www.salon.com Open in urlscan Pro
2600:9000:2162:b400:1a:b9b9:50c0:93a1  Public Scan

Form analysis
1 forms found in the DOM

/search/

<form id="navbar_search_form" class="navbar_searchbox" action="/search/" onsubmit="location.href='/search/'+encodeURIComponent(this.search_input.value); return false;">
  <label for="search_input" class="sr-only">Search</label>
  <input id="search_input" name="search_input" type="search" placeholder="Search..." onkeyup="buttonUp();" required="">
  <button type="submit" class="searchbox_icon" aria-label="Search">
    <svg class="s_logos s_search_logo" role="img" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512">
      <path fill="currentColor" d="M505 442.7L405.3 343c-4.5-4.5-10.6-7-17-7H372c27.6-35.3 
  44-79.7 44-128C416 93.1 322.9 0 208 0S0 93.1 0 208s93.1 208 208 208c48.3 0 
  92.7-16.4 128-44v16.3c0 6.4 2.5 12.5 7 17l99.7 99.7c9.4 9.4 24.6 9.4 33.9 
  0l28.3-28.3c9.4-9.4 9.4-24.6.1-34zM208 336c-70.7 0-128-57.2-128-128 0-70.7 
  57.2-128 128-128 70.7 0 128 57.2 128 128 0 70.7-57.2 128-128 128z"></path>
    </svg> </button>
</form>

Text Content

 * News & Politics
 * Culture
 * Food


 * Science & Health
 * Life Stories
 * Video
 * About

Profile Login/Sign Up Sticky Header: off Night Mode: off Saved Articles Go
Ad-Free Logout
Sticky Header Night Mode
Search





WHY SOME SCIENTISTS BELIEVE LIFE MAY HAVE STARTED ON MARS


PROMINENT SCIENTISTS IN DIFFERENT FIELDS SAY THAT THERE ARE CLUES THAT LIFE
COULD HAVE STARTED ON THE RED PLANET


BY NICOLE KARLIS


PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 7, 2021 7:30PM (EST)


Life on Mars (Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images)
--


SHARES

Facebook
4K
Twitter

Reddit
519
Email
26
view in app
save

On February 18, NASA's Perseverance rover will parachute through thin Martian
air, marking a new era in red planet exploration. Landing on the Jezero Crater,
which is located north of the Martian equator, will be no easy feat. Only about
40 percent of the missions ever sent to Mars succeed, according to NASA. If it
does, Perseverance could drastically change the way we think about
extraterrestrial life. That's because scientists believe Jezero, a 28 mile-wide
impact crater that used to be a lake, is an ideal place to look for evidence of
ancient microbial life on Mars.

Once it lands, Perseverance will collect and store Martian rock and soil
samples, which will eventually be returned to Earth. This is known as a
"sample-return mission," an extremely rare type of space exploration mission due
to its expense. (Indeed, there has never been a sample return mission from
another planet.) And once Martian soil is returned to Earth in a decade,
scientists will set about studying the material to figure out if there was ever
ancient life on Mars. 

Advertisement:


Yet some scientists believe that these samples could answer an even bigger
question: Did life on Earth originate on Mars?

Though the idea that life started on Mars before migrating on Earth sounds like
some far-fetched sci-fi premise, many renowned scientists take the theory
seriously. The general idea of life starting elsewhere in space before migrating
here has a name, too: Panspermia. It's the hypothesis that life exists elsewhere
in the universe, and is distributed by asteroids and other space debris.

To be clear, the notion of life on Earth originating on Mars isn't a dominant
theory in the scientific community, but it does appear to be catching on. And
scientists like Gary Ruvkun, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School,
say that it does sound "obvious, in a way."

The evidence starts with how space debris moved around in the young solar
system. Indeed, we have evidence of an exchange of rocks from Mars to
Earth. Martian meteorites have been found in Antarctica and across the world
— an estimated 159, according to the International Meteorite Collectors
Association.

Advertisement:
Advertisement
Progress Slider


Volume Slider

Hollywood doubted Eddie Huang's "Boogie": "You can't get this made"
Progress Bar
00:00 00:00
Volume Bar


"You can assign them to Mars based on the gaseous inclusions that they have,
that are sort of the equivalent of the gases that were shown by the Viking
spacecraft" to exist in Mars' atmosphere, Ruvkun said. In other words, small
bubbles of air in these rocks reveal that they were forged in the Martian air.
"So, there is exchange between Mars and Earth — probably more often going from
Mars to Earth because it goes 'downhill,' going to Mars is
'uphill,' gravitationally-speaking."

But for Ruvkun, whose area of expertise is genomics, it's the timing of cellular
life that he believes makes a strong case that life on Earth came from somewhere
else — perhaps Mars, or perhaps Mars vis-a-vis another planet.

Ruvkun noted that our genomes reveal the history of life, and provide clues
about the ancestors that preceded us by millions or even billions of years. "In
our genomes, you can kind of see the history, right?" he said. "There's the RNA
world that predated the DNA world and it's very well supported by all kinds of
current biology; so, we know the steps that evolution took in order to get to
where we are now."

Advertisement:


Thanks to the advancement of genomics, the understanding of LUCA (the Last
Universal Common Ancestor) — meaning the organism from which all life on Earth
evolved from — has greatly advanced. By studying the genetics of all organisms
on Earth, scientists have a very good sense of what the single-celled ancestor
of every living thing (on Earth) looked like. They also know the timeline: all
modern life forms descend from a single-celled organism that lived about 3.9
billion years ago, only 200 million years after the first appearance of liquid
water. In the grand scheme of the universe, that's not that long.

And the last universal common ancestor was fairly complicated as far as
organisms go. That leaves two possibilities, Ruvkun says. "Either evolution to
full-on modern genomes is really easy, or the reason you see it so fast was that
we just 'caught' life, it didn't actually start here." He adds, "I like the idea
that we just caught it and that's why it's so fast, but I'm an outlier."

If that's the case, then Erik Asphaug, is a professor of planetary science at
the University of Arizona, is also an outlier. Asphaug said that what we know
about the oldest rocks on Earth — which have chemical evidence of carbon
isotopes, tracing back to nearly 4 billion years ago — tell us that life started
"started forming on Earth almost as soon as it was possible for it to happen."

Advertisement:


If that's the case, it makes for an interesting precedent. "Let's say you expect
life to be flourishing whenever a planet cools down to the point where it can
start to have liquid water," Asphaug said. "But just looking at our own solar
system, what planet was likely to be habitable first? Almost certainly Mars."

This is because, Asphaug said, Mars formed before Earth did. Early in Martian
history when Mars was cooling down, Mars would have had a "hospitable"
environment before Earth.

"If life was going to start anywhere it might start first on Mars," Asphaug
said. "We don't know what the requirement is — you know, if it required
something super special like the existence of a moon or some factors that are
unique to the Earth — but just in terms of what place had liquid water first,
that would have been Mars."

An intriguing and convincing piece of evidence relates to how material moved
between the two neighboring planets. Indeed, the further you go back in time,
the bigger the collisions of rocks between Mars and Earth, Asphaug said. These
impact events could have been huge "mountain-sized blocks of Mars" that were
launched into space. Such massive asteroids could serve as a home for a hardy
microorganism.

Advertisement:


"When you collide back into a planet, some fraction of that mountain-sized mass
is going to survive as debris on the surface," he said. "It's taken a while for
modeling to show that you can have a relatively intact survival of what we call
'ballistic panspermia' — firing a bullet into one planet, knocking bits off, and
having it end up on another planet. But it's feasible, we think it happens, and
the trajectory would tend to go from Mars to the Earth, much more likely than
from Earth to Mars."

Asphaug added that surviving the trip, given the mass of the vehicle for the
microorganisms, wouldn't be a problem — and neither would surviving on a new,
hospitable planet.

"Any early life form would be resistant to what's going on at the tail end of
planet formation," he said. "Any organism that's going to be existing has to be
used to the horrific bombardment of impacts, even apart from this, swapping from
planet to planet."

In other words, early microbial life would have been fine with harsh
environments and long periods of dormancy. 

Advertisement:


Harvard professor Avi Loeb told Salon via email that one of the Martian rocks
found on Earth, ALH 84001, "was not heated along its journey to more than 40
degrees Celsius and could have carried life."

All three scientists believe that Perseverance might be able to add credibility
to the theory of panspermia.

"If you were to go and find remnants of life on Mars, which we hope to do with
Perseverance rover and these other Martian adventures, I would be personally
surprised if they were not connected at the hip to terrestrial life," Asphaug
said.

Ruvkun said he hopes to be one of the scientists to look for DNA when the sample
from Mars hopefully, eventually, returns. 

"Launching something from Mars is a seriously difficult thing," he said. 

But what would this mean for human beings, and our existential understanding of
who we are and where we came from?

"In that case, we might all be Martians," Loeb said. He joked that the self-help
book "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus" may have been more right than we
know.

Advertisement:


Or perhaps, as Ruvkun believes, we're from a different solar system, and life is
just scattering across the universe.

"To me the idea that it all started on Earth, and every single solar system has
their own little evolution of life happening, and they're all independent — it
just seems kind of dumb," Ruvkun said. "It's so much more explanatory to say
'no, it's spreading, it's spreading all across the universe, and we caught it
too, it didn't start here," he added. "And in this moment during the pandemic
— what a great moment to pitch the idea. Maybe people will finally believe it."



NICOLE KARLIS

Nicole Karlis is a senior writer at Salon. Tweet her @nicolekarlis.

MORE FROM Nicole Karlis


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RELATED TOPICS ------------------------------------------

Mars Origin Of Life Panspermia Perseverance Reporting Science


RELATED ARTICLES



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Advertisement:

Advertisement:



TRENDING ARTICLES FROM SALON

Advertisement:

Advertisement:

 * Home
 * About
 * Staff
 * Contact
 * Privacy
 * Terms of Service
 * Archive
 * Go Ad Free

Copyright © 2022 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages
without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated
Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This
material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


DMCA Policy