www.rand.org
Open in
urlscan Pro
130.154.3.8
Public Scan
URL:
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA830-1.html
Submission: On August 16 via api from PL — Scanned from DE
Submission: On August 16 via api from PL — Scanned from DE
Form analysis
3 forms found in the DOMGET /search.html
<form method="get" action="/search.html" class="velocity-search" role="search" aria-label="Site-wide"><label for="search-box" class="access">Site-wide Search</label><input name="query" id="search-box" class="query" type="search"
placeholder="search"><button class="submit search-submit" name="search-submit" type="submit" id="search-submit"><span class="access">Search</span></button></form>
POST
<form class="subscribeForm" method="post" data-componentpath="/content/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA830-1/jcr:content/par/product" data-subscriptionpath="/content/rand/newsletters/rand-news-bulletin">
<label for="emailproduct" class="access">Email</label><input type="email" name="emailproduct" id="emailproduct" class="email" required="" placeholder="Email address"><button class="btn">Sign Up</button>
</form>
POST
<form class="subscribeForm" method="post" data-componentpath="" data-subscriptionpath="/content/rand/newsletters/rand-news-bulletin">
<label for="email" class="access">Email</label><input type="email" name="email" id="email" class="email" required="" placeholder="Email address"><button class="btn">Sign Up</button>
</form>
Text Content
* Skip to page content Objective Analysis. Effective Solutions. Toggle Menu SITE-WIDE NAVIGATION * About RAND * RAND at a Glance * Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion * RAND History * Leadership * Organizational Structure * Contacts * Locations * Quality Standards * Educational Opportunities * Employment * RAND Campaign * Press Room * Events * RESEARCH RESEARCH AREAS * Children, Families, and Communities * Cyber and Data Sciences * Education and Literacy * Energy and Environment * Health, Health Care, and Aging * Homeland Security and Public Safety * Infrastructure and Transportation * International Affairs * Law and Business * National Security and Terrorism * Science and Technology * Workers and the Workplace TRENDING TOPICS * Artificial Intelligence * Gun Violence * Ukraine * Racial Equity * Mental Health and Illness * Media Literacy * Global Security * Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) All Topics Browse Reports RESEARCH DIVISIONS * RAND Army Research Division * RAND Australia * RAND Education and Labor * RAND Europe * RAND Health Care * RAND Homeland Security Research Division * RAND National Security Research Division * RAND Project AIR FORCE * RAND Social and Economic Well-Being FEATURED RESEARCH ACTIVITIES * RAND International * Center for Asia Pacific Policy * Center for Global Risk and Security * Center for Middle East Public Policy * Center for Russia and Eurasia * RAND Gulf States Policy Institute Research Departments * LATEST INSIGHTS REPORTS /content/admin/rand-header/jcr:content/par/header/reports * SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PROGRAM BROKE THE JAIL-TO-HOMELESS CYCLE AND MOSTLY PAID FOR ITSELF * SECURING U.S. ELECTIONS BLOG POSTS /content/admin/rand-header/jcr:content/par/header/blogPosts * RUSSIAN FORCES IN UKRAINE: MUDDLING THROUGH * LEARNING, RELEARNING, AND NOT LEARNING THE LESSONS OF COVID-19 MULTIMEDIA /content/admin/rand-header/jcr:content/par/header/multimedia * ADDRESSING VACCINE HESITANCY WITH RESEARCH * THE POLICY CURRENTS PODCAST * POLICY EXPERTS ALL EXPERTS SPOTLIGHT * DARA MASSICOT @MASSDARA Commentary: Russian Forces in Ukraine: Muddling Through * DANIEL M. GERSTEIN @DANIEL_GERSTEIN Commentary: Learning, Relearning, and Not Learning the Lessons of COVID-19 BY RESEARCH AREA * Children, Families, and Communities * Cyber and Data Sciences * Education and Literacy * Energy and Environment * Health, Health Care, and Aging * Homeland Security and Public Safety * Infrastructure and Transportation * International Affairs * Law and Business * National Security and Terrorism * Science and Technology * Workers and the Workplace * CAPABILITIES Drawing upon decades of experience, RAND provides research services, systematic analysis, and innovative thinking to a global clientele that includes government agencies, foundations, and private-sector firms. * Capabilities Overview * RAND Solutions WHO WE WORK FOR * Public Sector * Philanthropic Sector * Private Sector WORK WITH US * Explore Business Contacts ABOUT RAND RESEARCH * Disciplinary Expertise * Quality Standards * Methodological Innovation FEATURED SOLUTIONS /content/admin/rand-header/jcr:content/par/header/caseStudies * IMPROVING PSYCHOLOGICAL WELLBEING AND WORK OUTCOMES IN THE UK * MANAGING ESCALATION IN CRISIS AND WAR * GETTING TO KNOW MILITARY CAREGIVERS AND THEIR NEEDS * PLANNING FOR THE RISING COSTS OF DEMENTIA * GRADUATE SCHOOL The Pardee RAND Graduate School (PRGS.edu) is the largest public policy Ph.D. program in the nation and the only program based at an independent public policy research organization—the RAND Corporation. * About PRGS * Admissions * Academics and Degree Program * Students * Faculty FEATURED VIDEO ON PRGS.EDU OVERVIEW: PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL STUDENT SPOTLIGHT * LISA BERDIE Assistant Policy Researcher, RAND; Ph.D. Student, Pardee RAND Graduate School * DIANA Y. MYERS Assistant Policy Researcher, RAND; Ph.D. Candidate, Pardee RAND Graduate School * ABOUT * 中文(简体) * العربية * Sign In Sign out * Cart Toggle Search Site-wide SearchSearch 1. RAND 2. Published Research 3. Research Reports 4. >RR-A830-1 The authors consider a hypothetical situation in which China is nearing the point of global primacy. Within such a context, the authors explore the prospect of systemic conflict. To help illuminate how such a war might unfold, they examine trends in warfare and geopolitics, the behavior of select past great powers, and patterns in interstate war. From these data, they formulate two scenarios of low- and high-intensity systemic conflict. Read Online THE RETURN OF GREAT POWER WAR Scenarios of Systemic Conflict Between the United States and China by Timothy R. Heath, Kristen Gunness, Tristan Finazzo * Related Topics: * China, * Global Security, * Low-Intensity Conflict * Citation * Synopsis (print-friendly) * Embed * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on LinkedIn * Download * Purchase DOWNLOAD DOWNLOAD EBOOK FOR FREE FormatFile SizeNotes PDF file 3.7 MB Technical Details » Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. More PURCHASE PURCHASE PRINT COPY FormatList Price Price Add to Cart Paperback156 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. How might China's security goals change if it were to engage in systemic conflict with the United States? 2. How might the People's Liberation Army (PLA) operate and modernize its forces in such a situation? 3. Where and how might conflict involving Chinese and U.S. forces unfold? 4. What distinctive features of the Chinese military might enable or impede its ability to fight a systemic war with U.S. forces? Through a careful synthesis of current and historical data on relevant factors, anticipated trends, and research-grounded speculation, the authors analyze several scenarios of systemic U.S.-China conflict under hypothetical conditions in which China has neared the point of global primacy. Drawing on academic and research findings regarding the potential trajectory of international security and warfare in coming years, China's approach to future warfare, relevant experiences of preceding great powers, and patterns in interstate wars, the authors explore the possibility of a U.S.-China war of power transition. The authors develop two scenarios of systemic U.S.-China conflict. The first scenario features a low-intensity conflict that unfolds across much of the world, across many domains, and over many years. The second features a high-intensity war that evolves out of the low-intensity war. The high-intensity war scenario envisions aggressive actions by both countries to destroy the warfighting capability of the adversary and carries an extremely high risk of escalation to the most destructive levels. Both scenarios occur within the context of a deeply fragmented international situation in which the U.S. and Chinese militaries experience immense strain from sustaining the war effort while grappling with an array of nontraditional threats and responding to demands for aid from embattled partners. Although their analysis concerns a hypothetical conflict situation in which China has neared global primacy, the authors' findings could inform defense planning for potential contingencies even today. KEY FINDINGS * Systemic U.S.-China conflict would likely extend across the globe and to all domains, including cyberspace and outer space. Such a conflict would take a chronic, systemic form that persists, possibly for years. The conflict would end only when one side or the other concedes the fight and acknowledges its subordination to the other. * The U.S. and Chinese militaries could find themselves under immense strain in a systemic conflict owing to the competing demands to sustain the war effort, respond to a broad array of acute transnational threats, and help partner nations cope with their own security challenges. * Low-intensity war could feature extensive fighting conducted primarily through partner nations and nonstate groups. The escalation risk would remain high because either side might tire of the inconclusive nature of such fighting and seek more aggressive actions to bring the war to a conclusion. * To fight U.S. forces in a high-intensity war, the PLA might favor operations that rely on lower-cost, lower-risk weapons and on such methods as long-range precision strike, cyber operations, and support for irregular forces. * Although such a war might begin with more modest war aims in mind, the temptation to escalate would be difficult to resist, owing to the underlying drive to dominate the other side. Fighting could feature extensive Chinese missile strikes throughout the Indo-Pacific region aimed at shattering U.S. military power. RECOMMENDATIONS * Planners should consider a broader range of contingencies for low- or high-intensity war with China, which could carry out combat options beyond such flashpoints as Taiwan. * Planners should consider the prospect of U.S.-China conflict less as a single battle or clash over a specific flashpoint than as a series of sequentially related, geographically dispersed clashes between U.S.- and Chinese-aligned forces that span many domains. Such conflict could last for years and severely stress a U.S. military already addressing competing demands for security assistance from allies and partners and potentially tackling severe transnational threats as well. * The United States should consider bolstering its ability to wage low-intensity war, which is a more likely scenario for U.S.-China conflict than a high-intensity war. * Planners should ensure U.S. ability to defend and secure vital choke points in the Middle East and along the Indian Ocean. * Planners should focus on alliance building and on weapons and platforms that help gain the information advantage and mitigate long-range strike capabilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS * Chapter One Introduction * Chapter Two Geopolitical and Military Trends * Chapter Three Insights from the Wars of Past Global Leaders * Chapter Four Strategic Rivalry: Patterns in Crisis, Escalation, and Great Power Conflict * Chapter Five How the People's Liberation Army Might Prepare for a Systemic U.S.-China War * Chapter Six A Low-Intensity U.S.-China Conflict Scenario * Chapter Seven A High-Intensity U.S.-China Systemic Conflict Scenario * Chapter Eight Conclusion RESEARCH CONDUCTED BY * RAND National Security Research Division This research was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD). This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. DOCUMENT DETAILS * Copyright: RAND Corporation * Availability: Available * Print Format: Paperback * Paperback Pages: 156 * List Price: $25.00 * Paperback Price: $20.00 * Paperback ISBN/EAN: 1-9774-0816-8 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA830-1 * Document Number: RR-A830-1 * Year: 2022 * Series: Research Reports EXPLORE RELATED TOPICS * China * Global Security * Low-Intensity Conflict BROWSE BY SERIES BROWSE BY AUTHORS STAY INFORMED RAND Policy Currents Get weekly updates from RAND. EmailSign Up CITATION Format: * Chicago Manual of Style * RAND Corporation Style Manual Heath, Timothy R., Kristen Gunness, and Tristan Finazzo, The Return of Great Power War: Scenarios of Systemic Conflict Between the United States and China. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA830-1.html. Also available in print form. Heath, Timothy R., Kristen Gunness, and Tristan Finazzo, The Return of Great Power War: Scenarios of Systemic Conflict Between the United States and China, Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, RR-A830-1, 2022. As of August 12, 2022: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA830-1.html Download Citation (BibTeX) Download Citation (RIS) * Save to My RAND * Email * Print * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on LinkedIn ABOUT The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. * RAND History * Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion * Leadership * Research Integrity * Career Opportunities * Santa Monica, CA * Washington, DC * Pittsburgh, PA * New Orleans, LA * Boston, MA * Cambridge, UK * Brussels, BE * Canberra, AU CONNECT CONTACT US * Contact Us * Locations I AM INTERESTED IN * Jobs at RAND * Media Resources * Congressional Resources * Doing Business with RAND * Supporting RAND * Educational Opportunities * Alumni Association FOLLOW * RAND Corporation on Facebook * RAND Corporation on Twitter * RAND Corporation on LinkedIn * RAND Corporation on YouTube * RAND Corporation on Instagram * RAND Corporation RSS Feeds * RAND Corporation mobile applications STAY INFORMED Subscribe to the weekly Policy Currents newsletter to receive updates on the issues that matter most. STAY INFORMED RAND Policy Currents Get weekly updates from RAND. EmailSign Up View all email newsletters RESOURCES * Multimedia * Latest Reports * Browse by Author * RAND Classics * Databases and Tools SITE INFORMATION * Site Map * PRIVACY POLICY * Support Policy * Feedback * Help 1776 Main Street Santa Monica, California 90401-3208 RAND® is a registered trademark. © 1994-2022 RAND Corporation.