www.latimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
18.164.116.46 Public Scan

Back to summary

URL:
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-05-30/trump-verdict-california-house-republicans
Submission: On May 31 via manual (May 31st 2024, 3:52:10 pm UTC) from US — Scanned from US

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM

https://www.latimes.com/search#nt=navsearch

<form data-element="search-form" class="flex justify-center max-w-300 m-5 pb-1.25 border-solid border-0 border-b border-header-border-color xl:mx-auto" action="https://www.latimes.com/search#nt=navsearch" novalidate="" autocomplete="off"> <label
    class="w-full"> <input data-element="search-form-input" class="w-full text-2xl leading-none border-0 text-secondary-color-7 md:text-4xl-1" type="text" placeholder="Search" name="q" required=""> <span class="sr-only"> Search Query </span> </label>
  <button data-element="search-submit-button" class="flex justify-center items-center transition-colors transition-bg cursor-pointer w-10 p-0 shrink-0 bg-transparent border-0" type="submit"> <svg data-element="magnify-icon"
      class="h-6.25 w-6.25 fill-header-text-color md:relative md:top-1.25 md:h-7.5 md:w-7.5">
      <use xlink:href="#icon-magnify"></use>
    </svg> <span class="sr-only">Submit Search</span></button> </form>

POST https://membership.latimes.com/subscription-services/v1/newsletters/subscriptions

<form class="form newsletter-module-form" method="post" action="https://membership.latimes.com/subscription-services/v1/newsletters/subscriptions" data-error-message="Something went wrong. Please try again."
  data-invalid-email-message="Please enter valid email address." data-field-error-message="Something went wrong. Please try again." data-success-message="Thank you for signing up." data-success-link-message="Manage all your newsletters here."
  data-success-pre-text="You've signed up" data-success-post-text="successfully." data-submitting-text="Submitting..." data-subscription-url="https://membership.latimes.com/newsletters" novalidate="">
  <div class="email-input text-input"><label class="email-input-label text-input-label" for="email-input-element-0000018f-cf52-dd86-a3bf-cfd7f8a20000"><span>Enter email address</span> <input class="email-input-element text-input-element" type="email"
        id="email-input-element-0000018f-cf52-dd86-a3bf-cfd7f8a20000" name="emailinput" placeholder="Enter email address"> </label> </div>
  <div class="form-error-message"></div>
  <div class="form-buttons"> <button class="button" type="submit">Sign Me Up </button> </div>
</form>

Text Content

* News

* Home Page
* California
* Election 2024
* Housing & Homelessness
* Politics
* Science & Medicine
* World & Nation

* Business

* Artificial Intelligence
* Autos
* Jobs, Labor & Workplace
* Real Estate
* Technology and the Internet

* California

* California Politics
* Earthquakes
* Education
* Housing & Homelessness
* L.A. Politics
* Mental Health

* Climate & Environment

* Global Warming
* Water & Drought

* Entertainment & Arts

* Arts
* Books
* Stand-Up Comedy
* Company Town
* The Envelope (Awards)
* Movies
* Music
* Television
* Things to Do

* De Los
* En Español
* Food

* 101 best restaurants in L.A.
* Recipes

* Image
* Lifestyle

* Health & Wellness
* Home Design
* L.A. Affairs
* Plants
* Travel & Experiences
* Weekend
* Things to Do in L.A.

* Obituaries
* Opinion

* Editorials
* Letters to the Editor
* Op-Ed
* Short Docs

* Sports

* Angels
* Angel City FC
* Chargers
* Clippers
* Dodgers
* Ducks
* Galaxy
* High School Sports
* Kings
* Lakers
* Olympics
* USC
* UCLA
* Rams
* Sparks

* Times Everywhere

* 404 by L.A. Times
* Facebook
* Instagram
* LA Times Today
* Newsletters
* Photography
* Podcasts
* Short Docs
* TikTok
* Threads
* Video
* YouTube
* X (Twitter)

* For Subscribers
* All Sections
* _________________
* eNewspaper
* About Us

* About Us
* Archives
* Company News
* eNewspaper
* For the Record
* Got a Tip?
* L.A. Times Careers
* L.A. Times Store
* L.A. Times Studios
* News App: Apple IOS
* News App: Google Play
* Newsroom Directory
* Public Affairs
* Rights, Clearance & Permissions
* Short Docs

* Advertising

* Place an Ad
* Classifieds
* Coupons
* People on the Move
* Find/Post Jobs
* Local Ads Marketplace
* Media Kit: Why the L.A. Times?
* Hot Property Sections
* Place an Open House
* Sotheby’s International Realty

* Bestcovery

* Compare

* B2B Publishing
* Business Visionaries
* Hot Property
* Crossword & Games
* L.A. Times Events
* L.A. Times Store
* Subscriptions

* Manage Subscription
* EZPAY
* Delivery Issue
* eNewspaper
* Students & Educators
* Subscribe
* Subscriber Terms
* Gift Subscription Terms

* Special Supplements

* Escapes. Travel. Adventure (ETA)
* Healthy Living
* Las Vegas Guide
* Philanthropy

Copyright © 2024, Los Angeles Times | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | CA
Notice of Collection | Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
Sections

Tap to enable a layout that focuses on the article.
Focus mode

Subscribe or Log In
* Profile
* Sign Out

Show Search
Search Query Submit Search
* 2024 Election
* California primary results
* Balance of power
* California U.S. Senate race
* View All

Breaking News

Police arrest protesters on UC Santa Cruz campus after ordering them to leave
encampment
Advertisement

Politics

MOST CALIFORNIA REPUBLICANS IN COMPETITIVE CONGRESSIONAL RACES ARE SILENT ON
TRUMP’S CONVICTION

Former President Trump delivers an address during the California Republican
Convention in September in Anaheim.
(Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times)
By Laura J. Nelson
, Seema Mehta and Julia Wick
May 30, 2024 6:57 PM PT
* Facebook
* Twitter
* Show more sharing options

Share Close extra sharing options
* Facebook
* Twitter
* LinkedIn
* Email
* Copy Link URLCopied!
* Print

Most of the Republican candidates for Congress in California’s most competitive
districts reacted to the news of former President Trump’s historic criminal
conviction with radio silence.

A New York jury deliberated for 9½ hours over two days before convicting Trump
of 34 counts of falsifying business records in a scheme to illegally influence
the 2016 election through hush money payments to a porn actor who said the two
had sex.

After the verdict, California’s Republican leaders quickly cast doubt on the
verdict’s legitimacy and argued it would boost Trump’s chances of reelection in
November.

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield said that Trump’s “only
‘crime’ is running against Joe Biden in 2024.”

Jessica Millan Patterson, the chair of the California Republican Party, said the
prosecution was “a politically motivated case brought by a far-left district
attorney” and that the guilty verdict “never should have happened.”

San Diego-area Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Bonsall) called the verdict and the trial “a
disgrace.”

Democrats, by contrast, praised the verdict as proof of the American legal
system functioning as it should. Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank), who is running
for Senate, said that “the rule of law prevailed” despite Trump’s efforts to
“distract, delay and deny.”

Opinion

OPINION: THE GUILTY VERDICT ONLY MAKES DONALD TRUMP STRONGER

May 30, 2024

In California’s most hotly contested congressional races, though, few wanted to
publicly tangle with the question of Trump’s conviction.

Representatives for Reps. Young Kim (R-Anaheim Hills), Michelle Steel (R-Seal
Beach), Mike Garcia (R-Santa Clarita), David Valadao (R-Hanford) and John Duarte
(R-Modesto) did not return requests for comment. Nor did representatives for
Matt Gunderson, who is challenging Rep. Mike Levin (D-San Juan Capistrano) in
coastal Orange and San Diego counties, or Stockton Mayor Kevin Lincoln, who is
running against Rep. Josh Harder (D-Tracy) in the Central Valley.

A representative for Republican Steve Garvey, who is running for Senate against
Schiff, said he had no comment on the verdict.

One exception was Scott Baugh, who is running to flip the coastal Orange County
seat held by Rep. Katie Porter (D-Irvine). Baugh, the former chair of the Orange
County GOP, characterized Trump’s trial as a political prosecution and said the
verdict “should surprise no one.”

“A politically motivated prosecutor and a hostile judge set the trial up for so
many prejudicial errors,” Baugh said in a prepared statement. “President Trump
will have his opportunity to appeal and I am confident that a fair hearing will
expose and resolve these issues.”

And longtime Riverside Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Corona), who is fighting to retain
his once-safe seat in a now-competitive swing district, said in a statement on
Thursday evening that Trump’s prosecution was political — but his comment was
more muted than the loudest GOP voices.

Calvert said that Americans who believe that “justice should be blind to
politics” should be “concerned” by the trial’s outcome. He continued: “It’s
alarming that our criminal justice system continues to be taken advantage of by
partisan prosecutors who want to use the power of their office to influence our
democratic elections.”

Whether to lock arms with Trump has been a fraught question for Republicans in
California for nearly a decade, but especially this year. Republicans hold such
a razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives that a handful of
hyper-competitive races in the Golden State could determine which party controls
the chamber. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report has rated 10 California races
as competitive.

Remaining silent on the verdict makes sense for Republicans in those competitive
battleground districts, said Dan Schnur, a politics professor at USC, UC
Berkeley and Pepperdine.

“You’ll notice that the loudest voices supporting Trump on this tend to be
Republicans in very safe seats,” Schnur said. “Candidates who need to reach
swing voters don’t have that luxury.”

One challenge for candidates, said UC San Diego political science professor Thad
Kousser, is that partisan allegiances determine how voters viewed the trial.

Polling has found that Democrats overwhelmingly saw the trial as fair, while
only a tiny percentage of Republicans agreed. Independents were evenly split. A
Trump-like message about a rigged, unfair trial that might resonate with a
candidate’s Republican base could also turn off independents, Kousser said.

“Anyone trying to win a November race in a competitive district needs to worry
about both mobilizing their base through more Trump-like rhetoric, but also the
cost of alienating the middle,” he said.

Opinion

EDITORIAL: EVEN BEFORE GUILTY VERDICT, TRUMP WAS UNFIT TO SERVE

May 30, 2024

Rob Stutzman, a GOP strategist who isn’t involved in any congressional races,
said that while the verdict can be used as a tool by both parties to turn out
voters in November, it’s a “touchy subject.”

“You may have independents in congressional seats who are indifferent to the
verdict, but don’t necessarily want to see Republican incumbents defending Trump
or decrying the verdict,” Stutzman said.

But Shawn Steel, who represents California on the Republican National Committee
and is married to Steel, of Orange County, said the verdict will have
“absolutely no impact” on California’s House races.

“The White House got the verdict they planned years ago,” Steel said. “The
Manhattan jurors who convicted Trump did it out of malice and hate. Today’s
verdict, along with the not-guilty verdict of the O.J. Simpson criminal trial,
proved the steep decline of trust in the American criminal justice.”

Harmeet Dhillon, a San Francisco attorney who also represents California on the
Republican National Committee and whose law firm represents the Trump campaign,
said Californians are more concerned with quality-of-life issues, such as
homelessness, crime and illegal immigration than they are with the trial.

“People are fed up,” she said. “People are much more motivated in this election
to vote because things are getting bad here in California.”

While California Republican House candidates were largely quiet, some of their
allies in other states, such as Arizona Senate candidate Kari Lake and vice
presidential hopeful Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, were not.

“This was a rigged, disgraceful trial,” Trump told reporters after leaving the
courtroom. “The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people.”

The Biden campaign said Thursday’s verdict showed that the law applied to
everyone, but warned that the only way to keep Trump out of the White House is
voting in November.

“Convicted felon or not, Trump will be the Republican nominee for president,”
campaign spokesman Michael Tyler said. “The threat Trump poses to our democracy
has never been greater. He is running an increasingly unhinged campaign of
revenge and retribution, pledging to be a dictator ‘on Day One’ and calling for
our Constitution to be ‘terminated’ so he can regain and keep power.”

In the wake of Trump’s conviction, Democrats seized upon 23 vulnerable House
Republicans who had endorsed the former president, including Duarte, Garcia,
Calvert and Steel.

“House Republicans have continued to put Donald Trump first and the American
people last,” said Courtney Rice, a spokesperson for the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee. “Their districts deserve better than their
cult-like adherence to a wannabe dictator. Each and every one of them should
rescind their endorsement, but won’t.”

Trump’s trial, which began in April in New York City, was one of four felony
cases that Trump was facing, though it was thought to be the only one likely to
see a trial before the November election.

Politics

WHAT VERDICT WILL VOTERS RENDER AFTER JURY FINDS TRUMP GUILTY IN HUSH MONEY
CASE?

May 30, 2024

The verdict hinged on whether Trump falsified business records to hide a
$130,000 hush money payment that Michael Cohen — Trump’s lawyer and, later, a
witness for the prosecution — made to adult film actor Stormy Daniels, who
alleged she’d had a sexual encounter with Trump a decade prior.

Manhattan Dist. Atty. Alvin Bragg had to convince the jury that Trump not only
commanded Cohen to make the payments, but that he did so in order to influence
the outcome of the 2016 election, rather than to shield his family from the
story. Trump pleaded not guilty and denied the sexual encounter with Daniels;
Cohen testified that he had been deeply involved in the scheme.

www.latimes.com Open in urlscan Pro 18.164.116.46 Public Scan

Form analysis 2 forms found in the DOM

https://www.latimes.com/search#nt=navsearch

POST https://membership.latimes.com/subscription-services/v1/newsletters/subscriptions

Text Content

www.latimes.com Open in urlscan Pro
18.164.116.46 Public Scan

Form analysis
2 forms found in the DOM