’s
not slow.

The card’s 128GB and 256GB models are usually available for $17 and $22,
respectively. The latter in particular might be a good bargain compared to the
Pro Plus if you want better write speeds than the Kingston card can offer. The
1066x also comes with a lifetime limited warranty.


OTHER NOTABLE MICROSD CARDS

Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget

We didn’t use it ourselves, but if you’re willing to pay for a more powerful
UHS-II card built for heavy-duty video recording, the Delkin Devices Power has
tested well elsewhere and should deliver significantly faster sequential write
speeds than our picks above. It’s one of the few UHS-II cards we could actually
find in stock, but it costs a ton, starting at $55 for just 32GB.

The SanDisk Extreme effectively matched the Pro Plus in a few of our sequential
write tests and delivered sequential reads about on par with the Canvas Go Plus,
but that was partly due to us only being able to secure the card’s 256GB model,
which is higher-rated than the 128GB version. Its random performance was well
behind the Samsung and Kingston cards, too, and it typically costs more. In
general, stock for the Extreme has been spottier at most retailers as late. If
you see it on sale from a reputable seller, however, it’s another quality
option.

The SanDisk Extreme Pro, meanwhile, is rated for even higher speeds (up to 200
MB/s sequential reads), but it also appears to be unavailable at most trusted
retailers as of this writing.

The PNY Elite-X wasn’t far off the random read/write performance of the Pro Plus
and Canvas Go Plus in CrystalDiskMark, and it often goes for cheap, but it was
well behind in our sequential tests.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at
https://www.engadget.com/best-microsd-card-130038282.html?src=rss



Quelle: engadget.com Stand: 28.06.2023, 10:41 Uhr


10:41